Would you take in a North Korean refugee?

>>140097058
No! They belong in korea. removing them will only give the enemy more lebensraume.

>>140097058
i'd take 5 womyn, i'm a total beta loser and i can't even get the goblins that inhabit my country, may like to have a starved nork gf

>>140097058
The ones you see in pictures won't need to be refugees. The refugees will be grimy, and ugly.

Yes! So cute! :3 We could watch anime together and play video games.

Japan accepted 500,000 Korean refugees at the Korean War in 1950-53.
Then they committed many crimes in Japan. That's the reason Japanese became negative to accept foreigners.

>>140098003
still better than nothing, i'd take anything at this point, i'm really desesperate

>>140098121
they can do whatever they want here, i just want someone to talk to sometimes, and maybe eat with them, i haven' ate with someone since 2012

>>140097058
Will trade for niggers.

Rather an East Asian refugee over a shitskinned refugee.
But any refugee is bad.

>>140098947
No one wants to force Japan to take them in, I meant somewhere like the US where they'll become staunch high-iq conservatives

>>140099899
will trade for anything i have, i just don't want to be this alone anymore

>>140099504
That's depressing, aren't Mexicans known for having large social families? Where's yours?