'Whoever leads in AI will rule the world’: Putin

>>140074440
Yeah learning programs. The best players in the world can't beat a self programmed bot in dota 2. This will be the way of all things soon.

>>140068383

Can we have ai to detect when a nigger is near?

>>140074634
There are machines that create odours, but not many that detect them.

It's over hyped. Making bots in games is not something new.

>>140074440
It's not going to be US because Trump is controlled by Russians and Russians wouldn't want US to achieve such things

>>140074440
>says something obvious
WOW BASED PUTIN

Fucking with multiple AIs as we speak. They will be /pol/s AIs thanks to the amateurs using the net to teach them.

>>140075104
Making bots that self program and outperform humans without cheating is what's new.

Automate everything

>>140075619
self program, yeah. but not outperform.

AI has always been able to outperform humans due to it's ability to react instantaneously as soon as the first frame of something starts, as well as do other frame-perfect shit like just guard. Unless you enforce a artificial randomness there is no inconsistency. If a bot can do it once it can do it every time, which in any game that isn't turn based where the human is given time to think, will always be superior.

The reason AI were shit compared to humans is when it meets the innate human randomness. The AI could only do what it was programmed to do. If in a fighting game there was a 10 hit combo that could be countered at the 8th hit with a frame perfect tech and the AI was programmed to do that but the player dropped the combo at 7 and went for a grab instead which isn't nearly as good as the full combo so it wasn't input, the AI would try teching the 8th hit and then get grabbed, and this would happen every time because the AI wasn't programmed to react to the combo being dropped.

If a human dedicated a lot of time and effort into programing the AI it could be just as good as a self taught AI, but the problem there is the a lot of time and effort part.

>>140074440
>>140074539
Original thread.

>>140068383

>>140074440
>to create AI.
Into the trash it goes.

A CS degree should be required before anyone is allowed to put the letters A and I next to each other.

File: 1504405623170s.jpg (6KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 250x250px

>>140074440
Putin just get BLACKED by the black pill..... The true reality is AI in the next 10 years will take over most jobs today and it's not matter of time it could happen tomorrow. AI advancement is fast than anything because of the speed it can produce. Just depends on hardware.

>>140077011
>the AI would try teching the 8th hit and then get grabbed, and this would happen every time because the AI wasn't programmed to react to the combo being dropped

Neural nets can already learn.

>>140077757
> AI advancement is fast than anything because of the speed it can produce. Just depends on hardware.

Hardware is getting significantly more powerful. We just got 16 and 18 core consumer procesors from AMD and Intel at affordable prices.

>>140075530
Well yeah but he is still more inteligent than 99% of politicians.

>>140077011
You're confusing scripted bots with an actual learning AI. Yes it can do what you described.

File: 1494411561917.png (9KB, 235x236px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 235x236px

>>140075279
weak b8

File: Appleseed OVA [ac3 ITA ENG JAP] by Salvo.avi_snapshot_00.07.47_[2016.08.19_21.38.00].jpg (37KB, 656x480px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 656x480px

I want to look into the spooky future.

>>140074440
First AI will be created by a multinational corporation, militaries can't get the brightest brains to work for them.
Truthfully, nobody wants a true AI anyway, they want a mostly intelligent slave that is easy to control and specialize in different tasks.
It's fucking ridiculous, we could be creating a true God to save us from ourselves, but we want to make artificial minds that are good at driving cars and showing ads to people.

>>140086732
US Military contracts civilians and private corporations. In Iraq we used contractors to supplement man power shortages for our supply chain, including the security for the chain and high profile business men. The cadre for any technical MOS in the Army are pretty much all civilians. The NCO is only there to make sure the privates don't fuck around and do their job basically. I wouldn't be surprised if companies like intel etc are working for the US Govt/military on projects like this.

>>140074539
time to get up to sleed anon
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cLC_GHZCOVQ