American Royalist

Hell yes. Better her than the kind of faggot we would elect as president. Plus she is on the other side of the world and funded by the UK taxpayer. Long may she reign!

>>140048415
She rubber-stamped every Jewish innovation in governance since she was in her 20s, especially mass immigration.
The House of Windsor is shite.
Try the House of Stuart for a change.

File: 4477.jpg (449KB, 1192x1798px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 1192x1798px

>>140047951
Reporting

>>140047951
NRx is one of the ideologies I'm trying to decide between. I've been wondering why it never seems to come up here.

>>140048415
After her, Prince Charles would be King. Are you ok with that?

>>140048880
essential NRx:
https://reactionaryfuture.wordpress.com/2016/11/07/locke-versus-filmer-or-why-you-are-all-communists/

>>140048954
It will be a short reign.

>>140047951
Here here; not necessarily for a hereditary monarch, but an noble elective dictatorship would be pretty good.
Basically just turn the entire government into a traditional corporate structure, but determine "shareholders" based on something other than shekels.

>>140047951
>funded by the UK taxpayer.
Actually She funds the taxpayers. Crown Estate, yo.

>>140048616
>rubber-stamped
Had to. That's how the UK government works. Otherwise it'd be a constitutional crisis, because the monarchy is a caged tiger.

>>140048954
What's the problem?

>>140048954
Actually it's skipping straight down to baldy

>>140048616
House of Stuart's, Prince Michael Wenzel will be the first Jacobite pretender to the British throne in centuries to have been born in England:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2642246/Will-3bn-teen-King-Scotland-19-year-old-heir-Charles-I-rule-independent-nation.html

>>140049227
She couldn't have sided with Enoch and gone to war with the Lugenpresse?
She couldn't have said 'no focking Africans', that is where I draw the bloody line?
She couldn't have sided with the nationalists, or shamed the Tories into nationalism?

File: giphy (1)-1.gif (975KB, 450x257px) Image search: [Google]

975KB, 450x257px

>>140047951

>>140049861
Nope. Interfering with politics is forbidden by the agreements George III enacted.

>>140049861
She couldn't have clarified that "White Briton" is a redundancy? She couldn't have made clear that Commonwealth nationals such as Indians or Pakis could work in Britain but never bring their families along, never become British and restrict themselves to a lifetime limit of 7 years living in Britain?

>>140049192

Other than shekels.

Blood, or "stake," hence monarchy

>>140049959
There's 'politics' and then there's 'electing a new people'. George III was not agreeing to that definition of 'politics'.

>>140047951
i'm glad she removed (((diana)))

File: f4pemcpy1ijz.jpg (54KB, 477x637px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 477x637px

>>140047951


I wonder what the royal families of europe think of the invasion and occupation of their countries by foreign hordes?

I suspect that if they collectively said Fuck It and stood against it they would have shocking amount of support from the people despite being merely figure heads at the moment.

Take your countries back royals i know some of you come here

>>140050621
Agreed the 'accident' should have taken the boys with her.

>>140049390
I heard Prince William is pro EU. Are you comfortable with a pro EU monarch reigning over you after Queen Elizabeth dies?

>>140050539
He probably wasn't. But the state of the (((media))) and (((parliament))) now meant that the deal subtly changed. Remember, it was (((Churchill))) who served as Her Majesty's mentor.

>>140050809
Couldn't give a toss really. They aren't gonna let us leave anyway. Brexit is a husk, as I said it would be from the moment the referendum was announced.

>>140049227
Here is an article by the Guardian about Prince Charles
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/03/prince-charles-meddling-monarch-royal-neutrality

Right here. I wish there was a real monarchist movement here, but it will never happen.

File: 1502480882121.jpg (2MB, 3112x2338px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3112x2338px

>>140047951
>Fuck off redcoat. USA #1

>>140050958
What if we archive that
https://unvis.it/theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/03/prince-charles-meddling-monarch-royal-neutrality

File: 1502482393589.jpg (299KB, 854x1024px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 854x1024px

>>140050963
>>140048628
>>140048880
>>140049000
>>140049192
>>140049567

FUCK YOU 1776

File: Pope-Pius-VI.jpg (113KB, 457x446px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 457x446px

>>140047951
Absolute Monarchist here. Not that I think the world will accept monarchy anytime soon

>Germany should reinstate its monarchy to speak to people’s emotions, make them proud of their country and even encourage them to have babies, according to Prince Philip Kiril of Prussia, great-great grandson of the last Kaiser.

https://www.thelocal.de/20120314/41325

>>140050958
Oh, i'm aware. It gives me hope for Him.

Burger's don't understand:

What makes a constitutional monarchy great is that the head of state has no real power and is apolitical. It's the complete opposite of your model where the President is powerful, elected, and hyper-political.

Privately she might very well hate immigrants, just look at some of the shit her husband has said over the years. But if she does she can't say it publically and most defibnately can't act on it. If the position is political then you need to have it elected (which causes its own problems).

>>140051077
LARPing in favor of the founding father's autism is Reddit.

>>140051271
That's true, but the problem is Prince Charles is too political.

>>140051271
An absolute monarch would only adopt policies that benefit their descendants, who would be future rulers of the country. They would view the country as their property, and would be much more likely to care for it correctly. Less likely to allow Muzz scum to invade.

>>140051271
>What makes a constitutional monarchy great is that the head of state has no real power and is apolitical
That's only if your constitution is crap and chooses to give all the power to parliament.
The constitution could simply exist to keep the monarchy from overreaching with its powers and becoming tyrannical.

>>140047951
I used to be a part of an FB group that claims to be the monarchist, traditionalist, religious version of /pol/. It calls itself /rel/ Religiously Intolerant. In that group, most of them likes the Habsburgs and wants to restore them onto the throne. They also want to install a Spaniard to the French Throne. I left because I don't like the Habsburg especially the current ones alive, and I don't think that Spaniard is the rightful heir to the French throne.

>>140052041
There's a Habsburg on Twitter that shitposts.

>>140052578
Link please.

File: images.jpg (10KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 275x183px

85% Japanese support the emperor system now.
Tennou is translated as emperor in English language, but Tennou is not same with western emperors.
Tennou lost political power in the 9th century.

>picture
Hirohito and Pope in 1981

>>140052885
https://twitter.com/EduardHabsburg/status/890515115874951168

File: dead-and-injured-redcoats-battlefield-footage-012161932_prevstill.jpg (97KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1280x720px

>>140051485
It honestly blows my mind how any American would want to live in a monarchy.

Talking about blood and soil, my family came to America in the early 1700s and overthrew the British. I would fight to the end before relinquishing the country to some inbred limp-wristed british homosexual

>>140053080
Good goy. Reject your people and instead (((vote))) for a chosen puppet.

>>140047951
The real Redpill is that the USA is the military arm of the Royals. We never truly gained our independence from the Brits. We are still under their control.

>>140051077
>muh magical piece of paper
Authority comes from men
Lesser men cannot give authority to greater people

File: tumblr_ohymrnORpU1uaxri9o1_1280.jpg (381KB, 1280x1640px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 1280x1640px

>>140053080
>It honestly blows my mind how any American would want to live in a monarchy

My ancestors were loyalists, but even if they weren't I'd still be a monarchist

I am a direct descendant of King Robert II of Scotland, founder of the House of Stuart. I will reclaim the throne and kick Muzzies out of Europe.

>>140053053
too bad that guy is far from the line of succession, the heir apparent to the House of Habsburg is this racecar driver
https://twitter.com/Fhabsburg62

>>140053080
Were those redcoats killed with French weapons?

>my family came to America
From where?
You pretend your blood and soil began 300 years ago.
>relinquishing the country
You can't relinquish anything.
You don't control anything.
None of it is in your hands.
What your family fought for was to harbor 5 million jews here and sell the nation off to capitalists.

>>140053549
Authority comes from god

>>140052041
Sounds like a fun group and they're probably talking about Louis XX who is a Bourbon. Or I least hope they are.

>>140053790
He's young, give him time. Though no one will be as good as Karl or Otto, or the Silesian branch who were supposed to rule Poland.

>>140053681
Franz?

>>140054138
No. I will rule under the name Christian.

>>140053147
So opposing monarchy makes me a (((puppet)))?

The reason I want to deport all the non-white and jews to avoid a statist government.

>>140054503
>So opposing monarchy makes me a (((puppet)))?
Yes. Because the alternative is plutocracy. So you're supporting (((them))) indirectly.

>>140053262
This. Royal institute of international affairs=council on foreign relations.

File: 1684363624.jpg (14KB, 320x272px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 320x272px

>>140047951
>American Royalist
Is there a phrase more cucked than this?

>>140054045
True, but only in an indirect fashion. Pragmatic authority comes from force and history.

>>140054138
They are, my argument against him is that he is a descendant of Philip V of Spain who relinquish the rights of him and his descendants to the French Throne when they signed the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713 to end the war of the Spanish Succession.

Ok, I'll give him time. But, I don't like the fact that his dad's party acquired money from a charity for his campaign to the EU parliament while he is on the board of that charity. Besides his party is pro EU which most of us in /pol/ opposes. I hope he isn't like his dad.

>>140054503
Statism is part of human nature. Either you accept it and get the best government possible, or you avoid it and deal with all kinds of shitty systems that will inevitably degenerate into trannies

File: jacket.jpg (79KB, 973x776px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 973x776px

>>140053927
One half of my family were scottish immigrants. They were low class never owned land until they made it to Missouri. I still live on that land although I am currently living at a university in st. Louis.

You are probably a deracinated urbanite so you don't understand what "blood and soil" truly means. Its about honoring your ancestors and living your life to bring glory and honor to your family and descendants.

Sure America has a lot of (((problems))) but I love this country and the ideals it was founded on. I would rather try to fix the problems than going full retard reactionary

File: 1502841429727.jpg (107KB, 1234x1230px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1234x1230px

>you can totally trust this guy to be king, and all future sons of his, for generations, he's our guy it's cool, trust

NOPE
we need less government not more, less power to the system, a decentralized permanent constitution republic. where the highest law of the land is not man, but unchanging paper.

just take the original vision from the founding fathers of america, and tweak it in a way that prevents future corruption by rendering the constitution permanent with no ammendments possible.

>>140055112
Statism isn't part of human nature.

The only reason for the giant size of the state in America is the increase of state power during times of war. If america hadn't let Jews in we wouldn't have fought in either of the World Wars and we would have a much smaller government

File: 1500435747387.png (897KB, 675x665px) Image search: [Google]

897KB, 675x665px

>>140055315
This leaf tells the truth.

>>140054957
Habsburgs were always going to be pro-EU after Otto and Pan-Europa. Of course a monarchist EU would have been a thousand times better and kept natural identity as well.

I've heard that argument for the throne and the counter is that the Orleanists were evicted by a revolution and that Louis XX is a direct descendent of Robert and the Capets. While I'd rather have him, in the end I'll choose either in France over keeping their republican farce.

>>140055315
The reason the Constitution is so great is that it is a living breathing embodiment of our ideology and culture and the courts try to uphold it. Double that with a historical monarch and you have both; hopefully at least.

>>140047951
I am for the reformation of the traditional Anglo Saxon empire, but the monarchy must be based in the US. Perhaps we should name Donald Jr Trump as King. He would be great at it.

The king only enforces the big picture path of the nation. Let the majority of shit be left to congress but big things are let to the king. And the king also has the right to kill any fucking congressman that is going against the best health of the nation. So kinda like the UK government pre ww1.

>>140047951
No, go fuck yourself.

>>140055502
leafs always tell the truth

other than the chicks, they're straight up whirlwind barb build

File: 1501650216993.jpg (162KB, 1260x645px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1260x645px

>>140047951

>Descended from an occultist blood sucking vampire
>a rent seeking leech, some 2% of public taxation(theft) is given to them because muh royal rent seeking bloodline
>the house of Windsor, one of the ancient Babylonian blood lines of Europe, one of her progenitors spreading a blood disorder to all the monarchs of Europe and Russia

Rolling, doubles the witch and her descendants are backstabbed by another corrupt global establishment group, vampire style

>also the witch which enabled Jimmy Saville
>enslaves the commonwealth nations with his rituals and symbols

Rolling!

>>140055590
Why not the Bonaparte's? Jean Christophe Bonaparte's resume about money which is important in running a country.
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/jcnapoleon

File: 0704czarfamily.jpg (181KB, 600x853px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 600x853px

>>140055376
>Statism isn't part of human nature.

Then why do you suppose that wherever there was civilization a monarchy emerged? This wasn't only true for Europeans, but even for everyone from the Mayans to the Edo People in Africa

>>140055153
Your family betrayed their ancestors and race by spitting at the nation they created, and the nation they served and were a part of.

Your family is burning in hell, as we speak, just like the other republican traitors like Washington, Jefferson and Jackson. Soon, you will join them if you don't repent your ways, consort of the devil.

File: 1491347255277.jpg (504KB, 2000x1189px) Image search: [Google]

504KB, 2000x1189px

>>140055153
>One half of my family were scottish immigrants
Thank you for proving my point.
Stop LARPing about blood and soil when you're so embarrassed of your blood that you pretend you have no heritage prior to your family leaving their homeland and coming to America... an endeavor that was made possible by the British crown, which you reject in favor of honoring the people who betrayed their family and descendants for muhh shekels.

>fix the problems of our country
>keep the ideals it was founded on
Pick one and only one.

>>140056027
Perhaps, claim/history needs to be the most important since that is what will keep the unity, culture, and stability of the realm for years to come.

>>140056314
Blame George III and your pathetic parliament for destroying your Kingdom while evicting the Stuarts.

>>140053080
But what if we live in a progressive theocracy where the media and the academy function as the state-sanctioned church? If we don't live in a democracy to begin with, why not switch to a monarchy that will protect us from another progressive takeover?

>>140056314
>t. assblasted redcoat

Too bad your king wanted a divorce so bad he broke off from the church, thus dooming everyone on your cold rainy island to eternal hellfire.

File: NuclearFamily.png (514KB, 614x401px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 614x401px

>>140056395

My family never owned land in Scotland.

They didn't flee for "shekels," they fled due to religious persecution

I assume they came on a private ship funded by a joint venture like most people did at the time, so they didn't get any help from the british crown.

>implying fixing americas problems and keeping American traditions are mutually exclusive
I can tell you are an urbanite from your jew tier purity spiral logic

File: 800px-Flag_of_the_United_Empire_Loyalists.svg.png (5KB, 800x400px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 800x400px

>>140055708
>American Royalist

>>140055315
the governments of today hold far more power than any king ever did before and if you know how kings rule you would know its not centralized also how is your republic so far i can tell you can never get it people are stupid and easy to manipulate so you will end up here any way

>>140055315
>we need less government not more
Monarchy IS less government. It does away with oodles of bureaucracy.

the world should be made up of ethno monarchies

prove me wrong: you can't

>>140051271
>What makes a constitutional monarchy great is that the head of state has no real power and is apolitical

no, that's the exact reason ceremonial monarchies fucking blow

>>140053080
the problem wasn't monarchism, it was being ruled by a foreigner

you need an american monarch, not a british one

>>140047951
>>140048415
>>140049192
>>140050621
>>140050963
>>140051271
>>140051271
>>140053147
>>140053549
>>140053681
>>140054503
>>140056314
>>140059316
>>140059499

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7UuMX7uPeA

File: 330px-Quentin_Kawananakoa,_2013_King_Kamehemeha_Parade,_crop.jpg (35KB, 330x428px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 330x428px

>>140059848
You mean like restoring the Hawaiian Monarchy?

>>140058515
>My family never owned land in Scotland
And apparently this means they don't deserve acknowledgement. Sure thing.

>didn't get any help from the british crown
The French and Indian war never happened, then?
The colonies themselves were a British venture. The crown is the reason your family had anything to sail to on that private ship, unless they planned to learn French.

And I was talking about the Founding Fathers betraying their descendants for shekels.
Muhh taxation was their biggest justification for revolution.

>I can tell you are an urbanite
Keep tryin, faggot.
You just got done telling me how you live in a (((university))) in St. Louis
What's a country man paying city men to teach him then?

>fixing Americas problems and keeping American traditions
Those """traditions""" are what lead to our problems, so yes.

>>140060114
every state should become a monarchy and together they could be ruled similarly to how the HRE was ruled in medieval Germany

>>140048616
You are shit

>>140060148
Sure bud. Everyone but me gotta learn

>>140060325
What's wrong with having a governor-general in every state appointed by the monarchy?