If North Korea only had one nuke, would you want it to hit San Francisco or Los Angeles?
I vote LA because if it hits SF it'll mess with Northern California, which is a cool place.
>>140046937
bump..
>>140046937
Definitely LA
>>140046937
northern california is hella cooler than southern california. alough it was 110 today because of all the smoke.
>>140046937
It should nuke Silicone Valley and destroy the Globalist Internet control hubs of (((Google, YouTube, 23&me, Apple))) etc
Fuck muh Economy. Freedom is much more important.
>>140046937
San Fran
I have family and friends in LA, including my pupper
That said, I have no idea why /pol/ thinks the death of millions would be something worth celebrating but I guess I'm just out of the loop or a Jewish mindslave
>>140046937
>>140048260
\>city on fire already
\>wants to nuke us as well
Los Angeles is the better option because the hispanic population there is huge and it would also affect Mexico.
>>140046937
>>140047633
>>140048260
>>140049104
>>140049350
>>140049395
>>140049483
>>140049546
get on my level, plebs.
TWO SCOOPS
TWO EARTHQUAKES
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/904197258517905409
>>140046937
if they actualy use a nuke offensively we get to blow them off the map right?
>>140049350
>>140049395
SF is far preferred, wiping out the total control of Silicon Valley would be a huge step forward in freeing the human race from the demonic clutches of the possessed money worshippers
>>140050002
Not to mention the naval facilities at Alameda as well as the port itself. And the cherry on top would be the Golden Gate Bridge reduced to straight-blocking radioactive slag.
>>140046937
San Fagcisco
>>140046937
LA just to get git rid of (((Hollywood)))
>>140046937
Best Korea please nuke LA