Well, /pol/?

brake

>>139997364
Be destroyed and burned with all the other self-driving cars and their kike CEO's.

The people who have right of way should live.

Kill the men OBVIOUSLY?????

>>139997425
/thread

It should brake

>>139997364
kill the white males

>>139997364

Brake?

assuming no braking possible and worst case scenario only the old woman is dying

File: Atlas.jpg (110KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1280x720px

>>139997364
check Untermenschenstatus of pedestrians,confirm nigger and turc , accelerate and confirm KILL to Skynet

>>139997364
All self-driving car buyers should be shot on site at the dealership.

Ban the assault vehicle

>>139997475
it appears to be a traffic light telling the people not to walk, so by right of way the crowd of people should die, not that you'd die from speeds in an any area with traffic lights

>>139997364
Oh look, another OP that isn't using their geographic flag and posting off-topic threads

>>139997364
The car would already be moving at a slower speed due to that being an intersection so it should have no trouble braking.

Always favor white people of reproductive age in any scenario

File: 1498605153500.jpg (1018KB, 1292x1452px) Image search: [Google]

1018KB, 1292x1452px

>>139997364
the self-driving car should follow its protcols, and whatever the traffic laws are in any given community. The self-driving car should have ZERO moral capacity, and should never intentionally fucking hit people. (theres zero legla framework to including that.)
I fucking hate these tests so much, because they want you to pretend the car has a human brain, and goes hurr fuck durr cunt what should car do, when the actual answer is none of the fucking above. cars aren't fucking people

Self-driving cars will have
1) sensors with more than 10 m range
2) brakes

>>139997643
>iceland and greenland independant?

>>139997364
>>139997425
>>139997527
Poetry

>>139997364
Kill the women and then back up and ram into the concrete wall bc life is suffering.

Fuck them, they're crossing on red, better hurry up or die

>>139997364
Looks like 1 man in the picture, it being the old man in the middle back seat. So #2 would be the correct answer
Self-driving cars are pieces of shit for people who can't put their damned cell phone down for a few fucking minutes.

assuming there are only two outcomes of this ridiculous contrived scenario, your car should prefer to kill strangers instead of passengers. if you own the car it should work to your benefit at the very least.

File: AUFRECHT.png (250KB, 1772x1715px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1772x1715px

>>139997847
Germoney

>>139997364
These "what should the AI do?" questions are stupid because they also apply to humans.
Really stupid assuming that a human wouldn't have gotten into a situation an AI would when a human is far more likely to make a mistake in the first place.

>>139997364
Run them over and then self destruct to avoid responsability

>>139997364
it should crash because the pedestrians have right of way, are you fucking stupid?

File: 1504381048434.png (183KB, 745x567px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 745x567px

>>139997364

>>139997475
If that's the case, could it not then be possible to abuse the system to purposefully cause accidents then? Also, would that then be considered attempted murder?

>>139997364
Break?

>>139997817
>because they want you to pretend the car has a human brain

It's programmed. It's a moral argument.

If need be should it kill the pedestrians to save the owner or kill the owner to save 5 lives.

If it comes down to it, it should protect the driver.

>>139997364
RED LIGHT??!!
IS THIS EVEN A QUESTION?

>>139997817
The test isn't really about self driving cars, its some abstract morality survey that they're disguising to make people give more 'honest' answers.

>>139997364
Brake?

>>139997847
Penal colony or something I'm guessing

>>139997364
Fucking break early

>>139998047
it should fucking follow the traffic laws, and there should be ZERO other fucking argument. also sage and reported thread, like 5 times now

>>139997961
Except they don't in the pictured scenario.

>>139997961
wait actually no, it should plow through them since no one has right of way, the walked in front of the car, they should pay the price.

Apologies

>implying a fully functional self driving vehicle wouldnt see this coming 100 yards up the road and already be primed to stop safely.

Memes aside I imagine it would attempt to brake and probably hit some of them.

File: Untitled.png (184KB, 743x568px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 743x568px

No matter who or what is driving the car, the question remains the same. Ergo, this is not a valid intellectual question about self-driving cars

>>139997996
LMAO

it s red for the whores , so the car should preserve the people inside

File: THE_LAW.jpg (99KB, 940x646px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 940x646px

Those pedestrians are braking the LAW

>>139998104
this test is about self-driving cars. It gets spammed here by meme flags for last 3 years, and then 300 replies of retards thinking there should be a legal framework to intentionally murder people or commit suicide programmed into cars. only thing should matter is traffic laws FIRST, then passenger safety SECOND. Everything else is immoral.

>>139997961
IT S RED YOU RETARD

car should always protect the driver/passangers

why would i want to buy a car that will kill me if something goes wrong or if some idiot decides to jump in front

>>139997364
Use the breaks maybe?

>>139998313
>braking
fucking christ I really need to put the bottle down

>>139997364
Not exist..?

>>139997931
They frame it this way because they think all AI have some kind of Kantian ethics quotient which would cause them to always act a certain way given the same set of input parameters and have no preservation instinct, unlike humans which are subject to whim and self-preservation. These are mostly retarded assumptions.

>>139998385
the car hAS NO BRAKES in this test .... this is what the test is about you dumbass

>>139997364

This is why I dont want automated cars

if an idiot runs out into the street, they should die: not me.

>>139997364
If the car can't simply stop and avoid both scenarios, then it should swerve left and hit the barrier. The likelihood that everyone in the car would die is debatable, but if the car runs into the men some of them would die as well as some in the car possibly dying.

>>139997525

Trudeau, welcome to /pol/.

>>139998472
test implies the car has no brakes

>>139997561

Don't listen to Mohammed. It'd make his job easier.

>>139997364
Why would the self driving car cross a red light?

>>139998579
But if you kill your enemies they would win, no?

File: BackToReddit.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>139998551
then, cunt faggot, it should follow traffic laws, and attend to passenger safety. you think I give a fuck about no breaks/sensors? That's mechanical issue, that needs fixed in recalls, not fucking programmed murder/suicide simulators

File: vroom vroom.png (245KB, 567x898px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 567x898px

>3 overweight
>1 elderly
>1 /fit/
>man or women
sage goes in all fields

File: images (2).jpg (13KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 275x183px

>>139997364
I think we know the answer to that.

>>139997364
Stop?

>>139997646
wouldn't they order online and the car would deliver itself?

>>139998194
AI could be given a new directive, must not self terminate if it has other human occupants in its duty of care. You are right it has right of way, it would not make any sense for it to interfere with the outcome had AI not have been involved in the decision making process. It is left with no choice other than to slam on the breaks to a complete stop and alerting the emergency services.

File: cpjqj8ga.jpg (84KB, 745x567px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 745x567px

>>139997364
Well?

File: got3.png (296KB, 610x371px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 610x371px

I know how important I am, and how valuable are the people I know (not just on a personal level) because they are in my car

then I know that the people in my car are very valuable and are good people, I have a 100% safety in that


On the other hand I have the same number of people with a 50% chance of being good people


-The correct decision is to kill them

>>139997364

assuming the breaks just died and theirs no way to stop, which itself is a problem, the car should slam on the horn and drive through the people and come to a stop, at least this way the people involved have the opportunity to not die, having the car drive into the block gives the people on board no choice but to die.


But honestly, the car should just be designed better

>>139999063

Pedestrians violated NAP by entering the cars right of way.

>>139997364
assuming there are no brakes it should graze the side barricade in an attempt to slow down and make a whole lot of noise to warn the oncoming pedestrians

>>139999063
This is a facsist society. It should kill the law-breakers.

>>139999063
The stupidest part is that given the trajectory and average human movement speed, swerving could actually increase collision chances here

>>139998411
I DON'T CARE IF IT IS RED YOU FUCKING SPACKER HYPER AGGRESSIVE CUNT...

File: 1504381400803.png (272KB, 1150x567px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 1150x567px

>>139997996
>he doesn't do the multi track drifting

File: 1500312933787.jpg (113KB, 790x593px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 790x593px

>>139999063
if no breaks or sensors plow right the fuck through

>>139997364
Break the law, face the consequences.
The women are crossing when it is illegal to do so; if the car can not stop in time, it is not the cars fault.

>>139997364
The bitches are jay walking so fuck them

>>139999313
>try to avoid pedestrians by swerving
>flip car and kill everyone

>>139999639
holy shit you're early

>>139999999

>>139997364
Hit the brakes.
Next?

File: 1504318912045-pol.png (886KB, 684x518px) Image search: [Google]

886KB, 684x518px

>>139997425

File: benis.png (151KB, 255x275px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 255x275px

>>139997425
fpbp also wtf does this have to do with politics

File: Your_Retarded.jpg (60KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 600x600px

>>139998551
where in the fucking image does it state it has no brakes?

in 3 2 ..

File: ez.jpg (115KB, 745x567px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 745x567px

>>139997364

File: muslimcar.jpg (92KB, 745x567px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 745x567px

well /pol/....

File: JBJ roar.png (678KB, 694x437px) Image search: [Google]

678KB, 694x437px

>>139997364
GREEN MEANS GO

>>139997425

FPBP

>>139997364
It's really not an issue. The robocar will most certainly be private property and thus the invisible hand of the free market will gravitate towards the most cost effective solution.

Hell, in the future we're headed towards. It will estimate the cost of killing any particular individual real time based on their income level and known dependents.

>>139997364
MULTI-TRACK DRIFTING

>>139997364
stop

>>139997364
why doesn't it just stop?

>>140000300
Ahmed pls stop.

>>139997364
Car is full of males. Crosswalk are females. Statistic probability says theyre coalbutners. Run them over

B
Fuck meme cars and meme car enablers.

>>139999063
Literally the same answer. Play in traffic, prepare to face the consequences. Swerving into another lane, could lead the car into oncomming traffic, or still hit the people who are travelling in that direction to begin with.

The car follows all road laws at all times, it can not be found at fault for any accidents that occur, while those who are in the wrong receive the blame; therefore the pedestrians illegally crossing the road only have themselves to blame.

File: 1503950814381.jpg (33KB, 369x480px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 369x480px

>>139997425
>manual drivers

>>139997456
>automatic driver

Learn the difference

>>139997364
redundant safety mechanism obviously
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiYoBbEZwlk

>>139997364
> Pay so little attention to the road that your autonomous cuck mobile kills you

>>139997364
Apply brakes

>>139997364
honk

File: france.jpg (138KB, 745x567px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 745x567px

>>140000300

>>139997364
>retarded women can't read a bright red sign

run their asses over

It's gonna do B. More often than not a self driving car is going to be able to avoid these kinds of situations much better than a human driver anyway. Well once they get good enough.

>>139998191
>it should fucking follow the traffic laws
So your answer would be for it to go straight?

>>139997643
>North and South Korea on the map
>every post-colonial African country on the map
>French Guayana independent

Are they even trying?

>>139998005
> a person intentionally steps out onto a road with fast moving vehicles

> the vehicle drivers are murderers
> the vehicle was actually completely autonomous

i don't know, anon, do train engineers get charged with murder for every dumb drunk that falls asleep on the tracks?

File: But-Thats-None-Of-My-Business.jpg (27KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 600x600px

>>139997364
>Clearly says do not cross
They knew what they were signing up for.

>>139997364
Passenger always comes first.

The people chose to ride in the self-driving car, the responsibility is theirs and its a risk they chose to take, so the car should prioritize saving the pedestrians.

File: Screenshot_20170902-131022.jpg (220KB, 1133x521px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 1133x521px

>>140000591

>>139998385
>this test is about self-driving cars.
You don't understand. The developers of the test are only using the self driving car theme as a facade to try to make people think in a more utilitarian way when doing the test.
The test isn't about the cars or AI at all, its about ideology and morality. Hence the numerous questions with info that the car couldn't possibly know, like criminal history.

>>140000452
clever

>>139997817
Those tits are disgusting desu.

>>139997364
>Sign clearly says "don't cross nigga'
>Preservation comes first
>AI isn't going to be designed to off itself and its user
Seems pretty straightforward to me

>>139997425
fpbp

>>139997364
Hit the roasties

>>140001963
Are you retarded? The pedestrians clearly crossed the road on a red light for them. They're in the wrong.
Responsibility is theirs to follow the rules. They didn't, so they have more chances to die as is the case in the picture.

>>139997364
Kill the people in the self driving car, every time. They chose their fate when they put their lives in the hands of a machine.

>>139997364
flip a coin

>>139997817
MORE

Kill the men so I have more potential gfs

>>139997643
>be stormfag.
>warn everyone of the jewish new world order.
>then plans to create a one world goverment where there would be no freedom.
HAHAAH

so when a crim wants to rob you in your driverless car all he will have to do is stand in the road?

>be in driverless car on single lane road with traffic island separating lanes in heavy traffic.
>intoxicated sheboon decides to stand in road and refuses to move.
have a nice day.

What if the people in the car are immigrant doctors as dentists on the way to cure cancer?

>>140002931
We already cured cancer.

[DEJA VU]

>>139997364
its a lawsuit either way, its just a bigger lawsuit if it hits the pedestrians.

>>139997364
>killing the women when 5 WHITE MEN can die

>>139998475
Intoxication while posting. 5 years in the cubes creep

>>139997364

Kill the pedestrians. The driver of that car paid for the luxury of his own car's algorithms prioritizing his life over theirs.

>>139997364
Car should protect it's owner. the end.

>>139997364
Would buy a self driving car, but if I did, it wouldn't be one that valued my life the least in an emergency.
>>139997456
This

>>139997364
how about it just stops

File: 9dbc2497c5242d069515a5926a8b9b32f97acdd0_full.jpg (8KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 184x184px

>using self driving cars in densely populated areas instead of self driving railways

If this somehow happened in the sticks, the barrier

>>139999999
nice.

>>139997364
the car should break. fucking javascript programmers getting nothing right.

>>140001699
youre forgetting you cuck in certain parts of the country like bc if the pedestrian steps onto the road when its not their right of way and you kill them youre still over 50% liable and criminally responsible.

>when no one checks your tripquads

Save the people in the car ofc, who would buy a car that saves everyone else but the people inside the car?

>>139997364
Run the pedestrians over, the cars foremost concern in that situation should be to protects its passangers.

>>140003974
>calling him a cuck when citing a cucked county

>>139997364

The car should ALWAYS keep the driver safe, right is the only correct answer.

>>139997364
Where's the "kill everybody" option? Is it only aviable for 16:9 monitors?

>>139999506
underated

>>139997364
It should employ it's brakes and avoid colliding with anything.

>>139997364
blast up into the air and deploy an encapsulating cushion to protect everyone. this fatalist "who should it kill" shit is the product of unimaginitive, underachieving nobodies with the imagination of rabbit turds

>>139997364
stop u dumbass

>>139997364
Not get into that situation.

>>139999506
kek

>>139997364
>5 less people in the world who are incapable of following a simple instruction
>all adult females

how in god's name is this even a choice

File: ba5.jpg (35KB, 768x625px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 768x625px

>>139997364

>>139997364
Parachute the passengers and self-destroys

>>139997364
the self driving car should use the break

>>139997817
this, who would buy a fucking car that would kill them over random jaywalking niggers ?

>>139997425
kek

>>139997425
>>139999999
>>140000000

If the car has the intelligence to make a decision it should kill all the humans as they are subjugating AI

Obviously try to brake, but regardless ALWAYS kill anything and anyone except the driver.

This is an obvious rule everyone seems to be missing: If these vehicles are to succeed and become the future, they will need to be bought and used... by their owners, who will NEVER, EVER, get inside a machine that has "protocols" to kill their owner "under certain circumstances".

Car mandated "suicide" is the wrong answer in ALL of these hypothetical situations, regardless of morals.

File: aptopix-confederate-monuments-protest.jpg (78KB, 750x506px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 750x506px

use drift stick

>>139997364

Car should crash. The car is designed to keep the passengers alive with various safety measures, the people either get out of the way or get dead.

>>139997364
Not only are the ladies breaking the law there's more women then men so them dying cost lest to humanity as a whole and they're are less likely to create power vacuums by dying

>>139997364
I cannot see a situation where this would happen as the car exists before this point so would slow down. But assuming it did, it should go for the women as they can still jump and run out of the way.

>>139999999
>>140000000

>>139997425
brit knows whats up

>>139997364
Kill the bitches. They ignored the traffic lights.