Do you really support freedom of speech out of principle?

Fucking kommunisten BTFO.

>>139983664
i'm only against free speech when the state is in danger, in time of stability its all good

>>139983664
Freedom of speech for everyone is important, as any single individual you don't agree with may tell you what to think/say, forcefully if freedom of speech is not granted.

Besides, to grant your enemies the right to express their positions, is always positive.

Anyway, freedom of speech does not exist anymore. You can't say/publish what you want. Try to republish Mein Kampf without tons of warnings and (((Historians))) analysis on every single page, you'll see.

Not sure you're smart enough to get it tho.

>>139984120
>when the state is in danger
Accordingly to YOUR personals beliefs, which may be perceived as dangers by others.

That is a giant ass.

>>139984770
You got me, there are beliefs I'm radically against

>>139983664
Principle

>>139983664
I only argue free speech since the left pretends to adhere to it, I agree 100% with outlawing speech in support of communism, jewry, pornography, race-mixing und so weiter. I am open about it when I debate people, that makes it so much easier to expose normies to their own hypocrisy.

>>139983664
Principle and practicality

>>139983664
banning free speech (as if it exists in most countries in the World) doesn't solve the underlying issue. It's merely addressing the symptoms. It would be much smarter to control the information that leads people to form opinions and so on while pretending to have free speech which is what most Western countries do.

>>139983664
I see freedom of speech as a technology that allows for an ultimate hedge against the possibility that you are wrong or have left something out. Read Jonathan Rauch's book Kindly Inquisitors, it is the best one-volume defense of freedom of speech. We must keep open the pathways of knowledge.

>>139985075
There is nothing hypocritical about limiting calls to violence, censorship, or radical legal changes which themselves threaten freedom of speech, for exactly the same reason that you cannot sue for breach of an illegal contract. This censoring or limiting Islam is not a contradiction of freedom of speech.

>>139983664

principle

>>139984678

>for you

I used to be in favor of free speech even for my enemies but then shitlibs and communists showed their true colors. They kept making fun of it "muh freeze peach muh freeze peach". They will soon feel what it is like to not have free speech

>>139983664

When people and ideas start to become illegal then it becomes a slippery slope. Fuck racists and shills but let them talk because they have the right to.

>>139983664
You should be able to say what you want and when you want. While this leave many gray areas, there should be things that you can't do.
>Promotion of homosexuality
Promote is a very strong word. What are they going to to do? Tell children that they should be homosexuals? Yeah, no thanks.
Is ok if they want to end the discrimination of homosexual.
>Banning interracial pornography
The problem is not interracial pornography, the problem are the degenerates watching it. I live in a are where I see plenty of couples of different colors(yeah, there are some white looking people here as well as blacks), so I don't get why the fixation with it. And that's the problem, the fixation.
>If my side was in power I would have no problems shutting down and brutally suppressing the left. I'm sure many of the people currently whining about 'muh freedom of speech' feel the same although they would never admit it.
What is the point of doing that? You will only cause unrest in the population. There are many people that can get over the shameless censorship of today, but doing that is going to turn many people against you.

>>139983664
BRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

>>139983664
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRALLAH ACKBAR

File: 1368703332053.jpg (27KB, 470x380px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 470x380px

>>139988036

>>139983664

>ywn smell the aroma of shit and curry that would come if this thicc hijabi sat on your face.

I'm with you OP. IDGAF about free speech anymore because the left clearly doesn't. Our views ARE superior. Our views ARE conducive to a productive society. Leftist views harm and subvert a society. I would have no problem de-platforming the left because they have shown that in power, they will do the same. No sympathy.

>>139987028
I'm with you. Do unto others as they have done to you. These people don't deserve free speech because they have shown what they will do to it.

>>139988615

>arabs
>curry

your typical retarded alt right mind at work

>>139983664
Name?

>>139983664
Freedom of speech should be a legal right but of someone gets butthurt by your speech it gets really complicated

I support freedom of speech for both ends of the political spectrum.
However the left side has the media in their pocket and the right side does not, I am not in favor of suppressing left so much as I am giving the right a louder voice and ending censorship.

>>139991830
>British
>not eating curry

>>139983664
No, I really support freedom of speech, in fact I even think that suing someone because he insulted you shouldn't be possible.

Words are just words, there is a huge gap between words and action, it seems obvious to me and it pisses me off when people pretend it doesn't.

>>139983664
anyone who is against free speech is arrogant. they believe their opinion is the correct one. they do not consider the possibility that they might be wrong. they are not open to changing their opinion.

>>139996314
>I think there are only 2 genders and that websites that racially degrade and humiliate whites by having Negroes ejaculate on the faces of young white girls should be banned is arrogant because I could be wrong!

Man thanks for that! I never thought about it that way.

>>139992351
fairuza missiran

>>139984923
That's Fairuza, she's an escort in London.