Women mental life and the new female - NO BLUEPILLED PEOPLE ALLOWED

>>139872305

Explain "woman drags culture", charts shows something but doesn't explain anything at all.

What's the conception of woman and culture through time and places for you?

>>139872305
My theory is that since the brains of women develop faster than their male counterparts, and that they are high in neuroticism, it would be ideal to teach them at an early age in an accelerated program/learning environment. Otherwise their brains mature during a period where they lack knowledge, understanding, and critical thinking abilities.

>>139872885
The display of the feminine essence is shown across multiple cultures, in different geographies and different ethnic groups, as being an immoral creature.

Marcus Aurelius said it.
Muhanmad said it.
Buddhism said it.
Schopenhauer said it.
Catholic church said it.
Jews said it.

All universal literature until modernity was inclined to the idea of it.

It's a universal idea that cross along time, space and ethnic groups, it's a cultural constant, the need for domesticating women feral lying and cunning nature, so there can be some familiar stability.

>>139873282
>develop faster
I think it mature sexually earlier, because thats what they are here for: some good ol' dicking, displaying beauty as their main reproductive strategy and the behavior algorithm that comes along with it(lying, cunning, deception, pretending, attention whoring, baiting betas fucking alfas)

bump for final red pill

>>139876990
Islam = Cultural technology for female submission
But it's foreign, so I don't like it

File: 1503946240597.jpg (86KB, 750x726px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 750x726px

>>139874623
I agree, I have multiple pdf's on the philosophers of yesteryear and they all come to the same conclusion.
I especially love Schopenhauer's essay, "On Women." It's replete with redpills.

>It is only the man whose intellect is clouded by his sexual instinct that could give that stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped, and short-legged race the name ofthe fair sex; for the entire beauty of the sex is based on this instinct. One would be more justified in calling them theunaesthetic sexthan the beautiful. Neither for music, nor for poetry, nor for fine art have they any real or true sense and susceptibility, and it is mere mockery on their part, in their desire to please, if they affect any such thing.

File: 1499595252510.jpg (94KB, 500x643px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 500x643px

>>139877328
Oh, don't get me wrong, I greatly dislike Islam myself. I'm not giving up beer or bacon. Unfortunately, they do have the right idea when it comes to women. This is why the super-feminized countries are importing Muslims by the thousands. The women, subconsciously or unconsciously want assertive men who will put them in their place.
I'm trying my best to unbrainwash myself from the feminist lies I had to grow up with.

File: 1503888926633.png (433KB, 640x482px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 640x482px

Bamp

>>139877492
There is Esther Villar too, where she redpilled me as identifying myself as the construction unit of civilization, while women merely whore and lie away their days. The truth is that men and women are not equal, and women on their natural condition are indeed inferior in qualitative aspects. They are not fit for building or struggle, just mainly for sex. That being said, I embrace intellectual value wherever I see it, so female talents always make me very happy to witness!

>trusting the vaginal jew
When will you guys swallow the gaypill?
Who else here /dicks4life/ ?

>>139878088
They CONSCIOUSLY KNOW, and they also consciously LIE ABOUT IT. There is no way around it. They know they like strong man, dominant and superior to them.
The problem is, when you become that, you start being flooded with pussy, and than you start to despise them for being so whory.
But don't resort to hate, that's just who they are, nature made their mental software like that. They don't control it at all. It's just like a cat barking and a dog barking. See women as supermarket carts. It's not your to own, it's just there for a limited amount of time, and then it will go to another dudes hand.

>>139879235
never, I will shallow the peace pill, the one that you start following (((love))) as a important goal and you can keep your sanity and your money

File: IMG_047.jpg (259KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 960x1280px

>>139872305
The final solution is to have all women wear diapers and call their boyfriends "daddy"

>>139872305
>Also, wich way: SYNTH or GENE?
We will need to use artificial wombs for at least 1 generation. With artificial wombs and genetic engineering technology, it may be possible to create a new genetically engineered population of women that women have their irrationality and disloyalty edited out.

>>139880355
That was what I said. But wich way: SYNTH OR GENE?

Womens are hell daughters. But we love em,don't we folks ?

File: Athena,_Protector_of_OrderL.png (730KB, 660x872px) Image search: [Google]

730KB, 660x872px

>>139872305
>In the west, this came trough us on the form of the Catholic church and Christianism.

Semitic sand nigger mind poisen thread

>Do you agree with me? Do you not? Why?

How would you implement any of these without the destroying the most important virtue of the west, freedom?

>>139881576
Synth: No freedom broken, only a market attended by free initiative.

>>139881877
However we are currently so far away from this that you could also include mind altering nano machines and control rays.

>>139881988
Also, in the west, the tradition for freedom don't really consider women political entities. They were always considered just reproductive patreons, who chooses who would mate and who wouldn't. The catholic church made sure to create an ideological position where the women was submissive by default. Do you think going back to our roots breaks your idea o freedom, as in western civilization?

>>139882545
>They were always considered just reproductive patreons, who chooses who would mate and who wouldn't.

Not anymore. You cannot revoke already given rights. I.e. after declaring a slave a human you cannot declare him a slave again without infringing the rights of everyone.

>Do you think going back to our roots breaks your idea o freedom, as in western civilization?

If we do it now, yes definitely.