remainder to install google killer https://adnauseam.io/ ru

Where's rockmelt

>>139857294
I'm using vivaldi, it's not there either.

>>139857141
Brave is not excellent on Desktop. I mean, one can't even follow your
>remainder to install google killer
advice on it.

It's great on android, acceptable on iOS, and absolute shit on desktop. Pale Moon also stopped Adnauseam from being able to install unless you dig into the about:config settings.

This chart is all wrong for the advice you're trying to give out.

File: (((adnaseaum))).png (106KB, 437x385px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 437x385px

Here is the ultimate red pill on AdNauseam.

The Marxist Jews are the masters of subversion. They know best how to infiltrate the discourse and twist it for their own good. One of their common techniques is called "false equivalence". The trick is to substitute a minor, mundane issue for a major one and eventually take the attention away from really important things. So called "ad surveillance" is one of the examples. Yeah, it's kinda nasty, but no more than dog poo in the street. It's basically cookie tracking which can be disabled with one click. Only tech-illiterate normies who buy shit online are affected by it. Can I easily disable government surveillance? The effects of mass migration, affirmative action, anti-hate speech regulations? The Marxist Jews don't want people to talk about it, they want everybody to focus on their ad poos. This is not even helping the cause. Instead of promoting alternatives to Google services and Youtube, damaging Google's reputation in the eyes of normies, they make people vent out in a safe outlet, which may actually benefit Google in the first place.

Big advertisers have been waging click wars on each other for YEARS. Reports of mass click fraud date back to 2015, 2013, 2011.. And they use much more sophisticated methods than just blatantly sending 100 clicks an hour from your home IP. Over 50% of web traffic is bot traffic at this point. Do you think Google's quantitative analysts are dumb? That they don't have early filters in place? If anything, it's Google's competitors that will suffer from click fraud first.

So, what's the REAL goal of these Jews?
- To give Google an edge over competitors because the latter can't handle click fraud effectively and lack good quants
- To sell data to Google for their new adblocker
- To suppress smaller scapegoat websites in favor of (((big))) ones
- To push the discourse sideways, in a safe direction
- To expose the IP addresses of people with questionable political views
We can only guess.

>>139857484
Isn't Vivaldi closed-source?

>>139857595
I don't know, I just didn't wanted jewgle shit anymore and vivaldi had nice reviews. It's slower than Chrome but not that bad.

>>139857516
I didn't tryed all those browsers. I just saved that pic and used it to bake the break cuz the last one >>139831673 is over 300

>>139857550
I'm not doing it because I'm concerned about ad surveillance. I just want to take down google for all the shit they are pulling. I want to make an example out of them, by breaching the trust that companies have with them as an advertising company.

I am also using a separate browser (Chromium) to use it, and am ONLY using it to target Google.com. I use FF with NoScript and U Block Origin, as well as a bunch of other shit, for everything else.

>>139857775
According to Wikipedia, it's proprietary freeware. I'd be wary.

>>139857550
If this is true why would they bother banning it from chrome? While all other adblocks are acessible.
This doesnt hold up.

Thanks based chicken maker.

File: 1504280312039.jpg (870KB, 2928x2216px) Image search: [Google]

870KB, 2928x2216px

>>139857141

>>139857141
It's more fun to just larp and shitpost as an asshole, that throws them off too. I just wish youtube would stop recommending serial killer documentaries to me, wtf youtube? fuck you.

File: 03010.jpg (47KB, 400x290px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 400x290px

>>139859635
>resisting your true calling.
Wewlad

>>139857775
Google doesn't require warrants or subpoenas for info requests 99% of the time.

They'll literally just fork your shit over.

Im gettimg a fainth smell of piss and milk ITT

>>139857595
So is Opera anyway.

>>139857141
1. Any love for Cyberfox?
2. Where do the alternatives go on this list?

>>139857294
Never tried. Any good?

>>139857141
I'm pretty sure the mozilla issue doesn't affect waterfox.

so what browser should we use?

File: AdnauseumVsAdBlockers.png (297KB, 300x543px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 300x543px

>>139857141
Here, have some OC

cant be tracked with ads if you block them all in the first place. this is stupid and gives them revenue. this is a psyop

File: 1500003021789.jpg (69KB, 693x756px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 693x756px

Pale Moon just popped up with a message politely telling me to go fuck myself for installing adnauseam, and that its blocked.

>>139861267
lol wow. It works on Waterfox.

I have it installed on on Opera. Works good. It makes me happy watching the tally of the money I am costing Jewgle just by browsing the internet.

File: 1470417626020.jpg (30KB, 500x359px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x359px

>>139861143
this. when caught making money off fake clicks they only return 7-11% of the money.

>>139861527
It still devalues ads?

>>139857141

>using anything but chrome

enjoy your 1997 "secure" browsers, sempai

Waterfox would be a much better browser if the user ID said firefox so that I could blend in better.
I bet theres only 1 person using waterfox in my entire state, it would stand out too much desu

>>139861527
Can't they get sued for fraud?

File: 1481407827641.jpg (103KB, 728x810px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 728x810px

>>139859540
explanation for this you useless memeflagger? or are you just shitposting?

Google’s refunds amount to only a fraction of the cost of the ads served to invalid traffic, which has left some advertising executives unsatisfied, the people familiar with the situation said. Google has offered to reimburse its “platform fee,” which ad buyers said typically ranges from about 7% to 10% of their total purchase

http://patriotmoneynews.com/google-issues-refunds-to-advertisers-over-fake-traffic/

Here's a reminder that by using sites that use captchas like this one, google already knows it. And if you actually bought a pass then you're just as stupid. There is no escaping google.

>>139857141
opera babyyy

I wanna make it clear that the stormfags calling out the adnauseam devs for being Jewish need to be ignored. Their stance is pointless as clearly we are going above what the expected use of adnauseam is. Even if it was made to

>push cultural Marxist culture...

It doesn't matter because we are clearly using it as a tool for attacking a threat to free speech. In one of the few ways an every day common man is able to

File: ads.png (404KB, 1653x1011px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 1653x1011px

>>139857141
so the script seems to work well
even setting it right to "sometimes" the script does $700 per hour and looks really random
I had it running overnight and it accumulated thousands of dollars
I don't even use the browser running it

>>139861678
>Can't they get sued for fraud?
how much do you think it would cost to sue google, the second biggest company in the world? probably more than most spend on adds

>>139861807
read the thread, palemoon blocked adnau, brave is shit on desktop

>>139857550
>Every thread it is the same fag with the snek flag
You hiding a leaf under there?

>>139861637
>https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/random-agent-spoofer/
or 'user agent switcher'

>>139862173
I understand that. sucks. But, if enough attention is brought to it and even normies start to see it, wouldn't the government be forced to step in?

>>139861983
thats why you use main browser for shitposting and separate one to run script

File: 1464991204021.png (226KB, 511x474px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 511x474px

>>139861637
>bet theres only 1 person using waterfox in my entire state,

>>139862448
fuck i must be drunk, wrong post second time

>>139861880 read >>139862448

File: 1503546302909.jpg (82KB, 568x454px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 568x454px

>>139862446
>wouldn't the government be forced to step in?
https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e

google IS the government

>>139861527
that 11% is the profit dumbass.
this is how media buying works.

you buy $1000 worth of ads from google. they charge you 7-11% fees on top of that $1000. then they take out another 7-11% of that from the $1000 and give the rest to the website publisher.

that second 7-11% pays for the staff and servers etc. the first 7-11% is the profit. so when they're refunding that 7-11% they're refunding all the profit.

>>139861637
Cyberfox says it's Firefox. Looking at it now.

File: 1476120851743.jpg (20KB, 243x240px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 243x240px

>>139862739
>that 11% is the profit dumbass.
ya i want a source on that

>>139857550
this
>>139857141
Why don't more people use Opera? I've been using it for 3 years and have never had any problems with it.

>>139859540
>>139857516
The anti-brave mentality is caused by people who forget this is an anti-google options thread and not an "off-the-grid" /g/ autist thread. You might as well leave it but bump it down a peg by saying "Once it gets X amount of users the owner will start selling your data like every other browser.

Brave worked fine for me.
its UI was kind of bare and it didn't handle as many tabs as fire fox but when it ran with just a few tabs it ran better than fire fox with one.

>>139862961
Because /pol/ is full of devs looking for beta testers for free, why do you think a Browser like (((Brave))) is on second place and is NOT ABLE to run AdNa or any other extension.
Tested Browsers for AdNa, which work are
>Waterfox
>SJWFox
>Opera
>Vivald
>IceCat
>Iridium

>>139862961
Opera is owned by a Chinese company, meaning it is a Chinese botnet.

Whether or not that is worse than feeding into google is up to you.

>>139857550
>leftie socialist Jew
>literally hate everything capitalism, including Google
Why the fuck shouldn't I use the extension of faggot lefties if it does the job right?

>it's just cookie tracking goy, you can totally disable it and Google will totally not keep doing what you disabled
Fuck off shill. Tell me exactly why can't I give a shit about my privacy AND mass immigration? I'm not some brainless fuck that can't focus on more than one thing at a time.

>>139862961
it's not open source so everyone mildly tech-savvy recommends against it
it's not installed by default so normies don't use it
what does everyone think of Vivaldi?

>>139862755
Never heard of it, gonna check it out.

>>139862392
I'll take a look at that
I checked the github page for waterfox and the dev is aware of the issue but hasn't commented on it further

File: 1504280312039.jpg (930KB, 2928x2216px) Image search: [Google]

930KB, 2928x2216px

>>139863065
ok, heres the updated version lol

>>139862912
i have a network account so i can both buy and sell ads on google AdX their ad exchange.

google "double dips" like every other exchange charging platform fees to both the buy-side and the sell-side.

the actual rates vary substantially depending on how big of a player you are and how you negotiate. the actual range is probably more like 1-18%.

and then they take as much as 30% on the sell side.

but in general the sell-side fees cover maintenance, operations, and R&D and the buy-side fees are the cream. i've actually been trying to get in touch with my google rep for 2 weeks and it's fucking impossible. they're basically not even answering their phones out of fear of a class action or an investigator calling or something like that. or because they know they're fucked and getting fired. their office has to look like a killhouse right now. refunding the demand-side fees is refunding the cream, there's no other way around it. that's how these businesses work and i've worked in this industry a long time.

>>139857550
This
>installing adNoseum and allowing pop-ups and removing your adblocker because you trust jews to jew other jews
SHIGGY DIGGY

>>139857141
>tfw I use a chromebook because I bought it two years ago when Google was nice and it was only $250
Almost bought a PC from Costco but they were out of the Lenovo I wanted. I refuse to go back to hard drives

File: 1492048929754.jpg (81KB, 924x571px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 924x571px

>>139863065
>be me
>fell for the brave meme
>i use forced learning on myself so i uninstalled all my other browsers to power learn brave.
>cant install add ons but shits built in right?
>see some adds and pop ups. wtf? apparently it only blocks 3rd party adds!
> go to steal got off the internet, brave has a built in torrent downloader
>all downloads fail, says they need to be verified or some shit!!!!! cant use regular program
>and the cherry on top. cant view my pics through my browser to post on /pol/
>sperg out
>install pale moon, uninstall brave

>>139863584
Just cross out the firefox branches too, can't use waterfox and shit because it depends on firefox updates somehow making it dependent enough to be cucked into whatever shit Mozilla is doing with Soros.

>>139860314
Cyber fox is slow trash use water fox.
>tow I started the brave push on /g/ and pol

Feels fucking great, I wanna see the browser become the next chrome they already have there own digital currency, along with new investors.

>>139863400
Personally I like it because it's like old Firefox. Seems faster but it might be because it looks lightweight.

>>139864076
Then try Cyberfox.

>>139864137
What, really? I've found it to be pretty fast. Weird.

File: airplane.jpg (39KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1280x720px

>waterfox
>https everywhere
>better privacy
>ublock origin
>decentraleyes
>random agent spoofer
>noscript
>>clear default whitelist in ns, only add domains you need to make pages work

File: 1504280312039.png (3MB, 2928x3000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2928x3000px

Updated in light of new info.

>>139863893
>Lenovo
Lol, killyourself.

Remove the HDD from whatever pc you want, and run an OS from a disk.

>>139864514
Better crack open the linux autism box.

>>139857550
idk man, I think im dumb, I still dont understand wtf adnauseam exactly is, someone inform me moar pls

>>139864197
I checked it out just now, seems to not be focused on privacy like waterfox is.

>>139864675
just going to use telnet from now on.

File: 1499176473088.jpg (171KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1366x768px

>>139864514
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/16086-nsa-taps-directly-into-undersea-fiber-optic-data-cables

>>139863584
shouldn't the fact that Mozzila teamed up with George Soros (one of /pol/'s mortal enemies) make it crossed of the list as well?

>>139864768
Any way to make it better, or should I just go back to Waterfox?

>>139864514
this whole effort is about incremental gains
let's get people off of the chrome botnet first, or at least get them to install ublock origin before we go full Stallman

>>139864741
I'll tell you exactly what it is very simply:

The internet has ads on it. These ads get shown to you at the expense of whoever is trying to sell stuff. They pay google to show you these ads.

In order to not see those ads (because they are ugly as shit and intrusive) most people use adblockers.
All adblockers do is they stop the ads from connecting to your computer, therefore you never get them or see them. This is defensive adblocking.

But adnauseum takes things on the OFFENSIVE by connecting to the ad in the background (without showing it to you) and giving it a fake click from your computer. And it does this to every single ad it captures. Keep in mind most people that don't use adblockers still hardly click on ads, so if Every. Single. Ad. gets clicked on it creates a lot of noise for Google. And at the same time each click costs money for the advertisers that google has to refund out of their own pocket when they realize it was caused by fake traffic.

>>139864741
ignore the OP cunt, he posts this same shit everyday.

These threads get started by people under google-AD payroll, they get paid per click (fractions of a cent, but it all adds up)

The more people download this shit, the more autoclicks he gets, far FAR more than the average user without adblock.
It's just to slightly boost revenue.

Ignore OP, and just use Adblock.

>>139857141
Didn't Pale Moon blocked AdNauseum ?

>>139864948
Waterfox is the safest bet for now, will have to see how he handles the updates. If you have a github account pester him about the useragent thing.

>>139864514
Some one make a /pol/fox or /pol/cat would be a pretty cool name for our browser

>>139864741
its a trick to get you to go from blocking ads to clicking everything automatically. along with the niceness of giving them revenue vs not, you also open yourself up to tracking. this is all bullshit.

>>139865027
>And at the same time each click costs money for the advertisers that google has to refund out of their own pocket when they realize it was caused by fake traffic.

That's the part that doesnt happen. There's no way for it to differentiate which clicks are fake, so there is no refund.

All this does is result in advertisers being paid more. If you dont like ads, dont fucking fund them!

use adblocker!

>>139864801
Wonder if they can bypass VPNs as well.

>>139864958
Agreed, I think it's nice we are moving in the right direction at least

>>139865186
I don't, but let's hope some anons here do it.

>>139865259
I've actually wondered that before: why don't some on /pol/ and /g/ team up to make a privacy-based browser?

>>139865027
>so if Every. Single. Ad. gets clicked on it creates a lot of noise for Google. And at the same time each click costs money for the advertisers that google has to refund out of their own pocket when they realize it was caused by fake traffic.

I dont think you realize how big Google's servers are, they can handle that easily, also pretty sure Google doesnt do refunds, so fuck this

File: danielchowe adnauseum jews.png (317KB, 587x447px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 587x447px

>>139857141

>>139865477
>I've actually wondered that before: why don't some on /pol/ and /g/ team up to make a privacy-based browser?

Didnt /g/ make Pale Moon or something but it failed?

File: adnauseum mushon zer-aviv.png (197KB, 578x450px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 578x450px

>>139857550

File: 1504128646370.jpg (224KB, 1220x1088px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 1220x1088px

>>139865111
>JUST US ADBLOCK GOY
>DON'T COMMIT ECONOMIC TERRORISM
flag, coward

>>139864137
>brave

I refuse to use a browser that can't into uMatrix. I just tested Brave and couldn't figure out how to add it.

>>139857141
Where is duckduckgo?

File: pwned.png (939KB, 1235x762px) Image search: [Google]

939KB, 1235x762px

To all the doubters/shills:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-issuing-refunds-to-advertisers-over-fake-traffic-plans-new-safeguard-1503675395

File: adnauseum mushon zer-aviv israeli army.png (380KB, 584x588px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 584x588px

>>139865111
>>139866038

>>139865534
It doesn't matter how big the server is if the network it's on is congested. Besides, it's not even about simply giving the server a lot to do. Google's main thing is data analytics, garbage data gives garbage analysis. They can't sell "everyone likes everything".

File: 2017-08-31 18_29_27-Google Issuing Refunds to Advertisers Over Fake Traffic, Plans New Safeguard - W.jpg (25KB, 1193x151px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 1193x151px

>>139866202
>https://archive.is/ZsqYo
I use what works. if a /g/entelman comes up with a better solution, well golden. As long they don't, I use the program of a tranny that don't want to be part of Alphabet inc, change your gender with goolag kids

>>139864666
>Kill yourself over a brand
What a raging asshole/homosexual. I like their touch pads and their power ports compared to HPs. Other than that type of stuff the store bought laptops are all the same.

Qupzilla now it's named falcon

File: 2017-09-01 19_19_06-AdNauseam — AdVault.jpg (31KB, 733x182px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 733x182px

>>139866202
btw, flag coward

File: mossadnauseum.png (30KB, 609x298px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 609x298px

>>139866620

>>139857141
What's wrong with Opera?

>>139865353
What happens is companies start getting hit the massive bills.
You pay into the system to spread word of your service or product and statistically some ads will be clicked.
Even if they don't, word of your product is spread and getting into the minds of the consumer which gives you more of a presence above competitors.

Companies pay into these given a rough estimate of how many clicks they get, if they're already highly popular they're already willing to pay out more for ad space.

So then what happens is all of a sudden you get bombarded with clicks, well above the statistical amount. It seems like no skin off google's nose since that means the advertiser has to pay them a big fat wad for all those clicks. But the advertiser will not be happy about it. They will get charged with a bill and see no increase in their sales to reflect their tremendous click count. This makes google seem like the bad guy, arouses suspicion that google is gypping them. To damage control Google has to say that clicks are being bombarded by fake clicks and refund money to advertisers. Still it creates such a bad prescient it damages googles reputation.

File: 1504285165246.png (539KB, 541x459px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 541x459px

>>139862156
>>"Personal Injury Attorney"
You okay there Anon?

okay so whats the actual best browser then? you guys are saying everything is shit, so what do you use?

>>139867508
safari, duh

>>139867508
Anything that was on the higher list is still the best you're going to get.

>>139867310
this

We might not make "the" financial blow to google, bit we can make them look bad and make their ad service moot. If there data is no good why would anyone trust them? If their service is ineffective why would anyone use them? Anything that disrupts what they do is a good thing.

>>139861994
>implying stormfag
They are shill desesperate to shut this whole thing down by impersonating everything possible

so which one is the fastest

>>139867508
Follow privacytools.io and tune Firefox.

Install all the recommended add ons, plus Random Agent Spoofer (very important).

After setup Firefox is most secure.

To see proof, go to panopticlick.eff.org and run the test.

Change browser, tweak your setup until you pass the test (not unique, unique means bad).

>>139857141
Why ungoogled chrome is botnet tier?

>>139867629
What is it with your cowards? Do you hate your countries so much, are you ashamed, or is it just part of the contract with goolag?

>>139866113
Isn't duckduckgo a search engine?

File: 1479938578579.gif (3MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x270px

>>139868865
its still summer anon

>>139868482
Something about certain Chromium branches having Chrome's data-mining algorithms still in tact leading people to believe the browsers are still capable of "phoning home"

>>139868833
>says the austrian
where was hitler from again?
oh right

thanks for that.

>>139866620
So how do we end up at COST and who is getting fucked? Google or the advertiser?

How does this sum even add up?

File: 2017-09-01 19_51_45-AdNauseam — AdVault.jpg (11KB, 240x189px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 240x189px

>>139869166
>where was Hitler from
Braunau am Inn
Where is the argument coward?

>>139869394
>Who is getting fucked
We fuck goolag, goolag fucks the advertiser till the advertiser has enough and sues goolag

What about IE?

File: 568180537.jpg (25KB, 354x308px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 354x308px

>>139870145
at leasts its not chrome

So which browser is the best for security?

>>139857141
Will it work with Greasemonkey on WaterFox?

>>139857141
>shitty Firefox forks ranking above Firefox

Can i transfer my bookmarks and shit from chrome to palemoon? If not, not worth.

>>139871260
Haven't had any problems with grease monkey, but then again, guess it depends more on what you have done with grease monkey. If you installed ad blocker scripts I guess not.

>>139871528
It doesn't work with palemoon. OP is a dev faggot shilling his browser (SJWmoon)

>>139870145
Go back to bed, dad

File: 1484396299742.jpg (155KB, 592x543px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 592x543px

>>139871528
try it and tell us anon

>>139861267
if you're deadset on keeping Pale Moon
type about:config in the address bar
search blocklist
set extensions.blocklist.enabled to false

I would recommend switching to a new browser, though. The dev of Pale Moon is a furry autist that calls Ad Nauseam malware when it clearly fucking isn't.

File: Serious smug Pepe.png (7KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 420x420px

>>139857141
>No Vivaldi

>>139871821

kek

File: 1458319845741.png (1MB, 1277x1065px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1277x1065px

Which one(s) are open source, free, and as fast or faster than Chrome, but are available as an .exe simple install and not some autistic "compiler" Linux terminal command building crap shit?

>>139857141
Palemoon?
that's a joke, right?

what is the best search engine besides (((jewgle)))

>>139857141
Don't listen to these shills. Opera is a better choice than Firefox, and is increasing in popularity. If you want to put a dent in Jewgle's monopoly, use a fucking browser that has a decent userbase. Opera is number 4 worldwide.

>>139872299
bing

>>139872299

DuckDuckGo for privacy, might not find what you want though.

>>139872299
Startpage

Brave is run by jews (look at their about page) and built upon the chrome botnet/spyware

>>139872299
I go with Bing, tried ddg but it is shit imo. Yandex seems kind of o.k, not really tested it

>>139868257
>Random Agent Spoofer
Alright thanks to this post and the one earlier I got this set up and running and feel like I can install waterfox now.

>>139857141
Running windows 10, what do you think is better, IceCat or Palemoon?

>>139872299
searx.me

>>139873189
>Trading Google tracking for Microsoft tracking
You can fuck right off.

>>139873402
What is
>cleaning the cache, cookies and changing IP regularly
>What are do-not-track addons
>What is not using the same Browsers all day long
Tienes que volver!

>>139871861
>>139871811
It worked but I decided to use Sleipnir instead cuz i'm edgy.

>>139857141
can you even get icecat on windows 10?

>>139874395
>Windows 10
You're already fucked.

>not using links
baka

Quick question.
Ice cat or Pale moon?

>>139874279
>Sleipnir
Tried it, reminded me on IE 3.0, deleted it in an instant

>>139874611
Ice cat just removes firefox branding so it can be offered up as fully free software. I would use Palemoon(focused on speed) or Waterfox(focused on privacy)

>>139874611
neither

>>139874611
i'd pick palemoon personally.

>>139857141

Doesn't anyone realise that as long as you all are giving traffic to Google services, this whole browser choice thing is a farce for protesting them?

Unless you go pretty much full on Stallman, none of this will work.

>>139874556
eat ass

hold on
how many of you here are from /g/
is /g/ really as pol-populated as i think?

File: 1468703213634.jpg (141KB, 480x693px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 480x693px

>>139875117
kek, for how long do you browse 4chan?

File: linux penguin.jpg (214KB, 998x679px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 998x679px

>>139875084
Save yourself before its too late Microcuck.

>>139867915
If shills act as stormfags, they are no better than stormfags.

>>139857141
Pale Moon is "just ok", it works and is fast enough. Brave sucked my ballsack, it would be slow to start, slow to load...and the "you pay us shekels now to give to others" model was iffy.

>>139857550
The fact that it clicks ALL adds - including ones that may be to "questionable" websites - makes one wonder.

>>139859950
Your figures may be off, but if anyone bothered to move their fingers and search, they'd find this to be not too far off the mark.

>>139861267
It's a fucking setting change. The creator disagrees with how AdNas works, and identifies it as a questionable extension.

>>139862243
Yeah, and you can un-block it and install it, he even gives the fucking instructions. Because he's a small developer he can't afford to "name the jew" and get his shit pushed in, so he has to at least show a fig-leaf, i.e. "see I don't allow it" along with "psst, hey, yeah, you can still install it, just ignore the bullshit I posted"

Goddamn tl;dr normies, go take your meds for fucks sake.

>>139861600
Enjoy having all your shit shipped off to Google for analysis and storage, potentially to be used against you at a future date.

>>139861880
>There is no escaping google.
There is escaping the Jewgle, you're just too fucking lazy and/or poor and/or penny-pinching to get off your ass and do something.

>>139862735
Actually, I'm surprised to find out how many people don't know about FB's venture capital funding from a well-known CIA front. And yeah, Goog not only lubes and bends over for gov, but also sends lobs to shit all over DC, so they can have their way with your asshole.

Look, everyone has their opinions. I get that some of this won't make any sense, or that you will be pendantic, or (worse yet) LARPing your way to new keks, but really, for something like this, especially if you are playing with fire (and shitposting is fire on /pol/), you really should take a few precautions.

>>139875392
This. There is no reason to not set up a dual Linux/Windows boot on your PC. Use Windows for gaming, Linux for almost everything else.

>>139860862
Adnauseum Ackbar!

>>139874800
it doesn't have h.264...

Thoughts on going with Chromium?

>>139876976
useless if you want to avoid the google botnet - see ungoogled chromium if you must use it. but you must compile it yourself.

File: 0-Ultron_logo_1.png (79KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 512x512px

>>139857141
Stop spamming this board with this garbage. I started getting more ads running it. Fuck you OP.

>>139877347
>NASA

There is no space in internet.

File: 1474755064248.jpg (38KB, 555x448px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 555x448px

>>139877347
>using it as an adblocker on your everyday Browser

>>139877128
>ungoogled chromium
>removed ungoogled-chromium (64-bit), on Windows: 53.0.2785.143 (403382). It is buggy and outdated.

>>139877971
ok dont then
i've not been keeping up with

What's wrong with Iridium?

>>139878158
not a damn thing

File: i've got way too much thyme on my hands.jpg (120KB, 593x740px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 593x740px

>>139877562
All I do is shitpost on CNN opinion forums and rant here, I am the autistic /pol/ user meme.

>>139861527
And what do you think happens next?

Googles reputation as an advertisement platform gets a lot worse. They lose a fuckton more revenue than they gained in the short term.

Shit, some of you retards can't think longer than the tip of your nose.

>>139876587
Not only that, but if your plans are to get away from Google and be more privacy focused, then all of your efforts are wasted by using Windows which does just as much tracking as Google and then some.

Installed AdNauseam and shilled it on kikebook. Am I done now?

>>139857141

>give google money by clicking their ads, even if they don't interest you!

Then when someone calls you a fucking shill, tell them:

>nuh, uh! google has to give all the money back!

Then

>set your clicks to "sometimes" so it's harder to detect fake clicks

Now whats the plan here? to make it easier for google to keep your fake click money?

You all are a bunch of fucking top goy. Just block the fucking ads and they get NOTHING. All you are doing is giving them SOMETHING FOR NOTHING.

>>139881481

Newfag spotted, welcome to 4chan

>>139881481
No, setting clicks to "sometimes" keeps Google from knowing it's YOU doing the fake clicking, and making you do a captcha when clicking ads.

This only needs to be done when running the script.

At the end of the day they'll know the the clicks are fake regardless of how slow you take it. Not to mention the advertisers themselves will know as well when their ad gets 1,000,000 clicks but only 1,000 page views.

Nice try, kid.

Hasn't Firefox stopped supporting it now, putting it into 'Legacy'? Mine doesn't show AdVault or fake-revenue generated at all on any device.

>>139883376
if you want to use it, use the firefox ESR of a fork that supports xul still

>>139883376
ublock already have a webextension port, now we wait for adnau jews to update their version too, not like it matters, theres a lot of time before ff will drop support for current version

>>139862243
Adnauseum is malware. Palemoon was right to block it.

someone tell me why using vivaldi is bad. I'm in love with it senpai

>>139857141
make the advertisers to spend money in nothing. Google cannot sustain never ending litigation (nobody could).

>>139857775
Chrome is only fast because it analyzes your browsing patterns and preloads shit for you.

File: 1504115031170.jpg (82KB, 537x358px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 537x358px

google is on rampage >>>/g/62203595, we need to kill them before its too late

Technical question hypothetical, for those who understand this stuff. Apologies if it has been addressed, on vacation so not fully following the last 1.5 threads.

Opera has like 6-8 IP addresses for its VPN, could we get them all banned such that Google had to essentially literally ban Opera's entire VPN option??

>>139885316
How is this not at least violating some unfair competition regs

Holy shit Google is now just pure evil

>>139885575
Google won't ban them. If they ban them they will probably get sued by Opera.

>>139857141
What is google killer?
Opera user here.

>>139857141
FIREJAIL + w3m/lynx on 2g yes 32kb/s in shitty mountains.
Drinking vodka with realnium without javascript

>>139863065
lies
every thread on /pol/ is an autism thread

>>139885937
Does that encourage us to be obnoxious with our sleep/random times? Like 5000/5000? Anything short of getting captcha? Do we purposefully trigger captcha with like 50/50?

>>139886650
AdNauseam is a privacy tool that protects you from Google stalking.

It works by clicking on every ads, rather than blocking them. This obfuscates the user data secretly collected about you thereby protecting your privacy.

It also has a secondary effect of generating many clicks Google will have to refund to the advert placing companies, however this effect is not by design but simply a result of Google adopting a flawed model. The more people use AdNauseam, the more Google will have to refund, and the more exposed the flaws of the Google's advertising model to companies.

Metaphorically it is a privacy tool that protect and also attack.

>>139887759
Why do you want Captchas? You should avoid them

>>139887908
If we were purposefully trying to get all of the Opera VPN IPs banned...??

I am the one who made most of the keyword lists and did more testing of CodeFag's script than anyone except maybe him. Also, have the script running for 2 weeks while I am on vacation.

We gotta think how to systematically get them. Meaning, (((them))), meaning jewgle.

>>139889605
they wont ban by IP, all this would do is block opera users from google with capcha, what would make people switch from opera to something else, now what other browser is the most popular and has a working google?

>>139886650
Doesn't Opera have Chrome running underneath it now? If so I would look into a browser that doesn't have Chrome running as a backend. I would say Waterfox, Palemoon, and Brave(still in beta) would be better alternatives.

Also stop using Google and related serives. searx.me, duckduckgo, startpage, and Qwant for alternative search engines.

Protonmail for email

Adnauseam for adblocking (it also generates fake clicks for ads)

Decentraleyes as an added layer to prevent tracking (works great with AdNauseam)

>>139889605
I mean if you can get the whole Opera user base start getting Captchas, that would be some funny shit.

>>139857141
Do pale moon / ice fox spoof a browser agent similar to chrome or firefox? You would stand out like a sore thumb otherwise

>>139891043
Palemoon and icefox(Waterfox? Ice cat?) use Firefox as a backend so probably... If not you can get a plugin for it (they all support firefox plugins)

Palemoon is good for speed
Waterfox is good for privacy
Icecat is free as in freedom with firefox branding removed.

Hey guys, what about Netscape?

>>139892302
Netscape has built in adblocker you cannot disable so you can't use Adnauseam with it.