[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Was the USSR Socialist or Communist?

This is a red board which means that it's strictly for adults (Not Safe For Work content only). If you see any illegal content, please report it.

Thread replies: 22
Thread images: 11

File: USSR_logo.png (127KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
USSR_logo.png
127KB, 300x300px
Many debate whether the soviet union was socialist or communist.

>Did they have private property
>Was there ANYTHING owned by private industry
>What was the value of the family in the USSR (Family > State, or, Family < State)
>>
USSR was most definitely not communist and it wasn't entirely socialist either, it was pseudo-socialist.
>>
>>139793075
State capitalist
>>
File: IMG_1631.jpg (152KB, 1457x794px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1631.jpg
152KB, 1457x794px
Don't care - Red is red
Join anti-communist action to end leftist terrorism
>>
>>139793075
State Capitalist, because Communism doesn't work, and it has never existed, as soon as the ideology doesn't have an authoritarian govt to enforce it, it goes back to mans natural state.
>>
File: nimeton67161.png (2MB, 999x1283px) Image search: [Google]
nimeton67161.png
2MB, 999x1283px
>>139793075
neither, it was a failure
>>
It was a failure, that is all I can tell you.
>>
File: IMG_1666.jpg (125KB, 640x800px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1666.jpg
125KB, 640x800px
>>
File: IMG_1626.jpg (69KB, 800x787px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1626.jpg
69KB, 800x787px
>>
>>139793376
all "communist" governments devolve into state-capitalism because real communism is untryable. it defies human nature
>>
>>139793075

The Soviet Union was a Marxist-Socialist State, adhering to Marxist-Leninist Doctrine, ruled over by a Communist Party.

>>Did they have private property

Generally no, but there was personal property

>>Was there ANYTHING owned by private industry

4% of agriculture in the Soviet Union was privately owned (and that 4% output 30% of all agricultural output for the country in the 1980's).

>>What was the value of the family in the USSR (Family > State, or, Family < State)

The early Communist regime under Lenin and then Stalin attempted to supplant the family unit in favor of state control, but WW2 was a wake up call that all of their doctrine wasn't necessarily relevant. Family units become increasingly relevant in official Soviet discourse and propaganda.

Any other questions?
>>
>>139793075
It was retarded like you

sage
>>
File: 201855-21560.jpg (1MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]
201855-21560.jpg
1MB, 1680x1050px
>>
File: -497343.jpg (35KB, 590x350px) Image search: [Google]
-497343.jpg
35KB, 590x350px
>>
File: 1504092228403.jpg (424KB, 850x1230px) Image search: [Google]
1504092228403.jpg
424KB, 850x1230px
>>
>>139794970
>>139794990
>>139795042
D-DELETE THIS!
>>
File: 1430009766700.jpg (168KB, 900x684px) Image search: [Google]
1430009766700.jpg
168KB, 900x684px
>>139793075
They were Socialist because they did not have the surplus of refined goods and resources to live in a truly Communist society.

Communism is the end goal and Socialism is the transitory political structure. It is supposed to stem out of a mature Capitalist society where there is so much surplus that workers can be compensated with what they need (food, clothes, car, etc.) in the place of money. This of course is meant to happen unanimously as the workers become fed up with being exploited for their labor. This never actually happened as Lenin forced the conditions where the Russian Empire lacked them.

Socialism is (in Marx's writings) what comes immediately after a mature Capitalist society is overthrown by the Proletariat and utilizes the means of production and the resources therein to best achieve the surplus of necessary and luxury goods to allow for the Utopian system of Communism to step in.

Communism was never designed with the Russian Empire in mind, it was too backwards. In 1917 Imperial Russia lacked the industrial infrastructure necessary to support a truly Socialist society. The Soviets were working towards Communism, however they lacked EVERYTHING they needed to be Communist, or even really Socialist. The basically just built the shit they needed and called it Socialism.

From Stalin through Chernenko, the Soviet Union was more of an authoritarian state that functioned under the guise of being a "Socialist" society.

The Politburo ultimately answered to the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, i.e. Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev, Andropov, and Chernenko.

Tl;Dr - No, they were authoritarian, but they claimed to be Socialist. Socialism really hasn't been tried because it can't be.

t. I studied Soviet historian - I learned about my enemy and why they will always fail. Feels good nibba.
>>
File: 1442461750096.jpg (25KB, 458x418px) Image search: [Google]
1442461750096.jpg
25KB, 458x418px
>>139795352
>
I am a Soviet historian* I studied Socialism and Communism in college. Fuck I'm drunk and it's late here.
>>
File: 1503839845270.jpg (183KB, 481x320px) Image search: [Google]
1503839845270.jpg
183KB, 481x320px
>>139793075
Who cares fag it has been 'refined' by better jews then you and has proven over and over agin to never work

Now go read the federalist papers and stop being a nigger
>>
All I needed to know about the Soviet Union I learned in 1945.
>>
>>139793075
Socialist.
Even at the beginning, Vladimir Lenin realized his """Communist Utopia"""" would never come to be, so he enacted the NEP to allow SOME private enterprise; which in turn made it impossible for the state to be Communist, but a Socialist state with a very controlled economy and very few communist implementations, like collectivization of farms under Stalin.
>>
>>139795352
Interesting. What, if you could imagine, would be the difference between the USSR and western communist/socialist movements such as the communards if they ever took power? I imagine a more optimistic, less barbaric, but still insolvent society.
Thread posts: 22
Thread images: 11


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.