Which ethical system is correct?

>>139780342
Christianity.

Utilitarian

t. anglo

>>139781152
kek
>>139780536
isn't Christianity just deontological?

>>139780342
none, moral intuition>articulated system

>>139780342

Natural Law.

File: Chris+is+3rd+best+behind+benkei+for+me+i+mean+_a102ce21cef88614e23fba28b2129788(1).jpg (78KB, 799x599px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 799x599px

>>139780342
Utilitarianism
The ends justify the means

>>139784382
what does that even mean
>>139785560
So murder is ok in a certain context?

>>139786994
Yes you idiot point to any time in history where that's wrong? CONSEQUENTIALISM IS THE ONLY WAY

>>139787684
Sorry caps lock

>>139786994
>what does that even mean
"muh feels"

>>139780342
Combination of action and outcome

Where do you want to go? How do you get there?

>>139784479
I agree that natural law is important, but the problem with using it as your moral center is that as society advances technologically it becomes obfuscated heavily
the only way to avoid that is basically anarcho-primitivism, which is fucking retarded

>>139786994
Are you expecting us to say no?
Yes it's ok in certain contexts. Like in self-defense circumstances, or when defending the rights of your fellow man.

>>139784382
An institution can, and has, twisted around it's moral code for it's own benefit. Because the institution is run, and can be continuously altered, by man , it is by definition biased.
An articulated moral system cannot be altered in such a way.
And before you even say it,
yes, said articulated system can be ignored or applied in an unfair way.
But that's true of any moral system, ESPECIALLY a moral institution.