Post your best proof, some redpilling will be done.

>>139713493
fake news is just a meme.

There is no proof of fake news.

>>139713493
No one will post if you don't contribute yourself first.

File: IMG_20170831_185900.jpg (320KB, 1478x962px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 1478x962px

>>139713493
Cnn faking a situation where they saved a man on live television from flood waters

>>139713563
Yes there is, you fucking leaf.

>>139713493
I would but I don't give a fuck about CNN. Try pulling a JFK and replaying the video of Charlottesville and repeating brake lights and baseball bat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wi-lW2poE4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2SLzQXyFOg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kh3ngzbUeA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2G360HrSAs

File: CNNsBestFriends4.jpg (53KB, 395x538px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 395x538px

https://youtu.be/IdYRN8Clddw

>>139713628
Nothing wrong with this. Not fake.

>Reporter sees a man in trouble.
>I gotta save him
>Oh no, I'm wearing my favorite khaki shorts. It's light colored, don't want it to get dirty
>brb, I'll change, and wear my black pants instead. It's dark colored so it's pretty dirt-appropriate
>saves man

File: 0325.jpg (707KB, 1427x2040px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 1427x2040px

>>139713493
CNN has never proved fake news that they didn't later apologize for.
Find me just one time where CNN has lied. I don't mean being biased or telling a half truth (which is a problem for all news networks), but i mean straight-up lied.

File: Donna_Brazille-Debate_Questions_for_HRC_only.png (4MB, 1026x910px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1026x910px

While working for CNN, Donna Brazille sent questions planned for an upcoming Hillary v Bernie debate to Hillary's campaign manager, John Podesta. She did not send the questions to the Bernie campaign, only to the Hillary campaign.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/38478

File: 2017-07-25-moreCNNlying.jpg (135KB, 719x768px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 719x768px

CNN often plays fast and loose with language in order to forward a narrative, rather than to strive for journalistic accuracy.

In this example, it is clear from President Trump's tweet that he did not call AG Sessions weak. Rather, it is clear that President Trump stated that AG Sessions' position on a specific issue was weak. That is not a fine point, that is a very large and important point. It is exactly the sort of point that any so-called news organization - even one where its owners dislike the President - should strive to convey correctly in the interest of being real news rather than encourage the perception that they are pushers and creators of fake news.

CNN, as an organization, is either stupid and does not see the point or they do not care about the President's statement and so ignore the point. Whatever their reason, instead of being truthful they decide to "mine" the language he used to form a wholly new and erroneous point.

This sort of failure - yellow journalist writ large - is not acceptable in an organization that is expected to present facts to the public.

https://youtu.be/L5EbXOUCpGQ?t=33s
>>139713628

>>139716702
>Someones in danger
>Want to rescue
>Changes clothes first, maximum faggotry
Yeah, OK

You know there is usually an audio guy, producer, intern, etc with these crews, right?

They are all BEHIND the camera.

>>139713563
A FUCKING LEAFDRONE