Here's the daily views statistic for one of Anderson's vids on holocaust. Mind you, I don't deny the holocaust myself, that'd be illegal, but look at the effect the content warning has produced. When it was still normal it used to get a steady flow of views, probably from conservative Christians who watched this guy's sermons and stuff and wanted to see more from him. They would potentially get accidentally redpilled by this vid, but now there's a warning, which for a conservative person, especially if he's a tech-illiterate boomer, can be very deterring, and you can see the effect right away - the daily views have spectacularly decreased.
What this does is reinforce the notorious information bubbles, and you end up unable to propagate your ideas outside the group that already agrees with you. Even if you found an alternative video hosting it wouldn't matter, unless it's as popular as youtube is today, since all that would achieve is put those videos where only those already redpilled can find them. Same with spamming links to censored vids - only redpilled folk will proceed beyond the content warning.
Sadly I've no idea how man can fight this devilish trickery, but maybe you do.
Invade Poland and then kill another 2,000,000 jews
>>139698075
how to solve the censorship problem: make a forbiddentube website that only displays limited state videos, complete with like/dislike and comment secion
it will be like a punk website because you can go see all the edgy shit that youtube doesent want you to see -> redpill youth
>>139700257
There are already edgy sites like liveleak, but do they actually get huge viewership? I mean of course you would redpill some young people with an edgy version of youtube, but you'd think the numbers wouldn't ever be near what you could achieve using actual youtube, seeing just how huge it is.
>>139699916
Kek you're funny anon. We all know that didn't happen
https://pew.tube
Fuck SjwTibe