hey lolbertarians, refute this. pro tip: you can't

Refute what? Most libertarians I know, including myself, once considered themselves conservatives. Not exactly sure how anyone's views can shift straight from communist to libertarian.

>>139664540

>libertarian left

What does that even mean? What does 'left' even mean in this context? Socialist? Does it mean socialist? Because that is the furthest thing from libertarian.

There is no such thing as libertarian 'left'. It's as retarded as 'anarcho communist'. Who is going to enforce the redistribution?

I enjoy shit posting as much as the next Aussie, but this chart doesn't even make sense even before your arrows.

I don't undetstand what you're trying to say. I went from a liberal faggot in my teens to a Reagan fanboy to a libertarian.

File: 1343628164291.jpg (58KB, 674x640px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 674x640px

>>139666061

>>139664540
Huh? I eddied from classic liberalism to modern libertarian-ism and currently reside a scant few notches from the extreme economic right so what am I refuting exactly?

File: collectivist scum.jpg (165KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 960x960px

>>139666637
rothbard has more functional brain cells in one of his rotting toenails than you do in your entire skull if you believe that communism is in any way preferable to fascism or socialism. i think all collectivist ideologies are retarded, but your side of the explanation- both of the major movements which arose out of the debate once marx's predictions failed- has easily killed 10x as many people in the past century. i won't bore you with the details, but a LOT more people die under communism than under fascism or any other authoritarian collectivist movement.

it's time to stop: you're not impressing anyone

collectivism is retarded. if we don't have individual rights, we don't have any at all. the french- in Burke and Locke, mostly- seemed to figure this out (the hard way, i'll admit) hundreds of years ago. perhaps you missed the memo