QUANTITATIVE LOOK AT "BOTH SIDES"

File: data.jpg (164KB, 1119x707px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1119x707px

Sources are Goolag: Alt-Right vs Antifa: Search INTEREST vs Search RESULTS

NOTES: Despite public interest (via GoolagTrends) in Antifa overwhelming the interest in Alt-Right by several orders of magnitude (Trends averages interest at a ratio of "6" to "0"), resultant "product" displayed as fit for consumption is offered at a perversely inverse ratio of 6-7 to 1 against. I'd love to drill down into flagship MSM mentions but NYT Chronicle seems deactivated (http://nytlabs.com/projects/chronicle.html) and I'm not autistic enough to invent workarounds. A cursory glance on their sites shows however that both NYT & CNN have ZERO mention of even the word "Antifa" until Berkeley 2.0 circa 04/20/17, and even then only as a non-contextualized quote/mention from Trump supporters. lol. Actual coverage of the "concept" Antifa is only forced by Trump "both sides" controversy 08/15.

Also of note, despite MSM flooding of Alt-Right coverage, public INTEREST is absolutely not moved. Hillary's Alt-Right speech failed to move the needle anywhere close to Trump's Both-Sides. Hilariously, public search interest for the term peaked during post-election loss apocalyptic hysterics linked to Bannon.

Thanks to Trump's media savvy, Antifa is officially on the map to stay, and I believe the disparity quantified here should only improve over time.