ROMANS WERE BLACK

>>139630246
WUZ

>>139630320
KANGZ

>>139630246
0:26 seconds

Fuck this.

OPERATION: DIVERSITY

hey /pol/ we have all seen the massive and obvious historic revisionism going on, we need to divide those that preach it.

Examples:
Games such as Battlefield one, the new Call of duty, the new assasin's creed

Movie shows/even documentaries about the history such as: Dr. Who, Game of thrones (supposed fiction but oddly representative of Medieval Europe), History channel documentaries, Discovery Channel.

Our own history books/media: No more mention of whites ever being slaves or abolishing it before others, no mention of Hitlers love of islam or the approx 70k African soldiers and 400k Arabic muslims, 500k Balkan muslims. No mentions of Jewish influence in the development of basically every political and religious ideology. No mentions of genocides against whites (Moor invasion of Spain, Barbar slave trade, 1100 years of islamic expansion and agression, Byzantinium and Constantinople, The famines in Russia/Ukraine that were artificially created and killed 15 million), communism and America's hatred for communism not just geopolitics but genuine hate.


We need to analyze their goal wich is obvious.
1. Remove white identity
2. Remove the feelings of inferiority felt by less fortunate races.


Now the dividing part:
Why are holocaust victims still always depicted "White" in movies and docs, we need diversity in those roles so these comnunities get more income equality.

Also, we could let Commies become aware of just how many of the 1% are jewish and make them address some jewish dem about it, Bernie is so cucked he might genuinly redpill for us.

File: 13181662676.jpg (39KB, 700x535px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 700x535px

Thank you, this really makes me hate humanity even more. I think austria born politicians should go back in power in germany, this one particular fellow had a pretty good run. He even almost got rid of communism! That is something that even the americans can't do today!

1. There were African Roman Legionaire

2. This is 100% okay considering all the whitewashing you did in media and history prior to this decade

>>139630246
As long as its tokenish and/or explicitly referred to as African drawn men I wouldn't care. Roman did have black soldiers around, they were just rare especially as north as brittania.

>>139630515
Toothpaste is right.
We need diversity of Nazi guards and Auswitz prisoners.

We also need to make sure Jewish over-representation in media jobs is highlighted.

>>139630869
yes but just auxiliary? not actual legionaries

>>139630320
ROMUNZ

File: aU9JkAzTRruQF4qOWN0Yfw.png (26KB, 884x606px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 884x606px

>>139630246
Can't watch this in Burgerland.

>>139631141
change the "tube" in youtube to "pak", thank me later

>>139630246
Gibs to Caesar dat wut iz Caesars.

File: 430A84D100000578-4766466-image-m-8_1502093932699.jpg (23KB, 306x439px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 306x439px

W E W U Z R O M A N G Z
E

W
U
Z

R
O
M
A
N
G
Z

>>139630246
I'm black too

>>139631231
Neat, thanks.

>>139630246
POL: One black legionaire=WHITE GENOCIDE!!1!! Chill for fuck sake. If the patron saint of the Holy Roman Empire can be black so can one soldier in the armies of Rome.

>>139630246
the romans were about as much black as they were white, the were olive/brown skinned meds you autists, KANGZ tier whiteys

File: 1480293384936.gif (971KB, 360x205px) Image search: [Google]

971KB, 360x205px

>>139630839
Whitewashing? As in being accurate that shitskins were bystanders in the foundation of civilization and contributed fuck all in the big picture? That whitewashing?

>>139630839
Contradictory, get your shits together.

>>139630246
WE

>>139630246
Hope he breeds with a Celt xxx

>>139630246
that surprises you?
ave kangz n shiit

>>139631750
Nothing about that is contradictory retardo

>>139630839
I assume this has to be bait, but I'll bite:

>1. There were African Roman Legionaire
Source? As in Sub-Saharan? Doubt. And if, they weren't used outside of Northern-Africa.

>2. This is 100% okay considering all the whitewashing you did in media and history prior to this decade
White majority countries make movies for their own population portraying the heroes and main characters as white to apply more to the white audience? Come back when Kongolese film industry start portraying their ancient Kangz as white.

File: commodus.jpg (13KB, 700x327px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 700x327px

The only blacks in the Roman Empire were the black slaves taken from Africa

>>139631887
If there was black legionnaires you wouldn't have to say it's justice to blackwash history.

>>139630839
bit contradictory m8 ?

anyway, you've missed the point - its completely unnecessary, the Romans were mostly from Southern Europe so represent them that way

>>139630246
never heard of this, looks kinda cool

also the Roman Empire wasn't a white supremacist empire, especially later on, The Roman Army was made up of a lot of non-'roman' auxiliaries, from germanic whites to black africans.
Literally nothing to get angry about, kys.

/pol/acks believe Jesus was white so I'm honestly not surprised this thread exists.

Why always West African coonz? There are twice as many Indians/Pakis in the UK as there are blacks. Why the fetishization of the BBC so much?

>>139632143
are you just trolling or actually that retarded?
he is wearing the lorica segmentata, which means by definition he can't be a fucking auxiliary because it was only worn by legionaries

>>139632143
This. These fucks see what black dude and lose their shit for no reason.

>>139632539
we wuz kangz n sheit nigga

>>139632143
>black africans
Not in Britain. Besides, black legionaires were Ethiopians, not Bantous, they appeared centuries later and never went so far.

>>139630246
If this were true, would not "black Romans" have neanderthal dna?

File: Screenshot_20170830-203104.png (2MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1080x1920px

Das raite we ave olveiz been black kangz ma nigga

File: Roman_Empire_Trajan_117AD.png (357KB, 2534x1540px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 2534x1540px

>>139630246
at least some of them

Why are Bongs so obsessed with Rome
How many movies and tv shows have they made about it?

>>139633430
There's no black populations on this map.

>>139630839
Two wrongs dont make a right. Also,

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtPZhDH4QU8

File: Races2.jpg (91KB, 972x402px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 972x402px

>>139630515
the new assassins creed isn't blackwashing you dumb kanker, the egyptians were actually caramel colored people, although they werent coons

left to right is;
4 Libyans
a Nubian
an asiatic (levant)
and an Egyptian

File: 1504115313190.png (2MB, 800x3857px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 800x3857px

>>139633703
how many have they blackwashed?

>>139630246
Why do they always feel like they have to put shitty music in these traielrs.

>>139633817
Well now in 2017 there is...

File: 1452458925725.jpg (31KB, 449x546px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 449x546px

Why does anyone deny that some Romans would have been black? The Roman empire was a melting pot and people ended up all over the place. As far as we can tell they made no big deal about race just as they didn't about sexuality. Near where i live thwere was a unit of men from the river Tigris in what is now Iraq who supplied Roman Army units stationed on Hadrian's Wall. Guys came from Syria, Spain, Germany, North Africa, wherever. SJWs are actually right on this one.

>>139633703
Their Aristocracy thinks they are somehow the successors to the Roman Empire.

>>139633817
Last time I visited Paris there was no lack of black.

>>139632013
>Source? As in Sub-Saharan? Doubt.
Rome literally had legionaires from everywhere in their empire. Military service was a method for barbarians in conquered provinces to become Roman citizens.

>And if, they weren't used outside of Northern-Africa.
They frequently shipped their soldiers to places far from where they were from, probably to avoid conflicting loyalties.

>>139634452
To be clear, I'm not denying that there's been massive retarded diversity pushes in media that wind up being completely ahistoric, but this simply isn't one of those cases.

>>139633703
Think we see ourselves in them to some extent. Anyway, Hollywood always cast English actors as Romans until recently. In The Eagle they were played by yanks which was clearly a commentary on the US today and its imperial overstretch.

>>139634021

It is blackwashing when you try to portray a era which had almost no blacks as african.

They were overwhelming minorities in what was essentially a greek-dominated area.

>>139634159
Subsaharan Africa was seperated by something known as the Sahara Desert, and the Roman Empire only owned coastal areas of North Africa (which had pheonicians, which most certainely weren't black)

>>139634452
>>139630839
This is bait, but
>Sub-Saharan Africans
>legionaries
More like auxiliaries you dumb fuck.

File: 1499140304761.jpg (94KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 640x640px

>>139630246
DAS RITE WHITE BOI

>>139632143
Phagót
There were never actual niggers

>>139635174
While the Romans did not occupy black African lands there would have been a lot of movement of people around the periphery, Blacks would be far from unknown and there was no particular colour bar. If a Gaul or Syrian could make it in the Roman Empire and become Romanised so could a Nubian.

>>139634159
>The Roman empire was a melting pot and people ended up all over the place.
No. Black people were very few in the whole empire, and people rarely travelled, it was not a melting pot.

File: 1500791555611.jpg (118KB, 739x709px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 739x709px

BBC is really pushing this shit. First to kids. now doctor fag

>>139635450
>that fucking vice piece.

It's like they deliberately sent the most effeminate, cuck looking white guy they could find just to make the comparison as crazy as possible

File: cor-deo01s.jpg (56KB, 742x525px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 742x525px

>>139632019
actually there were mercenaries hired from sudan, but werent allowed to go freely to the empire, egyptians called themselves black people because south africans weren't consider people or humans at that time.

File: 29047857406735607.png (372KB, 574x356px) Image search: [Google]

372KB, 574x356px

That's almost as ridiculous as pushing this slide garbage instead of

THIS ----->

>>139630577
>>139630577
>>139630577

>>139634452
Source that they had Sub-Saharan legionaires. It's highly unlikely not only because of geography, but I do also doubt they would use Sub-Saharans in any legion because of racism. I'm 100% sure that even if the Romans looked down upon Germanics, they would absolutely despise Sub-Saharans.

>They frequently shipped their soldiers to places far from where they were from, probably to avoid conflicting loyalties.
Source that they shipped Sub-Saharans over to Britain. Source on even some credible speculation that they did - there is none.

>>139634550
You honestly believed there were Sub-Saharans in Britian during the Roman rule?

>>139633703
Rome ruled Britain for near 400 years. It played a large part in shaping its culture and spreading Chritianity across Europe.
I think a lot of historians are Romophiles tho. Like they've read the roman accounts of how they brought civilisation to the savages and just taken it as read.

File: 1482226430870.jpg (33KB, 720x694px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 720x694px

>>139630246

>walking around the public gardens of Roma heading to the forum to attend a congregation of the plebs, get assaulted by JAEQVNVS TVRONVS

>>139630246
>whites spend hundreds of years genociding blacks in africa and taking all their resources
>they get assblasted when theres a black roman soldier (which there were)

>>139636904
Source

And source that they were in Britain

>>139636904

Blacks have killed far more blacks than whites ever did.

no such thing as a non-roman legionaire.
they used lots of celtic, germanic, thrakic etc.auxialiary troops though. possible that they had negro auxiliaries in north africa.

>>139636340
>It's highly unlikely not only because of geography, but I do also doubt they would use Sub-Saharans in any legion because of racism
Romans used foreigner auxilary units extensively in army (numidian cavalry etc.). So it isn't far fetched to say that some non-european auxilaries might have been in Britain. Not legionnaires of course.

I don't think Romans were in fact racist. They were xenophobic sure, but would they regard sub-saharans less than other "barbarians"? I don't think so.

>>139636904
>which there were
Not at this place and at this time, and not subsaharan blacks.

>>139630246
They removed it in Burgerland because all the WE posters.

>>139636904
>blacks butthurt that we used resources they never comprehended were useful
also blacks
>we wuz aintshint egipchians an shied we build da pieramids an shied

>>139636340
There's documentaty evidence that a unit in Northern England came from Mesopotamia. The Ninth Legion that got BTFO when they marched byond the wall was the Ninth Hispana - Spanish. German troops swam over the river Thames in full armour to ambush the Britons during Caesaer's invasion of Britian. A lot of people moved around a lot. Especially soldiers and merchants.

>>139636904
Why would we kill our biggest associates on the slavery biz? The tribes sold their fellow blacks cheap.

Also, South Africa, desu.

>>139637639
>numidian cavalry
Berbers. Not Sub-Saharan.

>so it isn't far fetched to say that some non-european auxilaries might have been in Britain.
HUGE difference between Berbers and Sub-Saharan Africans. It's far fetch to claim that there were one single Sub-Saharan African in Britian as a soldier.

>I don't think Romans were in fact racist.
>They were xenophobic sure, but would they regard sub-saharans less than other "barbarians"? I don't think so.
Of course they would. It would be obvious to them that 95% of the Sub-Saharans were incredibly dumb aswell as looking very different from themselves. It's natural to be racist, why wouldn't the Romans be?

Unless someone provides me with a source that there were black (sub-saharan) soldiers in Britian, there weren't any. It's not likely no matter how much you liberal history teacher wants it to be true.

>>139637074
There was a barber legion at adrian's wall. I think that's the only one known tho.
They liked using soldiers from different areas so they weren't loyal to the locals.

>>139637957
>Mesopotamia
>Sub-Saharan Africa

>Spain
>Sub-Saharan Africa

>Germany
>Sub-Saharan Africa

>>139638696
>Berbers
>Sub-Saharan Africa

>>139638757
Exactly.

>>139639002
Exactly what?

The claim is that there were Sub-Saharans Legionaires in Britian. Which didn't exist, probably nowhere. Another claim is that there were Sub-Saharan soldiers at all in Britian, which is HIGHLY unlikely and far-fetched.

Do you divide humanity into "White" and "minority"? Simply "not white" isn't the same as sub-Saharan Africans at all.

>>139639002
Berbers never went south of the Sahara. They are north Africans.

every 60 seconds in africa, a minute passes
this needs to be stopped

>>139630246
NOS

>>139639832
ERAMUS

>>139639876
REGES

>>139630246
Niggimus Noggimus

>>139630246
I imagine that this will worsen relations with italy.

>>139639706
Are you Berber? If you are, what do you feel about liberals lumping you together with Sub-Saharans?

File: 123.jpg (39KB, 392x336px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 392x336px

Julius Obongo

>>139630246
WE WUZ ROMUNS N SHHHHIIIEEEETTT

>>139638542
>Of course they would. It would be obvious to them that 95% of the Sub-Saharans were incredibly dumb aswell as looking very different from themselves. It's natural to be racist, why wouldn't the Romans be?
They held all non-Romans as vastly inferior to themselves but yet they still used them in army as auxilaries, so I don't think it would be a problem.
>It's far fetch to claim that there were one single Sub-Saharan African in Britian as a soldier.
Yes, but it's still possible some nubians in let's say mostly egyptian auxilary might have existed and Romans did have a tendency to move their auxilaries far from home. It's highly unlikely but not completely impossible. I doubt there's any actual proof though, so outside of speculation nobody can claim it happened.

lol @ the uk

what a fucking shit hole

File: 1488593177800.jpg (3KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 125x125px

>>139630246
>no one outside of cuckistan can view this video
lmao Big black cock BBC is so embarrassed by what they're doing that they don't want the whole world making fun of them lmao

UKucks, why the hell do you let your state broadcaster get away with this shit?

The YouTube comments are pretty /pol/ and /tv/

>>139640909
It's on Sky, a commercial broadcaster.

>>139640176
>Are you Berber?
lol, there must be very few Berbers in France.

>>139641533
>there must be very few Berbers in France.
How? Half of your population is algerian.

>>139640293
>They held all non-Romans as vastly inferior to themselves
False. Culturally, yes. Racially I am 100% certain they valued Sub-Saharans far below anyone else like every human on this planet did until we met Abbos.

>Yes, but it's still possible
That's not the point here. It's possible that there was a blonde blue eyed Kang in Kongo too. Likely? No.

Portraying a Roman Legionaire in a "historical" TV-series or whatever this shit is, is just wrong. It's unhistorical and ideologically motivated. Just like when they had a fucking Chinese woman in "Vikings". Of course it is possible, but it's very unlikely, and unless there actually is an historic example, it's unhistorical.

WE WUZ LEGIONEERZ AND SHEEEIT
REPLY

>>139641823
Yeah I know. They are millions.

>>139641823
kek

>>139632143
>nigger wearing lorica segmentata
>being in the Auxiliae

pick one

>>139637639
numidians were berbers, you are mixing them with Nubians

>>139630246
One token nigger is hardly erasure. It's plausible enough to consider they did exist, just that they were not the norm. I'm not trying to defend the KANGZ, but I'll probably end up watching this.

>>139643307
It's just unlikely that there were a Sub-Saharan African in Britain at all. It would be wrong even if he was portrayed as an auxiliary. It's unlikely that there was black auxiliarians at all reall that weren't Nubians/Ethiopians.

I dont see the problem. Brits are niggers.

Why do they keep putting Argentinians in this kind of movies?

>>139644312
>It's plausible enough to consider they did exist
Actually it isn't. Holy fuck there is so many of you in this thread that think this is acceptable/defendable. Are you paid by BBC? What is it?

There weren't sub-Saharans in Britain. It's so unlikely. Have you watched Vikings? You probably thought the Chinese woman was "plausible enough" too.

It's not at all plausible "enough". I will probably too end up watching this by torrent, that's not the point.

>>139643307

Trajan's column depicts a kind of thematic design that did not exist in reality. Actual archaeological evidence points to the continued use of mail or scale by the legionaries and use of Segmentata by the Auxiliae. In general ideas of uniformality beyond a particular color of clothing is really unlikely in pre-industrial times. As late as the Napoleonic War you had soldiers wearing polygots of panoply.

>>139644312
you know very well why kikes put a nigger in there, and it's not about plausibility or historical accuracy, even though it's unlikely but possible.
they're pushing
>WE WUZ ALWAYS THERE N SHIT

>>139642262
>Portraying a Roman Legionaire in a "historical"
I'm not talking about legionnaires, it's obviously completely impossible. Just saying that they would have a leg to stand on (since they're claiming to be historical or some meme) if they portrayed him as nubian auxilary in a seperate regiment, not as a fully fledged roman in lorica segmenta. That's at least 5% probability and not 0%

>>139638707
What I'm saying is that people came from all over Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Blacks were not magically excluded from this. The Romans were pretty certainly less racist than we are. To them it was "Romans" and "barbarians" rather than race-based.

>>139644981
its required by american law.

>>139644443
Exactly while there would've Nubians in the Auxiliae having them in Britain is pretty fucking farfetched, Nubian and Ethiopia auxiliaes were most likely used in north africa and the middle east at most with all the proxy wars against Parthians and Sassanids

>>139645067
Rome never controlled sub saharan africa you clown. How are they raising soldiers from there?

>>139644992
More like 0,1% probability. And not as a soldier, but as a slave. If you are going to make it historical, you simply don't have Sub-Saharans in Britain at all. It's not about it being possible or not, it's about that they claim to be historical and then portray a Sub-Saharan as a Roman soldier, which isn't historical because it's so unlikely that unless there is a historic example, it simply isn't history.

It's 100% ideologically motivated to have a sub-Saharan in that show.

>>139644981
You're right. But I've lost the will to care at this point, I'm just glad the rest of the cast isn't multicultural, but this is not going to stop and they'll just keep doing it more and more until next they do a fantasy drama about Samurai only with token Indians and Africans and fuck knows what.
At least I can still tell myself that it's not categorically impossible, but that line is going to get crossed real soon.

>>139645067
the only plausible blacks that could've been in the Auxiliae were Nubians and Ethiopians and sure as hell Rome wasn't going to ferry an auxiliae from the middle of nowhere to Britain, if they had a full official Legion of Nubians (also unlikely as hell) maybe it could happen but Nubia wasn't part of the Empire anyways

>>139645067

Legit question, are you retarded? Romans less racist?

Dude they would murder people of gallic and german descent just for having moustaches.. Have you read ANY roman historian whatsoever?

>>139630839
>African legionaires
North Africans 200 years ago were Berbers, not sub Saharan Africans. Closer to Arabs.

File: 1503683382414.png (806KB, 2000x1800px) Image search: [Google]

806KB, 2000x1800px

>>139630839

1. Romans conquered and slaved nubians. Yugurta was a tremendous faggot.
2. Gas the kikes who are spreading these lies

MEMENTO MORI, FAGGOTUM

>>139645067
Huge fucking difference between Germanics/Berbers and fucking Sub-Saharans mate. Genetically and culturally.

The Romans were just as racist as we are. That they weren't is a liberal meme. But ok, for argument's sake, the cultural differences between non-Nubian/Ethiopian Sub-Saharan blacks and Berbers/Germanics/Romans etc. was HUGE. You can with 100% certainty say that the average Roman would look much more down upon a Sub-Sahran than a German or Berber.

File: ALL SIDES.jpg (524KB, 886x1002px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 886x1002px

>>139630246
WE CRUCIFIED JESUS N SHIETT

>>139645785
Don't pay for these shows when they do this. Torrent them.

File: 1491485083814[1].jpg (104KB, 792x528px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 792x528px

>>139634021
Y'ALL WERE DICKWASHERS

>WE

>WUZ

>LEGIONNAIRES

>N

>SHIET

this jew meme needs to die already

Combined data from two large mtDNA studies provides an estimate of non-Caucasoid maternal ancestry in Italians. The first study sampled 411 Italians from all over the country and found five South Asian M and East Asian D sequences (1.2%) and eight sub-Saharan African L sequences (1.9%). The second study sampled 465 Sicilians and detected ten M sequences (2.2%) and three L sequences (0.65%). This makes a total of 3% non-white maternal admixture (1.3% Asian and 1.7% African), which is very low and typical for European populations, since Pliss et al. 2005, e.g., observed 1.8% Asian admixture in Poles and 1.2% African admixture in Germans."
"
Similar data from the Y-chromosome reveals Italians' even lower non-Caucasoid paternal admixture. Both studies obtained samples from all over the mainland and islands. No Asian DNA was detected anywhere, but a single sub-Saharan African E(xE3b) sequence was found in the first study's sample of 416 (0.2%), and six were observed in the second study's sample of 746 (0.8%). The total is therefore a minuscule 0.6%, which decreases to 0.4% if only Southern Italians are considered and 0% if only Sicilians are considered. Again, these are normal levels of admixture for European populations (e.g. Austrians were found to have 0.8% E(xE3b) by Brion et al. 2004)."

>>139646443
I always do, it's good advice in general.

>>139646960
""The proportion of blacks in the population of Roman Italy is, however, most unlikely to have been as high as in eighteenth century Britain (where the number of blacks has been estimated at between 20,000 and 30,000), even when one allows for exaggeration in the British figures and also subtracts from these figures a considerable number of so-called blacks whom no Roman would perceive as falling within the category Aethiops."
"The average recorded age at death for the slaves of the city of Rome was extraordinarily low: seventeen and a half years (17.2 for males; 17.9 for females)."
"However, one piece of negative evidence...provides an intriguing hint that conventional estimates of slaves making up as much as 40 percent of Italy's population by the late first century B.C. may be far too high. An analysis of the genetic makeup of Italy's modern population argues that the various distinctive genetic combinations currently found in different regions within the peninsula by and large track the linguistic distribution that resulted from the migrations of the Iron Age. No data indicate the subsequent large-scale infusion of new genetic material into the populations of these regions except in the case of southern Italy and eastern Sicily, which is explained by the well-documented Greek migrations there. ... But if a population of 3 million slaves, representing as much as 40 percent of Italy's inhabitants in the first century B.C., was successfully reproducing itself, it would surely have left its mark on the genetic makeup of contemporary Italians. That it did not argues strongly for a very low rate of natural reproduction among Italy's slaves, which in turn is difficult to reconcile with the hypothesis that the number of slaves ever grew large enough to comprise 40 percent of the Italian population."

No niggers pls. This has got to stop.

The Romans kept track of their history and from everything I've read there is no depiction or mention of Black Africans in any Roman texts by Tacitus, Seutonius, Livy, ect.
I know for a fact that there were never any dindu Legionnaires. Recruitment for the Legions was very strict, most being built up from a single location within the heart of the Empire. Auxiliaries don't count, they are basically slave soldiers at the end of the day.

>>139636760
SALVE JAEQVNVS TVRONVS!

Literally any faggot come at me.
debate me on this
niggers weren't even remotely involved in ancient Rome, ever.

File: lmao.png (51KB, 364x896px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 364x896px

LOOK AT THE COMMENTS, PURE GOLD

Towards the end of the Roman Empire a majority of the military personnel/officers, soldiers and generals were Germanic. So it'd be more historically correct to see Germans in the role of soldiers overall.

File: be3f137d1d293602d4a038a9aa71dca2--egyptian-fashion-the-egyptian.jpg (107KB, 736x894px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 736x894px

>>139646607
That's a scene depicting circumcision

>>139630246
I fucking hate brits so much, goddamnit

File: 1280px-Periplous_of_the_Erythraean_Sea.svg.png (1MB, 1280x903px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x903px

>>139630839
Greco-Romans went to the horn of Africa.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periplus_of_the_Erythraean_Sea

>>139630246
Are you fucking kidding me?
It was already debunked that Jesus truly was pretty pale (Syrian-ruling-class-level white), and Romans (except for their hired mercenaries, which didn't wear Roman gear) were whiter than Jesus.

>>139644855
You're talking out of your asshole, there has never been anything to suggest the shit you're spewing forth. The auxilia wearing segmentata while legionaries wear mail, are you fucking high?

>>139649542
And got out-breeded there

>>139650725

Jesus christ this burger is dumb

>>139650326
I dont understand what the point of this reply is?

>>139651232
Horn of Africa =/= honorary Mediterraneans

File: gLEIgHZ.gif (906KB, 517x285px) Image search: [Google]

906KB, 517x285px

>>139646960
>>139647063
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-1809.2003.00007.x/full
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929707643663
http://www.cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002-9297(07)64365-1
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-1809.2003.00039.x/full

>>139649200
It looks like a circumcision to you?

File: 8e8a570771a4bb2a7bfda2056dab3132.jpg (183KB, 700x961px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 700x961px

>>139652214
Yes, it does and it is, that picture is in a lot of sites talking about ancient egyptian circumcision, I have no idea of where the dickwasher meme came from.

>>139650725
Are you seriously implying that fucking Agrippina, mother of Caligula was fucking black? Seriously?

>>139630246
can't watch in us.

>>139633703
My town is Roman, there is more evidence of the Romans here than there is in most parts of Italy.

I dont even like the Romans, they were cunts, but im not black so im not gong to chimp out and pull down 2000 year history

>>139652880
No it's not and it's not dickwashing either. It's epilation.

Does anyone here read Simon Scarrow?

File: 1502037463373.jpg (89KB, 621x668px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 621x668px

>>139636904
You got any source whatsoever that SUB-SAHARAN Africans were in the roman military?
Because the Romans sure as shit never controlled any part of sub Saharan Africa

File: 1503608147095.jpg (50KB, 720x691px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 720x691px

>WE WUZ ROMANS
this has to be the most anachronistic shit i've ever seen

The black legionnaire is probably just some token black dude to make things exotic. Probably was freed from slavery and joined up, or was pulled from the auxilia or some other shit.

It's not the first time historical shows have done this. Didn't Ragnar have some Chink slave in Vikings?

It's not a huge deal anyways judging that he's decapitated in the end of the trailer. Even the Picts or whatever shitters they are knew that around blacks, never relax.

>>139630246
I hope the day comes soon when all the people responsible for this revisionist history hang. Disgusting.

File: “blacklove”.jpg (109KB, 892x480px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 892x480px

>>139652938
The picture is probably from the notorious afrocentric site Realhistoryww
>>139653220
Are there any sources on that?

>>139653718
well they did have a small number of them from the frontier in Africa, but their numbers were so low within the Empire that they rarely would have been in the military or as far north as Britain.
And saying rarely here is being very generous

>>139653871
>Are there any sources on that?
No. The hieroglyphs are nebulous. We can only judge by the drawing itself, and what we see are bald pubis, gestures not focused on the the tip of the penis, and tools far more appropriate for epilation than circumcision. Egyptians were known for their habit to remove hairs.

File: 1503723002326.jpg (14KB, 341x294px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 341x294px

>>139630839
Post your sauce for that informations?

>>139656222
Checked
There weren't any
there is no sauce

>>139630246
>Glorious painted celts resisting shitskin roman conquerors
I'm fine with this. Pre-roman britons don't get enough media.

>>139637957
It wasn't German troops. The specialized amphibious troops were a Dutch unit as far as I am aware.

>>139645931
They also detested economic migrants.

Caesar killed an entire tribe in Gaul for migrating outside their territory. Women, children, men, the lot.

File: Taleb_mug.jpg (128KB, 793x776px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 793x776px

>>139630246
mfw

>>139639701
Are you a fucking mong?
Does someone else have to wipe your shitty arse after you shit in your pants?

There's evidence of berbers, not niggers.