Net Neutrality Proven Titanically Stupid By Net Neutrality’s

>>139624413
We less government types find Net Neutrality and Title II to be titanically stupid for at least two reasons. It is antithetical to the Constitution and to even a rudimentary understanding of economics. Constitution: Net Neutrality is a blatant assault on at least the First and Fourth Amendments. First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Fourth Amendment: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The ISPs have spent more than $1 trillion building their networks. They are thus their networks. They can assemble said networks any way they wish (First Amendment) - completely free from government interference or imposition.

File: 1491420525129.gif (4KB, 452x523px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 452x523px

>>139624413
>>139624464

>>139624464
Net Neutrality is the government mandating how ISPs will assemble people upon their networks. A First Amendment no bueno. And certainly with the Title II imposition, the government is executing a massive, unreasonable, unwarranted seizure of ISPs $1+ trillion worth of private property. A Fourth Amendment no bueno. Economics: Net Neutrality bans all sorts of normal business practices in which every other business on the planet engages all the time. The government Post Office charges you different prices for different speeds of delivery. But Net Neutrality is the government - prohibiting ISPs from charging different prices for different speeds of delivery. No hypocrisy there.

And, of course, businesses everywhere charge different prices for differentiated levels of service. And, of course, you would very much like your eye surgeon to be able to purchase a faster, dedicated, uninterruptible Web connection in preparation for his taking a laser to your optical orbs. Net Neutrality is simply bizarre, anti-Reality policy. And, of course, every single Net Neutrality advocate engages in exactly the sort of business practices and avails himself of the exact same Constitutional freedoms - which he wants to have the government ban for ISPs.

File: IMG_0017.jpg (23KB, 453x557px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 453x557px

>>139624413
>>139624464
>>139624530

>>139624530
Online retail titan Amazon is a huge Net Neutrality proponent. Let’s leave aside the crony fact that they use a ton of bandwidth - and Net Neutrality prohibits ISPs from charging them for it. When you order products from Amazon you can choose at least three different delivery speeds, which the Net Neutrality they champion prohibits ISPs from doing. Web domain giant GoDaddy is a huge Net Neutrality proponent. They cancelled the domain name of a white supremacist website. I.e., GoDaddy is assembling their private business exactly the way they wish - completely free from government interference or imposition, which the Net Neutrality they champion prohibits ISPs from doing. Google is the king of the Internet. They are a nearly $1 trillion business - all by their onesies. Three-quarters of all U.S. Internet searches are conducted through Google. Like Amazon, Google too crony benefits from Net Neutrality’s ban on ISPs charging them for their massive bandwidth consumption. Like GoDaddy, Google banned the same white supremacist domain name when it was registered with Google. This is Google, like GoDaddy, assembling their private business any way they wish - completely free from government interference or imposition, which the Net Neutrality they champion prohibits ISPs from doing.

>>139624605
Google also recently fired engineer James Damore after Damore’s private memo about Google’s diversity (or lack thereof) was leaked to the public. Google is perfectly within their rights to do this. As they continue to work to assemble their private business any way they wish - completely free from government interference or imposition. But the Net Neutrality they champion prohibits ISPs from doing exactly the same thing. Net Neutrality is titanically stupid policy. In no small part because it clearly violates the Constitution - and the very basic laws of very basic economics. All of which explains why the Left are such huge fans thereof.

https://web.archive.org/web/20170829040249/https://townhall.com/columnists/setonmotley/2017/08/28/net-neutrality-proven-titanically-stupid-by-net-neutralitys-proponents-n2374192

>>139624413
PSA for the dummies: NN is just a push from content providers for a socialist price regulation framework to protect their profit line, nothing more nothing less

All you need to know: http://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2017/05/18/the_ugly_truth_about_obamas_net_neutrality_110247.html

We aren't falling for it, juden. No real person supports ending net neutrality.

>>139624413
>For instance, emails from Nigerian princes - deserve equal access to you as does a doctor performing your remote, online Lasik eye surgery. If that causes your surgeon’s connection to buffer and stall - well that’s just too bad. You didn’t want to read those Nigerian prince emails anyway.

>implying I don't want to forge alliances with royalty

>>139624811
I think it doesn't matter anymore, nothing helps against the Jews, especially no law and order, desu

>>139625176
>Google is more equal than ISPs
I don't know, your way sounds pretty jewish too.

Yeah but a bunch of YouTube personalities told me that Net Neutrality was good. They didn't cite any specific legal provisions to back up their claims but they looked very sincere. So without actually looking into the issue with a critical eye I have no choice but to stand by Net Neutrality.

File: 1503289560065.png (395KB, 553x691px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 553x691px

>>139624413
>>139624464
>>139624530
>>139624605
>>139624667

tl;dr, an ISP should be able to shut down your accounts or block access to your websites if they disagree with your political views.

>>139624413
>>139624464
How can so much retardation fit in a single skull?

>>139624413
fucking bate, saged

>>139624811

>NN pushed by the content creators to fuck everyone
>NN decried by the ISP so they can fuck everyone

WHERE IS THE FREE MARKET OPTION? WHERE DO WE NOT GET FUCKED?

How about the government lays fiber everywhere we pay for it then let private companies compete to provide service on it?