Repill me on globilization /pol/, just sat through a sociology

Both are wrong

File: 1502125799110.jpg (2MB, 3000x3912px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3000x3912px

>>139611825
>globalisation is unstoppable
Only if you allow it to be.
>necessary
Only if you allow it to be.

The logic of globalisation is with integrated networks countries and corporations will be more efficient in meeting supply and demand and in doing so drive down costs of production and compliance resulting in savings that should deliver cheaper goods and jobs for everyone. However the reality of this is the very opposite.

1) savings achieved are never passed on to consumers
2) jobs created are actually jobs taken from elsewhere because the cost benefit says so
3) businesses operate for profit any otherwise they're called charities, thus in an unrestricted competitive global economy, businesses unburdened by sophisticated national laws that govern workers rights, consumer rights and product safety, can entertain a business model that would otherwise be illegal had it stayed in its original country
4) the world trade organisation has a demonstrated history of failing to negotiate equitably for all economic participants specifically in rapidly deregulating high tech industrial and manufacturing goods to export to third world countries but dragging their feet on agricultural trade liberalisation specifically when agriculture contributes far more to economies of poorer countries.
5) In opening its doors to trade liberalisation, several countries suffered severe food price distortions because multinationals had driven out domestic agircultural competition through dumping practices. As a result food prices spiked due to rising costs of production from the scarcity of fertiliser and fears of food security in wealthier nations. This resulted in food riots in the early 2000s.

There Ive done your homework for you.

>>139611825
Jews push it relentlessly, that should tell you enough.

>>139611825
>to "make the playong field for countries equal"
to be read empower the jews

>>139616322
Tell me anon, if the major first world countries were to change from a highly globalized first world countries to a much more nationalistic and less economically liberal do you think our economies would be better off?

>>139611825
Its just communism, bro.

>>139617743
In the same vain, ask yourself, if the GDP the end all be of a nation?

>>139611825
Well to get globalization working. We need all the immigrants to quit trying to move

>>139611825
Globalization is inevitable yes, it will happen.

But the question is what kind of global order, what are the rules and who calls the shots? If whites want to survive this century, the current Jew world order must be opposed.

File: 1502687169097.jpg (59KB, 600x338px)

59KB, 600x338px

>>139611825
Globalization only makes the playing field equal for the elites in each country.
The point of it is that an independent country has to be self sufficient. It's people can do what they want and think what they want and be what they want, for the most part. ('they' meaning the collective unconscious and prevailing social norms of their culture, I'm not saying all individuals will be totally free)
(((globalists))) don't want these closed systems, they want the global economy to expand. And these (((globalists))) who push so hard are usually the ones who stand to profit from that, what a surprise.
When a country is globalized, high tech countries become ever more gentrified, and jobs become more and more scarce, while developing countries find their development slowing down, as profiteers realize what a massive amount of money they can make by devoting all of the country's resources to production and export. The common folk in both countries suffer as a result - export focused countries deal with ever worsening pollution, living standards that never increase no matter how industrialized their nation becomes because it's all devoted to making cheap products, and constant inflation from the foreign money pouring in means every worker will have to work themselves to death all the way through old age because saving for retirement is impossible - that amount of money will be worthless in ten years.
The high tech countries meanwhile find their job markets utterly saturated, to the point that even the highest educated young people will never find any work, postings only becoming open as old people retire and the queue is shuffled up a row, leaving the tantalizing position of some kind of barely paid lab assistant open, with the promise that in 20 years you might end up promoted to something you could own your own house on (except the fact that your debt is only getting worse and worse this whole time).

>>139611825
Globalization is pushed by megacorps so they have an endless stream of cheap labor. Thats the ONLY reason behind it

>>139618197
Globalization is not inevitable, and it should not happen. It does not benefit the people in any way. International cooperation is fine. We can all visit each other and communicate over the internet, and export and import luxury goods at high prices, the way things have always been until the 19th-20th century fucked the whole human race.
Countries should strive for economic independence, because the last time I checked, "dependent" was an antonym of "free". With economic independence, you won't get things like global recessions, countries being so covered in factories that the air becomes toxic, and countries like ours that are stricken by debt and inflation where the elderly die because they can't afford to heat their homes, despite living in a country that has an enormous excess of every useful natural resource you can think of.

OP here so would you guys consider the push for diversity a factor, symptom or a method towards the goal of globalization and even if a country is diverse how would that even change the control that (((globalists))) have over the population, would it be easier to just control population of a country, i mean look at sweden there's large groups who wholeheartedly agree with the ideas of globalization so why try to replace them with mudslimes and africans? Is it because the native swedes will try to protest to keep their rights as citizens?

File: joker_this.gif (446KB, 300x186px)

446KB, 300x186px

>>139618291
But anon, wat do?

>>139619055
Immigrants are a useful combination of desperate and gullible. Locals, OTOH, feel entitled to their savings and whatnot.

>>139619055
Destruction of the economy of the nation. there is a reason that the majority of invaders is aimed at heavily socialist countries.

>>139618739
Globalization will happen... technology makes distances shorter and shorter until the world economy is fully integrated.

Of course globalization is inevitable, its just the natural progression of power centralization. People have been trying to conquer the world for as long as there has been civilization, and we're approaching the point where its technologically feasible to rule the world.

Consider what the world will look like thousands of years in the future, when humanity spans multiple planets or solar systems, do you really think independent states will be like China or USA? Or more like Earth, Mars, Venus, etc etc.

Question is, which race is going to rule Earth? Jews? Chinks? Whites maybe? if you don't all get genocided by the Jews...

>>139619630
It's because we've got the best gibs in town.

File: 1489283749492.jpg (56KB, 604x569px)

56KB, 604x569px

>>139620428
>>139620458

then stop it.
then stop it

>>139619055
High IQ k-selected white populations save too much and don't consume as much, are less dependent on government, and are harder to rule.

Low IQ r-selected blacks and browns will gladly spend their welfare check on the newest jordans and drugs; they're stupid easily manipulated consumers who will never rebel against the ruling class.