Thread replies: 3
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: db649766538c16f12d7b8e0a4b8a5cd6.gif (2MB, 500x281px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 500x281px
How many of these incidents are false flags and how many are actual attacks?
And to people who say they are all real attacks, I say, don't you think there is enough crazy people that these attacks would happen more often? If 1% of all muslims in the world were radical, that should still lead to millions of Muslims commuting terrorist attacks, yet that's not the case. The same can be said for shootings in America, or most recently, the 'white supremacist' that ran over that fat ANTIFA girl. If there really are a certain fraction of people who are just batshit crazy or evil enough to carry out these attacks, shouldn't we see this happening a lot more often in a world of 7 Billion + people?
>>
File: 201324154347_5465.jpg (159KB, 1200x630px) Image search:
[Google]
159KB, 1200x630px
For if a number of the American population does suffer from mental illness, what drives someone to commit an act of violence while suffering the same distress as many others?
Many people suffer from the same psychological issues that Adam Lanxa suffered, yet we don't see these attacks committed by their hands. Then when these attacks do happen, there is always a message or agenda driven home with it. This has been true for culturally every attack on U.S. soil in the past 4 decades.
>>
File: fbi_hijackers.jpg (40KB, 450x431px) Image search:
[Google]
40KB, 450x431px
And how often is it the case that these attackers were known about by the FBI or some sort of authority, yet when unpunished and had the ability to get the necessary means to carryout these events? What is the job of the authority if they do not arrest the bad guy? Why do they always maintain the ability to get the weapons or devices they need? Or in the case of 9/11, sign up for pilot lessons with no prior background or experience...
Or renting a large shipping truck in europe...
Thread posts: 3
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3