Gay hate thread

>>139544188
Anyone who openly flaunts that behavior should face the death penalty

>>139545325
Omar did nothing wrong.

File: CWUE3yl.jpg (267KB, 1420x1922px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 1420x1922px

>>139544188
>>139545325

You seem frustrated. Anything you want to get off your chest anon?

>>139545325
Agreed, that's why we're killing nazis. People this hateful should go live in a forever home. In the ground

>>139544188

Science on gays as parents:

http://whatweknow.law.columbia.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/

www.asanet.org/documents/ASA/pdfs/12-144_307_Amicus_%20(C_%20Gottlieb)_ASA_Same-Sex_Marriage.pdf

Farr, R. H. (2017). Does parental sexual orientation matter? A longitudinal follow-up of adoptive families with school-age children. Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 252-264.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000228

http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Patterson-Farr-Forssell-AppliedDevScience-Jul-2010.pdf

>>139548049

How Does the Gender of Parents Matter?

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x/abstract?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=userIsAuthenticated=false


Statistics on gays and marriage:

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/06/26/same-sex-marriage/

http://archive.is/g0kHt

http://www.gallup.com/poll/212702/lgbt-adults-married-sex-spouse.aspx?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_content=morelink&utm_campaign=syndication

http://archive.is/MlP5k

https://www.quora.com/What-percent-of-gay-men-in-the-US-are-in-a-long-term-relationship-and-how-does-this-compare-to-the-general-population

7% of millennials are gay:

https://www.prri.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/PRRI-Millennials-Web-FINAL.pdf

http://www.aacap.org/AACAP/Families_and_Youth/Facts_for_Families/Facts_for_Families_Pages/Children_with_Lesbian_Gay_Bisexual_and_Transgender_Parents_92.aspx

>>139548084
Genetic Evidence of Homosexuality:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/06/04/the-science-of-sexuality-how-our-genes-make-us-gay-or-straight/

http://archive.is/y64OH

https://www.advocate.com/health/2015/10/09/study-dna-identical-twins-can-reveal-whos-gay

http://archive.is/GuptB

http://www.nytimes.com/1991/12/17/science/gay-men-in-twin-study.html

http://archive.is/PSmzQ

https://www.christiantoday.com/article/research.points.to.genetic.element.in.homosexuality/35856.htm

Straight males carry gay genes:

http://chaladze.com/files/publications/Chaladze2016ASB.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xq28

Fecundity increases in female relatives of male homosexuals:

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051088

https://www.livescience.com/2623-gays-dont-extinct.html

http://archive.is/32sQz

Scientists find DNA differences between gay men and their straight twin brothers:

http://archive.is/g3lal

http://www.nature.com/news/epigenetic-tags-linked-to-homosexuality-in-men-1.18530

http://www.tim-taylor.com/papers/twin_studies/studies.html

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/identical-twins-genes-are-not-identical/

http://archive.is/MALR3

http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/1961to1999/1993-homosexual-orientation-in-twins.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xq28

Female relatives of gay men have 1.3x as many children:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02785.x/abstract

Androgen receptor gene linked to XQ28

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAGEA11

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/11/study-gay-brothers-may-confirm-x-chromosome-link-homosexuality

http://archive.is/E3my1

>>139548131
The benefits of gay marriage:


https://www.liveabout.com/the-benefits-of-gay-marriage-1411846

http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/gay-marriage-boosts-happiness-health-study-article-1.3053017

http://archive.is/dmO9e

http://theconversation.com/evidence-is-clear-on-the-benefits-of-legalising-same-sex-marriage-82428

http://archive.is/kezfR

Yes, anal sex is disgusting, gay and straight alike

Filthy piders need to be shot in the back of the head

>>139547615
Go fuck yourself leafboi...

File: pic.png (275KB, 482x516px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 482x516px

>>139544188
>Live on neetbux
>Fap exclusively to loli's
>Thinks he's a chink
>"Gays are a leach"

If you care that much about gays, then perhaps you are gay?

File: DHFe1RvVYAAtuHi.png (94KB, 538x538px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 538x538px

>>139544188

>>139547440
tfw no qt /pol/ bf
:(

>>139548049
>>139548084
>>139548131
>>139548160

Fake News. The Gay identity has been manufactured by cultural Marxists in an effort to Divide and rule.

File: 1502764952097.jpg (661KB, 1790x1162px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 1790x1162px

>>139549389
Forgot pic.

File: GenGay.png (379KB, 666x940px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 666x940px

>>139549389
I'm sure all that research was just fools being fools!

>>139549479
I'm guessing the source for all these historical claims can also be found up another man's ass?

>>139549887
Social science research is not research. There are far to many variables to control, and it's impossible to arrive at statistically significant conclusions. Seriously check some fucking p-values on the papers you cited.

82% of humanities papers are not cited by other sources. If that doesn't scream ecochamber to you, then you are beyond arguing with.

The same people telling you one loci of a gene is responsible for sexual preference also claim that an entire fucking chromosome doesn't determine gender.

File: 1503796330080.jpg (44KB, 329x399px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 329x399px

>>139547440
GAYS NOT WELCOME
A
Y
S

N
O
T

W
E
L
C
O
M
E

File: 1499997255909.jpg (75KB, 805x1024px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 805x1024px

>>139544188

>>139544188
Why not find something to love, faggot

File: 1f5cbb10011b733868759bca0f511a676bf6bf4b44a71336c0d02876456dc0d5_1.jpg (134KB, 533x820px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 533x820px

>>139544188

File: 1481471934593.jpg (90KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 680x680px

>>139548160
>The benefits of gay marriage

File: IMG_5809.jpg (91KB, 402x550px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 402x550px

>>139544188
"Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God."

basically, gays won't make it to heaven

I'd really recommend reading all of Corinthians 6. Its very uplifting and helps remind one not to desecrate their spirit.

>>139553862
So then you will agree the work of Paul McHugh, Mark Regnerus, and Paul Sullins is bullshit too/

File: 1503495387713.jpg (161KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 900x1200px

>>139555691
I've seen you a lot and you are always trying to damage control for your group of degenerates. Well I guess it is true gays are female men who need validation when they don't deserve any.

File: 00317e299261ff9be845dea8aab426b55a4011c7.jpg (92KB, 1002x1002px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1002x1002px

>>139554036
Because I'm lazy.

>>139544188
Fags can suck my dick

>>139555691
literally who?

All social science is bullshit. Even the ones that you faggots don't agree with

File: 1502590584181.jpg (43KB, 331x271px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 331x271px

>>139545325
fpbp

File: 1503159284970.gif (2MB, 219x186px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 219x186px

>>139559912

File: GayMuslimChristian.png (15KB, 309x726px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 309x726px

>>139560635
K just making sure.

Also this is not for validation, gays literally get more rights globally every year, meanwhile the brand of evangelical Christianity that most hates gay people loses power and followers every year.

>>139561048
I don't think people give any more of a shit about boys being abused by women. They just don't care about men in general and boys are easier targets than girls.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-29 at 12.37.38 AM.png (582KB, 1128x984px) Image search: [Google]

582KB, 1128x984px

>>139561090

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-29 at 6.20.57 PM.png (569KB, 632x958px) Image search: [Google]

569KB, 632x958px

>>139561279

>>139561064
>being this butthurt about christfags

Where did Father Mike touch you?

>>139547440
>hating gays makes you gay
I hate people who fuck corpses does that make me a closet necrophiliac or a rational person?

File: GayMarriageChurch.jpg (37KB, 540x405px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 540x405px

>>139561329
Evangelical Christians are the main source of opposition to gay rights, not Muslims.

File: 7 Tips For Having A Happy Pride With Your Kids.png (1MB, 924x1587px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 924x1587px

YRYL

>>139548049
>>139548084
>>139548131
>>139548160
Hey faggot, you forgot to include this study proving that you were not "born this way".

Homosexuality is 100% nurture, and 0% nature.

http://amazinghealth.com/13.06.24-identical-twin-studies-prove-homosexuality-is-not-genetic

File: 1468541820499.jpg (58KB, 627x663px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 627x663px

>>139561402
Who the fuck mentioned muslims? 3/10 bait

>>139561598
>Amazing health

What study did they cite?

>>139547615
leaf

>>139561404
I lost

>>139561622
Generally when you claim evangelical Christians are the ones who present the most political opposition to gay rights, people here claim Muslims are worse, which is patently untrue. They may do some nasty shit in the Middle East, but here, the main source of anti-gay activism is evangelical Christians and to a much lesser extent, Catholics.

>>139544188
>T. closetfags

File: GayTwins.png (117KB, 1328x516px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1328x516px

>>139561598
Also, actual data.

File: CI1BE5lWsAAtsem.jpg (99KB, 576x1024px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 576x1024px

>>139561598
That's pretty bluepilled. The best current research suggests that homosexuality is caused by a contagious brain parasite spread by the homosexual molestation of boys.

https://forum.therightstuff.biz/topic/50703/final-solution-to-the-faggot-question

File: IMG_7341.jpg (33KB, 640x392px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 640x392px

>>139547440

>>139561933
1 Study. Results were never replicated. Compared gay people sampled at a pride parade (hence non-clinical) with straight university students.

This is a non-representative sample. Are you claiming this represents all gay people?


http://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/Anti-gayActivismandtheMisuseofScience_1.pdf

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2009/06/05/a-major-study-of-child-abuse-and-homosexuality-revisited/

File: really nigga.jpg (66KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 640x640px

>>139548131
>washington post
>nytimes

>>139562144
>http://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/Anti-gayActivismandtheMisuseofScience_1.pdf

The first citation, “Tomeo, Templer, Anderson and Kotler”5 indicates a study that is presented as concluding there is a correlation between being abused as a child and being gay; the citation fails to note several highly relevant factors: it was a non-clinical study and the data concerning homosexuals was gathered by setting up an interview booth at a “Gay Pride” parade6 while the data for heterosexuals was gathered at a college. Did the signage attracting participants at the Gay Pride parade booth ask specifically for victims of abuse who were willing to tell their story? The study does not say anything on this point – we do not know how participants were attracted.

At every Pride Parade I’ve attended there are numerous non-gay persons, and in fact it is possible if not probable that heterosexuals would outnumber homosexuals at such an event – how come some heterosexuals did not wander over to the booth and participate – or were they refused with some undocumented screening or, even worse as far as the data is concerned, counted as homosexuals? How reliable is this kind of self-reported data from this self-selected, or worse, deliberately skewed sample?

Also note that the data on 39 persons was ignored entirely because their sexual orientation was not known – bi-sexuality was not an optional choice, and this may have led some to leave this section blank. One must also wonder, did many bisexuals describe themselves as homosexuals because of the lack of other options? Would this affect the data? Why on earth wouldn’t you allow for such an option?

Meanwhile, the data on heterosexuals was obtained at colleges; is this a group that one could then compare to persons attracted by unknown means to a booth at a gay pride parade? Can one then ethically extrapolate the findings to the general public?

GOD HATES FAGS
can't wait until we get finished with the beaner/mudslime menance, then we can start dealing with the gay disease

>>139562375
Another interesting aspect of this study is the use of the word “molestation.” In the questionnaire given to participants, the word “molestation” is never used; “sexual contact” is used. What does this phrase mean to the various participants? Does it mean one thing to those participating in a festive Gay Pride Parade and something quite different to a student at a perhaps more subdued or introspective University setting?

Since 84% of gay men and 95% of women considered themselves gay before the “sexual contact” according to the study, could it be something less nefarious than, for example, forcible rape they were recounting? Could it be that the college students were only counting more disturbing experiences, such as forcible rape? Of course it is possible the two groups were defining “sexual contact” in precisely the same manner, but we really should not have to assume such a thing; our doubts are due to the absence of pertinent info from the researchers – this should have been made clear.

The study does not even attempt to quantify these probably relevant differences in these two groups. And, instead of continuing to use the phrase “sexual contact” in their closing discussions, the authors of the study switch to “molestation” in their analysis of the data, which might have surprised some of those who participated in the survey.

Not like the authors of the study had any bias, nope.

>>139562318
So click on the link if you care and read the actual scientific articles they cite in original format.

Got some Christian Post in there too. Don't see you complaining about that one.

>>139544188
Gays took something that could be fun--sucking dick, taking it up the ass--and turned it into a disgusting, flamboyant culture. If not for gays, there would be a lot more homosexual sex and many more happy men.

File: 1435712931490.jpg (233KB, 688x971px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 688x971px

>>139562144
Homosexuality is caused by a parasitic brain infection, and homophobia is an evolutionary response to this pathogen. Until a cure can be developed, homosexuals must be quarantined from society.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5VNe9NTOxA

>>139561684
It linked to this Christian site,
(http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/blog/2013/06/identical-twin-studies-prove-homosexuality-is-not-genetic/) so obviously it's biased, but it's no less biased than any of the liberal studies on the subject such as this: http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-genetic-homosexuality-nature-nurture-20151007-story.html
I'll admit that it's probably not 0% nature, but it's definitely more nurture than nature.

>>139562782
So what about people who get toxoplasmosis and aren't gay? What about gays who don't test positive for toxoplasmosis? Feels bad to even have to respond to such fringe bullshit.

>>139562846
I mean what was the actual study?

>>139561598
>>139549389
>>139548131
>>139544188
>>139561805

How can a gene for homosexuality be passed on if it eliminates the desire for heterosexual sex? A genetic mutation causing pure homosexual behavior wipes itself out in a single generation. A gene that leaves someone predisposed to homosexual behavior is either recessive or leads to extinction within a small number of generations.

The only way it can be genetic is if there's a gene for bisexuality...but that would make homosexuality a choice, wouldn't it?

Fags BTFO

>>139562624
this.

>>139562782
fuck I miss when America was smart like this

File: GayGenerations.png (471KB, 1934x1038px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 1934x1038px

>>139562894
Because lots of gay people still have heterosexual sex, and then raise the kids from that relationship, either with their heterosexual partner, with a same sex partner, or alone.

It reduces the reproductive rate, but not to zero.

Also, surrogacy and adoption.

Also this:

Straight males carry gay genes:

http://chaladze.com/files/publications/Chaladze2016ASB.pdf

File: lake-of-fire1.jpg (13KB, 520x390px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 520x390px

Lake of fire!

Hell is for ever!

>>139562894
>what is a recessive gene
>implying gay people are physically hindered from reproducing

>>139562846
>http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/blog/2013/06/identical-twin-studies-prove-homosexuality-is-not-genetic

Here's where they got the 11% figure from:

Bailey & Pillard, 1991

In the most recent twin study of homosexuality, Bailey and Pillard report on a sample of 161 male homosexual probands, all over the age of 18 with a twin or adoptive brother. Recruitment was through advertisements placed in homophile publications in several cities in the Midwest and Southwest of the United States. For probands with adoptive brothers, it was stipulated that they must have entered a common rearing environment when both were no more than 2 years old.
Most of the probands were interviewed in person with informed consent. Questionnaires were sent to the cotwins and adoptive brothers, with a cover letter explaining that they were being asked to participate in a general study of personality, attitudes and behaviour. Five questions regarding sexual orientation were imbedded in over 100 other items about social attitudes, personality, and childhood behaviour.

>>139563184
Bailey and Pillard determined the zygosity of the subjects using a questionnaire containing items relating to physical similarity, past and present likelihood of twins being mistaken for each other, etc. They claim that "such questionnaires generally range in accuracy from 90% to 95%."

The distribution of sexual orientation among cotwins of the monozygotic probands appeared to be bimodal. In other words, most subjects classified themselves as heterosexual or homosexual, with very few giving evidence of significant bisexuality. This finding is in agreement with other recent studies (e.g. Buhrich et al. 1991).

According to their data, 52% (29/56) of monozygotic cotwins, 22% (12/54) of dizygotic cotwins, and 11% (6/57) of adoptive brothers were homosexual. Heritabilities of homosexuality were calculated using these results under a wide range of assumptions of the population base rate and ascertainment bias. Under all conditions considered, heritabilities were substantial (h2 was between .31 and .74 in all cases). However, "the rate of homosexuality among nontwin biological siblings, as reported by probands, 9.2% (13/142), was significantly lower than would be predicted by a simple genetic hypothesis and other published reports."

>>139563007
> lots of gay people still have heterosexual sex
That's called bisexuality, which is exactly his point

File: 1435921410032.jpg (121KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 960x720px

>>139562871
Toxoplasmosis is just one of the countless co-morbid pathogens of homosexuality, the causative pathogen has not yet been publicly identified.

>>139563199
So basically the actual concordance rate for monozygotic twins was 52% but they reported the rate for adoptive brothers, which is 11% in the study.

>>139563223
>>139563257
>being a sodomite
Hell is for ever!

>>139563202
Plenty of gay people still have heterosexual sex and identify as fully gay and they do so due to societal stigma, need to conform, or desire for biological kids. Doesn't mean its their preference, just means it happens.

>>139563224
All of which you have 0 quality evidence for.

File: gayhell.jpg (35KB, 650x366px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 650x366px

>>139563318

>>139561760
there is just way less Muslims here. If that changes you are getting tossed off a skyscraper by Abdul. Instead of Peter making you feel bad

File: End ban on gay blood donation.jpg (108KB, 437x437px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 437x437px

>>139563257
Anything less than 100% concordance among mono-zygotic twins rules out the genetic hypothesis for homosexuality. The disease is clearly pathogenic in nature.

>>139563257
And for the other study they use it measured opposite sex twins and still found double the concordance of sexuality compared to unrelated people.


The etiology of human same-sex romantic attraction is generally framed in terms of (1) social influences, (2) genetic influences, or (3) hormonal influences. In this article, we show that adolescent males who are opposite-sex twins are twice as likely as expected to report same-sex attraction; and that the pattern of concordance (similarity across pairs) of same-sex preference for sibling pairs does not suggest genetic influence independent of social context. Our data falsify the hormone transfer hypothesis by isolating a single condition that eliminates the opposite-sex twin effect we observe—the presence of an older same-sex sibling. We also consider and reject a speculative evolutionary theory that rests on observing birth-order effects on same-sex orientation. In contrast, our results support the hypothesis that less gendered socialization in early childhood and preadoles- cence shapes subsequent same-sex romantic preferences.

http://www.soc.duke.edu/~jmoody77/205a/ecp/bearman_bruckner_ajs.pdf

>>139563525
No it doesn't lol it just means how genes are expressed matters too:

http://www.nature.com/news/epigenetic-tags-linked-to-homosexuality-in-men-1.18530

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/identical-twins-genes-are-not-identical/

>>139563349
> identify as fully gay
So homosexuality is something you CHOOSE to identify with. Really makes me think

>>139563659
No sex is something you choose to have. Sexual preference is innate.

File: e25.jpg (576KB, 1564x1564px) Image search: [Google]

576KB, 1564x1564px

>me in this thread

>>139544188
They're a leech in every way

File: convicted_pedophile.jpg (38KB, 534x712px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 534x712px

Something nobody wants to admit: Most gay man would act as a pedophile if given them the chance and not risk of being caught.

>>139562893
>"Eight major studies of identical twins in Australia, the U.S., and Scandinavia during the last two decades all arrive at the same conclusion: gays were not born that way."
Source: http://www.hollanddavis.com/?p=3647
Source for that source: http://www.mygenes.co.nz/download.html

File: 18157328_1448531438550573_1160613518132575240_n.jpg (48KB, 576x720px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 576x720px

As a homosexual I have to say this is quite the thread.

File: nick-young-confused-face-300x256_nqlyaa.jpg (25KB, 600x512px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 600x512px

>>139563695
>straight man can have heterosexual sex with a man
>gay man can have homosexual sex with a women

File: 1475965735112.jpg (568KB, 800x1915px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 800x1915px

>>139563772
I'm not even gay but I'd suck his stiff dong down to the last drop.

>>139562871
Men are fine but women become crazy cat ladies and their children are at higher risk of their children being homosexual or otherwise damaged mentally.

>>139563793
Ok I discussed multiple studies and clearly he is misinterpreting the data. The figures being cited were not for mono-zygotic twins.

File: polutterlyBTFO.jpg (117KB, 809x773px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 809x773px

/pol/ BTFO. When will bigots learn?

File: 1494629646600.jpg (65KB, 480x625px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 480x625px

>>139563627
Epigenetic modification of the host's brain is the parasite's primary proposed mechanism of action. Many pathogens are known to modify the host epigenome to their own advantage.

File: FB_IMG_1503664180161.jpg (42KB, 640x815px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 640x815px

>>139563994
Try again

>>139562050
i'm very satisfied that American Apparel is out of business

File: leftwing.jpg (515KB, 1280x883px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 1280x883px

>>139544188
just come out the closet faggit quit tryin so hard nigga

>>139563994
>jew backed "study"

>>139564053
Do you have a source for this kooky theory?

>>139564304
Stop

>>139563007
If a gay man is capable of having sex with women then indulging in homosexual activity is a choice, and a choice that causes very clear and dangerous societal plagues including low birth rate, high STD rates (especially HIV), and a breakdown of he nuclear biological family. Surrrogacy and adoption do not pass on the gene for homosexuality and so would still lead to the extinction of the behavior were it 100% genetic.

>>139563108
I mentioned recessive genes you nigger. The main point I'm making is that if men are able to physically reach orgasm and reproduce with a woman, they are at least partially heterosexual and not 100% gay and therefore choose to indulge in their homosexual impulse. this choice has resulted in massive societal pathologies that would have been avoided without gay sex

>>139564400
Straight people are capable of having gay sex. Does that mean being straight is a choice?

>>139563970
Um, can you prove that?
They use the word "identical" a lot here, so are you sure they didn't keep that in mind?

>Identical twins have the same genes or DNA. They are nurtured in equal prenatal conditions. If homosexuality is caused by genetics or prenatal conditions and one twin is gay, the co-twin should also be gay.

>“Because they have identical DNA, it ought to be 100%,” Dr. Whitehead notes. But the studies reveal something else. “If an identical twin has same-sex attraction the chances the co-twin has it are only about 11% for men and 14% for women.”

>Because identical twins are always genetically identical, homosexuality cannot be genetically dictated. “No-one is born gay,” he notes. “The predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.”

In case you missed it, Dr. Neil Whitehead said: “If an identical twin has same-sex attraction the chances the co-twin has it are only about 11% for men and 14% for women.”

I myself am gay, I don't plan on raising kids, I don't look any different to a straight dude, and I'm not a slut. Am I welcome? OwO

>>139564930
Well your first post ends with OwO so no.

>>139565073
Chill, just a may-may

File: 0b358a6f8cbd91daccda6a20134bcd87ed5f3777301acdc56a0a6723d653efd1.jpg (929KB, 3100x1855px) Image search: [Google]

929KB, 3100x1855px

>>139564346
The gay-germ theory was proposed by Gregory Cochran.

https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/depths-of-madness/

It was originally proposed in this paper: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9cae/c943c9c46c5ab1c02d089b59d627198b8d2d.pdf

>>139564552
>>139564850
>>139565067
Back to /hm/, faggot. Or even better, back to the closet!

>>139565580
feet pls

File: 1500581910675.jpg (2MB, 2400x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2400x3000px

>>139545325

>>139565580
Disprove this, without a "it's Christian" ad-hominem attack:
http://www.hollanddavis.com/?p=3647

Bump, faggots will rot in hell

>>139548131
Sorry anon but no gay gene ever found. It's simply a degenerate hyper sexual enveloped in same sex deviancy.

>>139565880
That definitely one of the top ten most badass pictures of all time.

Goodnight, (literal and metaphorical) fags!

>>139564494
In one sense it is a choice the same way that nailing your foot to the floor is a choice. You can blow a dude without desiring it.

On the other hand, most people do not have a desire for homosexual sex because they do not carry a gene or set of pathologies that make them bisexual or find homosexual sex desirable.

Being gay is a choice in the sense that everyone loves to eat food, but some people for whatever reason love to eat food and also have a taste for eating human shit. Indulging in their desire to eat human shit benefits nobody and spread rank and deadly disease, especially when they can live while eating food like most normal people. Absolutely nobody outside of genetic dead ends and the severely and terminally mentally ill desire to only eat human shit.

In out society today, you have people saying that people who eat food and people who eat shit are completely equal. We must all support and tolerate shiteaters. Eating is eating, and if you have a problem with shiteaters you're a bigot who isn't welcome in society (and probably has a secret toileted desire to eat shit). people are also arguing that restaurants that serve food do not have a right to decline to accommodate people who eat shit, and that the entire internet will descend upon you if you refuse to put a big steaming pile of shot on your menu.

>>139566288
This. Now goodnight for real.

>>139544188
no webms of faggots being thrown off a building?
come on /pol/, you're better than this

File: IMG_2293.jpg (202KB, 1024x866px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1024x866px

How to be an asshole and do it daily and never be right nor change in any way: the threads

File: 1489387494562.jpg (33KB, 500x268px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x268px

>>139561760
Muslims throw gays of buildings, faggot.

>>139566910
Elliot shimon
>>139566723
Evolution is fake. Everything in there is a blatant lie. Nobody catches HIV anymore it's impossible. It's genetic. Or it's not. Let's discuss your dick. The original sinner

File: Germania Bog Execution.jpg (276KB, 1200x901px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 1200x901px

>>139544188
our ancestors had it right the first time

I like going balls deep on traps

>>139567090
Hi fags take my daughters. In fact. Grab them and their asses. By me. Cuz this is my daugher. Nothing new under the sun you swamp frog pagan. To live is Christ to die is gain. Pagans make up everything they say as they go along. Take your fertility cults and massive amounts of faggotry and present evidence or keep suckin dick

>>139567371
There is no reason to do this. There are more men who do stupid shit like this than there are who don't. Straight people don't exist

File: 1488706002398.jpg (8KB, 276x277px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 276x277px

>>139567233
what is this post even supposed to mean

>>139567534
>sodomy
>doesn't even know what it means
What is this brain surgery you fucking Heeb? Why dont you take a crack at it? Another hit on the pipe maybe

>>139563525
No. It means the mother is the carrier and cause of the trait. Derp. It's the RESULT of a maternal effects gene. It's the women that have the ability to manipulate the INAH-3 region of the brain while the baby is in development. you shift the hormone ratio one way or another and you end up with gay or straight offspring.

File: images (1).jpg (6KB, 227x222px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 227x222px

>>139549037

>>139567670
Men are fags

>>139563085
Does this mean God is good because he is good or he is good because he can send you to hell?

They can be good people, but they're all just mentally ill.

>>139567608
both of these posts lack all structure, it reads like it was written by a kindergartner. good bait though

>>139567949
You have daddy issues. You dont? Freud said so. Freud also defined the term he also made up--heterosexuality--as being abnormal
>>139567952
Fuck off

File: marriage-l-12.jpg (113KB, 267x402px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 267x402px

>>139544188
There is 0 mention of lesbians in this entire thread.

How is this even gay?

File: 1492911950941.gif (979KB, 500x381px) Image search: [Google]

979KB, 500x381px

>>139568027

>>139568161
Look, it's the thing we are going to hang nazis with :D

>>139568161
You are possessed and a Satanist. You think your little baby threats scare me? That's not your job. There's two parties. One has upside-down stars on its logo. Yours. Mine has right-side-up ones. Oh well. You're fucked

>>139568222
Nah, it's the commies that will get the rope.

File: sparky.jpg (858KB, 1460x911px) Image search: [Google]

858KB, 1460x911px

>>139568283

>>139568328
Thanks for the backup Martin Prince amd your mighty faggots

>>139562981

Before Jews had a monopoly on media and education

File: bfe71ed92117e3ef28ccf5f52a92a507--nuremberg-trials-experiment.jpg (41KB, 500x367px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x367px

>>139568328
I don't remember that during the Nuremberg Trials

>>139568430
I couldn't care less, Robespierre. You hate being a male you can't breathe walk nor function without an umbilical cord and beig attached to some woman

>>139563783
I would say effectively all of them would 12 and up. 12 and below I bet its at least half of them. if there was no consquences,

>>139568111
Because no one gives a fuck about lesbians. All women are bisexual and can be easily converted from lesbians to house wives with a good fucking.

File: Eugene Weidmann Execution.jpg (16KB, 239x300px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 239x300px

>>139568540

>>139568607
Why the fuck do zionist right wingers think they are God?

File: IMG_7486.jpg (37KB, 480x464px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 480x464px

>>139568027
>using this as an argument over decades of scientific and psychiatric research

I can see why you take it up the ass

File: 14112115_1164922230237358_1722603473_n.jpg (109KB, 720x665px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 720x665px

>>139568503
I don't remember good things coming from communism, or pictures that told truth.

>>139568509
how do I get a bigger dick?

>>139568689
>decades
The earth is also a pear

>>139564702
He represented a figure of 11% to be from monozygotic twins but that figure was not found in the actual study. That figure instead represented the concordance of adoptive siblings sexuality.

He is deliberately misrepresenting the data. If I am wrong, find me the original studies where it makes these claims. There's a reason nobody has ever made these claims from these studies besides this guy, because the studies in question simply don't say what he is claiming they do.

>>139565279
Ok so literally one person's opinion and not backed by any research?

>>139566288
So you can understand genes could make someone not want gay sex but you can't understand how they could cause someone to want gay sex?

>>139566910
Not in the United States or New Zealand. Muslims are more tolerant in English speaking countries of gays than evangelical Christians are and evangelical Christians HATE when you bring up that fact.

>>139568628
If only that work with gays ;)

>>139561367
Why do you hate people who fuck corpses?

>>139568741
It's called advancing the human race faggot. But you can't have your own kids so you wouldn't know what that means

>>139568669
This is some kinky ass BDSM going on.

>>139568748
>that one asian guy and the tall white guy with the face thats too big

every buzzfeed video ever

>>139568806
Hagar ronaldo artificial eggs made ONLY from males. Artificial wombs. Adoption. Get off this site especially. And at midnite. And go lay your pocket vag and raise your children. Oops you have none of these. Gone

>>139568628
true dat,

now since this is a gay thread, how do I get a bigger dick? sport? crossfit? smoking weed and chilling outside?

File: Weidmann execution 2.jpg (198KB, 1600x1169px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1600x1169px

>>139568858
last guillotine execution in France in 1939, pretty interesting really

>>139568777
Here is a more comphrensive analysis of the NARTH-funded bullshit Whitehead is spewing:

For an article with such a grandiose claim to have ‘proven’ something that has eluded the scientific community even at present, and which begins with the proclamation that “Eight major studies of identical twins in Australia, the U.S., and Scandinavia during the last two decades all arrive at the same conclusion: gays were not born that way,” I would surely expect to find in it proper references and sources to back up the claim. Yet the entire article does NOT contain a single citation. Not being knowledgeable in biology myself, I’d expected to spend quite a bit of time to study the relevant material, but to my relief, virtually all of the information in this article can be found in one small section in Wikipedia! [4] The main difference is that the facts which can be extracted from Wikipedia are twisted to suit the author’s foregone conclusion, liberally sprinkled with Dr Neil Whitehead’s unsubstantiated personal opinions!!

On googling (try it!), I cannot find any academic information on this Dr Neil Whitehead (not to be confused with the English anthropologist Neil L Whitehead). Upon doing a lot more digging, I finally found out that this Dr Neil Whitehead is a member of none other than NARTH! [5] One would wonder why the article omits Dr Neil Whitehead’s affiliation and only verifiable qualification, probably because NARTH is one of the remaining discredited ex-gay organizations. This is what Wikipedia writes of NARTH,

>>139569026
“NARTH's leaders disagree with the global scientific consensus, the holding of the world's major mental health organizations, and scientific research into the topic which show that homosexuality is not a disorder.” [6]
“The American Psychological Association [US] and the Royal College of Psychiatrists [UK] expressed concerns that the positions espoused by NARTH are not supported by science and create an environment in which prejudice and discrimination can flourish.” [7]

(Individual citations are found in Wikipedia.)

There is MUCH misinformation contained in this article. For example, it is claimed in it (and repeated on Pastor Poh’s post) that “In 2002 Bearman and Brueckner studied tens of thousands of adolescent students in the U.S. The same-sex attraction concordance between identical twins was only 7.7% for males and 5.3% for females—lower than the 11% and 14% in the Australian study by Bailey et al conducted in 2000.” These are in fact the only two academic studies being mentioned by names in the entire article, but the given facts are wrong.

>>139568693
USSR and all "socialist" states that followed became deformed workers state. They never even had the change to transition to communism before plunging back into a secular monarchy.

>>139568983
That's the day France went to shit

>>139569037
According to Wikipedia (with citations), [4] “Bearman and Bruckner (2002) studied 289 pairs of identical twins (monozygotic or from one fertilized egg) and 495 pairs of fraternal twins (dizygotic or from two fertilized eggs) and found concordance rates for same-sex attraction of only 7.7% for male identical twins and 5.3% for females, a pattern which they say "does not suggest genetic influence independent of social context.”” Here, the percentage figures are identical, so this is the exact study being referred to. Yet this study only involves 289 pairs of identical twins and 495 pairs of fraternal twins, thus reducing its significance – NOT the grossly exaggerated “tens of thousands” claimed in the article.

Next, “the Australian study by Bailey et al conducted in 2000” mentioned in the article is also found in the same section of the Wikipedia article! (How convenient!) According to Wikipedia, [4] “In 2000, Bailey, Dunne and Martin found similar results from a larger sample of 4,901 Australian twins. They found 20% concordance in the male identical twins and 24% concordance for the female identical twins” – much higher than the respective 11% and 14% claimed in the article.

>>139554861
Literally a drag queen of today

>>139569084
The “eight major twin studies” mentioned in the beginning of the article can also be found in the same Wikipedia section. (How convenient again!) According to Wikipedia, [4] “A meta-study by Hershberger (2001) compares the results of eight different twin studies: among those, all but two showed MZ [monozygotic] twins having much higher concordance of sexual orientation than DZ [dizygotic] twins, suggesting a non-negligible genetic component.” This is in direct contradiction of the central claim in the article (and its title) that these eight studies “prove that homosexuality is not genetic”.

It is now obvious that virtually all of the ‘facts’ asserted by Dr Neil Whitehead can be found within one Wikipedia section, while the article takes complete liberty in just making up figures to suit Dr Neil Whitehead’s conclusion.
The rest of the article deals with Dr Neil Whitehead’s unsubstantiated claims and personal opinions describing an ex-gay paradise unachievable even by the most hardened and diehard ex-gay proponents. We see gems of Dr Neil Whitehead’s wishful thinking such as:

File: 8y drag.jpg (157KB, 634x1105px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 634x1105px

i'm lovin it

>>139569119
“About half of the homosexual/bisexual population (in a non-therapeutic environment) moves towards heterosexuality over a lifetime. About 3% of the present heterosexual population once firmly believed themselves to be homosexual or bisexual.”
“These changes are not therapeutically induced, but happen ‘naturally’ in life, some very quickly,” Dr. Whitehead observes. “Most changes in sexual orientation are towards exclusive heterosexuality.”
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! If you want a good laugh after a stressful day, please do read this article!!!
Even crazier is this assertion plucked out of thin air: “Numbers of people who have changed towards exclusive heterosexuality are greater than current numbers of bisexuals and homosexuals combined. In other words, ex-gays outnumber actual gays.” If this is the case, why haven’t we ever heard of these many ‘ex-gay’ persons in the media? Why were there only about ten people showing up in the recent first ever ex-gay pride parade in Washington DC? [8] You can also watch their pathetic ex-gay gathering on YouTube. [9] And why did the oldest and largest ex-gay Christian ministry Exodus International collapse and even issue an apology to the LGBT community? [10]

File: IMG_2160.jpg (97KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 640x640px

>>139569100
>worships reptiles
Hrm

File: Oh-no-i-didnt.jpg (199KB, 750x962px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 750x962px

>>139568509
Its unfortunate you cant have a discussion. I understand you'd rather not get your ass blasted, or rather you would.

File: pence.jpg (14KB, 220x326px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 220x326px

>>139544188
It's a real tragedy.
Instead of treating this mental illness it gets promoted as something normal or even positive.
All this dumb fools gonna kill themselves when they hit their 40s

>>139569179
Memes and invisible mirror wives. Also a cat family. Oops he has toxoplasmosis and is therefore a faggot

>>139569152
Remember that phase you went through in high school? Goth? Emo? Maybe in this age its MLP. I'm sure you want to go on TV and say "I'm an ex-brony."

>>139569268
Ok that has nothing to do with some no-name doctor deliberating misrepresenting research to support his anti-gay conclusions.

>>139569345
Obligatory. Zzzz. https://unvis.it/abc.net.au/news/2017-08-23/same-sex-marriage-what-bible-has-to-say-robyn-whitaker/8831826

>>139569145
germoney..

pls

>>139568777
Obviously I understand how genes make someone want heterosexual sex: it is the major driving force for the continuation of life in sexually dimorphic species.

What I'm saying is that I absolutely 100% do understand that a gene could make someone attracted to both sexes. However, a gene that causes attraction in only and completely the same sex never gets passed down because it does not drive people to sex that causes procreation. Once a gay gene mutates in someone (already unlikely since mutations are one in trillions), there is no next generation because the carrier is too busy being gay.

My main point is that if you're attracted to both sexes, it is a choice to indulge in your impulse to homosexuality vs your impulse to heterosexuality. You cannot dispute this without denying genetic inheritance and therefore revolution as a whole

>>139544188
>cuddling with a qt
>cuddle more and realise it's a dude
>pulls me in closer and giggles
>come back to reality
>too scared to open eyes in case it wasn't a dream
>it was
>didn't really mind it in the dream
>irl I'm disgusted with myself for a good 3 or 4 days

am I a degenerate?

File: reward.jpg (140KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1280x720px

>>139569224
did you forget to take your antidepresiva

>>139569666
>post number
Too much uncle tommery

>>139569601
were humans, not animals, human do have always a choice, even downies or retarded people always have a choice wtf.

how do I get a bigger dick ffs

this thread really stinks of shill and coordinated shitposting

>>139569724
>antidepresiva
>so rushed he doesn't check what he types and sounds like a Mexican now
Did you forget to see the yellow sky today?

>>139569601
Why does EVERYONE have to reproduce?

Imagine a gene that when expressed in women makes them MORE attracted to men, and thus have more kids on average.

This same gene is deleterious in men because it causes them to have less kids on average but it is carried by heterosexual males and thus doesn't die off.

Straight males carry gay genes:

http://chaladze.com/files/publications/Chaladze2016ASB.pdf

Fecundity increases in female relatives of male homosexuals:

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051088

https://www.livescience.com/2623-gays-dont-extinct.html

http://archive.is/32sQz

It isn't indulgent to be who you are programmed to be. Clearly there are much worth mental health outcomes for people who repress being gay. Why would you want to condemn people to unhappiness and potentially suicide? If you want kids, great for you. If they want kids, great for them. If they do not want kids, how is that harming your ability to have kids?

>>139569666
Devil trips checked. You probably have aids

I'm a red pilled gay. I don't do anal and I intend to raise white children through a surrogate. I'm your ally whether you accept me or not. Also women are intellectually and emotionally inferior beings and all heterosexual men have to stoop to their level and accept their shortcomings in literally every straight relationship. Your loss.

>>139569859
>completely bashes his own comment as fake and self loathing and filled with your own buzzwords
>still thinks his post illicited faggotries of any sort
K. Also. Truvada. Also. You dont wear comdoms. At all. Also you also have anal but there's no point not that vaginas have anything to them either. Aaaand you have a fuck tonne of diseases. Aaaand you fucken made em all. Not us. Aaaand by their nature they are harder to see in the middle of a humongous hole. But enjoy! This is what angers you. That i didnt settle for this crap. Look at all animals. All male species are pretty. All the women species are brown

File: FuckRaw.jpg (217KB, 1400x750px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1400x750px

>>139568777
>Ok so literally one person's opinion and not backed by any research?
Most of the theoretical groundwork for the gay-germ theory has already been laid, it is by far the best explanation for homosexuality which has yet been proposed. Research funding will require a major change in the political climate, as even an interest in this topic puts one's career at risk.

File: 0_153569_db2e47bd_orig.jpg (74KB, 429x600px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 429x600px

>>139568693
Oh really? Soviets haven't enough pictures of executions in german occupation zone? How about this?

>>139570049
There is zero research to indicate this is any more than a crackpot theory.

File: 0_153567_592c1ff4_orig.jpg (62KB, 427x600px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 427x600px

>>139568693
Or this?

>>139570049
His post number was superior. Also I mentioned that shit already it got no replies. Read things first. Then repeat them after I let you steal them. Not before. All you do is repeat your own bullshit anyways

File: 0_153566_4ff592ec_orig.jpg (68KB, 600x392px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 600x392px

>>139568693

File: image.jpg (55KB, 475x395px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 475x395px

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6ICTsqE4Fjs
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DiqtFAKQHlk
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bRdLhSI3LC4

>>139561598
Err-- anon, not being genetic doesn't mean it's a choice.

Do you chose to like chocolate over vanilla?

Is there a "likes chocolate" gene in you?

Being genetic or not means nothing.

File: 0_153563_1cda7527_orig.jpg (136KB, 800x509px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 800x509px

>>139568693
Is this fake too?

File: 1fc51777cd512d45923d57eca45cfbff.jpg (31KB, 400x385px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 400x385px

Much science. Such philosophy. Many flat Earth Joos as proof that Muslim's are true faith in God science.

Duuuuuuuuudes. I'm sixty fucking years old. I lived as straight for most of those decades to take care of people that I loved. Ten years ago after a marriage to someone I really loved tanked, I decided to be honest about what made me happy. Fast forward... My guy makes me happier than shit. My adult son loves him. I don't regret a moment of my earlier life, but fuuuuuuck, this is a lot better.

>>139570245
>probably pastor lispy foreskin i mean "Jewish" Anderson
Anderson and Peterson. Two fucking goofs

File: 006 (1).jpg (122KB, 513x765px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 513x765px

>>139568693
Is this never happened?

File: 003 (1).jpg (185KB, 784x513px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 784x513px

>>139568693
Germans dindu nuffin?

>>139569809
>Muh cheap deflection
You still gonna end up in a bathtub in a few years.
When the crippling realisation comes..and it will come

>>139569179
This desu. I'm an atheist homosexual, but I feel like I'm at a crossroads in my life. I'm not a twink anymore. Straight people my age are beginning to get married. I know what the future holds if I really want to go this path of lifelong homosexuality, and it's very dark indeed. If I simply can't be attracted to women, then I think I'd like to follow the Catholic Church's advice of living as a lifelong celebate.

Thankfully I've always been a little apprehensive of the acceptance meme. I've always viewed gay culture with suspicion. I literally cannot force myself to believe that homosexuality is a perfectly normal human condition with no pathological basis. Medical science has abandoned gay people in order to signal virtue, and I'm very bitter about it. I want real scientific answers about its cause, not bullshit political memes about how it's not a disease.

>>139570428
I dont read people's "fortunes". Sorry babushka. You gypsy fuck

>>139570454
Fake. You are quagmire's dad

File: N52LmJa.jpg (217KB, 960x914px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 960x914px

>>139570094
The gay-germ explains all of the peculiarities of this disease, no other proposed theory of homosexuality can do so.

I. Homosexual behavior seems optimized for pathogen distribution. The huge sexual partner counts, extreme promiscuity, and waste product fetishism are ideal behaviors for rapid pathogen transmission.

II. The cycle of homosexual child sexual abuse is extremely apparent, a tiny proportion of the population is responsible for about 40% of child sexual abuse. This combined with the high rate of reported childhood abuse among those men who subsequently grow up to become homosexuals is strong evidence in favor of the gay germ theory.

III. Homosexuality has a high rate of co-morbidity with many other mental illnesses, this can be explained as a side-effect of the brain parasite.

IV. If homosexuality had a non-pathogenic cause, there would be no need for widespread homophobia to evolve. If some men voluntarily leave the reproductive market, this should allow the remaining men easier access to the females of the community. Objectively, a non-pathogenic homosexuality can be viewed as advantageous for the reproductive males. This does not happen in reality, almost every society treats homosexuals with violent revulsion. Homophobia is almost certainly an evolved response to a contagious pathogen threat.

V. Homosexuality has a very low twin concordance rate, ruling out genetic explanations.

VI. Homosexuals appear to have a modified epigenome. The epigenome is a set of methylation markers on the outside of DNA which can control gene expression. Many infectious diseases are known to modify the host epigenome. The behavioral and phenotypical changes in homosexuals are likely induced by the modification of the epigenome in developing brain cells during childhood.

>>139569862

Oh look. My post was ignored again. Too real?

File: IMG_2243.jpg (86KB, 780x438px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 780x438px

>>139570582
Ancient egyptians loved cats. And frogs. Not many recorded instances of what we call gays from back then except maybe elites. But that's just them

Anyone in Michigan want to meet up? My tight little boypussy needs to be bred NOW!

File: facts-gender is not nuture.jpg (86KB, 620x330px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 620x330px

>>139548131
No faggot, mutations and other such things are NOT GENETICALLY IDEAL MUTATIONS OR DISPOSITIONS THEY ARE AMALGAMATIONS OF THE IDEAL AND THUS OUGHT TO BE TREATED AS SUCH!

File: 1463608498524.png (100KB, 258x330px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 258x330px

>>139561319

File: donald get the battery.jpg (136KB, 544x506px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 544x506px

>>139548131
>>139547440

>>139570492
>fortunes
Its not a fortune, its the logical conclusion of a sodomistic lifestyle

>>139570582
Adam and eve sinned with their genitals and ushered both Christ. And all deaths. And all sins. The stop the fags meme was all lies. Was three kids. In non same sex parent families. Think about it. Everybody does gay shit but nobody admits to it. In the year 1700, blowjobs were sodomitical and nobody knew wtf homosexuality even meant. They just used their benors. 51% of millennials are not 100% straight. Which gender gets abused? Probably girls, no? Oops. As if you obsess this hard that you make up garbage about something like this. It's all on YOU

File: faggots GTFO.jpg (68KB, 557x626px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 557x626px

>>139547615
KYS FAGGOT SUBHUMAN KIKE

>>139571012
You're a witch. In a coven for Solomon or some crazy bullshit. Be quiet

>>139570582
Anon, this is an interesting theory, and it made a thought cross my mind.

Could it be that HIV is a modified or mutated form of this proposed "gay germ"? It just seems really fishy that there's no trace of this virus before the mid-20th century. Epidemics caused by other viruses have recorded since antiquity, but not AIDS, AIDS is completely new.

>>139571050
You created israel and were halves of fags and used their symbolism

>>139571104
Aids is also dead

File: IMG_4102.jpg (23KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 400x300px

>>139562782
Why is Rod Serling narrating this? Not complaining cus it makes it even more awesome. "A sickness of the mind....in the twilight zone"

>>139568805
It's degenerate, like being gay.

fucking philosophical lunacy. Having faggots is what in evolutionary terms is a strongly conserved trait. You clearly don't know why faggots keep happening. I don't know why faggots keep happening. Mother Nature clear as shit demands faggots keep happening and has since before recorded history. Fuck with Mother Nature at your peril, you commie, Muzzie dick sucking what to be faggot.

someone please post a webm of a faggot getting thrown off a building
I really need to laugh

Remember that you have at least one bisexual in your lineage, so don't hate on bisex people. We're people. Homos, fucking whatever, kill them. I'll join you in killing them.

>>139571150
Like yabbering away on here and having your periods. Stop staring at dick. And stop whining about cheaper pussies. You faggot

File: facism is bad....png (443KB, 1506x3976px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 1506x3976px

>>139571024
Faggot, blaming things on humanity's ancestors (((assuming youre not one of them or a nigger))) does not wipe away the stain of your disgusting abominable perversion of sexuality. NOW KILL YOURSELF FAGGOT

>>139571150
checkmate

>>139571229
Abominable to nonexistent levitical priests and priests alone and literally nothing else. You bacon eating Mong. Serpent seed (another species) is worse than two men. Become a woman. Stop crying

File: JUDEN-IN-RUS.jpg (594KB, 700x674px) Image search: [Google]

594KB, 700x674px

>>139570418
nope you fucking kike commie faggot. They didnt.>>139570376
>>139570276

>>139569836
Im making a comment on the reproductive inviability of a supposed "gay gene" based on the principles natural selection and genetic heritability. For a gene to be passed on you do actually HAVE TO reproduce. I'm not making a moral comment here, just a scientific one: if homosexuality is genetic then it will fail to be passed down.

The comment on mothers making their sons gay is the first decent point you've made. It would likely be a consequence of increased testosterone in the mother and therefore a change in hormones sent to her son in the womb, which could affect sexuality. A slut mother who passes on a slut gene or through in vitro or mothering processes produces slut daughters and gay sons to provide for them and raise their children could be a survivable gene. This has an equal chance of being nurture vs nature, however

>>139569792
What the hell are you saying

File: takei the faggot.png (360KB, 825x449px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 825x449px

>>139570281
hahaha so you became a fucking disgusting perverted faggot because some cunt broke your heart. Way to be a fucking retard. RULE #1 = NEVER TRUST DEM HOES MANE

Now kill yourself you faggot kike

>>139569862
>>139569862
>>139569862
>>139569862
>>139569862
>>139569862

>>139571585
>never trust what is laying your manhood
K

>>139571070
Its just reality.
Its a meaningless life, no family, no higher goals, just cheap ectasis from time to time.
eventually crippling depression kicks in and you off yourself.

>>139570045
Wut

>>139571681
Woe unto them bearing children when Christ returns. Sept 23? Use your brains. But they're buried in vaginal headwear

File: communism again.jpg (772KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

772KB, 1280x720px

>>139570418
>>139570376
>>139570276
Shit is such an obvious old school paste job its making my eyes hurt. The very images of the corpses are higher light with intense clarity to the rest of the pic.

YOU ARE A FAGGOT KIKE, NOW KILL YOURSELF YOU FAGGOT KIKE AND GTFO OF MUH MOTHER RUSSIA

>>139571554
And I linked articles why that isn't true. Lots of genes persist despite negatively influencing reproductive ability. They either have neutral values and are just random or they might have other positive traits that are harder to see.

Uh I didn't say moms make their sons gay I said female relatives of male homosexuals have more kids on average.

>>139571713
You fucked up your interpretation of his post and everything you said. As usual. Then make no further claims and pretend three hours late you're illiterate. You expect what from me right now? A response?

File: Widlife removal.jpg (34KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 640x427px

>>139571108
Britain created israel you dumb rainbownigger, we just support them

>>139571883
Jewish hair splitting.gif

>>139571629
It sounds like you need a hug Anon. The truth is that you probably shouldn't be raising children though. It's in the best interest of everybody.

By the way, misogyny is stupid and Himmler condemned hypermasculinity for good reasons.

>>139563994
How the actual fuck can they come to a conclusion so soon

>>139571975
The fuck is this post. Go back to the psych ward

File: decarte quiz.png (450KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 640x480px

>>139571645
laying manhood?

WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT FAGGOT? YOU LITTERALLY BUTT BLAST ANOTHER MAN BECAUSE YOURE TOO MUCH OF A KEK THAT YOU EVER COULD SATISFY A WOMAN. WOMEN ARE PRETENTIOUS CUNTS WHO NEED TO BE TREATED LIKE SHIT.

YOU need to admit you fucked up as a faggot little putz and because she cucked you and you were heart broken now you let several faggot dudes savage your bunghole every few days...

File: gay pride New York02.jpg (93KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 500x667px

>>139571104
>Could it be that HIV is a modified or mutated form of this proposed "gay germ"?
Genetic evidence suggests that the HIV virus jumped from Chimps to humans relatively recently. HIV doesn't appear to cause sexual targeting dysfunction in heterosexual hosts.

>It just seems really fishy that there's no trace of this virus before the mid-20th century.
Modern travel has allowed many new African jungle diseases to enter our cultural lexicon.

>>139572011
>the earth is not billions of years old
>it's not 6000 either it's about 8 months old

File: 1503697927517.gif (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x360px

>>139571938
Nigga i fucking hate israel, but saying the USA created israel is just fucking wrong, britain gave them palestein

>>139548160
>Benifits of gay marriage

Gee wiz. Could not be propaganda

>>139572086
Phobes love poop. Didnt read. Since you hate men. And being one. And ignore women anal. You think all men are just circumcised smelly bags of shit. Thats your problem. Everything you say is physically impossible

>>139572149
Go back and read the fucking chain of posts b/w yourself and me

File: son i am dissapoint.gif (85KB, 480x600px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 480x600px

>>139548860

>>139572371
Daughter you are daughter and fellow poster

>>139571975

>Misogyny is stupid

Oh so you're a dumb blue pill

File: 1468684624275.jpg (595KB, 1070x1080px) Image search: [Google]

595KB, 1070x1080px

>>139571756
Its not about religion but human nature.
You're SICK in the head and instead of getting treatment you amplify your sickness by glorifying it
so sad

I wouldn't mind a nice brojob after vidya sometimes. no homo. girls are just such a pain. :(

File: Pic-2.jpg (209KB, 957x1024px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 957x1024px

Gays hate each other desu so dont even bother

>>139572571
You call politics religions you make your own sex cults and blame me and you call spirituality mental illnesses. It's like I'm playing Bioshock. King David was bi. Sacred band of thebes. Hadrian. Alexander. Sleep tite Jennifer

File: trudu.png (3MB, 3837x771px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3837x771px

>>139545325
this post makes me very happy

>>139572703
homos are love!

File: glorious pence.gif (4MB, 384x288px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 384x288px

>>139561064
Faggot I dont care if the pope accepts you and if every fake Christian on earth and everything else in the planet is forced to accept the perverted apostasy and sodomy you call a (((lifestyle)))

IT IS STILL AND WILL ALWAYS BE AN ABOMINATION! NOW FUCKING KILL YOURSELF!

>>139569152
Uh...I don't go around telling people I'm ex-Mormon. It's just as shameful. When people ask where I went to college I lie so they don't know I was an idiot lds

>>139573159
>old man yells at rainbow
Lol at him at nasa like Eve. Dont touch. Touches.

File: Masha_Bruskina_(1924-1941)_02.jpg (14KB, 240x220px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 240x220px

>>139571780
>denying intensyfies

Are you fucking serious? Well lets see full set of one of picture when people still alive berfore the execution.

>>139572117
Why has the "gay germ" never been directly observed though? Are there any credible Western institutions that have looked into it?

>>139572472
It's not normal or healthy to hate half the human population. There are indeed biological differences between the minds of men and women, but to get butthurt over it is ridiculous. Think of the most alpha pussy-slaying straight guy you know, and I bet you he doesn't harbour any negativity towards women.

The modern misogyny movement is led by Muslim and Jewish males, whose propaganda is designed for an audience of insecure betas.

File: 267px-Masha_Bruskina_in_Minsk.jpg (22KB, 267x254px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 267x254px

>>139571780
2

File: bruskina-masha2.jpg (30KB, 425x256px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 425x256px

>>139571780
3

>>139573242
Frank grimes? I mean. This man is zeus after all

File: e0cc48a92ab6.jpg (49KB, 640x402px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 640x402px

>>139571780
4

File: 1481393327768.jpg (44KB, 579x804px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 579x804px

>>139561319
KYS FAGGOT, FUCKING DO IT ALREADY

AND SHOVE THIS KIKE TUMBLER GARBAGE UP YOUR ASS ALONG WITH ALL YOUR BLACK AND PURPLE DRAGON DICK DILDOS

>>139573429
>heavy flow day

>>139571839
Lots of genes do exist that hinder reproductive capability, this is true. Just because it hinders reproductive capability does not mean it's not possible. Someone who is lactose intolerant is technically genetically hindered since their sources of protein are more limited than others, for example. Same thing with genetic myopic vision or sickle cell anemia. All would make it harder to reproduce. None would possibly be so catastrophic to successful sexual reproduction as a gene for pure homosexuality. Were it genetic, it would not get passed down and so it cannot possibly be purely genetic. Even if it's a combination of genes that create a man predisposed to homosexuality, if he can still enjoy sex with a woman then indulging in homosexual tendencies IS A CHOICE. This is my original point for the 3rd or 4th time.

>>139571843
Ya man you need to get a grip on your emotions. Your posts are word salad. You clearly have no knowledge of how I "usually" argue and are obviously projecting arguments you've had with others onto me.

>>139573486
Nope

>>139573486
It can be purely genetic though. It can get passed down by women or heterosexual males who carry the gene.

>>139570251
this

>>139573486
I didn't say enjoy, I said possible. Straight people can have gay sex. Clearly there is a drive for gay sex, separately.

File: bruskina-masha3.jpg (18KB, 300x199px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 300x199px

>>139571780
We know their names. We know why they were killed. Try to find ORIGINALS without germans hanging civilians. Go on.

File: you heart loli huh.png (3MB, 1856x1242px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1856x1242px

>>139561422
>>139561404
>>139561402
Not Christian, insane and out right ill.

>>139573604
>having genes doesn't mean anything
>hugs trees
It's your extra chromosome talking. Trees age horizontally. Likeyou cuz youre fat

File: 3_mini.jpg (73KB, 900x566px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 900x566px

>>139571780

File: love.jpg (263KB, 728x1024px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 728x1024px

>>139561622
nah muslims are huge closet fags, even the women. Its pretty fucking ridiculous.

Fuck the gays. kys gays. they brought aids to the world.

File: paris-anti-gay-marriage-march-1-13-13a.jpg (133KB, 640x443px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 640x443px

>>139573314
>Why has the "gay germ" never been directly observed though?

There are a few possible reasons:

1. Pathogens, especially viruses, can be extremely difficult of detect and classify, especially if you aren't specifically looking for them.

2. Homosexuals serve as pathogen repositories. They are infected with so many organisms, that it is almost impossible to figure out what each pathogen is doing.

3. Even if the pathogen had been identified, any attempt to publish this information through official scientific channels would be blocked, and the career of the scientist responsible would be terminated.

>>139562554
Not Christian if they condone gay sex. Now fuck off.

File: eyeroll.jpg (39KB, 604x354px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 604x354px

>>139574028

>>139574000
Fucking seinfeld over here. The simplest of jewgle searches will show it was made in a lab. By females like you?

>>139574069
Churches in Europe blessing same sex celebrants:

http://religionnews.com/2017/08/04/britains-first-same-sex-marriage-celebrated-in-a-scottish-church/

http://news.abs-cbn.com/overseas/08/25/17/italian-protestant-church-says-i-do-to-gay-blessings

>>139574069
Centurion. Born eunuchs. Ethiopian

File: spider.jpg (65KB, 583x497px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 583x497px

>>139562074
stop posting this, for some of us it's true

>>139548084
All of these researchers are likely post-modernists and cucks.