Something that has peaked my curiosity recently, in consideration of recent attacks and the overwhelming retardation of government reaction to migrant overflow, is what exactly is the overall public sentiment towards Africans and Arabs in Germany and Sweden?
Personally, whenever I visit family in Finland, I only see non-Europeans in Helsinki or Turku, and even then they are few and far between.
As far as I can tell, nobody cares about them, maybe that's changed in Finland recently, haven't been there for a year, but at that time they were just everyday persons.
Africans and Arabs were small in number, the ones you did meet were decent and kind, and the only ones that stuck out like a sore thumb were the broads that didn't drop the Hijab act when they came to a country that neglected their "modesty".
However, the difference between Finland and Sweden, per se, from my personal experience, is that it is still a country ruled by moderates and where the people have a healthy mix of rationality and national pride.
Finland doesn't have that many migrants, for now, and the ones that I've seen are either laborers, which therefore fall in the same camp as the gypsies, or people who have a genuinely constructive reason to be there.
However, what's the sentiment of Africans and Arabs in countries like Sweden and Germany, where the migrant issue is starting to cause rife on a national scale?
East Europe has 0 tolerance of refugees. Hungary, Bulgaria, Serbia, Macedonia, Poland, etc. in particular very hostile because of history/culture reasons.
Sweden they're very hush hush because immigration is a taboo topic there. Germany are indoctrinated with holocaust guilt to say anything.
>>139485449
Feel like shit just want him back, famalam..
>>139486207
Even if they are hush hush in Sweden and indoctrinated in Germany, I feel that that is only a manufactured national image.
In Sweden and Germany, the topic of the migrants, like stuff like social justice in the States, is dominated by thuggish demagogues, silencing anyone with a dissenting opinion, but not removing that opinion from existence.
What you are forced to say publicly is not necessarily what you really believe, ask any politician that.
I'm curious as to what is the sentiment "on the ground" as it were. People surely must share their true opinions on forums such as this (though I'm aware of arrests being made on internet posts), or pubs or dorms or at least in some intimate privacy.