Some of my co-workers kept saying that kids need to be taught about sex at a younger age to "protect" them. These sex lessons would include anal and giving head and shit like that. Is it really necessary? I'm just curious as to what /pol/ thinks.
snrksnrksnrk
>>139466700
No faggot. Degeneracy is degeneracy
>>139466700
I never learnt about non-vaginal sex at school and legitimately had no idea that it was a thing that people did as a stage leading up to actual vaginal sex
they need to improve sex ed one way or the other
>to protect them
To protect them from what, exactly?
>>139467263
That's the thing, I was asking myself that question and I couldn't think of the right answer. Like, I guess ass tearing or something? But what 6 year old is going to need that knowledge?
>>139467766
It's a bullshit meme, i think. The only thing you're protecting them from is missing out on anal in their early teen years.
Schools do sex ed because parents are too embarassed and retarded to do it properly. Every school program like this should be opt out, and any self-respecting parent should opt out and teach their kids themselves. Whats a school going to teach your kids about sex that you cant other than libshit memes.
>>139467263
When other people do things to children they should at least know what's sex and rape and what is just plain torture.