Can /pol/ furnish me with an historical example of a US state, local or federal law which stipulates that a person who refers to a male using feminine pronouns, or who refers to a female using masculine pronouns, is on those grounds liable to jailing?
Can /pol/ also acquaint me with the legal theory under which such speech is somehow(!) not protected under the first amendment, and is consequently susceptible to legal sanction?
>>139425169
Those are big words. Could we all just post trap porn instead?
>>139425169
If such law existed some liberal would have found it and rioted against it.
I agree with >>139425267