Why Google / YouTube Censorship is worse than you think.

>>139341923
LE FRI MARKET FIKSIT :DD

File: the_real_fed.jpg (83KB, 400x523px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 400x523px

>>139341923
I'm waiting for the replies so I can refute them one by one, but meh...

One thing I noticed is people think that you can just move to a lax country and ignore the lawyers. First off (((they))) will find a way to erase you from the internet. Just like you can't watch certain video on Jewtube in certain countries. Soon it will be whole websites you can't see.

Also if you don't plan to live in that shit hole country you can bet you will be arrested, fined, or detained whenever you try to go anywhere.

>>139343425
Is hating corporate globalism communism?

>>139341923
>late stage capitalism

the fuck do lawyers have to do with capitalism?

go back to that idiotic subreddit

>>139343553
yes if you want to replace it with government globalism.

>>139341923
Yeah I agree basically. The 1st amendment is tremendously important, and it seems to me that 'free speech' and 'free communication' actually requires legislation and some degree of government intervention against corporate censorship. This is probably a bitter pill for libtards , but it honestly makes sense if you think about it. The govt regulates water supply so you're not poisoned, and electricity so you're not fried, and so on. It makes some sense to regulate media and platforms like search engines as though they were utilities so that corporate leaders can't massively manipulate the public.

It would require carefully constructed legislation and probably the nationalisation of the internet into a utility, though.

Tricky topic, OP. Do you have any thoughts?

File: 1471230136489.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

>>139343707
>in a completely free market where only contracts matter we wont need lawyers

>>139341923
>The constitution means I can use privately owned platforms to spread my hate speech.

Oh sweetheart, thats not how this works at all.

Not even a smidge.

You see, you're no longer welcome. You'll just have to start your own hate speech Nazi sites to spill your garbage on to and even then, we'll go after your ads, hosters, ISPs. Your hate speech isn't safe anywhere.

Get fucked Nazis.

>>139343913
sure thing mr. central planner, anything else you wanna predict for the future?

fucking retard

>>139341923
How come Google was able to take over Yahoo as the dominant search engine then? How come Youtube came in and destroyed RealPlayer?

You don't know shit about capitalism. You're just complaining because you're a loser who doesn't have the talent to build anything.

>>139343923
The Constitution defines the powers of the federal government

>>139343707
>what does crony mean?

File: cable_ass_fuck.jpg (51KB, 640x353px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 640x353px

>>139343707
I think capitalism is great most of the time. But America and the west has not had real capitalism for a long time now. If I just start buying and selling stuff I will be arrested for not following one of THOUSANDS of laws, across dozens of jurisdictions. Read the stories about kids trying to run lemon aid stands. It would be easier just to be a drug dealer.

Once corporations gain control of government they invariably make it hard (with regulations) for any new business to challenge them. I hear people bitch about Jewgle, Jewtube, and Jewbook. But there is no competitor waiting in the wings, because no SMALL company can navigate the regulatory and litigation minefield that (((they))) have set up.

File: 1499109564678.jpg (97KB, 820x1024px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 820x1024px

Free Market won't fix anything. We need to push regulations that treat Google and Facebook as public utilities and enforce the first ammendment on them.

Things like Jordan Peterson's and PJW's ban were quite obviously politically motivated, Cuckerberg needs to change his policies at gun point.

>>139341923

It's also why you don't here rock anymore. All these copy right claims have ruined rock. There's only so many ways you can play six strings on a guitar and people have been playing Rock for the last 50 years. There's no way to create a new guitar rythem that hasn't been played some where, some when already.

>>139343923
>Privately owned
Any company that sells stock is not privately owned, the CEO is merely the handler.

? There already are competitors to google/youtube.

File: CMAOk-AWwAEjxbH.jpg (33KB, 575x556px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 575x556px

>>139341923
I fully agree. Although you'd think the leftist who were complaining about corporate monopolies censoring public opinions and controlling the narrative for years would be alarmed by these recent events. Yet they all seem to celebrating the death of free speech. Most in the left are (((globalist corporate))) stooges, and the funny thing, they still believe they're against the Man, when they have become a tool for the establishment.

File: the_last_taxpayer.jpg (77KB, 1088x1200px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1088x1200px

>>139344466
Crony
>insider
>person with political influence
>friends with people in government
>person who has access to government
>Like nepotism, or (((tribalism))) but for whoever bribes the most

Cronyism is the natural state of most 3rd world non-white shit holes. There's no merit or hard work, just who you know and who you are friends with.

There's no point in working hard for anything because a crony capitalism will just use his "connections" to either steal it or destroy you. That's why so many people come to the west, just so they can keep what they actually create (at least for now).

>>139342303
It would if civil courts didn't exist

What's funny is that the gentiles actually think we give a shit about their stupid "amendments". Fuck them, fuck jesus and fuck their amendments too LOL.

File: gud_id_daun.png (81KB, 502x410px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 502x410px

>>139345037
Maybe I didn't make that clear. When your fledgling company is attacked by lawsuits it might be a legitimate crime you are committing in SOME jurisdictions (like copyright violation), but is just a likely to be some civil suit bullshit.

In the COUNTER-Jihadist community they call them "SLAPP"s, "Strategic Lawsuits to Prevent Public Participation". In some districts if you sue someone and lose YOU have to pay THEIR legal fees. That's why "district" shopping is so important to (((them))). Even if you win they can make you spend $10 for every $1 they spend.

Everyone is talking about the few violent acts in Charlottesville but look closely at the LAWSUITS being brought against the "white supremacists". A lot of these will succeed just because the "white supremacists" don't have access to good lawyers. 20 Years BEFORE the internet the SPLC used this tactic to bankrupt the White Aryan Resistance (look it up). Scientology used this tactic to bankrupt the "Cult Awareness Network"

>>139345932
which is precisely why all civil lawyers need to be hanged. Fucking kikes

>>139343425
>I'm waiting for the replies so I can refute them one by one, but meh...

You sound like a sad piece of shit

File: surbrise.jpg (63KB, 673x459px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 673x459px

>>139348174
Better than a "1 post by this ID". I never start a thread unless I intend to argue in it. It just seems like common courtesy to defend what you start.

>>139343707
OP literally explained what lawyers have to do with capitalism.

File: free_rides_prosperity.jpg (39KB, 640x623px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 640x623px

>>139350171
Final thought. A lot of people will say that big companies like Google MUST be "regulated" like utilities.

My point is that this is just exchanging one master for another. Only by removing the "barriers to entry" for startups can we have true freedom on the net, but the current net giants will fight tooth and nail to prevent any upstarts from gaining traction with regulation, litigation, or just buying them up.

>TL:DR (thread) KILL ALL LAWYERS FOR A BETTER FREER WORLD.