Why are mass immigration, diversity and multiculturalism inherently good?
>>139336617
obligatory "liberals pls discuss"
>>139336703
This is more about something that's been bugging me for some time. I hear the Platitude of "Diversity makes us stronger!" "Immigration is a right of every citizen of the world!". And i want to see their reasoning, not some "google it!" or "you're racist!" platitudes.
I want to know WHY Diversity, mass immigration and multiculturalism are inherent goods. What advantage does a more diverse society have over a less diverse one? And why should countries such as Hungary be less Hungarian?
The sad thing is that some of them will literally say shit like ethnic restaurants with a straight face
>>139336617
They are good because I, libtard, do not want to be ostracised by my fellow libtards.
Take that you Nazies.
>>139336969
Didn't you know you have to be from a place to cook their food, it's like science man, and it's settled
>>139336969
It's very much the "criticising capitalism on an iPhone!"
>>139336617
a) indoctrination (it's good because it's good)
b) economic reasons
And for B they mistake consequences for reason.
Heavy trade areas are rich and diverse, but not rich because they are diverse - filling a city with niggers won't create trade.
Company recruiting talent worldwide becomes diverse, but quotas won't make company prosperous.
Maximising diversity for economic reason is social equivalent of maximising amount of smoke coming out of a steelworks - because large steelwork do create a lot of smoke, so smoke should be a good thing.