Morality question for /pol/

>>139329022

Nah. I used to wonder whether Eugenics of that kind might be useful, but there are way too many variables to consider, and no real way to identify what might make up "potential". Even a complete loser could inspire someone critically.

File: buckwheat.jpg (46KB, 275x305px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 275x305px

>>139329022
>Let's assume you could measure a person's future potential

Nigga what do you think MELANIN is? God paints them, it is up to us to heed the warning.

>>139329022
Future potential in what?

>>139330124
SPBP

>>139330174
bonus points: asians have black hair because they have impure thoughts.

>>139329022
>lower than average
well someone has to be lower then average, so no

Doing that would raise the average to the point where every child was killed.

I propose the same system, but the low-potential people are trained to be domestic workers and service industry types.

I honestly believe that everyone has worth, even that nigger in the back of Mickey Ds who's making my lunch.

>>139329022
>Let's assume you could measure a person's future potential while they are in the womb

And who gets to decide? The jews? The liberals? Put it to a fucking democratic vote?

You know, there's something inherently socialist, or even commie about this thread, cunt.

Better fucking dead than red.

What happened to the small government, personal freedom, individualistic /pol/ I feel in love with?

Trump was the worst thing to ever happen to this board. You all turned into a bunch of boot-licking state worshiping bunch of fucking debased pansies.

Harden the fuck up cunts. Make your own path in the world.

Honestly, how fucking dare you even suggest the state should have this sort of power. Just put your ass up right now, if you're really looking to get fucked by the government, cunt.

Man the fuck up, trumpkikes. Stop submitting to the fucking government.

>>139329022
No. You could take it a step further. If you were able to measure the future potential of offspring (which will more than likely be based on inherited traits) you might aswell only allow those to procreate that possess desireable traits. Then you wouldn't have to worry about abortion.

>>139329022
Yes. Unless you are a pro lifer that abhors abortion, there is no reason not to abort if a child is going to be a miserable retarded genetic defect their whole life. It's better for society and the kid that way.

>>139330024
>>Let's assume
>argues assumption instead of actual question
It's called 'assumption' for a reason.

>>139329022
of course

>>139329022
No, Jesus still loves them

>>139329022
>failing to understand statistics this hard
Buddy, go grab a book and learn the meaning of "average" and "below average".
If you kill all below average that just raises the average and you have to kill more people.

>>139331531
this

>>139329022
Yes.
Next question.

Eugenics would have been a great thing.

Too bad the majority of /pol would have been aborted.

>>139331661

I never said anything about assumption,

File: 1473400120823.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>139329022

Some of the greatest minds of this world wouldn't have been born in highly eugenic societies: e.g. Hawking. Sometimes, weak conditions make you rise above the average pleb.

>>139337618
Who cares? A superior version *COUGH COUGH* would have arisen.

File: 1478045046724.png (2MB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x900px

>>139329022
checked