Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
File: this-is-carl-marks-he-invented-communism-and-ruled-over-7909178.png (179KB, 500x718px)
179KB, 500x718px
I just recently got into politics in the months after the election, and I've seen a lot of different ideas being thrown around, especially communism and socialism. I took a look into both, and I realized that, in America as we know it, socialism/communism would be a lot more effective system. First of all, with the state in control of the market, there would be no feuds in between the different classes of people like there is nowadays. We would not have to worry about inequality, because socialism/communism eliminates the concept of private property, which, if you think about it, is actually quite a selfish and preservationist way of thinking. In addition, though the government controls property and markets, it would be accountable to the people, because the workers own the means of production. This balance of power would encourage cooperation on both sides, limiting the possibility of a corrupt system, as each depends on the other to operate. Lastly, it would break down the social division in this country, because all would be loyal to the state in their collective cooperation to support it. This would common ground enough to encourage integration with each other and a subsequent 'homogeneous cloud' of thought.
I encourage you to find something wrong with this conception, if you can. I just think that this sounds like a much more effective and coherent society all in all.
>>
>First of all, with the state in control of the market, there would be no feuds in between the different classes of people like there is nowadays. We would not have to worry about inequality
So you think that a state wouldn't naturally take advantage of this and use the earnings of the "proletariat" to enrich the country's leader, like it did in every nation claiming to be communist since Marx came out of his kike mother's pussy?
>>
>>139281316
Communism was designed by jews to never be succesful.
It wasn't a legitimate form of government. Just a means to control.
>>
File: Mark+King+I+Feel+Free+21683.jpg (32KB, 500x501px)
32KB, 500x501px
>>139281316
>>
>11 Billion
I guess commies aren't the only retards
>>
File: Bowden_communism.png (869KB, 665x969px) Image search:
[Google]
869KB, 665x969px
>>
>>139281707
>take advantage of this
Granted, if in the case that something like that does happen, the people have the option to revolt. I'm saying that if the government wishes to keep their safety and cushy lifestyle, as well as a stable country, it is in their best interest not to do so. Anyone with enough foresight would realize the flaws behind such selfish actions as 'enriching the leader', and would be able to see the ruination it would bring their country.
>>
File: Bowden7.png (568KB, 900x668px) Image search:
[Google]
568KB, 900x668px
>>
File: bowden_pol pot.png (500KB, 1221x840px) Image search:
[Google]
500KB, 1221x840px
>>
>>139282306
I do think it would be difficult to make up the slaughter of 6 billion jews. Why deny it? The evidence is there.
>>
>>139282306
It's obviously not a real meme. I'm afraid your inability to detect satire may suggest you have autism.
>>
>>139284298
You probably mean 6 milion*, but dont forget the other millions of slavs, gypsies, roma and gays that got burned/starved/shot. On top of that you have another ~10 million soviet citizens that were slaughtered by the nazis
>>
>>139284549
At least someone understands.
>>
>>139284074
>Granted, if in the case that something like that does happen, the people have the option to revolt.
Then how come every communist country that has existed first confiscated weaponry from its citizens? I don't see Venezuela, Cuba, or North Korea with any 2nd amendment equivalent. It's because they want to make revolt impossible, that way it doesn't matter if the majority of the population wants to change what the state does. If a communist state were to rise and not confiscate weapons, it wouldn't last long, as communist nations will use the government's power to enrich the government, the people be damned, and the people would then revolt with their weapons once they saw the corruption that generally accompanies an authoritarian communist society, that's why these countries don't let their citizens have weapons.
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5