Why does /pol/ have such a problem with diversity representation

Here it is done for comedic purposes; not to virtue signal.

>>139266250
Homosexuality in cartoons was seen as comedic, hence, some male characters kissed out of confusion, creating confusion to run away (In the case of bugs) or by accident

>>139267118
This. It's literally done as a joke in looney toons. You are not allowed to joke about queer stuff anymore

>>139266250
it used to be the funniest thing in the world whenever a male character got himself into some awkward situation where he had to dress up as a woman

it was a joke then because like two guys kissing it was such an absurd notion that it made people laugh hysterically

now if you laugh, shame, or use the wrong pronouns you'll wind up jobless or even behind bars in some places

>>139266250
These were used for humour not and agenda take you passive aggressive Normie meme and fuck off. Saged

i like memes that eliminate all context too

>>139266250
So it's true liberals really don't understand humor.

>>139266250
That did not have the purpose of normalizing the behavior. It was the opposite, pointing to the absurdity of it for laughs (because it is not normal).

>>139266250
how dumb do you have to be to think being conservative is a new thing?

>kissing in order to humiliate and incite fury is pro-gay hurrdurr

>>139266250
>10% of population
>90% of media representation
how about stopping with giving false ideas to people.

They can be diverse in non western white countries

>>139266250
Because it's blatant propaganda to brainwash the goyims.

>>139266250
Thanks for reminding me that fags and fag behavior is funny as fuck and should never, will never be taken seriously.

>>139266250
That's a cartoon rabbit if you hadn't noticed.

>>139266250
>Hurr durr why don't you CIS gender shits accept our gay sodomy?!?!

Faggots truly are sick people for wanting everyone to embrace their lifestyle

>>139266250
>complains about gay references in cartoons
>posts beastiality references in cartoons

>>139266250
You do understand that the very fact that Looney Toons use "homosexuality" for comedic effect explicitly shows that, back then, it was considered so outlandish and unthinkable that the mere thought of it evoked laughter?

according to wikipedia LGBT fags only account for 1.6% of the US population

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States

it makes no sense why every new sitcom/drama/etc or w/e has a gay character. they need to stop trying to force that shit, it gets really fucking old