Blacks are intellectually inferior to whites. All around the

>>139260108
>Blacks are entirely unfit for civilization. Blacks existed for 30,000 years before any other subspecies of homo sapien did. During this time, not a single civilization popped up. Only after the advent of cro magnon (white people and others) was there ever any progress made towards civilization. If only ever blacks existed, we would not even be so advanced as to be able to produce crops from agriculture.

I think you might actually be retarded

>>139260321
Prove him wrong then.

>>139260567
i'm not saying he's wrong, i'm just saying his example is akin to an example a retarded person would make. therefore there is a possibility he is retarded, and therefore should not be listened to or given any credibility.

>>139260766
I can make baseless claims too. Your IQ is CLEARLY sub 60 therefore you have no credibility and should not be taken seriously. I've only ever seen non-arguments in response to the OP.

>>139261277
the difference is that your claim is baseless, while mine isn't. op made an example on the level of a 6 year old, and showed such primitive knowledge of history, archaeology and geology that it made me rofl. since when was the cro-magnon a civilised specimen? top kek.

op is either a hillbilly or a retard, pick one

>>139261998
Your claim is baseless, because you're making people ask you to support it instead of offering any support whatsoever. Not to mention you're attacking a man made of straw. OP never said cro magnon was civilized, simply that civilization never even began to advance until after cro magnon. OP never even mentioned geology either, but I assume you're a guns germs and steel retard that actually believes that has some kind of impact on whether or not you can not be a mud-hut dwelling nigger. You're clearly a biased little nigger apologist faggot.

>>139260321
if they were around longer they should be more advanced in technology
>inb4 kangs n shit

>>139262562
no you idiot. that's not how evolution works. a nigga from 200k years ago isn't the same as a nigga today. organisms don't just stop evolving after a certain point. your conclusion might be correct, but the way you got to it is incorrect, A.K.A you're talking about something you know barely anything about and therefore should not be given any credibility.

>>139260108
>Blacks are entirely unfit for civilization. Blacks existed for 30,000 years before any other subspecies of homo sapien did. During this time, not a single civilization popped up

You might not be right. It's possible blacks created high tech society like 15 000 years ago and then caused nuclear storm which started ice age and after that modern civilization rised from 0 while niggers were regressing going from smart being to complete dummies the same way we see now white people go retarded. They fucked with evolution by welfare and they ended up as niggers and can't recover.

It's just a theory but it's possible it might happen to white people too. At least part of them

>>139260766
> i'm not saying he's wrong
> i'm just saying his example is akin to an example a retarded person would make
So the OP is right in what he's saying, just his examples were wrong. Did the OP actually give any examples? I thought the OP was just making blanket true factual statements. If you care to refute any, do so.
But the only one sounding retarded here, is you.

>>139263351
>Blacks are entirely unfit for civilization. Blacks existed for 30,000 years before any other subspecies of homo sapien did. During this time, not a single civilization popped up. Only after the advent of cro magnon (white people and others) was there ever any progress made towards civilization. If only ever blacks existed, we would not even be so advanced as to be able to produce crops from agriculture.

here's his example of black stupidity, even though he's talking about a point in time where races weren't clearly defined.

>>139263349
>. It's possible blacks created high tech society like 15 000 years ago and then caused nuclear storm which started ice age and........
Yea if we just call any fiction possible then I guess that is possible. I mean, in theory, Lord of the Rings could be possible. Star Wars being that it took place in a galaxy far far away and a long time ago is easily possible.
Even if that's not possible, it all could have happened in an alternate reality! Yes, in alternate reality black people could have created a high tech society 15000 years ago that.....
Eat my crum.

>>139263019
That's not even the same person you redditor. And since it seems like you're actually trying to present arguments now, now is a great time to tear you a new asshole.

So your argument is that humans (and blacks) all got collectively smarter in the last 200,000 years, and that it's just a big coincidence that civilization didn't happen after cro magnon? Do you have any evidence to back up that claim or are you just assuming because it's convenient for your nigger-loving sensibilities? Your understanding of archaeological anthropology is so facile it's laughable. Did you even graduate high school you simpleton?

Just to reiterate, you said your claim wasn't baseless, and now I'm asking you to provide a base for it. Provide evidence in your next post that humans collectively evolved in a way conducive towards civilization in the past 200,000 years or you're going to look like a mega retard.

>>139263520
What are you talking about not clearly defined? Cro magnon is clearly defined and is clearly a different breed of human resulting from the pairing of early homo sapiens and neanderthals.

>>139263747
i am aware that isn't the same person, but since he agrees with op might as well treat him the same way

anyways, you're claiming i said things i never did. i never said a nigga is as smart as a white man, simply that op clearly doesn't know what he's talking about.

humans didn't evolve in the same direction for the past 200k years. asians are the superior race, then whitey and lastly the nigga. this was more my attempt to piss off people than actually argue in favor of blacks.

also i don't use plebbit

>>139263520

I get where you are coming from but you missed the point he was trying to make. He believes blacks had a head start. Still nothing. Only after white people's ancestors came along did civilization start. If only blacks had ever existed, there would be no agriculture much less anything else.
He worded it a little funny. But that's what he was trying to say. I'm not educated on his assumptions regarding homo sapiens and sub species etc. So I'm not arguing those points.

>>139264143
>What are you talking about not clearly defined? Cro magnon is clearly defined and is clearly a different breed of human resulting from the pairing of early homo sapiens and neanderthals.

My bad here. I misunderstood OP when he said that blacks appeared 30k years before other races, thinking he was referring to 200k years ago as the start of the black man, as that is the start of the homo sapien, and 170k years ago as the start of other races, which is wrong.

>>139264284
>asians are the superior race,

Wrong. I am not going to call people who by and large have built nothing more than a COPY of westernized white society and only half decently at that superior. Their lack of empathy is often shocking. They seem far more robotic and reptilian in nature. They are smaller. They are shorter. They are often brash with hot tempers.
No I won't be calling them superior. Whites didn't copy their culture and technology.
Raw IQ tests alone do not prove superiority. Many IQ tests are mainly academic, and do not test logic, reason, spatial awareness, empathy, imagination, or resourcefulness.
All of which the white man has in great solid abundance.

>not posting more pics
for shame

>>139264826
I'm not entirely disagreeing with you, but logic is one of the things IQ tests focuses heavily on, unless you mean common sense. I would also argue that assertiveness, individuality, and love of freedom are major players in why western civilizations have thrived relative to eastern ones.

File: 1502940025395.jpg (57KB, 720x718px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 720x718px

>>139260321
>>139260766
>>139261998
>Serbian thinks he knows about niggers

Oh LOL.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Serbia#Ethnic_groups

>>139265171
> assertiveness, individuality, and love of freedom
Yes...yes could be. But as I said that I would count as logic, reason, and even empathy.
If these qualities are greater in white men, and it lead to them building the finest and brightest societies, then that alone makes them superior.
But it might not even be that.
I can not tell you why. I know white men built the greatest societies ever existing on earth through multiple time periods. This is true. Other races and cultures eventually copied it or they were left behind.
I can not say exactly what qualities in white men caused this......
I can not exactly say why other races did not achieve the same and even now have not......
At the time I can only ponder.....

>>139264826
depends on how you define "superiority".

asians may have copied what whites have done, but they do it a lot better, and a lot faster. specifically in japan. if blacks invented mud huts, you could say that whites perfected them into houses, but that's not what we're talking about right now.

what you're talking about is superiority as defined by success in modern human society, in which, if we are talking by biological standards, the black man dominates. you see, in evolution, "natural selection" is an often misunderstood term. it's not creatures that are just physically and intellectually superior, but ones that are better adapted to their environment. for example, while insects are not the smartest animals, they are extremely durable and breed insanely quickly, which is why they have survived for billions of years. the same logic can be applied to blacks. Where as blacks are not good at building and creating new environments, they are particularly good at adapting to environments made by whites, relying more on their physical traits rather than mental ones, which allows them to breed more efficiently than whites and asians, extending their survival. If they weren't so good at this, we wouldn't be worrying about the end of the white race right now.

what can i say, nature prefers quantity to quality.

>>139265399
why do all americans have the argumentative abilities of a preschool child?

>>139265677
>Japan doing anything better than the USA
Yeah, nah

>>139265677

Eh....I wouldn't want black biological traits. They're breeding is careless and without thought. It causes mongrels without fathers. I wouldn't call this survival. They have bad hearts. They have shorter lives.
> particularly good at adapting to environments made by whites
Due to white empathy handing them things to survive as we do EVERYONE. Everyone is good at surviving in white society. You just go to the welfare office. Set up by whites....
> If they weren't so good at this, we wouldn't be worrying about the end of the white race right now.
Well Jews have targeted every single white nation for mass immigration of everyone else. As much as possible. Since the whole rest of the world is a toilet this is somewhat easy.
Jews have taken every sector of society and they want to be the special people.
THIS is why we are concerning ourselves with white survival. We are under attack. Everywhere.
But this has nothing to do with black, or any other race except Jew in this case.

>>139260108
I lived in Hong Kong, Mainland China and Singapore. Asians are great at imitation and in some cases innovation. But they cant abstract. All their learning is done by rigorous memorization and they are stuck in their ways until a great big shit storm happens.

I taught kids in Singapore English. One day I asked them to write a story about anything but it had to be original. 9/10ths of the class gave me the exact same work but with the names changed. The other tenth just copied work from online sources and I easily google searched it.

In Northern China I visited a 'white' village. It was founded by Russians hundreds of years ago. Even though they were poor they had a better quality of life than the ethnically Chinese villages around them. Why? Because they invented tools to make agriculture better and easier even shared them with the surrounding villages. The Chinese outright refused and some older people still to this day do almost everything manually. It wasn't until the Chinese govt forced them to modernize did they get anywhere near the output and production of the white village.

>>139260766
ad hom
see the sticky

>>139263349
>It's just a theory
No it's not. I've heard theories before, and none of them sound this stupid.

>>139260108
Why is it always attacks on blacks?
All non Europeans / Japanese /Koreans are subhumans.

>>139267561
Because that's the normie's gateway into racial realism. And yes, there are normies browsing this board RIGHT now.

>>139265758
shut up, poopyface

>>139267561
Niggers are the worst, by far. Other groups have varying degrees of compatibility (with spics and abos also being around nigger-tier) with civilization, but niggers provide the most striking contrast.

>>139267918
Shithead in thread acquired

>>139267249
not an ad hominem if it's based off of something op has done

>>139268427
you smell like farts

File: 084.png (102KB, 300x256px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 300x256px

>>139268696

>>139267561
>All non Europeans / Japanese /Koreans are subhumans.

I'm honestly not that harsh with my judgements. The only group of people I really dislike are niggas and abos. I'm more of a race realist than a racist. I just accept that some, including me, tend to be inferior to others

>>139268852
I'm a big boy.

>>139265758
The most childish fall for the bait

>>139268996
Spend some time with our spics and you'll change your views quickly. And how can you not have a problem with mudshits?

>>139268996
you've never met abo in your life, moron

>>139269048
>i'm a big boy


>the most childish
Yep seams about right

>>139268131
>with spics and abos also being around nigger-tier

aren't abos like, the worst of the worst? not much experience with them, have never talked with them online since they probably don't even use computers. the only thing i know about them are aussie stories here and images. I have never seen a mildly attractive abo btw, do those exist?

>>139267561
Meh, Japanese, Koreans and Chinese can greate good and well-functioning societies. Even when they immigrate to western countries they do not commit crime and are a net-positive to society.

That said, I would still like to keep Sweden Swedish.

>>139269178
til i'm a moron for not meeting a group of people that live 10 thousand kilometers away from me.

other aussies here have drastically different opinions on abos

>>139260108
>he makes this thread everyday.

What for my dull child?

>>139260108
Plenty of black African countries in the Caribbean that are safe. Some African countries too. They might not be rich but they are safe.

>>139260108
black people need to be thrown from rooftops

>>139269471
13/50 posts
Wtf, man?
Are you seriously wasting your time like this?

>>139269866
Prop lazy feg with nothing better to do,

>>139269866
i got some free time on my hands, why not waste it on /pol/? this place has given me some of the best laughs in my entire life, and a serious debate is something that can be fun too

>>139269986
>Prop lazy feg with nothing better to do,

>LARPs as a nazi online
>tells me this

>>139260108

ALL RACES ARE INFERIOR TO CENTRAL ASIAN TURANIC MASTER RACE. WHITES ARABS INDIANS ASIANS AND NIGGERS ALL BOW TO THEIR TURANIC OVERLORDS.

KAZAKHNTAN IS NOT TURANIC THOUGH

>>139270190
Littarly have nothing better to do
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>>139269538
cite specific ones so we can refute these alleged examples

>>139269260
Abos are so retarded on average that they're mostly harmless. They just get high on gasoline and lounge around all day asking for gibs. Developmentally, they're worse, but more tolerable because of it.
Niggers are just smart enough to cause chaos and damage if left unchecked.

>>139269986
I dunno, what he is doing, but sunday on /pol/, well, that may vary
>>139270079
Indeed, /pol/ is a great place to troll retards, I as a libertarian do it also
There were african civilisations, but they never were enough resourcesful to fuel some expensive wars due to their climate (rainforests, deserts, mountains, you name it)

>>139271045
>climate
>mountains

File: realism.gif (861KB, 2970x2483px) Image search: [Google]

861KB, 2970x2483px

>>139260108

>>139270758
if what you're saying is true that's really a sad existence they have

>>139271228
>Implying you´re too retarded to realise, that mountains can´t be moved out of a way to make some decent agriculture

Evolution is a fables story for adults. Yes, believe you fell out of a chimps ass.

>>139271878
It's only sad from our perspective. If left alone, they can actually be very content and serene, but modern society ruins it by forcing intelligence to the forefront. Then it's a nightmare, because they are completely unable to compete.

A good example of relatively untouched Abo-tier people would be the Khoisan. They have similar IQ scores (Average is like 50-55, a whole standard deviation below niggers), but also maintain quite peaceful "societies" in little huts.

>>139271600
Modern day Africans are the ones, who never mixed with other genuses of Homo

Look it up, mate

>>139271045
>tropical/desert climate means you can't fund wars
Explain the Aztecs. OP is wrong in that there were civilizations, but they were by no means advanced. Niggers are just retarded.

>>139272311
i hope this is bait.

File: 1499468281500.gif (871KB, 357x200px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 357x200px

>>139272513
>a whole standard deviation below niggers

>>139260108
I came here only to laugh at your apparent love for chink drawings. Get an actual white woman.
>inb4 muh anime site, this is no-bully zone for weebs

>>139272311
Evolution
>We all are the descendants of the retarded fish, who went on land
>We are one species
>We are only looking on evolution without all the subspecies of Homo genus mixing, what happened to the Caucasoids and Mongoloids

>>139260108
You're absolutely correct.

>>139272513
>Khoisan
San people (Bushmen) in general are like that. They have interesting physical features as well. Thank god Southern African nations like Botswana and South Africa have reservations for these people, Africa and modern economics simply don't mix.

>>139272009
>africans couldn't farm because mountains

Abyssinia.

>>139273451
yes.

the same thing happened in scandinavia (except denmark), that's why viking raids happened.

same thing happened in central asia, only this time because of deserts these people relied on pillaging wealthier neighboring kingdoms.

>>139260108
You should really kill yourself. Little bitch

>>139272763
Aztecs were waging wars for fucking sacrifices
Mayans are where it´s at

What kind of civilisation do you view as advanced?
European?
Asian?
Mesoamerican?

Not all the civilisations have to leave such huge marks on Earth as Europeans

Africans never were mixed or influenced by different climate
If a fruit grows along your regular lazy life, for you then to pick it up and eat it, then you will become too comfortable with your life

Europeans experienced harsh climates as winters, so they had to adapt by inventing new things compared to Africans

>>139273451
Listen to this guy>>139273687

File: download (1).gif (29KB, 706x407px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 706x407px

>>139273577
Just because you Italians failed to conquer it doesn't mean Ethiopia was in any way an advanced nation on the global scale. On a regional scale maybe, but that's because Haile Selassie pushed westernisation on the country.

Also, Axum was created by Semites from the middle east. The Amhara language and alphabet of Ethiopia are semitic.

>>139273782
Mad, jamal?

>>139273687
I'm pretty sure you can't liken the farming conditions of Africa to fuckin Scandinavia because of muh mountains n shiet.

>>139263699
No. Not the alternate reality.

There are many signs of ancient civilizations over 10 000 years old who were far more advanced then any civilization 1000 years ago. In 15 000 years there won't be many things left after what you see now. Especially if there are people putting much efford into destroying any signes of our culture. As we can see it now. People are also getting way dumber.

And right now we have technology to anihilate ourselves. And it is possible that past civilizations achieved similar levels.

So it is not impossible. But you didn't learn about it anywhere so you will treat it as fiction becouse you are simply narrow minded and lack imagination.

>>139260108
>Blacks are intellectually inferior to whites. All around the world, whites and asians have created pockets of safe and productive communities (read: not nations), yet, on the ENTIRE PLANET, not a single safe and productive black community exists. Are we to believe slavery is to blame for the failure of every single black person that ever existed? Are we to believe the entire planet is racist against them, and that's why they can't get ahead? If so then maybe there's a good reason for that.
>
>Blacks are entirely unfit for civilization. Blacks existed for 30,000 years before any other subspecies of homo sapien did. During this time, not a single civilization popped up. Only after the advent of cro magnon (white people and others) was there ever any progress made towards civilization. If only ever blacks existed, we would not even be so advanced as to be able to produce crops from agriculture.
>
>Blacks are a scourge on civilization that must be removed. Prove me wrong.
>
>Inb4 non-arguments.
Nice sample faggot make this this thread once you can get an HD image of Mika.

>>139260766
so a classic ad hominem attack? btw i didn't even read the comment I just dont like people calling other people retarded

>>139274323
Can you grow a plant in a desert or high in the mountains?

File: download (3).jpg (1MB, 1779x1437px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1779x1437px

>>139274323
yes you can. In fact, Africa is way worse for farming. The mountains in Africa don't form chains like they do in Europe, and for that reason winds in Africa, and by extension the rainfall in Africa is extremely unpredictable. Where Africans had the opportunity to build civilisations, they did. Look up Kilwa Kisiwani on Wikipedia. Pic related is how Europeans depicted it.

>>139261998
Cro-Magnon (/kroʊˈmænjən/ (About this sound listen) or US: /kroʊˈmæɡnən/; French: [kʁomaɲɔ̃]) is a common name that has been used to describe the first early modern humans (early Homo sapiens sapiens) that lived in the European Upper Paleolithic.

File: 1493610758222.jpg (62KB, 361x406px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 361x406px

>>139260108
HATIN ON BLACKS, CUS U GOT SMALL DICK

>>139274906
somebody already said that to me, and i elaborated. it was a rude way of saying op doesn't know what he's talking about. could you read where the conversation is NOW, and then reply?

>>139275089
so you had to look up cro-magnon on google? doesn't sound like you know much about it. do you know what Paleolithic means?

psst

it means stone age.

they were cave men

>>139275065
>The average elevation of the continent approximates closely to 600 m (2,000 ft) above sea level, roughly near to the mean elevation of both North and South America
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography_of_Africa

You were saying, dumbass?

>>139275067
>The entirety of Africa is bad for farming
Yeah sure buddy.

>>139275437
no I didn't have to look it up, I did so to post the information to people you're trying to disinform. I know exactly what it is. And yes I know what paleolithic means also. Late stone age around 10,000 bc.

https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/development-of-agriculture/

You make the mistake of thinking some right wingers aren't highly educated. We are. Your days are numbered.

File: Africa_(satellite_image).jpg (141KB, 1024x995px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1024x995px

>>139276003
>Being this retarded
Oh, your numbers, lol
What about the fucking Sahara?
What about the fucking jungles?
What about your missing brain?

>>139276003
of course the entirety isn't. there's the nile, which is perfect for farming. it rises at the same time every year and is surrounded by desert on both sides, making it impossible for bandits to steal your shit. the only other farmable areas of africa are madagascar, most of south africa and ethiopia in very minor regions.

ever notice how europeans have pillaged the americas 3 decades after they discovered them, but left africa alone until the 1870s even though they knew of its existence since ancient times? here's your answer.

File: 1362744134002.gif (1MB, 200x183px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 200x183px

>>139260567
I can give you an argument as opposed to my other countryman.
>blacks were isolated from the other cvilizations by the Sahara and also had low populations due to being hunter-gatherers as opposed to modern times where abrupt introduction of agriculture without proper adaptability shot their populations sky-high into retarded levels that are unmanageable without slow adaption that the rest of societies in Eurasia experienced over the centuries
>they were thus not only exempt from the technological, scientific, political, ideological, cultural, and religious exchange between east and west through the Middle East which elevated all of Eurasia in different ways
>but abrupt and dangerously fast inclusion to the aforementioned also fucked them up
>ergo nignogs are nignogs because of bad fucking luck
>bad fucking luck in where they lived
>bad fucking luck in how they lived
>bad fucking luck in the circumstances that assailed them
>bad fucking luck all-around
Unfortunately, it is inclusion which is fucking up nignogs.
They need to be left alone to create their own borders, to genocide each other until they've had enough of genocide ON THEIR OWN ACCORD, and then to seek elevation by themselves rather than us sending them packages to feel like some kinds of saviors.

>>139276389
no. there are plenty of right wingers that are smart. you're not making any arguments by defining what cro-magnon means though.

>>139260108

XD yup keep spreading this nonsense. While real productive people go out and improve the quality of life for others you can stay here and waste away behind your computer. Thank God for 4Chan so real humand beings never have to deal with you and others like you in real life. So keep up what your doing troll boy.

>>139276845
>XD

did this thread get shared on reddit or something? serious question

>>139276845
exactly I cant wait for them to shut down 4chan and these autistic savants are forced to embarrass you in public too

>>139260108
Kinda preaching to the choir, mate.

>>139276401
>Sahara
Blacks, by definition, inhabit the area south of the Sahara. That's why they're called sub-saharan Africans.
>Jungles
>The entirety of sub-saharan Africa is jungle
>Jungles are impossible to remove
>You being educated
>Any of this being true

>>139276585
Ya, of course it isn't. My point exactly. Your example about the Europeans is lacking, because you're ignoring the fact that North America was mostly empty even before what little population was there got ravaged by disease.

>>139273857
Exactly. Africans are morons, because they don't need to be anything else.

>>139276845
Exactly the post I would expect from an assblasted, nigger-sympathizing liberal with no counter-argument whatsoever. You've done nothing to convince anyone of your beliefs yet you've done everything to communicate your inability to back them up.

>>139277145
see >>139276845

>>139277166
I am really considering, if you´re that retard, who doesn´t understand, why genetic engineering is bad in a long run.

Anyways, fucking rainfall, diseases, remoteness, etc...

(FFS, I am talking to a five year old)

>>139275067
>Kilwa Kisiwani
Swahili--that is, from the Arabs, who didn't have a very good opinion of native niggers.

>>139277166
>North America was mostly empty even before what little population was there got ravaged by disease.

LOL, the complete opposite.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenochtitlan

This city had almost 300k people in it.

>>139277332
Exactly, because (((evolution))) made them this way

File: why africa is poor.jpg (874KB, 1557x1200px) Image search: [Google]

874KB, 1557x1200px

>>139260108
POSTING MUST READ

>>139277555
The Swahilis are bantu people who immigrated from Modern-day Drc and Zambia to the coast.

Just because they didn't like tribesmen doesn't make them arab. Advanced civilisations tend to look down upon inferior cultures no matter the skin color (t. ancient greeks)

>>139277644
kek

>>139276401
He's not retarded. The river systems by themselves in sub-Saharan Africa can have their coasts irrigated perfectly well using technology far more advanced than what Egyptians used around the Nile even at its most difficult banks. There's plenty of areas with good soil for farming, even Uganda is a perfect example, while some of the most "impossible" areas to irrigate were still tackled by white farmers in south Africa during the colony years, and successfully at that.
Congo alone could feed the majority of Africa and then some if it wasn't a constantly warring and suicidal unstable social shitpile much like my country is.

>>139277777
Good read

>>139277560
And, as we all know, the continent was littered with Tenochtitlans, letting alone the diseases that wiped out 90% of Native Americans.

>>139277514
Yeah man. Fuckin rainfall. Fuckin diseases. Fuckin remoteness. It not, dey, poe nigguhz fault, n shiet. We wuz, commaz, in shiet. We wuz education n shiet. We wuz intelligent n shiet.

File: 1502870119019.png (15KB, 469x331px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 469x331px

>>139260766
> Your average liberal

>>139277926
the congo basin is barely airable. The river does create a large basin, but it's barely possible to expect an african tribesman to cut down the dense foliage already there. And what "impossible areas" are you reffering to? The only places in Africa that I can think of that have notable white farmers are south africa, namibia and zimbabwe.

>>139278355
i'm a fucking right-wing traditionalist, please stop being obnoxious. if you're actually going to say something worth my time, please do it

>>139278559
Oh please. You trying to come off as an intellectual is pathetic. You even stated previously in this thread that your time was worthless. You citing Tenochtitlan was a textbook cherry picking fallacy, and you expect anyone here to believe that you are an intellectual when you're using logical fallacies left and right?

>>139278359
The Congo should never have its foliage cut because it is a critical climatic region for the world along with the Amazon, so talk of cutting jungles there specifically can fuck off.
I'm talking impossible areas with high clay, iron, sandy soil among other things. Controlling tides is also hellish with some rivers, but doable.
White farmers have been employed in far more than just south africa, namibia and zimbabwe.
Even Israel during the 70's and 80's had a big farming technology and research focus which sent surveys everywhere around the world to document and evaluate for trade, investment, and personal development purposes.
Think you should be able to find some documentation on irrigation potential around the globe and projected potential outputs.

>>139277777
Wasted quints

>>139277777
High-quality post, burger

>>139277926
You seem to underestimate climate, my friend

>>139278136
Climate, man, try running to a desert, then come back how far you´ve come off the road

>>139278986
Read it, it's eye opening.

>>139278940
nah not really. why tf would i try to come of as an intellectual on an anonymous board lol? i'm simply looking for people that have at least some knowledge of what they're talking about.

could you point out at least one of my logical fallacies?

>>139278989
Son you can barely string together a coherent sequence of words, let alone form anything resembling a convincing argument. Stop trying.

>>139279286
>anyone who disagrees with me doesn't know what they're talking about
You want to know how I know you're not an intellectual? Because there are as many people trying to belittle others by acting like they're knowledgable when they're really not as there are retards who can't recognize their intellectual betters. You're just another drop in that pathetic bucket. That's not how intellectuals engage eachother in reasoned debate.

>could you point out at least one of my logical fallacies?
Why don't you try using your eyeballs and do this thing called reading and reread the post you linked.

looks like the thread is dead. good night /pol/, it's sleep time for me. it was a fun talk we had

>>139279977
>>anyone who disagrees with me doesn't know what they're talking about

literally never even hinted at this. there are valid examples to showcase niggas aren't as developed as whites, you picked the most obscure and mostly invalid one

>You want to know how I know you're not an intellectual?

i'm not, and i never claimed i was. i'm not an egoist, and as long as someone can make a good argument, like my fellow countryman did in one of the above posts, i respect it

>Why don't you try using your eyeballs and do this thing called reading and reread the post you linked.

and then you call me a pseudointellectual for calling you retarded. this is literally what someone says when they don't know what to say.

>>139279422
Seriously, back off, if you have not enough intellect to handle this much information

>>139280027
LMAO literally running away in fear. Cya retard.

>>139280499
>and then you call me a pseudointellectual for calling you retarded. this is literally what someone says when they don't know what to say.
In case you couldn't figure out the fallacy I'm accusing you of was already in the post you monkey.

>>139280639
i'll be here for another 15 minutes if it makes you happy, mutt. i replied to your previous post.

File: download (4).jpg (25KB, 479x480px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 479x480px

>>139280752
yes, and i have explained why i have called you a retard, because you are one.

seriously, i have never seen someone this assblasted about the fact that they aren't as smart as they think they are.

File: GB IQ.png (72KB, 593x408px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 593x408px

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/sep/27/james-flynn-race-iq-myths-does-your-family-make-you-smarter

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwib-tvMx_jVAhXBAMAKHfurD_MQFggoMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unz.com%2Farticle%2Fthe-iq-gap-is-no-longer-a-black-and-white-issue%2F&usg=AFQjCNHWoKC-48UpLM6HYbAcEk03TD49Og

tl;dr
the average IQ of an american in the 1900 was 30 points below what it was in 2012

Blacks in america are an outlier as the average IQ of blacks in the uk is 94 but even they are beginning to improve as the black white gap has shrunk by 5 points in the last 20 years.

>>139281173
>STILL dodging the fact that you're a filthy fallacy user
Kid I am an intellectual and you already admitted you're not one. Obviously you don't think I am but that's because it takes one to know, and you're too stupid to recognize your betters, as previously mentioned. Watching you flounder about trying to make arguments but failing was a real treat. Now get lost.

>>139281419
>>STILL dodging the fact that you're a filthy fallacy user
the only thing i used was an ad hominem, and only on you. if you payed attention, you might have noticed that people with average iqs get treated normally. retards like you don't

>Kid
t. a child

>I am an intellectual
no, you are a below average idiot. it's weird that you americans think that someone needs to be an intellectual to tell bullshit arguments apart from legit ones.

>and you're too stupid to recognize your betters
keep living in your fantasy world, how's your social life going by the way?

>Watching you flounder about trying to make arguments but failing was a real treat
>assblasted and now trying to one-up by talking down to people

wow you sure are one intellectual

>>139281966
Since you seem to think you're superior to me then go ahead and tell me how citing Tenochtitlan was not a logical fallacy. Put your money where your mouth is you imbecile.

Actually whites came first, then blacks, then we started building walls and cities.

File: peace corps africa.png (769KB, 1032x2291px) Image search: [Google]

769KB, 1032x2291px

>>139277777
>had it but good read
see other version .jpg

>>139282200
you need to explain why it is a fallacy first. you need to look at the context of the argument before actually calling it a fallacy.

the argument the other anon made was that europeans shredded the americas faster than africa is because compared to africa, the americas had a tiny population. i used tenochtitlan as evidence that there were densely populated areas in the americas, as africa was nothing close to the breeding ground it is today

>>139281966
>>139282200
For Christ sakes' I have to FORCE you to address your own logical fallacies because your reading comprehension and general intelligence is too stupid to realize that I'm implying that you aren't doing so and that not doing so automatically makes you a retard. Like do you not understand that? Do you honestly think you can claim you're not inferior when you just casually make logical fallacies like it's nothing? Jesus christ.

>>139282647
yeah exactly. I need to explain it to you. EXPLAIN IT TO ME WITH YOUR SUPERIOR BRAIN PLEASE I'M TOO MUCH OF A COCKROACH TO UNDERSTAND ON MY OWN. Now you're beginning to see why you're a contemptible little insect.

It's a fallacy because the argument was that Europeans ended up exploiting The Americas because it was sparsely populated. You can't cite one city as a counter-example because it does not address the rest of the continent. It's both a fallacy of composition and a cherry picking fallacy.

And by the way, Europeans didn't even end up dominating where Tenochtitlan was (central America). That place is dominated by latinos, which are, in part, descendents of the original inhabitants, so you're doubly wrong.

And now, unlike you, I unironically have to drive out of town on business because my time isn't worthless and I can't afford to spend any more of it explaining basic concepts to a little weasel.

File: image.jpg (21KB, 275x228px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 275x228px

>Blacks are entirely unfit for civilization. Blacks existed for 30,000 years before any other subspecies of homo sapien did

Actually, the allele of MCPH1 that causes macrocephaly only introgressed into Africans 37,000 years ago, and sub-saharan Africans are the youngest race;

>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcephalin
>Microcephalin (MCPH1) is a gene that is expressed during fetal brain development. Certain mutations in MCPH1, when homozygous, cause primary microcephaly—a severely diminished brain
>A derived form of MCPH1 called haplogroup D appeared about 37,000 years ago (any time between 14,000 and 60,000 years ago) and has spread to become the most common form of microcephalin throughout the world except Sub-Saharan Africa
>Haplogroup D may have originated from a lineage separated from modern humans approximately 1.1 million years ago and later introgressed into humans

Let's get technical;

>https://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Rs2442513

Orange is AA, green is AC, and blue is CC. The three letter codes can be read here;

>https://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Help_(population_diversity)

YRI, LWK and MKK are all African populations, and ASW is the acronym for American blacks.

If you look at pic related, you can see that CC only exists in Africans.

Only homozygotic Africans express microcephaly, but the point is that the CC homozygote genotype only exists in African populations. The low IQ's of every sub-Saharan African country is the evidence required to prove that blacks are clincally retarded, and that the C allele is associated with low IQ - as you can see, AC is also almost entirely limited to the African populations.

In my next post, I'll discuss other introgressions that occured in Africans around the same time.

>>139283048
it's 2am here retard, ever heard of timezones? i assumed you didn't.

even though i wanted to leave half an hour ago.

also stop being so assblasted about what anonmyous people say on /pol/

File: image.jpg (186KB, 950x1344px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 950x1344px

>>139283210

>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3174671/
>A long-debated question concerns the fate of archaic forms of the genus Homo: did they go extinct without interbreeding with anatomically modern humans, or are their genes present in contemporary populations? This question is typically focused on the genetic contribution of archaic forms outside of Africa. Here we use DNA sequence data gathered from 61 noncoding autosomal regions in a sample of three sub-Saharan African populations (Mandenka, Biaka, and San) to test models of African archaic admixture
>Three candidate regions showing deep haplotype divergence
>Interestingly, the Mbuti represent the only population in our survey that carries the introgressive variant at all three candidate loci
>Extensive simulation results reject the null model of no admixture and allow us to infer that contemporary African populations contain a small proportion of genetic material (≈2%) that introgressed ≈35 kya from an archaic population that split from the ancestors of anatomically modern humans ≈700 kya
>One candidate locus with an unusual segment of DNA that extends for >31 kb on chromosome 4 seems to have introgressed into modern Africans from a now-extinct taxon that may have lived in central Africa
>We estimated an initial split time of 1.25 Mya (95% CI, 0.7–2.1 Mya) and an admixture time of 37 kya (95% CI, 1–137 kya

What this entails is that A000 is an H. erectus lineage defined by the P91-8T allele that split off from the rest of mankind around 1,250,000YBP, introgressing into multiple BT-lineages around 37,000YBP and granting it the mutant M91-8T allele that defines Y-haplogroups A1b, A1a-T and A2-T and their descendent clades. We have three candidate regions of introgression, and we need to explain exactly three different introgressions into different BT sub-clades.

File: image.jpg (344KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 1920x1080px

>>139284058

If you had a pure population of A000 in Africa and a mixed population of A000 derived, P91-8T mutants and pure Y-Adam SLC24A5-A homozygotes in Eurasia, over the long term Y chromosomal signatures such as the P91-8T, if caused by recombination of A000 and Y-Adam sex chromosomes, would be lost in non-A clades since the P91-8T mutation could only be passed on by direct Y descent. Yet, other genes inherited from A000 such as the G allele of SLC24A5 could be passed down to P91-9T descendents.

This could be explained by noting that chimps, gorillas and orangutans all have 48 chromosomes, while all humans have 46. Molecular clock analysis and the 765kYBP origin for neanderthals establishes 765kYBP as the latest date for chromosomal fusion;

>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/27708712/
>The reduction in chromosome number was caused by the head-to-head fusion of two ancestral chromosomes to form human chromosome 2
>Next generation sequencing and molecular clock analyses estimated that this fusion arose prior to our last common ancestor with Neandertal and Denisovan hominins~0.74 - 4.5 million years ago

During this fusion, chromosome Y received a 100,000 basepair transposition from chromosome 1;

>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/11863072/
>During our search for evolutionary breakpoints on the Y chromosome, it transpired that a transposition of an approximately 100-kb DNA fragment from chromosome 1 onto the Y chromosome must have occurred in a common ancestor of human, chimpanzee and bonobo. Only the Y chromosomes of these three species contain the chromosome-1-derived fragment; it could not be detected on the Y chromosomes of gorillas or the other primates examined. Thus, this shared derived (synapomorphic) trait provides clear evidence for a Homo-Pan clade independent of DNA sequence analysis

File: image.jpg (97KB, 700x694px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 700x694px

>>139284304

The common ancestor of bonobos and chimpanzees lived less than one million years ago;

>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15483319/
>The bonobo and the common chimpanzee are estimated to have diverged approximately 0.86 to 0.89 MYA, and the divergence of the two common chimpanzee subspecies is estimated to have occurred 0.42 MYA

However, chimpanzees and bonobos have interbred since 860kYBP;

>https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161027142434.htm
>Published in the journal Science, the study from scientists at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and their international collaborators showed that one percent of chimpanzee genomes are derived from bonobos

And the oldest fossil evidence of chimpanzees only dates back to 500kYBP;

>http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050829/full/news050829-10.html
>500,000-year-old teeth shed light on evolutionary split between humans and chimps
>Palaeontologists digging in the dusty wastelands of East Africa have discovered the first known chimpanzee fossil

If it weren't for the evidence of introgression at 1250kYBP in Africa and the 1000kYBP estimate for the formation of the Denisovan gene pool, there would be no reason to believe chimpanzees were older than 860kYBP. However, if A000 was formed by introgression from a 48q-P91-8T hominid, that implies that Y-Adam was descended from a 46q-P91-9T hominid that emerged before 1250kYBP, meaning that the the 48-46 split happened before 1250kYBP.

>>139260108

That's right. Keep up that false sense of superiority for as long as you can. LOL

File: image.jpg (518KB, 1593x2102px) Image search: [Google]

518KB, 1593x2102px

>>139285764

Blacks have smaller brains - see >>139283210.