[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Anyone ever read his Manifesto?

This is a red board which means that it's strictly for adults (Not Safe For Work content only). If you see any illegal content, please report it.

Thread replies: 308
Thread images: 33

File: unabomber.jpg (55KB, 509x406px)
unabomber.jpg
55KB, 509x406px
Just started reading it for some reason and it's pretty interesting...
http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt
It was published in September, 1995.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MODERN LEFTISM

6. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled
society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of
our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can
serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern
society in general.

7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century
leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today
the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be
called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in
mind mainly socialists, collectivists, "politically correct" types,
feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and
the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these
movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing
leftism is not so much a movement or an ideology as a psychological
type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by
"leftism" will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of
leftist psychology (Also, see paragraphs 227-230.)
>>
>>139207806
8. Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good deal less
clear than we would wish, but there doesn't seem to be any remedy for
this. All we are trying to do is indicate in a rough and approximate
way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main
driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim to be telling
the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is
meant to apply to modern leftism only. We leave open the question of
the extent to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of
the 19th and early 20th century.

9. The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we
call "feelings of inferiority" and "oversocialization." Feelings of
inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while
oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of
modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.
>>
>>139207854
FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY

10. By "feelings of inferiority" we mean not only inferiority feelings
in the strictest sense but a whole spectrum of related traits: low
self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies,
defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend
to have such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these
feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.

11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said
about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that
he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is
pronounced among minority rights advocates, whether or not they belong
to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are
hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities. The terms
"negro," "oriental," "handicapped" or "chick" for an African, an
Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory
connotation. "Broad" and "chick" were merely the feminine equivalents
of "guy," "dude" or "fellow." The negative connotations have been
attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal
rights advocates have gone so far as to reject the word "pet" and
insist on its replacement by "animal companion." Leftist
anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about
primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative.
They want to replace the word "primitive" by "nonliterate." They seem
almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive
culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that
primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the
hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)
>>
These kind of threads usually disappear within minutes.
>>
>>139207916
12. Those who are most sensitive about "politically incorrect"
terminology are not the average black ghetto-dweller, Asian immigrant,
abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of
whom do not even belong to any "oppressed" group but come from
privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold
among university professors, who have secure employment with
comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual, white
males from middle-class families.

13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of
groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American
Indians), repellent (homosexuals), or otherwise inferior. The leftists
themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit
it to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely
because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with
their problems. (We do not suggest that women, Indians, etc., ARE
inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology).

14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as
strong as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women
may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.
>>
>>139208024
15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong,
good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western
civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The
reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not
correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West
because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so
forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in
primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he
GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points
out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in
Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the
leftist's real motive for hating America and the West. He hates
America and the West because they are strong and successful.

16. Words like "self-confidence," "self-reliance," "initiative",
"enterprise," "optimism," etc. play little role in the liberal and
leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic,
pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone's needs for them,
take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense
of confidence in his own ability to solve his own problems and satisfy
his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of
competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.
>>
>>139207806
He was too redpilled and inteligent for his own sake

Also had traitorous faggot brother who sold him to the police
>>
>>139207806
The ability to string words together into sentences does not necessarily equal "interesting", sane or correct.

You might want to look a little further than Florence Supermax for your next political hero.
>>
>>139208242
30. We certainly do not claim that leftists, even of the
oversocialized type, NEVER rebel against the fundamental values of our
society. Clearly they sometimes do. Some oversocialized leftists have
gone so far as to rebel against one of modern society's most important
principles by engaging in physical violence. By their own account,
violence is for them a form of "liberation." In other words, by
committing violence they break through the psychological restraints
that have been trained into them. Because they are oversocialized
these restraints have been more confining for them than for others;
hence their need to break free of them. But they usually justify their
rebellion in terms of mainstream values. If they engage in violence
they claim to be fighting against racism or the like.

Some of this is so spot on to the shit going on today...
>>
>>139209228
50. The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of
traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological
progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that
you can't make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the
economy of a society with out causing rapid changes in all other
aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably
break down traditional values.

51.The breakdown of traditional values to some extent implies the
breakdown of the bonds that hold together traditional small-scale
social groups. The disintegration of small-scale social groups is also
promoted by the fact that modern conditions often require or tempt
individuals to move to new locations, separating themselves from their
communities. Beyond that, a technological society HAS TO weaken family
ties and local communities if it is to function efficiently. In modern
society an individual's loyalty must be first to the system and only
secondarily to a small-scale community, because if the internal
loyalties of small-scale small-scale communities were stronger than
loyalty to the system, such communities would pursue their own
advantage at the expense of the system.

52. Suppose that a public official or a corporation executive appoints
his cousin, his friend or his co-religionist to a position rather than
appointing the person best qualified for the job. He has permitted
personal loyalty to supersede his loyalty to the system, and that is
"nepotism" or "discrimination," both of which are terrible sins in
modern society. Would-be industrial societies that have done a poor
job of subordinating personal or local loyalties to loyalty to the
system are usually very inefficient. (Look at Latin America.) Thus an
advanced industrial society can tolerate only those small-scale
communities that are emasculated, tamed and made into tools of the
system.
>>
>>139210035
173. If the machines are permitted to make all their own decisions, we
can't make any conjectures as to the results, because it is impossible
to guess how such machines might behave. We only point out that the
fate of the human race would be at the mercy of the machines. It might
be argued that the human race would never be foolish enough to hand
over all the power to the machines. But we are suggesting neither that
the human race would voluntarily turn power over to the machines nor
that the machines would willfully seize power. What we do suggest is
that the human race might easily permit itself to drift into a
position of such dependence on the machines that it would have no
practical choice but to accept all of the machines decisions. As
society and the problems that face it become more and more complex and
machines become more and more intelligent, people will let machines
make more of their decision for them, simply because machine-made
decisions will bring better result than man-made ones. Eventually a
stage may be reached at which the decisions necessary to keep the
system running will be so complex that human beings will be incapable
of making them intelligently. At that stage the machines will be in
effective control. People won't be able to just turn the machines off,
because they will be so dependent on them that turning them off would
amount to suicide.
>>
One of the greatest political works ever written.

He foreshadowed an incredible amount of what we now see today
>>
redpilled me in the 90s.
>>
File: 1478663325345.png (312KB, 601x595px) Image search: [Google]
1478663325345.png
312KB, 601x595px
>>139210342
163. Suppose the system survives the crisis of the next several
decades. By that time it will have to have solved, or at least brought
under control, the principal problems that confront it, in particular
that of "socializing" human beings; that is, making people
sufficiently docile so that their behavior no longer threatens the
system. That being accomplished, it does not appear that there would
be any further obstacle to the development of technology, and it would
presumably advance toward its logical conclusion, which is complete
control over everything on Earth, including human beings and all other
important organisms. The system may become a unitary, monolithic
organization, or it may be more or less fragmented and consist of a
number of organizations coexisting in a relationship that includes
elements of both cooperation and competition, just as today the
government, the corporations and other large organizations both
cooperate and compete with one another. Human freedom mostly will have
vanished, because individuals and small groups will be impotent
vis-a-vis large organizations armed with supertechnology and an
arsenal of advanced psychological and biological tools for
manipulating human beings, besides instruments of surveillance and
physical coercion. Only a small number of people will have any real
power, and even these probably will have only very limited freedom,
because their behavior too will be regulated; just as today our
politicians and corporation executives can retain their positions of
power only as long as their behavior remains within certain fairly
narrow limits.
>>
Depressing.

Is it worth is being "red pilled"? We should stop using that term btw. It's just being NORMAL. Zombies around us are not normal.

They are parasites, who live in the moment, obsessed by their own selfish short-term needs and pursuit of simple pleasures and comfort. Anyone looking beyond that, even a little bit, gets into the "red pill" so to speak.

This guy layed it all down 30 years ago, in plain writing. But he's nothing. Nobody cares about his manifesto. We care about Kim, Kylie, Kanye, Trump and whatever.

That's a signal from the World itself. I have a theory, our Creator doesn't want anyone red pilled. It's not that Youtube is clamping down and 90% of media is declaring us demons for nothing, or because they're EVIL.

Let me tell you a secret anon. They are normal and natural, but they don't know it. They steadfast pave the way to the big reset. YouTube censoring and Colbert Oliver culture, they are actually doing the right bidding. They are pushing this wretched train down the tracks towards the non-existent bridge.

We are the ones who complain about bridge not being there. We are the anomaly. This guy, the "UNIBOMBER" hahahahaha....he's the anomaly.

Obama is Nobel peace prize winner.

World wants to burn so it can grow something better from the ashes. We are in the way. That's why we will get taken out if we speak out.
>>
>>139210620
173. If the machines are permitted to make all their own decisions, we
can't make any conjectures as to the results, because it is impossible
to guess how such machines might behave. We only point out that the
fate of the human race would be at the mercy of the machines. It might
be argued that the human race would never be foolish enough to hand
over all the power to the machines. But we are suggesting neither that
the human race would voluntarily turn power over to the machines nor
that the machines would willfully seize power. What we do suggest is
that the human race might easily permit itself to drift into a
position of such dependence on the machines that it would have no
practical choice but to accept all of the machines decisions. As
society and the problems that face it become more and more complex and
machines become more and more intelligent, people will let machines
make more of their decision for them, simply because machine-made
decisions will bring better result than man-made ones. Eventually a
stage may be reached at which the decisions necessary to keep the
system running will be so complex that human beings will be incapable
of making them intelligently. At that stage the machines will be in
effective control. People won't be able to just turn the machines off,
because they will be so dependent on them that turning them off would
amount to suicide.
>>
>>139207806
He was right about everything.
>>
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/99356142/#q99365466

>Why did he do it /pol?
A frustrated genius mentally damaged by a government experiment he participated in during his college years.
I believe that had it not been for the psychological trauma he endured that he probably could have been an accomplished author and cultural icon fighting against the decline of the west.

>Was he right ?
I believe he hit the nail on the head in his cultural critiques. He quite accurately summed up what would happen in coming years, and its all come to pass. Though I suppose when you see yourself on a track you'd be inclined to spend some time thinking about your coming destination.
I disagree with him on the point of technology essentially crippling and destroying us. I can see why it would be an easy target to focus on, but I don't think his scope was broad enough. I'd argue that the radio isn't bad, but what plays on it, and if you question whats playing you have to look into whose making it.

His criminal acts became the focus of his life. Its a damn shame too.
Violent acts like the ones he carried out are short sighted, ultimately pointless. Its an act of frustration which accomplishes nothing.
Killing a few inconsequential people does not effect widespread political change. He spent so much time fixating on minor wrong doings of certain people that he began to see all faults of society embodied in them personally, as if they were an effigy of responsibility for the decline of the country.

There is a lesson to be learned here apart from his critiques on modern culture, and its that assassinations are a tool that only work when employed by the government themselves. Lashing out in frustration at the world is an impotent act.
I sympathize with and respect Ted a lot. I wish he had made different decisions in life. I wish he never went through what he did.
>>
>>139211792

Not everything though. He had resentment towards it. That's the selfish me me me generation, that all of us are a part of.

He keeps thinking in lines with "what happened to the way of life I had when things were simple and acceptable". Well - sorry bloke. You know how farmers deal with grass and weeds every season?

They got 2 options. Let the cows take care of it (slow) or burn it.

We are going from cows to fire - but something better will come out of it.

We 're just mad that we'll miss it because in order for it to happen we need to destroy ourselves. But such is life.
>>
He 'borrowed' quite a lot from Jacques Ellul
>>
File: antifa sensei.jpg (212KB, 850x480px) Image search: [Google]
antifa sensei.jpg
212KB, 850x480px
>>139212215

Self-Defense for Snowflakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDzgitjfwps

Fight against hetero normative, masculine, macho, gym culture!
>>
File: 1481325274782.jpg (124KB, 882x731px) Image search: [Google]
1481325274782.jpg
124KB, 882x731px
>>139211577
>For a time, he was housed in the same unit as Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Ahmed Yousef.
https://www.biography.com/people/ted-kaczynski-578450
>>
File: images.jpg (11KB, 250x201px) Image search: [Google]
images.jpg
11KB, 250x201px
>>139212698
Kaczynski is serving eight life sentences without the possibility of parole as Federal Bureau of Prisons register number 04475–046 at ADX Florence, a supermax prison in Florence, Colorado. When asked if he was afraid of losing his mind in prison, Kaczynski replied:
>No, what worries me is that I might in a sense adapt to this environment and come to be comfortable here and not resent it anymore.
>And I am afraid that as the years go by that I may forget, I may begin to lose my memories of the mountains and the woods and that's what really worries me, that I might lose those memories, and lose that sense of contact with wild nature in general.
>But I am not afraid they are going to break my spirit.
Kaczynski has been an active writer in prison. The Labadie Collection, part of the University of Michigan's Special Collections Library, houses Kaczynski's correspondence from over 400 people since his arrest in April 1996, including carbon copy replies, legal documents, publications, and clippings. The names of most correspondents will be kept sealed until 2049.
>>
>>139207806
Kaczynski is a fascinating character without a doubt. But as much as he shits on leftists, you obviously wouldn't like his conclusions. For his conclusions were not simply "fuck leftists" but rather "fuck techno-industrial society because it turns humans miserable and mentally ill, of which leftism is one prominent symptom."

He may well be right. Human cultural evolution has jumped light years ahead of our biological evolution, so the way billions of people live today is likely inappropriate for our species. Our minds and bodies evolved for a hunter/gatherer lifestyle out in the savanna, not for soul crushing wageslaving confined to a drab overcrowded asphalt jungle.

Still, there is no turning back the clock. He was deluded to think he could ever overthrow the modern way of life with his insignificant bombing campaign. But then again, the CIA fucked with his head, so who can blame him for having a few screws loose? He's an impressive mind and a tragic figure nonetheless. Just wanted to live innawoods in accordance with his natural instincts but techno-industrial society just wouldn't let him. He's the sort of maniac killer you can sympathize with and wish he'd gotten off scott free.
>>
One of my favorite essays.
Worth reading, even if you disagree with his conclusions, his analysis is on point
>>
>>139213362
>the CIA fucked with his head

?
>>
>>139213703
Raised in Evergreen Park, Illinois, Kaczynski was a child prodigy and accepted into Harvard University at the age of 16. He earned his B.A. from Harvard in 1962, then his M.A. and Ph.D in mathematics from the University of Michigan in 1965 and 1967, respectively. After receiving his doctorate at age 25, he became an assistant professor at the University of California, Berkeley but resigned abruptly two years later.[6] As an undergraduate at Harvard, Kaczynski was a research subject in an ethically questionable experiment conducted by psychology professor Henry Murray, which some analysts have suggested influenced Kaczynski's later actions.[7][8][9]

>As an undergraduate at Harvard, Kaczynski was a research subject in an ethically questionable experiment conducted by psychology professor Henry Murray, which some analysts have suggested influenced Kaczynski's later actions.
>>
>>139211575
>Nobody cares about his manifesto
that is in fact not true at all Dr Kaczynski manifesto will out live him he is the poster boy for mentally unhinged geniuses
>>
>>139213703
>>139213784
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Murray
>Henry Alexander Murray (May 13, 1893 – June 23, 1988) was an American psychologist at Harvard University. He was Director of the Harvard Psychological Clinic in the School of Arts and Sciences after 1930.

World War II, Office of Strategic Services, 1939-45
During World War II, he left Harvard and worked as lieutenant colonel for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). James Miller, in charge of the selection of secret agents at the OSS during World War Two said the situation test was used by WOSB and OSS to assess potential agents.
In 1943 Murray helped complete Analysis of the Personality of Adolph Hitler, commissioned by OSS boss William "Wild Bill" Donovan. The report was done in collaboration with psychoanalyst Walter C. Langer, Dr. Ernst Kris, New School for Social Research, and Dr. Bertram D. Lewin, New York Psychoanalytic Institute. The report used many sources to profile Hitler, including informants such as Ernst Hanfstaengl, Hermann Rauschning, Princess Stephanie von Hohenlohe, Gregor Strasser, Friedelinde Wagner, and Kurt Ludecke. The groundbreaking study was the pioneer of offender profiling and political psychology. In addition to predicting that Hitler would choose suicide if defeat for Germany was near, Murray's collaborative report stated that Hitler was impotent as far as heterosexual relations were concerned and that there was a possibility that Hitler had participated in a homosexual relationship. The report stated: "The belief that Hitler is homosexual has probably developed (a) from the fact that he does show so many feminine characteristics, and (b) from the fact that there were so many homosexuals in the Party during the early days and many continue to occupy important positions. It is probably true that Hitler calls Albert Forster "Bubi", which is a common nickname employed by homosexuals in addressing their partners."
>>
>>139213901
Harvard human experiments, 1959-62[edit]
In 1947, he returned to Harvard as a chief researcher, lectured and established with others the Psychological Clinic Annex.
From late 1959 to early 1962, Murray was responsible for what have become ethically indefensible experiments, in which he used twenty-two undergraduates as research subjects.[4] Among other purposes, experiments focused on measuring people's reactions under extreme stress. The unwitting undergraduates were submitted to what Murray called "vehement, sweeping and personally abusive" attacks. Assaults to their egos, cherished ideas and beliefs were used to cause high levels of stress and distress.
Among them was 17-year-old Ted Kaczynski, a mathematician who went on to become the Unabomber, a domestic terrorist targeting academics and technologists for 18 years.[5] Alston Chase's book Harvard and the Unabomber: The Education of an American Terrorist connects Kaczynski's abusive experiences under Murray to his later criminal career.[5]
In 1960, Timothy Leary started research in psychedelic drugs at Harvard, which Murray is said to have supervised.
>>
>>139213703
>>139213784
I seem to recall this was part of MK Ultra although wikipedia doesn't make mention of it anymore. Some fucked up shit either way.
>>
>>139213948
He was accepted into harvard at age 16 because he was a math prodigy.
I'd be willing to bet he was on the spectrum and targeted in these experiments because he was autistic.
>>
>>139207806
>be a /pol/ack
>worship a mentally diseased man
>>
>>139214059
So the government is causing Autism and they targeted ted to see if they could control them as better societal cogs
>>
>>139212123
>I'd argue that the radio isn't bad, but what plays on it

If you believe that, then you didn't comprehend what he said. Ted stated that machines will control us. Whether its degeneracy playing on the radio or right-wing messages strictly controlled by the state, it hsd already changed human society and will be the impetus for human control. If you strictly control media to the point that opposing viewpoints are antagonized, then you have become nothing more than a tyrannical society. If you just allow degenerates to do what they want, it gives fringe and immoral people to do what they want, giving these machines and the people behind them wide impact. And that's just with the radio. Things like means of production, your means of living and whatnot have an even bigger impact. Look at the internet, it has already made people sedentary to the point of being lazy neckbeards. What about AI? Already automation is threatening jobs. Factories? It has made human beings nothing more than disposable cogs in the machine. Ted is right. Allowing unchecked progress in technology will only destroy us.
>>
Ted was wrong to use violence and it has tainted his ideas, which have some merit.

Violence will not get us out of this mess.
>>
>>139211575
Nice analogy. I prefer to add that this world can also be diverted to a different track. With the established powers keeping the train going at such a momentum that most railroad switches are ignored.
>>
>>139223208
He was right though. Things won't change unless the current social order is violently overthrown. He was just wrong to think even for a second he alone could do it. A one-man revolution is an impossibility.
>>
>>139224788
Hello there FBI. How much are you getting paid by the shitpost?
>>
>>139214059
I really wonder if ol Ted was on the spectrum.
>>
I find it amusing though that one of the previous president's top advisors, Valerie Jarrett, said Mao Zedong, one of the biggest mass murderers in all of history, is one of her two favorite authors, yet never got called out from it (aside from the impotent and incompetent conservative media), yet agreeing Ted brought up some interesting points likely puts you on a blacklist.
>>
>>139207806

I had read it fully two times in my native language.

more important part is power process and how modern society prevents people to go thourugh it.
>>
Did he name (((them)))?
>>
>>139207806
The parts about leftism are essential /pol/ reading. The unabomber was a bit eccentric, let's say. But he also had genius level IQ and his analysis of leftism is spot on. And I say that as a former, politically active leftist.
>>
>>139208545
> traitorous faggot brother
right.
>>
>>139208545

>faggot brother

This asshole wrote a book about how he did it, and how he was confused and suffered and all this shit. Buy a special edition pls.
>>
>>139211792

No he wasn't. You can't expect people to return in caves voluntary, same way you can't make all nonwhites leave, as alt fags want.

There are lot of people able to describe problem, but when it comes to solutions they behave pretty much shchizophrenic.
>>
this is astonishingly accurate
>>
File: tenor.gif (1MB, 360x202px) Image search: [Google]
tenor.gif
1MB, 360x202px
>>139210035
>Beyond that, a technological society HAS TO weaken family
ties and local communities if it is to function efficiently.
Uber, Tinder, and this board are great examples of tech strengthening community bonds. The real problem is it amplifies messages to the point of being trapped in an echo chamber.
*Cough*
Anyway, remember he was anti tech, and his bombs we're against tech players and universities, and so he is biased against them.
>>
>>139208635
Fuck off sharia blue antifaggot
>>
>>139230643
lmao if you think Tinder and 4chan stregthen community bonds.
>>
File: 1259806353.jpg (18KB, 350x500px) Image search: [Google]
1259806353.jpg
18KB, 350x500px
He was right about a lot of things, except his solution of primitivism is wrong. We need an agrarian society. Pic related is similar to the Unabomber Manifesto except it is more philosophical and it is correct on the stance of agrarianism over primitivism.
>>
>>139231258
I am noticing a lot more shills and falseflagging recently.
>>
>>139232579
He never strictly proposed primitivism. He divided technology into two categories:
System building technologies and personally empowering technologies.
>>
>>139207806

>tfw the Unabomber was actually right all along and he was the good guy trying to save the world

what timeline am I in?
>>
Yeah he's a pretty smart guy. I don't entirely agree with his anarcho-primitivist views, I wonder if they've changed with the advent of genetic engineering. I'd like to mail him but I'm already on enough watch lists as is.
>>
>>139233421
He was well aware of the advent of genetic engineering.
It can easily be read in 1 or 2 sittings. Actually go read it before posting in Ted threads.
>>
>>139233421
He specifically talks about genetic engineering, man.
>>
>>139233484
It looks bigger than it actually is because he filled it with bibliographical citations which take up a number of pages. You can skip those.
>>
>>139207806
I have all of his writings in a black binder notebook neatly organized by timeline.
>>
>>139210620
google.
>>
>>139212415
I thought this was a parody at first. I'm speechless
>>
>>139207806
This century's greatest philosopher.
>>
File: 1487354728669.jpg (256KB, 604x527px) Image search: [Google]
1487354728669.jpg
256KB, 604x527px
>>139230643
>Uber
>Tinder
>4chan
>strengthen community bonds
>>
>>139211577
>>139212388
>>139224788
>>139229655
>>139232666
>>139233555
>>139235099

Everything here must be checked and counted for.
>>
>>139233141
The internet would probably fall under both categories.
>>
Is it futile then, anons? To be fighting against the scourge of leftism? Is leftism the future? It seems to be, to me, and even though I feel it may be futile in the long run, I can't help but fight it for I know it to be an evil.
>>
>>139239922
The one thing that may be leftism's undoing is despite all of its howling about racism it is actually an incredibly racist ideology. It refuses to see non- white people as moral actors, which is why you never see them criticize Islam or Chinese social conservatiism.

It is overly focused on only stamping out heretic Europeans, but turns a blind eye to the tribalism and illiberalism of non- European groups.

Denying how man is wired is what ended the Soviet project.
>>
>>139240400
It amazes me the power the left wields, in politics, universities, and through the media, esp online now. I actually fear a bit for the future. (to be fair, I live in CA, so that may have unrealistically increased my fear, as I am surrounded by many of these types).
>>
>>139240964
I live in bum fuck nowhere in the Rockies and liberalism is on the rise here too. It's everywhere anon, it's weird into all media now. My only hope is that they over played their hand. Even my liberal little sister is starting to complain about white guilt.
>>
>>139207806
The guy is an idiot.

Sheltered in academia, when someone with money buys land, instead of going "WELL I GUESS I SHOULD MAKE MONEY" he decides to go on some autistic bombing spree.

His "manifesto" is the definition of TLDR and reads as if it's some shitty academic paper.

If he had $$$ he would have outbid whoever bought the land to the plateau that spurred his bombing spree.

Leftists like to think that "public land" will always remain public, and that the "law is the law", but that's not how the real world works lmao. Leftism is a mental disease.

You can buy off anyone with the right connections. If not with a carrot, then a stick.
>>
>>139240964
They realize that the internet allows for dissent and non approved materials to get out, which is why they going full shut it down mode.

White nationalists are simply the first to be purged. Anyone left of John McCain will eventually be on the chopping block.

This site with all of its faults is the last bastion for free speech.
>>
>>139241503
I mean right of John McCain.
>>
>>139207806
the virgin extremist
McVeigh is the Chad's choice
>>
>>139241446

This post is how I know you're not part of the upper class.
>>
File: 1426858342702.jpg (31KB, 456x320px) Image search: [Google]
1426858342702.jpg
31KB, 456x320px
>be ubabomber
>be mindfucked by mk-ultra
>the ordeal is like taking the world's largest red-suppository
>write glorious political manifesto
>strong arm (((them))) into distributing it to nearly every citizen in the country
>the people who you sacrificed so much for to educate mostly respond with "tl;dr"
JUST
>>
>>139208635

fuck you and your ironic meme flag choice faggot.
>>
>>139213362

>He may well be right. Human cultural evolution has jumped light years ahead of our biological evolution, so the way billions of people live today is likely inappropriate for our species. Our minds and bodies evolved for a hunter/gatherer lifestyle out in the savanna, not for soul crushing wageslaving confined to a drab overcrowded asphalt jungle.

Very well put.

>Still, there is no turning back the clock. He was deluded to think he could ever overthrow the modern way of life with his insignificant bombing campaign.

I believe he was called out on this (he communicates with anarchists, apparently) and concluded that the best we could hope for was small scale hamlet/village agrarian set ups. This of course, would be overrun in about fifteen minutes by those who kept up with modern warfare technology.
>>
honestly he was right

our models of economy have led us to inevitable disaster of population growth, global climate degradation and the destruction of the White Family unit at the hands of the globalist machine and the guilt of the ever increasing, unquenchable hordes of brown

best we can hope for is that some disaster (superbug?) wipes out most of the worlds population if humanity is deserving of any sliver of hope

the jaws of the elite have neutered and enslaved any chance of going back on our own accord

if anything he is (was? does he still believe there is hope?) to hopeful
>>
Never read this. It's like he was a time traveller.
>>
>>139242119
McVeigh was a literal virgin too and unlike Ted has the blood of children on his hands.
>>
>>139213362

nothing is absolute. he identified some legitimate shit but his own personal redpill consumed him. and his brother was cunt. seriously, fuck that guy.

no one, anywhere, any how can predict what fuckups and glories our collective stupidities will achieve. we embody chaos.

a lot of us are only still living because we want to see what happens next.
>>
>>139212123

nice deflection. so very civilised.
>>
He is great. Don't forget to read "the System's neatest trick" too. It's only 14 pages, you can find a pdf online. It explains the mechanisms that cause the SJWs to be the suckers for the system they claim to oppose.
>>
>>139244957
What is the synopsis of it?
>>
>>139241503
We really do need decentralized internet/youtubes/twitters etc. It always amazes me that 4chan still persists (and I am grateful that it does). I'm not big into Nazi stuff, but its funny to me that I no longer believe the holocaust happened the way I was taught, and funny too how rabid many people would get if I denied that it happened the way it was taught. Disagree about the vietnam war, desert storm, korean war, and it's not a big deal. Holocaust and people flip out. I'm wondering if the left purposfully and conciously ratcheted up their timeline, or if it was an emotional response to Trump's election? Will america retain enough saniity to allow people to keep their freedom/power? ---or will the left, through use of government and media, seize freedom from the people?
>>
>>139217514

you know your flag is ironic hey?

so many layers .... much deep ....
>>
>>139246356
Normies have no capacity for independent thought. These are the people who would have marched and died for destructive ideologies if they lived under them.

If support for all our rights being stripped away was supported by the media, entertainment, government, and education complex, 80% of normies would be okay with it.

This is one of the most bitter blackpills to swallow.
>>
>>139246356

4chan is priceless for free speech

regards to your nazi point, to see who controls you, find who you cannot criticise
>>
>>139207806

The CIA broke him with one of it's mkultra projects and he went to live in the woods.
>>
File: 1503691958542.png (62KB, 828x476px) Image search: [Google]
1503691958542.png
62KB, 828x476px
>>139207806
I'm actually re-reading it. I got a nice authorised new edition of it, with new notes writed by him, in my language (he speaks fluent spanish). Now i'm mature and understand more, also his words are proved right everyday.
Few more letters of him: http://archive.is/oyrRU
There's also a library with copies of all his letters and the people who writes him, Chicago? i don't remember. If someone can tell.
Pic has his history (and a few others)
>>139211575
Damn boy, you must have hope. We are rising, everyday more people wokes. But i like your point of view, we are the right ones, we are the example of how a man should think. But Ted had an impact, he's the first redpill for a lot of people. There's a discovery tv show about him now, it will attract more people to his manifesto. Let's see if the tv show talks about mk-ultra and how.
>>
It's pretty good except that he makes a HUUUGE jump from 'industrialization is against the aims of the individual' to 'we will use technology to destroy technology and then when we have full and supreme power and are the only ones left with technology well will destroy it' ???

its communist tier retarded.
>>
>>139248082
I think it's not so much a single entity, but an ideology. The ideology of leftism, over the last (45?) years has come to rule. No civilized man can say publically that he thinks homosexuality is degenerate behavior (even if a multitude of studies infer that it is). Likewise, no civilized man is able to point out deficiencies in women or in any race other than the white race. It's a hush hush undercurrent of a rule. Such is the culture that has grown around us, and taken hold of government, media, and schooling.
>>
File: Kaczynski.png (318KB, 621x599px) Image search: [Google]
Kaczynski.png
318KB, 621x599px
>>
>>139208635

HAHA that is so clever. You not only made a funny, but you did it in SUCH a clever way. HAHA, which way to the burn ward, am I right!??? HAHAHAHHA

GIVE THIS MAN A RAISE!
>>
>>139248336
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/104495239/ you don't have to copy each letter from the pic
>>
>>139210485
hes up there with lanza, mcveigh, and weaver
>>
>>139243414
>concluded that the best we could hope for was small scale hamlet/village agrarian set ups
Makes me wonder, what does he think of the Amish?
>>
>>139248788

>to the left
Ted still trapped in the matrix, he's goes to school, does his homework, pays his taxes, helps old ladies cross the street

>to the right
Ted's real form after taking the red pill and living in zion, fighting the machines for years
>>
File: ggggr.png (305KB, 756x616px) Image search: [Google]
ggggr.png
305KB, 756x616px
>>139207806
>his home since last century
>>
>>139249138
Those three are maniacs that had no goal. Lanza in particular just wanted to become a notorious mass shooter.
>>
>>139250091
>being this clueless
>>
>>139213703
They did some experiments on him while he was at university to basically break him mentally. C
>>
>>139239922
In a world where conservative Christian Africans and conservative muslim Africans are having 6-7 kids. In a world where muslims are having 6-7 kids. In a world where India and China together are 35% of the world's total population.

Yes, in this world, Leftists, who have 1.4 kids per family will inherit the future.
>>
>>139251711
Their way of reproduction isn't by biological children, I would argue. Instead, they infect the minds of the weak and ignorant. What do you say?
>>
>>139208635
Your critique is weak and really just lacking one at all. At best, it highlights your own underwhelming post, not so much this excerpt from Kaczynski.
>>
I believe the nationalist vs globalist dialectic will soon fade as the primary source of political conflict and will be superseded by the neo-Luddite vs technocrat dialectic. Hippies, Muslims, conspiratards, labor and Christians will become allied rebels against a dystopian technocratic elite.
>>
>>139251936
Maybe. I've had this argument with an anthropologist before. I argued that it seems counterintuitive that the "progressive left" are very attached to values of education for all, abortions for all, etc., when at the same time they refuse to have kids themselves to pass down these values.

Basically, the argument against this (which you bring up) is one of horizontal or oblique transmission rather than vertical transmission. I.e you simply teach others' children. The problem with this is that horizontal transmission is not as hi-fidelity. For a simplified example, if one professor is constantly talking about the benefits of communism, but at home, the student reads about fascism, the two ideologies will clash.

However, if that student had parents who instilled the values of communism into him, that is much higher-fidelity. There is a much stronger correlation between the values of a parent and their children than a stranger and those children.
>>
>>139254575
I agree about the strength of the teaching generally being stronger. But perhaps that is also why the left pushes for such acceptance of the idea that "there are many types of families", ie, 2 dads, 2 moms, 1 mom, 1 dad. In this way, they create reliance on the culture of the left. A reliance that makes it ok for parents not to teach their children, for the system will teach the children. (I don't think we're much into this arena yet, but I do think we are headed in that direction.)
>>
>>139255049
We are already there buddy. Most homes have parents both working and kids are raised by school and the media.
>>
>>139255049
The ultimate goal of leftism is to dismantle the family unit entirely and have children raised by the state.
>>
It's pretty red pilled, through and through. I don't necessarily agree with his ideology on tackling the mistake that is society, but the motivation he sets up is probably the truest thing that can be said about our modern-day society.
>>
>>139254031
The nationalist vs. globalist dialect is still pretty new though. It really only started this millenium in Europe and this decade in America.
>>
>>139257211
You're right but technology is advancing so quickly I think it will become the premier issue soon, especially now that the technocrats are censoring the internet and wielding power openly.
>>
>>139233484
>>139233555
What does he say about it? Also nice trips.
>>
>>139211575
Last line is right. Impressive you discovered this by yourself. Got the inside baseball on this one.
>>
Dude tells obvious things, that I pretty much understood being 16 years old.
>>
>>139211575
What should we do then?
>>
>>139258796
It is better to burn for abiding by what you know is true, then to burn the truth within yourself. We continue, of course!
>>
>>139243414
Techno-agrarian warrior culture is clearly the only solution
>>
>>139259545
what the hell does that mean?
>>
>>139248788
>maths
>with an s
>not CIA nigger shenanigans
shiggy diggy famalampai
>>
>>139260310
how the hell would a techno-agrarian warrior culture work?
>>
File: 1498238103840.jpg (120KB, 670x490px) Image search: [Google]
1498238103840.jpg
120KB, 670x490px
>>139248788
>>
File: 2d4.png (167KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
2d4.png
167KB, 600x600px
>>139228203
>a literate roach
>>
>>139261309
Probably some meme fallout/madmax type of shit
>>
File: anti-tech-revolution.jpg (12KB, 231x346px) Image search: [Google]
anti-tech-revolution.jpg
12KB, 231x346px
Do you think people will ever take this seriously? I was surprised this was even able to be published, but no one else seems to know or care.
>>
>>139242416
debunked psyop
>>
>>139265436
What is the synopsis of this book?
>>
dude was a genius
>>
>>139266444
answer this checksum
>>
File: images (46).jpg (18KB, 384x384px) Image search: [Google]
images (46).jpg
18KB, 384x384px
>>139207806
I don't wanna get v&
>>
File: 156.jpg (302KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]
156.jpg
302KB, 1200x1200px
>>139207806
>Anyone ever read his Manifesto?
Yes? We're not all newfags like yourself pal
>>
>>139211575
>having a loser's mentality
>>
Ted is the result of too much cheese pizza.
>>
>>139207806
Yeah, I wrote a paper on him for my history degree. It's pretty interesting, just wish he hadn't given in to rage.
>>
>>139267390
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm

There it was published in the washington post, first. Penthouse tried to but Ted reserved the right to place one more bomb if it wasn't published in a more reputable source.
>>
>>139230643
>Uber, Tinder, and this board are great examples of tech strengthening community bonds.

LMAO!

Technology has only caused to weaken even the minutest bonds that hold the community. I now hold more in common with the average /pol/tard (by holding conservative and Christian views) than I do with the people of my own nation. Uber has also destroyed the community of taxi drivers. Now, you just push a button on your phone and some cab comes along your way. Before you had to call and talk with someone, now you just press a button on your phone and out comes a cab. Tinder has made relationships with the opposite sex disposable. It's nothing more than a vehicle for a quick fuck. The hell are you smoking?
>>
>>139238015
Not if you only allow it for commercial and business enterprises. It will allow for communication, but you will have to do it like you would with a payphone and ban use of it at home or on your phone.
>>
>>139233421
Read
>>139233141

He didn't propose adherence to primitivism. He was for personally empowering technologies as opposed to system building technologies. The former allows the individual to use technology for an individual's benefit and not for the system. The latter builds technology for the sake of it and treats the individual as disposable human trash if it doesn't comply.
>>
>>139239922
>Is leftism the future?

If we are to follow Ted's argument, then yes leftism is the future for mankind because the system due to technology wants to breed weak and defeatist men in order to make men more reliant on it further. In a sense, that is true. Technology for the sake of it has made men reliant on it. Who in here could honestly survive out in the wild on his own? Who here could farm his own food, build his own house and create his own clothes? Take note that your ancestors before the industrial revolution could do these things without buying them on the store. Now, mankind is totally reliant on others, factories and machines to create these today without ever knowing how to even create one on your own. Being totally dependent on machines for your very survival is a modern phenomenon which Kaczynski despised.
>>
File: 1491323140985.jpg (40KB, 400x388px) Image search: [Google]
1491323140985.jpg
40KB, 400x388px
>>139266444
My double numbers followed by triple numbers means that I am owed an answer.
>>
>>139230643
Technology certainly can strengthen community bonds, but not in the current form of implementation. Having neighborhood level renewable power generation and hydroponics would strengthen bonds within a neighborhood. Social networking by contrast does the opposite, expanding our personal bubbles until they overcome the community bubbles, leading directly to degeneracy.
>>
>>139207806
>He uses the more inclusive wording "we" to describe his own essay's findings
>>
File: spenglerschädel2.jpg (23KB, 440x323px) Image search: [Google]
spenglerschädel2.jpg
23KB, 440x323px
>>139266444

Oswald Spengler said:

"Life will have descended to a level of general uniformity, in which local and national differences will have virtually ceased to exist. The only places that will matter will be a handful of world cities - the "megalopolis," like New York or Berlin, as opposed to the eighteenth-century city of culture, which still retained some connection with a living tradition. These "barrack-cities" will be what Hellensitic Alexandria and imperial Rome were to the ancient world - vast assemblages of people living all on top of each other, a shiftless mob, willing to obey any leader who will keep them amused. Their life will be a meaningless repetition of purely mechanical tasks and vulgar, brutal diversions. Even intellectual activity will have become mechanized, practical, cold, and merely "clever". The educated will have lost their feeling for a language, and the same "basic" speech- What Toynbee would call a "lingua franca" - will be on the lips of intellectuals and common laborers alike. "
>>
This was around 1900 btw, so 50-60 years before the Unabomber. And Spengler came to the conclusion that the downfall (which he called decline) is inevitable , because Faustian humans can't not create machines that will ultimately replace them.
>>
>>139273956
Its scary people predicted this nearly a hundred years ago.

Spengler also met with Hitler and thought he was not the hero Germany needed (he wrote that he was a tenure, basically saying he only had a talent for giving rousing speeches and nothing more) and predicted Nazism would only last another ten years (which he was right on).
>>
>>139211575
>We should stop using that term btw
Agreed, the pill analogy was devised by Jewish-supported Transexuals
>>
>>139241282
Report rockie fag
>utah?
>>
>>139273651
I wanted to know what the book said not Spengler's ideas.
>>
>>139226181
I don't have the quotes on hand, but I remember him having extreme troubles with behaving around women. He would do the whole nice guy spiel with buying them flowers/asking them to courtship and whatnot.

So yes, probably.
>>
>>139207806

He is right on many fronts and writes eloquently, but also wrong on so many other things.

1) People can work remotely nowadays if they get the right job. You could go sit in a forest with a laptop and earn a living. There isn't really a 'system', even the SJW/leftist institutions are crumbling fast.

2) Its ironic that he correctly identifies that in modern luxurious society people are miserable because they don't have a feed-back loop between their actions and tangible results, and then he falls prey to the same sort of radicalism that the leftists engage in to feel excitement.

3) Living in an actual state of nature is not as fun as he thinks. Living in nature with the means of the 21st century is just glorified camping. You will definitely be healthier and suffer less from depression, but how fun is it to have a parasitic infection, or not sleep for 5 days because you're starving, or lose a toe over a week due to an infected bruise? At least nowadays you can hit the gym hard and take designer psychadelics to maintain your mental well-being.
>>
Uncle Theodore DOES know about /pol/, right? I know he's afraid of computers or whatever but surely he'd find this place fascinating
>>
>>139212415
I love when youtubers post their own videos on /pol/

I like your voice, you broody fuck. Thirsty for views, much?
>>
>>139268514
>just wish he hadn't given in to rage.
How so? He's more pretentious pseudo-intellectual than else
>>
>>139278265
Yeah. He could never get a gf, and this was before the sexual revolution took off.

However, I am surprised he never got slapped with the aspie label considering the Pentagon has thrown a diagnosis of the spectrum at Putin.
>>
>>139278681
>he correctly identifies that in modern luxurious society people are miserable because they don't have a feed-back loop

this is miserable people projecting themselves onto the entire world to escape personal responsibility by pretending its normal

if you're miserable it's because your own life is shit and its your fault if you're not fixing it
>>
>>139279536
The government really hates autists, because they can't be emotionally manipulated. I can see why they throw the label around so liberally.
>>
>>139211575
Made me think
>>
>>139279536
Getting labeled as as "aspie" is something that has become super common only recently.
>>
>>139280245
I have no interest to idea why homosexuals and trannies are considered victim groups but not autists. Autists are hurt by how their brains are wired, while homos simply make an identity by what they are attracted to.
>>
>>139281820
I just explained it anon. The government hates people that can't be emotionally manipulated. People who identify with identity politics, on the other hand, are extremely easy to manipulate emotionally.
>>
>>139210035
>50. The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of
>traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological
>progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that
>you can't make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the
>economy of a society with out causing rapid changes in all other
>aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably
>break down traditional values.

This is so true. Most of pol' muh civilization don't get that. They want "progress" without realizing they're dooming themselves.

There's no political solution. Traditional Tribalism is the only answer.
>>
>>139282813
The problem is that everyone has to drop advanced technology, unfortunately might makes right in this world.
>>
>>139207806
>Anyone ever read his Manifesto?
newfag
>>
>>139212873
we should break him out
>>
>>139207806
What a beautiful mind; he was clearly taken-out by the powers that-be.
>>
>>139228087
King Nigger recently quoted Nelson Mandela, in his niggerly racist extremist attempt at being a false man of peace.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/obama-charlottesville-protests_us_598f998ee4b09071f69a2a2b
The two sides of the same coin aren't equal in the eyes of the men in power.
>>
>>139284583
Let's archive it
https://unvis.it/huffingtonpost.com/entry/obama-charlottesville-protests_us_598f998ee4b09071f69a2a2b
>>
This nut job actually wrote this? Holy shit.
>>
>>139210035
>In modern society an individual's loyalty must be first to the system and only secondarily to a small-scale community, because if the internal loyalties of small-scale small-scale communities were stronger than loyalty to the system, such communities would pursue their own advantage at the expense of the system.
This is my issue with Bannon's "economic nationalism".

>Would-be industrial societies that have done a poor job of subordinating personal or local loyalties to loyalty to the system are usually very inefficient. (Look at Latin America.) Thus an advanced industrial society can tolerate only those small-scale communities that are emasculated, tamed and made into tools of the
system.
Probably why kikes have effectively taken power.
>>
>>139208242
this is actually insightful
>>
>>139282267
I doubt the government hates autists. They likely just share the same view as normies, social retards with an above average iq.
>>
>>139286579
Hi CIA.
>>
>>139285106

He also wrote ship of fools. It's definitely worth a read
>>
My problem with the unabomber story is the plane bomb.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_444

A bomb put a hole in the hull midflight, yet no record of an NTSB investigation, which is mandatory in cases like this. This all sounds like one hell of a psyops.
>>
>>139213784
Iirc Some guy who was in his class wrote an article about it. He basically did the same things ted did with the exception of the bombings (fuck this I'm outta here, cabin in woods, etc.)
>>
File: 16011601.jpg (24KB, 231x218px) Image search: [Google]
16011601.jpg
24KB, 231x218px
>>139287251
It predicted SJWs 15 years before they showed up.
>>
File: 1494119237257.png (2MB, 1080x726px) Image search: [Google]
1494119237257.png
2MB, 1080x726px
>>139207806
Does anyone have Ted K memes/OC? I'm going to post all that I have.
>>
File: 1494121996440.jpg (65KB, 287x425px) Image search: [Google]
1494121996440.jpg
65KB, 287x425px
>>139288779
>>
File: 1494122024935.jpg (64KB, 287x425px) Image search: [Google]
1494122024935.jpg
64KB, 287x425px
>>139288830
>>
>>139207806
If you think that Kaczynski is right wing you're deluded, stupid, or haven't read his work.
>>
File: 1500776006800.jpg (310KB, 597x519px) Image search: [Google]
1500776006800.jpg
310KB, 597x519px
We need more Uncle Ted OC anons...
>>
>>139288406
SJWs have been a thing for a long time, what do you think those (((psychologists))) pushing repressed abuse memories and "all men are pedo" were about in the 80s/90s? It just couldn't take off until smart phones
>>
>>139208635
Can you try and make an argument next time please?
>>
>>139207806
Never really thought about technology in any bad terms before reading this book + Brave New World. Though BNW didnt factor in robots. Industrial society only values efficiency/production and there will inevitably come a point where robots will take over most jobs due to being more efficient. Just look at how close we are to self driving cars. What happens when the two biggest jobs in the world (trucking and taxi driving) become automated? Untold tens of millions will be unemployed and unable to find another job because most jobs have been automated. What is left for these people other than being plugged into the matrix or more likely being genocided by robots who only think in terms of the most efficient solution.
>>
File: young-unabomber.jpg (58KB, 287x425px) Image search: [Google]
young-unabomber.jpg
58KB, 287x425px
>>139266444
>>139267240
>>139272280

>The techno-industrial will get so big that it will collapse on itself
>The prime means to an anti-tech revolution is to seize the means of transportation, communication and to distribute literature.
>Gives other tips and tricks on how to get a revolution going, citing ample historical examples. Focuses mainly on communism and Russia, but also brings up many others like Ireland and Cuba.
>Gives mathematical evidence for the irrationality of civilization and the nature of chaos in the natural world. Basically society will never be able to be planned out or put under any sort of control. IMHO his mathematical talent and understanding truly shines in this book
>>
>>139288972
Ted goes beyond left and right.

Silicon valley censorship of the internet is the first volley of removing people's ability for dissent.
>>
>>139261309
the problem is, if the system is allowed to exist at all, it will have greater technology ie. space-based laser weapons that can scorch the earth over any targetted area.

so you either have to destroy the system, or allow it to exist with a very complex control method that never allows power to fall into the wrong hands
>>
>>139212123
Violence often seems like a solution to your problems but it never is.
>>
>>139254575
>There is a much stronger correlation between the values of a parent and their children than a stranger and those children.

That's why they have been pushing for weak, non-nuclear, unplanned families and anything that brainwashes and makes people more stupid (TV, mindless entertainment, etc.). The amount of parents who can instill proper education in their kids is dropping every day. That's where the state steps in to brainwash them to love niggers from 3 years old. Soon everyone will be clamoring for lowering the age of consent to 10 years old so niggers can fuck young white sluts.
>>
File: Art.png (1MB, 1247x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Art.png
1MB, 1247x1080px
>>
>>139213362
>there is no turning back the clock
No need. We will inevitably end up where we're supposed to be. Modern western society in its current state is undeniably an abberation. If it goes against our nature, it will crumble. We're already seeing the fabric of Modern society being stretched to its very limit. Once whites become the minority in all of their native countries what do you think will happen?
Representative government won't be sustained. We will end up with neo-feudalism.
>>
>>139212123
>I believe that had it not been for the psychological trauma he endured that he probably could have been an accomplished author and cultural icon fighting against the decline of the west.
His peers in college were certain he'd win a Nobel for mathematics.
>>
>>139289827
What ability do you imagine you had before that?
>>
>>139291453
Well. We would be free to express ourselves. Now even the future of this site is in jeopardy.
>>
>>139207806
>has anyone on /pol ever read his manifesto?
do you even know where you are?
>>
>>139290844
>what do you think will happen?
A natural disaster. It is painfully inevitable but hubris makes people overlook it and pretend that their comforts are ordained. Technology is very fragile, a big disaster is guaranteed to bring us back to Earth.
>>
>>139244957
This is one of the best reads I've had for a while. It perfectly pulls apart what goes on in a "rebel's" mind and how the system uses it to it's own advantage. Thank you, I started lurking on /pol/ not too long ago and I am getting more and more paranoid about this but I can't stop myself from reading. I've had these ideas for so long but now finally I know I am not alone.
>>
>>139211575

No shit. But we know what ((they)) want to grow from the ashes, and it's disgusting. They want everyone to be stupid so that they'll be easier to control, while (((they))) run off with all the money.
>>
>>139212123

>Accomplished nothing

You read his book and are talking about him today, dense nigger.
>>
>>139244089
Wasn't McVeigh a CIA plant?
>>
>>139207939
Why?
>>
>>139265436
I think it might have been published for the exact purpose of people not taking it seriously. If they did try to censor it someone would probably bring it up to some kind of news source and the story would give him credibility.

By letting him publish stuff they let him get more and more irrelevant because lack of drama has that effect. This is the best way to silence him, he's basically being shadow banned.

I also have a weird feeling about this guy, he kind of reminds me of O'Brien in 1984.
>>
>>139211575
Welcome, reddit refugee. No it wasn't your spacing that gave it away.
>>
when he says the system does he mean technology?
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLqrVCi3l6E

Good documentary about Ted
>>
>>139297422
The system as he understands it is the economic forces that practically compel humans to strive ever more for technological advancement.
The system that produces ever more and faster and cheaper consumer gadgets. And loud motorcycles, and stereos, which he particularly hated.
>>
>>139296662
Why does Ted remind you of O'Brien? That guy was a top leader of the Inner Circle in 1984.
>>
>>139298250
I don't exactly know why but him just giving people answers on how to dismantle society or how to disturb the system just seems weird.

Also the feeling of reading truth when I read his stuff just makes me uneasy.

Why would they let him publish this stuff if it didn't advantage them?
>>
>>139298479
Because they feel most people would rather not abandon the comforts of the modern age.

Just look at what happened to the dissident right over the last few weeks. Stormfront was allowed to exist for 20 years, but as soon as white nationalists began organizing in the real world, they went into shut it down mode for the entire dissident right.

If there was a neo- luddite movement that had clout in the real world, all of their platforms would be taken away from them. Right now these people practically do not exist, and if they do, they are living off the grid trying to just live their life in lonliness, or if they are still plugged in, they are just survivslists. Either way, they are not a threat.

They wanted to destroy all possible growth the dissident right beliefs so they took down all the websites and removed paypal even for immigration restrictionist sites like VDare.

Leftists are tools and they will never know it.
>>
>>139207806
>http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt
>mankind
>nature
I love it when haughty baffoons try to take man out of nature, as if he is floating above the Milky Way, apart from other species, un-needful of air and water. From dust we came, to dust we shall return, jajajaja, jajajaja, ja.
>>
>>139223208
Yet, that's exactly the direction the left is headed?
>>
>>139229804
>>139229767
So he didn't have a brother who turned him in? Are you saying he himself wrote a book on that or his brother did
>>
>>139299794
The Left is the elite's shock troops, of course they get a pass.
>>
>>139207806
Am I the only one who agrees with not just how he views leftism but how he views our over reliance on technology as well?
>>
>>139293993
While his violence got his ideas exposure, it also tainted his ideas. No one outside of pol will go near Ted's tomes due to the fact his bombs killed a few people.
>>
>>139302000
rephrase them as your own
>>
File: refugee waifu 2.jpg (84KB, 910x683px) Image search: [Google]
refugee waifu 2.jpg
84KB, 910x683px
>>139209228
>30. We certainly do not claim that leftists, even of the
>oversocialized type, NEVER rebel against the fundamental values of our
>society. Clearly they sometimes do. Some oversocialized leftists have
>gone so far as to rebel against one of modern society's most important
>principles by engaging in physical violence. By their own account,
>violence is for them a form of "liberation." In other words, by
>committing violence they break through the psychological restraints
>that have been trained into them. Because they are oversocialized
>these restraints have been more confining for them than for others;
>hence their need to break free of them. But they usually justify their
>rebellion in terms of mainstream values. If they engage in violence
>they claim to be fighting against racism or the like.
Holy shit.
>>
>>139296392
Shills trying to hide the truth that have been given to us by Ted.
>>
>>139261309
Rednecks with tanks
>>
File: 1290198796915.jpg (272KB, 1680x1051px) Image search: [Google]
1290198796915.jpg
272KB, 1680x1051px
>>139302000
He's not after them. He's after you.
>>
File: 1503235434120.jpg (31KB, 480x446px) Image search: [Google]
1503235434120.jpg
31KB, 480x446px
>>139207806
Can you imagine how much damage he would've done to the trannies if he was still alive today?
>>
>>139211514
Bump
>>
>>139304049
Ted is still alive as far as I know.
>>
>>139303266
this
>>
>>139305128
Ah I thought he had died a year or two back. So he's still hanging with Charlie at Florence then?
>>
>>139303772
What do you mean?
>>
>>139211575
Don't worry so long as we carry the spirit of humanity within us we will always gain back our freedom.
>>
>>139296837
Sick contribution shill
>>
>>139303772
damn, so much truth in that quote
I'm one of those non-romantics, I'm convinced democracy is a farce and spread that notion all the time
>>
>>139273280
I remember reading that he used "we" to trick the FBI into thinking that the bombing was done by a group of individuals, to make the manhunt more difficult. Little did he knows that his brother was a scum.

>>139238015
You cannot have internet without system building technology. It's all or nothing, you cannot have you're garage internet developer, without the whole industry.

>>139228203
The power process is the central part of his ideas, and I feel like readers of Ted often miss this point.
>>
>>139305691
I do not know anything personally. I just know that if he died it would have been all over the news.
>>
>>139267498
Chill, we're on the same team
>>
>>139302000
Exactly the point...
>>
>>139307022
What do you mean?
>>
>>139303465
Sad. One of the best threads I've seen here.

singed, newfag
>>
Well, I'm depressed now.
>>
>>139308650
Why?
>>
>>139309424
This pill is hard to swallow, my friend
>>
>>139310481
How so?
>>
>>139207806
OP, without condoning or condemning this dudes methods. just purely based on his views on things. i can fully say that the unabomber was brilliant and woke as shit. he understood the world in a way the overwhelming majority of people refuse to.

his points about humanity being oversocialized were particularly astute. something that even a lot of /pol/acks probably don't understand.

little known fact, he was actually an MKULTRA subject too. and that's not some far out conspiracy thing either, that's like a serious confirmed aspect of his biography.

without question he is one of the most interesting figures of the late 20th century.

he lived a very primitive life and shit too. he made bear grylls look like a flaming faggot.

and even though he was murdering people, is till think it's tragic that in the end it was his own family that turned him in. that's pretty much wrong as fuck IMO. i would never turn in a family member, personally, no matter what they were doing.
>>
>>139213948
>>139214059
>>139213928
>>139213901
tipping point was where he was supposed to write a paper being 100% factual and indisputable on something specific that he was passionate about. He did it, but they had hired a guy that was a professional at ripping these paper apart. He was only one of the students that participated in it. Anyway, he ended up going fucking crazy after it happened. There's more specific information out there, I'm just paraphrasing a youtube video on the subject I saw long ago.
>>
>>139208635
wow how can this even be serious
>>
'They SAY they hate the West
because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so
forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in
primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them' --- Sound familiar? 'Communism didn't work in Russia because they weren't TRUE communists.'
>>
>>139311955
iirc to add some info, the paper he wrote was very similar to his manifesto
>>
The guy was Osama Bin Laden against technology. He was really smart, but also so paranoid, and illogical in thinking that he could get people to stop using technology, especially through any kind of violent means. The manifesto is very well written up until it becomes a revolutionary document 3/4ths of the way in.
>>
This is why I read /pol/.
>>
>>139244957
>the System's neatest trick
is this or his manifesto available on kindle?
>>
>>139313891
>https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-the-system-s-neatest-trick
Just google it. All his writing, and some of his correspondence are easily accessible. The System's neatest trick can be found in Technoslavery.
>>
>>139314350
im not using google i dont want to be on any lists
>>
>>139314486
If you get them on kindle, you're on the list anyway. Ted won't get any money from you, so just get them for free, or don't.
>>
He never did it. The FBI did it like all the other false flags that have happened. Well some of those were CIA.
>>
>>139233236

john titor fucked us good
>>
>>139210620
5G
>>
>>139249412
Change the TV for a PC and I would live there desu
>>
>>139258417
I remember when it was cool to be liberal on 4chan. That was like six years ago before the tide really turned. Implying anyone cares.
>>
no, but this direction to virtual enslavement with trans-humanism is starting to favor him
>>
>>139233236
the timeline where communism takes over because it was sold to ignorant youth by very intelligent jews, and we all get screwed in the end.

when antifa gets their way nobody wins, least of all antifa. they'll end up on the chopping block or in teh gulags with the rest of us, unless they want to totally submit to state power and become brainless, thoughtless slaves to gigantic government they're going to create in pursuit of their supposedly "stateless society"
>>
>>139316517
all "liberal" really means is someone who is open to change, politically and culturally.

when white conservative america was secure in its position of power in our society, it wasn't really "BAD" for young people to see where things could improve, and be brash and daring enough to pursue those changes.

BUT unfortunately things like socialism and communism are not going to make our society better in any way. they're going to make us slaves, and they're going to do it through slick rhetoric that roughly 75% of the people in the world are too stupid to see through.

so it would have been nice if we were "liberal" and moved in more positive directions for our society (which was already a very positive and well designed society, particularly when compared with other ones) but unfortunately it's not what happened.

that's why it used to be "cool to be a liberal" in places like this and now its "cool to be a fucking nazi". because in that previous temporal context a bit of liberalism was the right thing to do (and i was a bit of a liberal back then too). but now? in this temporal context? nazism is the right thing to do. and so now i'm a flat out nazi. most of /pol/ is too because places like this attract energy that resonates at a certain frequency. all of the people here are "connected" in some way in a spiritual sense, believe it or not, and they all recognize the ultimate need for militant conservatism AKA nazism because that need is resonating in our collective souls.

sorry to get spiritual but it really is true, dunno what to say.
>>
>>139316955
>>139316517
i swear the fucking "5th dimensional reptillian energy vampire" shit is real. nobody wants to believe me, but whatever. these are the fucking facts
>>
Did you read the thing about how the judge fucked him and they didn't allow press into the courtroom which is illegal?
>>
>>139317079
They're not 5th dimension reptilian energy vampires, they're hyper advanced humans who have withheld the rest of mankind from their technology. We shouldn't treat them like humans though, they're lesser.
>>
>>139207916
>Some animal rights advocates have gone so far as to reject the word "pet" and insist on its replacement by "animal companion."
lol

(there's plenty of interesting stuff here but this is also interesting)
>>
>>139207806
Aside from the part where he brutally murdered a bunch of innocent people for no reason he made some good points
>>
- No Comment -

95. It is said that we live in a free society because we have a certain number of constitutionally guaranteed rights. But these are not as important as they seem. The degree of personal freedom that exists in a society is determined more by the economic and technological structure of the society than by its laws or its form of government. [16] Most of the Indian nations of New England were monarchies, and many of the cities of the Italian Renaissance were controlled by dictators. But in reading about these societies one gets the impression that they allowed far more personal freedom than our society does. In part this was because they lacked efficient mechanisms for enforcing the ruler’s will: There were no modern, well-organized police forces, no rapid long-distance communications, no surveillance cameras, no dossiers of information about the lives of average citizens. Hence it was relatively easy to evade control.
>>
- No Comment -

59. We divide human drives into three groups: (1) those drives that can be satisfied with minimal effort; (2) those that can be satisfied but only at the cost of serious effort; (3) those that cannot be adequately satisfied no matter how much effort one makes. The power process is the process of satisfying the drives of the second group. The more drives there are in the third group, the more there is frustration, anger, eventually defeatism, depression, etc.

60. In modern industrial society natural human drives tend to be pushed into the first and third groups, and the second group tends to consist increasingly of artificially created drives.
>>
- No Comment -

78. First, there doubtless are differences in the strength of the drive for power. Individuals with a weak drive for power may have relatively little need to go through the power process, or at least relatively little need for autonomy in the power process. These are docile types who would have been happy as plantation darkies in the Old South. (We don’t mean to sneer at the “plantation darkies” of the Old South. To their credit, most of the slaves were NOT content with their servitude. We do sneer at people who ARE content with servitude.)

79. Some people may have some exceptional drive, in pursuing which they satisfy their need for the power process. For example, those who have an unusually strong drive for social status may spend their whole lives climbing the status ladder without ever getting bored with that game.
>>
- b b bbut that wasn't real communism! -

224. The people who rise to positions of power in leftist movements tend to be leftists of the most power- hungry type, because power-hungry people are those who strive hardest to get into positions of power. Once the power-hungry types have captured control of the movement, there are many leftists of a gentler breed who inwardly disapprove of many of the actions of the leaders, but cannot bring themselves to oppose them. They NEED their faith in the movement, and because they cannot give up this faith they go along with the leaders. True, SOME leftists do have the guts to oppose the totalitarian tendencies that emerge, but they generally lose, because the power-hungry types are better organized, are more ruthless and Machiavellian and have taken care to build themselves a strong power base.

225. These phenomena appeared clearly in Russia and other countries that were taken over by leftists. Similarly, before the breakdown of communism in the USSR, leftish types in the West would seldom criticize that country. If prodded they would admit that the USSR did many wrong things, but then they would try to find excuses for the communists and begin talking about the faults of the West. They always opposed Western military resistance to communist aggression. Leftish types all over the world vigorously protested the U.S. military action in Vietnam, but when the USSR invaded Afghanistan they did nothing. Not that they approved of the Soviet actions; but because of their leftist faith, they just couldn’t bear to put themselves in opposition to communism. Today, in those of our universities where “political correctness” has become dominant, there are probably many leftish types who privately disapprove of the suppression of academic freedom, but they go along with it anyway.
>>
- With the recenct advancment in genetic engineering ala crispr, this paragraph is haunting -

123. If you think that big government interferes in your life too much NOW, just wait till the government starts regulating the genetic constitution of your children. Such regulation will inevitably follow the introduction of genetic engineering of human beings, because the consequences of unregulated genetic engineering would be disastrous. [19]
>>
- No Comment -

229. The leftist is oriented toward large-scale collectivism. He emphasizes the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. He has a negative attitude toward individualism. He often takes a moralistic tone. He tends to be for gun control, for sex education and other psychologically “enlightened” educational methods, for social planning, for affirmative action, for multiculturalism. He tends to identify with victims. He tends to be against competition and against violence, but he often finds excuses for those leftists who do commit violence. He is fond of using the common catch- phrases of the left, like “racism,” “sexism,” “homophobia,” “capitalism,” “imperialism,” “neocolonialism,” “genocide,” “social change,” “social justice,” “social responsibility.” Maybe the best diagnostic trait of the leftist is his tendency to sympathize with the following movements: feminism, gay rights, ethnic rights, disability rights, animal rights, political correctness. Anyone who strongly sympathizes with ALL of these movements is almost certainly a leftist. [36]
>>
- No Comment -

155. Our society tends to regard as a “sickness” any mode of thought or behavior that is inconvenient for the system, and this is plausible because when an individual doesn’t fit into the system it causes pain to the individual as well as problems for the system. Thus the manipulation of an individual to adjust him to the system is seen as a “cure” for a “sickness” and therefore as good.
>>
>>139207806
his ideas are informed, his method of solving it was irrational.
>>
- No Comment -

49. For primitive societies the natural world (which usually changes only slowly) provided a stable framework and therefore a sense of security. In the modern world it is human society that dominates nature rather than the other way around, and modern society changes very rapidly owing to technological change. Thus there is no stable framework.

50. The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can’t make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values.
>>
Free my nigga Ted 2017

#FreeMyNiggaTed
#HeDinduNuffin
>>
- No Comment -

66. Today people live more by virtue of what the system does FOR them or TO them than by virtue of what they do for themselves. And what they do for themselves is done more and more along channels laid down by the system. Opportunities tend to be those that the system provides, the opportunities must be exploited in accord with rules and regulations [13], and techniques prescribed by experts must be followed if there is to be a chance of success.
>>
- No Comment -

32. The problems of the leftist are indicative of the problems of our society as a whole. Low self-esteem, depressive tendencies and defeatism are not restricted to the left. Though they are especially noticeable in the left, they are widespread in our society. And today’s society tries to socialize us to a greater extent than any previous society. We are even told by experts how to eat, how to exercise, how to make love, how to raise our kids and so forth.
>>
- TF's hate for brexit because it'd reduce funding for science in the UK. -

131. Technicians (we use this term in its broad sense to describe all those who perform a specialized task that requires training) tend to be so involved in their work (their surrogate activity) that when a conflict arises between their technical work and freedom, they almost always decide in favor of their technical work. This is obvious in the case of scientists, but it also appears elsewhere: Educators, humanitarian groups, conservation organizations do not hesitate to use propaganda or other psychological techniques to help them achieve their laudable ends. Corporations and government agencies, when they find it useful, do not hesitate to collect information about individuals without regard to their privacy. Law enforcement agencies are frequently inconvenienced by the constitutional rights of suspects and often of completely innocent persons, and they do whatever they can do legally (or sometimes illegally) to restrict or circumvent those rights. Most of these educators, government officials and law officers believe in freedom, privacy and constitutional rights, but when these conflict with their work, they usually feel that their work is more important.
>>
- No Comment -

83. Some people partly satisfy their need for power by identifying themselves with a powerful organization or mass movement. An individual lacking goals or power joins a movement or an organization, adopts its goals as his own, then works toward those goals. When some of the goals are attained, the individual, even though his personal efforts have played only an insignificant part in the attainment of the goals, feels (through his identification with the movement or organization) as if he had gone through the power process. This phenomenon was exploited by the fascists, nazis and communists. Our society uses it too, though less crudely. Example: Manuel Noriega was an irritant to the U.S. (goal: punish Noriega). The U.S. invaded Panama (effort) and punished Noriega (attainment of goal). Thus the U.S. went through the power process and many Americans, because of their identification with the U.S., experienced the power process vicariously. Hence the widespread public approval of the Panama invasion; it gave people a sense of power. [15] We see the same phenomenon in armies, corporations, political parties, humanitarian organizations, religious or ideological movements. In particular, leftist movements tend to attract people who are seeking to satisfy their need for power. But for most people identification with a large organization or a mass movement does not fully satisfy the need for power.
>>
Yeah I've read it, and I even noted blocks of text and wrote a simple script to spit out marked sections with comments. I'd recommend you read it too, it's quite interesting. Ted is definitely a smart guy and he had a great insight into the current state of events we are in, because he had first hand experience in the world of academia, however I don't agree with the overall luddite notion of reforming society to be less technological. I guess using ted's own words you could describe me as an over socialized pawn of the system stuck at 'winning' my own power process with a 40hrs a week desk job and being entertained with dumb shit like video games and game of thrones, which are fed to me via the 'system', but I can't imagine a life without the last 300 years worth of discovery. To think humans could go back to that way of life is just out of the question.
>>
>>139297422
No. Read
>>139270410
>>139233141
He wasn't against technology per se. He was against building technology just for the sake of it.
>>
>>139210620
Hate to say it but this is probably what will happen. The bible even predicts in Revelations that we will have a one world government and the population just goes along with it.
>>
>>139208545
this
>>
File: Shlomo Shekelstein.jpg (157KB, 501x585px) Image search: [Google]
Shlomo Shekelstein.jpg
157KB, 501x585px
>>139211575
Good Goy
>>
This topic is still up.
>>
>>139207806
Never forget that this nigga was fucked with by people involved with MK ULTRA while he was in college and it's what drove him mad.
>>
>>139249336
That's gonna be me if I don't stop reading this shit
>>
>>139207806
>unabomber
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vu0zax6EyeY&t=7s
>>
>we will inevitably end up with a world government this century due to wars over resources,but it will be short lived when the oppressed nationalists fight back.
>>
>>139330419
Lol if you think nationalists will be able to accomplish shit. They are getting their voices taken away from them as we speak.
>>
>>139207806
Kevin is that you?
>>
>>139330293
Do not do violence. Learn how to get off the grid, and become self sufficient. Unfortunately trying to do a community of like minded individuals would be too difficult, especially getting women to reject modernity (almost every young woman is either a leftist or materialistic).
>>
>>139333521
I meant the scraggly look, not the murders.
>>
>>139333870
You can be red pilled and still groom yourself.
>>
>>139208635
You are the epitome of blind intolerance and double speak. Filtered.
>>
bump bc of interest
>>
>>139335994
This will be the first time a Ted topic ever breached 300 posts.
>>
>>139207806
yeah he was right on a lot of points, why do you think they went so far out of their way to make him appear so insane?
>>
>>139208635
your string of words are uninteresting to me
>>
>>139337773
Because he really did have mental illness. Remember he killed people.
>>
I wonder if we should start an anti- tech or anti-modernity general on this board.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLqrVCi3l6E
another plug for this excellent doc
>>
This topic actually made it to the bump limit.
>>
>>139289833
Seems to me the only solution may be 100+ years off -- i.e. space colonization. Humans could thrive in more self-reliant, adaptable settings on new planets, as they did in the American colonies. It won't be perfect, and they may start out in hock to the corporations that finance the journey, but the vast distances and times involved would result in de facto independence and freedom.

It could be that Earth is forever doomed to totalitarian suffocation, but if technological civilization can develop far enough to get us out into the solar system and beyond, the true human spirit could perhaps thrive at the periphery (and that periphery could be effectively infinite).
>>
>>139340228
Lol no. They will breed any uniqueness out of man.
>>
>>139313891
>Wanting to have "terrorist" literature registered on his Amazon account
>>
>>139340228
Look at how much people with a dissent impulse fall for the leftism meme and become shock troopers for the system.

Our best and brightest fight for this shit.

Only losers like us realize what is going to go down or are even against it.
>>
The dissident left and right could potentially be brought together by the promise of a less complex and controlled world.
Thread posts: 308
Thread images: 33


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.