Does anyone know how or where in the evolutionary pathway the civilised branched off from the savage?
Why is it that the whites, the Chinese, the Mesopotamians, the Mesoamericans, hell, even the Indians managed to invent languages, the wheel, sophisticated society and agriculture, yet the Sub Saharan African, the Aborigine and the Native American degenerated into savage niggerdom?
If we have a common ancestor, how did one branch get so objectively shitty?
Wikipedia is your friend
aboriginals and africans live in the most unforgiving environments so that's one thing that could've fucked them up. the native americans did well considering how much younger a race they were. whites chinese and mesopotamians are the oldest and lived in relatively nice climates on nice rivers.
In short, they are the humans who didn't go through 'the first great filtering', when humans first crossed the sahara and the weak and unskilled were weeded out.
>>139204415
aboriginals and africans live in the most unforgiving environments so that's one thing that could've fucked them up. the native americans did well considering how much younger a race they were. whites chinese and mesopotamians are the oldest and lived in relatively nice climates on nice rivers.
>>139204925
>flat great plains, easy to navigate
>Giant slow animals full of meat, easy to hunt, powerful if tamed.
>Natural isolation against enemies (Australia-Island/Sub-Saharan Africa is protected BY the sahara).
I think the fact their environment WAS so protective was why they turned out like this. If they were forced to fight and deal with roman soldiers/greek hoplites/Turkish canonneeers AS they developed... they either would've gone extinct a long time ago, or would've been selected to be smarter/more ingenius.
>>139204415
I believe it comes down to one very simple thing -
>The niggers had to walk about 2 feet to get food and water, at any time of the year.
>Everyone else had to plan ahead to save food and stay warm, or die.
Anyone who had to plan ahead and save food for the winter (and everything else that goes along with that) will be necessarily smarter, or they would not exist. He would be a hungry Popsicle.
>>139204925
>>139204900
your a fucking retard, the current accepted theory (or it was until a couple of years ago when PC went overboard) is that the niggers that stayed in Africa never had to be creative or smart to survive, they had food everywhere, they never had to learn to farm in mass just to eat, the races that left for earope on the other hand were in harsh conditions where food was scare, they had to farm, learn to make weapons and insulating clothes, develop civilization and fight one another for resources to survive. evolution works best when conditions are harsh. abos can be explained by the island effect, isolated populations on islands always evolve slower than their mainland counterparts.
Consider this:
>niggers were part of the fauna
>white people were sent to the Earth as punishment for disobeying the God
>Have you ever seen the comparison of a white person's DNA and a nigger's?
>do you trust the science jew to dictate you the history of our ancestors?
We are truly the chosen one.
>>139206058
you're overestimating the hospitality of australia and north africa, neither of which can sustain very farming and have a relatively small amount of animals that can be tamed. although the whites asians and middle easterners could fairly easily develop an agricultural lifestyle and get better access to nutrition
>>139206627
already said Australia is due to island effect
>>139204415
Mesoamericans didn't invent the wheel. They made some circular calendars and geometry but no wheel.
>>139204415
No one knows which civilization invented the wheel dumbass.
>>139204415
->Earliest Ever Homo Sapiens Discovered in Morocco Forces Major Rethink of Human Evolution
->researchers discovered the fossil remains of five individuals dating back 300,000 years
->Long before the out-of-Africa dispersal of Homo sapiens, there was dispersal within Africa,”
http://www.newsweek.com/human-evolution-homo-sapiens-earliest-fossils-morocco-622544
>>139211800
Archived it
https://unvis.it/newsweek.com/human-evolution-homo-sapiens-earliest-fossils-morocco-622544
AFRICA DOES NOT MEAN SUB-SAHARA
The First people to be referred to as ''Africans'' in History were not Sub-saharan people
>>139204415
50,000 years ago in northern africa iifrc. Source: 10,000 year explosion.