http://www.turnto23.com/news/local-news/tastries-bakery-under-fire-after-reportedly-refusing-to-serve-homosexual-couples
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. - A Bakersfield bakery is facing controversy after they reportedly refused to serve a gay couple.
Posts on social media have criticized Tastries Bakery for refusing to make a wedding cake for a gay couple. The owner of the bakery has said she chose not to create the cakes because of her beliefs.
Owner Cathy Miller said, "Here at Tastries, we love everyone my husband and I our Christians and we know that god created everyone and he created everyone equal so it's not that we don't like people of certain groups of people there is just certain things that violate my conscience."
Miller also said she referred the couples to a competing bakery who would be willing to take on the order.
>>139193804
>>139193824
http://www.ncsl.org/research/civil-and-criminal-justice/state-public-accommodation-laws.aspx#CA1
>>139193824
Well after all these corporations banning people for their political beliefs I think we can say that it's their right to do so.
>>139193804
As should be the right of any free man to choose who he associates with or does business as a small business. As with all rights are responsibilities. Corporations that serve the masses should not be able to discriminate against customers.
>>139193804
I wonder if they'll be able to set a new precedent by citing occurrences of people being banned for race (white) and gender (males) from restaurants and bars. Last time that stuff wasn't as prevalent as it is now
>>139193986
http://articles.latimes.com/1988-03-11/news/mn-1358_1_civil-rights
http://archive.is/S1l6R
Four men wearing Nazi lapel pins who were refused service and evicted from a German restaurant in Torrance won a legal victory Thursday when a Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled that their civil rights were violated.
Judge Kurt J. Lewin ruled that the Alpine Village restaurant was in conflict with the First Amendment to the Constitution and state civil rights laws when it evicted the men two years ago. The four Los Angeles-area residents had been wearing swastika pins when they entered the restaurant during an Oktoberfest celebration.
When asked to remove the pins or leave, the men refused, resulting in an altercation with restaurant employees that caused the would-be diners to be arrested, attorneys said.
"We thought it was an important case under the (1959) Unruh Civil Rights Act," said attorney Carol Sobel, the American Civil Liberties Union attorney who represented Joe Fields, 24, of San Pedro, and three other plaintiffs who support white-supremacist doctrines.
>>139194318
Businesses cannot be coerced into producing anti-gay messages:
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/local-news/denvers-azucar-bakery-wins-right-to-refuse-to-make-anti-gay-cake
http://archive.is/1iwE5
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/dublin-bakery-s-refusal-of-anti-gay-marriage-cake-not-discrimination-1.3165211
http://archive.is/xtLSU
>>139194318
O so are you saying that online corporations cannot refuse service to people then?
>>139193804
This crazy Asian lady is a hypnotherapist that specializes in "hypnobirthing". One of the reviews of her business, which is also on Yelp, references that hypnobirthing killed their son.
Should a baby-murdering charlatan be able to attack a dumbass Christian baker and get away with it?
>>139194617
I'm not sure what the rules are for online providers but I know they are not responsible largely for the political content of sites they host.
My point is California has VERY broad ant-idiscrimination laws protecting both sexual orientation and also political beliefs.
>>139194830
No but they are responsible if they take down someones site for the political speech they don't like. 2 large sites have been taken down this week daily stormer and stormfront and also vdare but it's back up all for having the wrong political opinions not breaking any laws. In fact what happened to them was illegal and a violation of their first amendment rights since the people who did it have a monopoly.
>>139193804
YOU GOTTA BE TOLERANT TO ACCEPT THEM BUT NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND
fuck liberals and fuck the LGBT crowd that supports harassing this fucking business.
>>139195350
My point is those weren't forcibly taken down by state entities. There was a law passed in the 90s ensuring that people who host websites are not personally responsible broadly for content posted. They were shut down by their hosts who they were in a business arrangement with which is still permissible.
>>139193804
never heard of the place desu (I'm local) but I think it's funny that a business based around tooty fruity fancy cakes refuses to do business with homos. it's like an interior designer refusing to decorate a gay guy's condo.
>>139193804
>you MUST accept us, or else
Give them an inch ect ect
>>139193804
People do need to win their right to discriminate back from the state That said there's nothing wrong with people refusing to do business with such a place. It's about fundamental property rights. If I don't want want your money why would should the state force us into a transaction? The only reason fags target these places is because the state will give them a pay day in a lawsuitl
>>139196083
O so then I can decide not to serve fags at my fucking bakery then right?
>>139196391
If your bakery is located in a state without an anti-gay discrimination statute, which is still a majority of states, yes.
>>139196391
just go to court, you'll get the answer, why bother arguing rule of law online, while the final decisions must have power of law (legal)
>WAAHHH WAAHHH HOW DARE COMPANIES DISCRIMINATE AGAINST TRUMP SUPPORTERS AND HATE ON TRUMP?
>Oh yea private businesses have 100% the right to carry on their business as they see fit
Choose one you retards.
>faggots get mad when baker won't make them a cake for their unholy bullshit "wedding"
>other fags get all huffy and rant about it
>multiple bakeries refuse to make a MAGA cake for a little kid
>faggots cheer on the bakeries
you should all kill yourselves. The REAL America thinks you faggots should kill yourselves. you don't fucking matter. And NOBODY outside of Commiefornia or your twitter clique gives a shit.
>>139196753
There's nothing inconsistent about either. The top is opinion, the second is a defense of natural rights.
>>139193804
Here we go again. How tolerant of those people.
>>139196083
DMCA is the law
>>139197203
Muslims are more tolerant of gays than evangelical Christians. Your comic is not supported by factual data.
>>139197287
What exactly is the exemption? I was confused as to whether it was DMCA or 1996 Communications Act but I remember reading it was a broad exemption but I couldn't find exactly where.
>>139197203
>using a comic as an argument
>>139193804
This isn't a contraversy fuck off, the lady is being completely reasonable.
You faggots don't realize that if you just shut the fuck up and slid into the shadows noone one give two shits about you but you won't and everyone fucking hates you for it.
I used to be fine with the gay thing, but a group of people could not be this annoying and also be something I want surrounding me. Fuck all gays I hope they burn in hell.
>>139197313
Go to any non-Western Islamic country.
>>139197657
Except refusal of service isn't your point you stupid fucking retard, it's the idea that their discrimination would be tolerated by the left, of which you have no proof.
>>139193804
Fellow Christanons, start watching TruNews and band together. We're heading straight into the End Times.
>>139197366
Pretty sure DMCA has the safe harbor thing, making websites not liable for things people post there.
>>139197366
Think it's the communications act, it's called safe harbor which plebbit lost due to their CEO directly editing content.
>>139199673
I was wrong. It's DMCA.
>>139193804
We should help them out.
>"Best cake I ever had."
>"Got the swastika just right."
>>139193804
bake the fucking cake bigot
>>139199999
>>139193804
Why does yelp still exist? All these people never have and probably never would have shopped there, but now they're allowed to bombard this business with negative reviews cause of their feefees and virtue signaling?
>>139199999
BAKE THAT FUCKIN CAKE
>>139193804
Look at all these Islamaphobes
Why couldn't they just throw these fags off roofs?
>>139200126
http://billingsgazette.com/news/national/ex-members-detail-abuse-claims-against-christian-sect/article_6ae97242-e143-5afa-9414-e33089e7052c.html
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — A paramilitary Christian sect with members facing child sex abuse charges evaded law enforcement authorities for years by hiding births, physically punishing followers and quietly operating in isolated areas of New Mexico, former members say.
In interviews with The Associated Press and in court documents, the ex-members also alleged that leaders of the Aggressive Christianity Missions Training Corps exercised control over followers by forcing them into hard labor and refusing to give their children medical care.
>>139197203
>Allahu Aktarts
>>139197313
>us muslims
HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
lady you are in the wrong fucking state.. time to pack your shit and move before your place gets fire bombed.
Sometimes i think about cosplaying as a faggot, marrying another conservative faggot, and asking the muslim bakery in my neighbourhood to cater the wedding just to see what happens.
>>139193804
If google, ICANN, GoDaddy and Cloudfare can wipe Daily Stormer from the Internet, these bakers can refuse to bake a cake promoting sodomy.
It's the private market goy.
Soom these kike media will reap what they sow.
>>139200164
prison for all you
>>139200778
NSA, FBI, CIA are full of pussy bitches
>>139193804
https://www.google.com/amp/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/muslim-expressjet-flight-attendant-sues-after-fired-for-refusing-to-serve-alcohol-a7185406.html%3famp
This bitch won 3 million dollars from her employer for refusing to serve alcohol from her employer (they fired her and she sued).
The law only attacks white Christians. We need to do something fast.
>>139194192
They shouldn't be, but Muslim companies are allowed to discriminate, its only white Christian companies being attacked.
>>139200778
hire me faggots, disappear me, put me behind a computer far away and allow me to maximize my memes for (you)
put me on the meme team and let me propaganda up the internet
>>139201144
>The law only attacks white Christians. We need to do something fast.
See >>139200776
>>139201397
Christians are federally protected from discrimination in places of public accommodation.
>>139193804
How hard can it be to say "we make cakes for fags but we dont depict 2 men kissing on our cakes"
>>139193824
You faggots should be burned alive
>>139201477
And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?
And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.
And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.
And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
- Revelation 13:4-7
>>139201634
just make the damn cake, as Pastor Anderson rightfully puts it: According to the bible these people should be killed, you arent making some big stand by refusing to bake them a cake.
I actually think that these bakeries are being paid by Soros to make these huge controversies happen. Everytime it happens it gets huge coverage in the media.