Now tell me how pic related is not true and pol is not a big

File: 1500258185407.jpg (101KB, 593x530px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 593x530px

> dont even try retard
> niggers can't maintain land

>>139119576
This happened because of Rhodesia

>>139119381
We're just catching up with our new power that came from reunification and proping up Easern Germany. In fact we're a lot behind with our power play. We don't even have nukes or a military worth mentioning because we're still extremely cucked.
We've change a lot in the last 15 years, though. Let's see where the next 15 years lead us: will we become more uncucked or is it too late for us demographically?

>>139121460
Wtf are you talking about
You are already a demographic basket case

>>139119381

>protip: they're both puppets of internationalist big business and banking interests.

>>139122882
At least show your flag when you're putting out dumb oneliners.

>>139121460
>We don't even have nukes or a military worth mentioning
This is of little use nowdays, it's not the middle ages anymore

>>139119576
>implying that this has nothing to do with horrible economic policies of Zimbabwe nor with the global warming that keeps cutting farmable land in Africa

Sure its all about the race right, its not like there are any other relevant factors to count in.

>>139125203
>these other factors exist, therefore the biggest factor is no longer relevant

>>139125739
Race is mostly irrelevant when question is economic and one in charge of enemy is a socialist/communist.

File: Zimbabwe.jpg (1MB, 3904x1788px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3904x1788px

>>139123959
You still need it. Not to do anything with it but to wield it around with a stern face.
Modern total war would just be too destructive to justify it. Kim will never use a nuke on another country.

>>139125203
>>implying that this has nothing to do with horrible economic policies of Zimbabwe
Which is implemented by a negro.
Even these bleeding heart relief organizations have to admit that you can't just "teach them how to farm" and they will be fine. Sub-Saharan Africans have a very limited time horizon and a very high time preference. These countries will never be successful in our meaning of the word.

File: DGy_90OWAAE1oZt.jpg-large.jpg (158KB, 1400x569px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1400x569px

>>139119381

>>139126172
>These countries will never be successful
What about South Africa? Black majority, liberal and quite successful. Also Barbados

How is germany liberal?
They are communist dictatorship.

>>139127049
>What about South Africa?
A country soon to collapse.
White people fleeing/segregating themselves in record number. Public safety can't be upheld anymore in most places. Universities tank in global rankings due to ebonics and "black science. Ethnic conflict among negroes. Political parties go ever more communist.
The only thing SA has for them is their natural ressources that are mined by Anglo companies. But no geostrategist gives SA any future. The Western (white) part may split off if they get political support from European countries.

>Also Barbados
No idea.