Google to ‘Police YouTube Like it Never Has Before’

File: 1984.png (140KB, 558x627px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 558x627px

>Several large and prominent YouTube creators have revealed they no longer make money on videos after a wave of demonetization crackdowns by the company.

>The list includes popular conservative commentators such as Diamond and Silk and Prager U, but also includes some of the platform’s biggest creators, ranging from comedy and politics to sex education and gaming.

>A popular technique by YouTube is to “age-restrict” videos which aren’t “suitable” for advertisers, resulting in the creator’s inability to make money from advertisements.

>Earlier this month, YouTube also declared that if “enough users flag a video as ‘hate speech’ or ‘violent extremism,’ YouTube may impose restrictions on the content even if it breaks none of the platform’s rules,” according to a report.

>The company also announced a partnership with the left-wing biased Anti-Defamation League, who previously blamed Trump supporters for the rise of anti-Semitism, added a popular cartoon frog meme to their Hate Symbol Database, and attempted to slander Breitbart News Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon.

BOHICA

>>139089761
>wants free expression
>but not too much expression, and only what is allowed
it is a private company though....

>>139089761
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odw2lyLPd24

>>139089761
I have a small terrible channel but yeah they removed ads from tons of things. I think offensive content flag also means your video doesnt appear in parts of the search.

There are several campaigns running simultaneously and Im not sure which one is banning what. My friend I had working at youtube said anything with guns is going to be hit. So anything even as docile as overwatch is now autoflagging.

https://youtube.googleblog.com/2017/08/an-update-on-our-commitment-to-fight.html

https://youtube-creators.googleblog.com/2017/03/strengthening-youtube-for-advertisers.html#gpluscomments

>>139089761
Google should be policed like a utility, same with all these places.

File: 1503687225159.png (655KB, 1080x1136px) Image search: [Google]

655KB, 1080x1136px

And this is the reason why they fucked with Jared Taylor's video.

They're going in full thought police mode.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SJNVb0GnPI&bpctr=1503690225

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/08/01/youtube-will-artificially-limit-reach-non-rulebreaking-videos/

File: Zeronet_homepage.png (265KB, 1024x729px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1024x729px

>ZERONET
ZERONET
>ZERONET
ZERONET

File: eyespy.jpg (109KB, 428x480px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 428x480px

>>139089761
Wait...

...if Google's search algorithm is how we find information on the internet without having to know it exists first....

.....then, Google has the ability to manipulate information access at will, since it's a private company and can do what it likes with its product.

Holy.

Fucking.

Christ.

Fuck the government, Google can effectively make itself the government if it wanted to.

We're living in a cliche '90's conspiracy theory, except it's real.

I'm scared.

File: GOOGLEAyyLmaos.png (64KB, 588x469px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 588x469px

>>139089761

You're too late Google.
I bet you one American dollar whoever made/uploaded pic related browses here once in awhile.

Operation FaceLift kicks off September 1st......

dont miss it

File: 1503684929366.jpg (2MB, 2472x3256px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2472x3256px

>>139090120

This is actually what Steve Bannon proposed.

https://theintercept.com/2017/07/27/steve-bannon-wants-facebook-and-google-regulated-like-utilities/

Too bad he had to go. I don't expect Trump or the rest of his admin to do much about it.

>>139090337
google is a monopoly it doesn't get Private business excuses anymore.

File: drevil.jpg (10KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 480x360px

>>139090265

>p2p net
Sounds like a good way to get digital aids super quick.

File: subversion4.jpg (4MB, 3884x7735px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3884x7735px

>>139090337

Welcome to the New World Order.

>>139090456
When has being a monopoly ever stopped a corporation from claiming they should be free of restriction because they're a private company?

Furthermore, the gov is basically bought out already. Who do you think is going to stop them?

Smaller youtube channels might as well migrate to another platform, there's no future on youtube unless you're already established at this point.

>>139089761
LEL, I read that headline as "Report Google to Police".

Just find a new site and stick with it. There's vid.me, LBRY, Gab and now this ZeroNet thing. Find and support a new thing, why cuck out and stay on YouTube? Normals will go wherever the content is.

>>139089761

I swear people say this every week. But nothing ever changes ?

>>139091090
Are you retarded? Might want to see what has been happening with YouTube over the last year especially last couple months.

>>139089761
>implying we do propaganda for money
Unless it's on jewtube its all fair game, the ecelebs can starve for all I care

>>139091214
*until

File: 1439873305194s.jpg (7KB, 239x229px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 239x229px

>>139090145

>Cites references and only states facts

Why was Youtube so harsh on this video?

>>139091387
They recently fired a panjeet for doing the same

>>139091214
its not about the money
its about the fact that literally everything that isnt extremely left is getting completely banned from youtube.

>>139089761
Didn't you guys want this when you discovered those creepy videos?

File: final (1).jpg (74KB, 511x511px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 511x511px

>>139089951
Don't give up.

so google is going to self implode, I see opportunity as tech a individual.

>>139089761
Good, "youtube" isnt actually a job anyway.
Maybe now someone else will make something to actually compete with these fags.

Anything in the description or tags that was stuff like: racial

>>139091501
We already knew this was happening, let Google fall down, Censorship has never worked in favor of any internet community, only if we could get pewdiepie to leave

File: 1490773047766.png (173KB, 810x819px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 810x819px

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/08/08/former-google-employee-there-are-efforts-to-demote-anything-non-pc-from-search-results/
http://archive.is/W8c5s

>Emmett concurs with our source. “A number of friends have privately confirmed this to me. I know there are efforts to demote anything non-PC, anti-Communist and anti-Islamic terror from search results. To what extent that has been successful, I don’t know.”

>Emmett says he personally witnessed efforts from leftists within Google to bias YouTube’s algorithms to push anti-PC content off the platform’s “related videos” recommendations.

>“I have read internal mailing list e-mail from SJWs absolutely incensed that there’d be, say, a Sargon of Akkad video appearing as a video related to one of their favorite SJW vloggers. This is what happens when you have unbiased algorithms, which at the time, was true. I don’t have to tell you that, in that e-mail, the SJW was quite literally asking that the ‘related videos’ function be perverted so that such a thing would stop happening.”

>According to Emmett, the greatest threat is that ordinary users of Google and its related services won’t even be able to detect the censorship.

>“The software could just astroturf your Related Videos section, and you would be none the wiser. Sure, if you know what to look for, perhaps you’d notice. But the vast majority of the viewership would never ever know. That’s the whole point of such a disinformation program, right? If you can tell it’s disinformation, you would never ever believe it.”

>In Emmett’s view, it’s “only a matter of time” before Google begins to bias its search results against the Trump movement, Republicans, and right-leaning politicians.

>“I don’t have to tell you that there was an internal meltdown at Google when the election was over. The hysteria has only ever reached a higher level once. That was throughout this weekend, thanks to the #GoogleManifesto scandal.”

>>139089761
>>139089882

So mark every video youtube promotes as offensive.

>>139089882
>YouTube also declared that if “enough users flag a video as ‘hate speech’ or ‘violent extremism,’ YouTube may impose restrictions on the content even if it breaks none of the platform’s rules,”

you know what to do /pol/

File: 1491187702968.png (158KB, 809x780px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 809x780px

>>139091740

>>139091740
Why is it always anti Islamic, Wtf has Islam done in the past 1.4k years to deserve this

>>139090145
Holy shit its real

Mandatory exercises in front of the 2-way TV and the 2 minute hate is only a couple of years away

Eat your heart out Orwell

>>139091799
>>139091822
This too, but I'll presume they've already given priority to certain sjws so they can conduct the shoa

>>139091719
Will it fall though?

This is what worries me. People are so used to trusting Google (and most media outlets never call what Google's doing censorship, but instead bitch about how it's never enough to stamp out the undesirables), and you using it, and all the other things they own, that they are basically reliant on this company for their normal internet experiences. Combine that with the insidious way in which things can be manipulated (since you'll never see what they block you from seeing), and I truly do fear the normies may simply say "So they shut down a bunch of Nazis, big whoop. Nothing I do is affected." and go on thinking what Google shows them is an unbiased search, rather than one crafted to show them what Google wants them to see.

How do I download videos like this?
My normal downloader doesn't work.
What a (((coincidence))).

>>139090145

time to shill for any youtube alternative that exist, or time to invent a new one

>>139092044
hooktoob? i think they have a downloader

>>139092121
They're out there but nobody uses them.

>>139092036
Their search algorithm are still unbiased, but yes we should prepare for such a day, but the problem is lack of options, Bing is a porn search engine and duck duck go is another botnet we need an open source search engine

>>139092044
For android new pipe , for pc hook tube

>>139092044
>>139092180
hooktube seems to work
just replace any video with 'hook' instead of 'you'

>>139092219
I have to wonder, is it actually "unbiased" right now?

I mean, we already know the algorithm changes results based on search history from your IP to try to be more "relevant". You already don't get a full breadth of search results, you get ones they think you're looking for, or at least, that's what they SAY it gives you.

>>139092202
how many anons visit /pol/ daily?
we just need to put some stuff that will bring people to it, like funny cat videos, or fail videos, or we could just get 1 of those youtube celebrities, like pewdiepie, because youtube is fucking with him as well

File: 1462850845166.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>139091387

The Jews have spent decades trying to suppress racial consciousness, especially for whites.

They want to blend us all into a single rootless mud race with no identity, no culture except "goyim", and race realism goes against their interests. Having racial consciousness means whites might start caring about racial preservation, and white unity might come back. If it went mainstream, it would also destroy the whole "privilege", "institutional racism" and "environmental factors" argument they use to justify any inequality.

>>139092368
It works on tags and if you know how to use it it can't hide shit from you, Idk how the normie experience is

Use yandex for search, it's the only good search engine I know that doesn't censor the search results.

>>139092452
I too believe he is the key, if he starts a platform or shifts to one, that could work and I think twitch has potential too if they get a good mobile app

>Lolbertarians will defend this

>>139091958
pretty sure the young turks is a protected channel, otherwise it would of been vaporized by now considering how much shit they get from damn near every other channel on youtube.

Website that indexes and links to all controversial youtube videos by its own tagging and comment system when?

>>139089761
I mean its handy and all but life existed before youtube and the internet was arguably better. Its bullshit that its getting turned into a police state but really when like 80% of your audience is white american males that hate sjws of course they will do something about eventually.

Remember that youtube even got popular because of the people they are targeting. We will either find a new place to go or find a new concept altogether for entertainment. It sucks to let it go but i mean unless you are making money off it then the fuck you worried about?

>>139092720
Someone who truly loves freedom will not defend the domination of society by any powerful group, regardless of whether they consider themselves "private" or "public". The whole "it's ok as long as it's private" thing is basically an idea planted into the movement by corporate hacks for their own benefit, and most dumbasses went right along with it.

>>139092810
>not an illiterate burger
>uses "would of"
harm yourself

Most people are already getting the hint to jump ship to a new site. All it takes now is someone who can do it and has the sense to make something that's as easy as youtube to put shit up and monetize it.

Make no mistake though, a new google will come once this google is dead.

>>139092895
This

>>139089761
thanks for reminding me to cancel the free youtube red

File: Dude Stop.jpg (42KB, 459x488px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 459x488px

>>139092452
>>139092618
>>139093056
>YouTube sharing/streaming alternative appears
>all right wing content creators and/or pewdiepie begin to migrate
>JewTube begins to hemorrhages cash harder that it ever has before
>OyVey.goy has encountered a problem with Coincidence.jew and must be shut down to prevent damage to the system
>Google begins indirectly labeling the site as a right wing and promotes negative criticisms to deter normies
>Charlottesville style false flag incident occurs on said website
>the YouTube alternative is forcefully condemned by the normies
>program RubHands.vey has been executed by Merchant.jew

>>139090445
>bannon wants facebook and google regulated like utilities
>Lol fired
WHAT A COINCIDENCE!

>>139093056
Maybe Marx was right about society being a constant struggle, though his definition of "class"es was too rigid to accurately represent real-life interest groups.

>>139089761
>breitbart

could you please not assume that we're all retards with a sub-70 IQ and give us a real source instead?

>>139093347
Marx was right about a lot, doesn't mean he was right about everything. Hitler was right about a lot too and he still lost.

>>139093323
The real issue is that they control searches.

They could prevent people from knowing an alternative exists, if they wanted to, since there's no viable alternative to Google atm.

I agree with Bannon on almost nothing, but he was right about this. The internet needs to be regulated like a public utility before it's too late, and the general public loses control of the largest data transfer system in history to an insanely rich cabal of tech firms.

I'm pretty sure that this violates the first amendment...

>>139091740
Here are three relative rules from Rules for Radicals. These could be used against Google.

>4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
Start reporting normie videos to create an awareness. Hunting videos, lectures about communism, etc.

>11. “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
Just keep pushing the narrative that Google stifles free speech.

>13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
Focus on one and only one entity at a time. Maybe start with just YouTube and leave the google name out of it.

>>139092219
>>139092368
They already fucked Google's search about a decade ago.
You used to have full control via search modifiers like wildcards and shit.
They took most modifiers away and will actively ignore certain ones because the algorithm thinks it knows better than you.
That makes it insanely hard to search for obscure subjects and makes mainstream shit bubble to the top.

>>139089761
But don't you guys worry - those elsa vs spiderman poo poo baby needle injection videos will stay up.

>>139089761
>when tech giants like Google and Facebook Inc. face deeper scrutiny over how they moderate information distributed through their digital services
fucking media
you're the fucking scrutinizer!!!!!

>>139093323
>Google allowing anything to harm their information monopoly
Say goodbye to the dangerous and janky old internet and say hello to sleek and sexy Googlenet within 5 years.

>>139093347
its obvious that society is a constant struggle. the problem is when people create bullshit struggles for their own gain. slide threads IRL basically. Go back in history and see how many times some non issue bullshit madeup garbage kept society frozen for hundreds of years. all marx did was make a how to be a faggot for dummies.

>>139093612
Private company, so no. Also note
>Offending videos will not be removed, potentially allowing Google to still make money from them but cutting off monetization for the creators
They will still rake in money from (((problematic))) videos, but prevent the creators from making any money. Quite literally the most jewish thing ive seen all year.

>>139089761
If they do that someone can market a "free tube" and make bank off the ad revenue.

Google forgets what made it popular in the first place and has grown a big head.

File: 1497670456056.gif (283KB, 255x138px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 255x138px

>>139092180
>>>139092276
>>139092299

Thanks, anons.
Was unable to use hook on Firefox or Chrome, had to use Brave.

>>139093612
How old are you? Free speech and your supposed "right" to free speech on a privately owned platform are not congruous with one another. It is their prerogative to push whatever backwards bullshit leftist revisionist agenda they fucking want. I hate it, but isn't that ultimately why we have the first amendment?

>>139089761
>We think this strikes the right balance between free expression and access to information without promoting extremely offensive viewpoints.”

Of course, since "extremely offensive viewpoint" isn't defined, I can assume that definition includes "people that oppose us taking over the internet". What, am I supposed to just trust that what they get rid of is "extremely offensive"?

This is fucking Orwellian, but private. So, like, Deus Ex or something.

>>139093323
>>139093056
You guys are idiots. Google makes its money from advertisers, and the whole reason we're in this mess is because no advertisers want to have their product associated with dissident thought. So how would you pay for the billions and billions of dollars needed to host and serve these videos?

>>139089761
Thank the ADL

>>139089761
Welcome to Twitch

>>139093838
Jesus. That's as Jewish as a Rabbi rolling in prayer shawls and shekels while some curly haired kike children light menorahs and spin mad fuckin dreidels.

Check out Library. Still in early alpha, but it looks like it could be promising in a year or two - decentralized video platform, operating via blockchain.

>>139090445
Is this trumps fault or did they show him the actual JFK film?

>>139093684
We should flag Hank Green's videos.

>>139093844
What ad revenue? What company would want their product associated with these videos? Are you going to pay for the multiple terabytes of bandwidth every minute with Vox Day's book sales?

File: 1491892704276.gif (378KB, 208x200px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 208x200px

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/05/05/google-raises-stakes-diversity-spending/26868359/

Hope to god that EU will do one good thing and enforce unified standards for search engines and make service providers like Google reveal whatever possible bias their algorithms have. Because the one thing EU is really anal about is consumer protection.

>>139093716
Oh, thank God. I was worried.

>>139093684
That wont work because most of those channels would be protected and any reporting of them will just flop over.

>>139089920
I feel Youtube, Facebook, Twatter, etc., have crossed the threshold into being a public forum

>>139094080
I've never seen his vids.

>>139093911
Not being able to comment on videos deemed inappropriate is clearly a staple of Free Expression.

File: OFFENSIVE.png (35KB, 974x680px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 974x680px

>>139089761
>Can't comment
>Can't like
>Can't add to playlist
>If it was in playlist it doesn't work

>>139094192
Rule #13 anon. Isolate a target. Start a campaign against one vlogger at a time.

>>139092219
>>139092368

My dear Pajeet, the search engine is being manipulated like crazy and has been for quite a while. Type in Jihad, you'll see what I mean.

>>139089761
Looks to me like we're going to need an alternate platform that isn't run by Google.

File: DIGIq9IV0AAF2HP.jpg (133KB, 1199x901px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1199x901px

YouTube starts censoring videos because they promote """hate speech""".
>You're not allowed to discuss genetic differences between races, that's a bad goy!

Here's their definition of hate speech:
>Hate speech refers to content that promotes violence against or has the primary purpose of inciting hatred against individuals or groups based on certain attributes
So you're not allowed to say that blacks on average are less intelligent than whites, or that females are different from men, because the groups protected from "hate speech" include
>Race or ethnic origin
>Gender identity

But you're also not allowed to talk bad about people based on
>Age

So saying that toddlers are on average less intelligent than grown-ups is hate speech.

W E W

>>139094192
What about overloading the system? Have all of pol make a video of just a Nazi flag and put pro Hitler tags on it.

>>139093966
Google makes its money from Alphabet which is CIA funded just like Turner.

>>139094309
link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhx4koMPAWI&t=2s&bpctr=1503735125
WEll anyay

Anyway, that video would just have been outright removed a few days ago, now its just pushed into the shadows.

Cool let's label every video as offensive so there's no fucking ads

Jews lose

>>139094312
That wont work either. You playing to the strengths of a large corporation, when we're an underground movement with hardly any resources of our own. And once they realise it's obviously a targetted attack they'll just make it so all reports just fail.

It might not be what you want to hear, but we might just have to play to our strengths, and that's being small, light, and fast.

So you might not be able to veg out in front of a video, and might have to start READING again. How awful, right?

Except they cant understand Arabic.

File: IMG_0603.jpg (80KB, 399x536px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 399x536px

>>139094426

>>139094434
Auto-detect algorithms will flag it like they did with PJW videos when he mentioned the term SJW.

>>139090814
You kind of have to pick one. YouTube will be the Myspace until a new Facebook comes up

It's not old news that the google sucks. I tried to search for "why does obama call michelle michael" the other day and the search results were pruned. Tune into duckduckgo, any other search engine or even yahoo and there are no such problems.

In all honesty it doesn't matter if it's google or whatever spearheading this fight, because should google go belly up they'll just go for the next best alternative and bring them to the line.

>>139094548
Yeah it's actually terrible. I was just watching Bill Maher (it came on after dark knight) and he said "the number of global warming deniers doubled from 2015 to 2016 and it wasn't because of new evidence." He was insinuating that Trump makes people stupid. I immediately realized it was because YouTube really took off during the last election cycle and a lot of people were getting redpilled.

>>139094118

Doesn't matter because a lot of that content would get censored anyway with EU's anal censorship laws. From the frying pan into the fire.

>>139094609
Code words? That could be a funny video. Or just make a really sarcastic video about of you looooove refugees and they NEVER rape anyone.

You need a good name if you want your site to succeed. That + quick and easy to use clean GUI are all that matters.

>>139089920
these internet giants have become larger than many states.

File: 1503712901394.jpg (487KB, 815x777px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 815x777px

How has that 'Brother Nathaniel' guy not been axed yet? Dudes more relentless than Murdoch Murdoch ever were.

File: 13724994282.png (1MB, 547x837px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 547x837px

Hooktube.com now has a search function

There is literally NO REASON to use Youtube anymore

File: 1385714020303.png (192KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 500x500px

>>139093966
>>139094099
>>139094192
>>139094548
>>139094609

Shill / /leftypol/ detected.

>>139093966
Why do you think advertisers don't want to pay for those? Because those in power in those companies want to continue manufactured consent

>>139090337
You just figured that out?

Why do you think Jew York Times and MSM sources always come up first for a search?

>>139094796
No one is getting red pilled by people rambling at a camera. One of the few things Spender has been right about is when he said that people are getting "red pilled by life."

People can feel something is wrong, that this isn't the way things should be, or even used to be until very recently, but the problem is that they don't know WHY they have this feeling. And people on a video-broadcast site who just describe the causes of those feelings will not enlighten anyone.

>>139091578
It's going to get its self carved up when it's declared a monopoly. They are going to piss off the wrong people in court and lose everything.

>>139094910
the wwe went on a copyright holocaust and thats how we ended up with Bork Lazer, Juan Cena (kinda) and Pepsi Man in video titles for a good while. Great tactic and brings communities together.

>>139094426
>So saying that toddlers are on average less intelligent than grown-ups is hate speech.
lel, someone do this

Make a video in the style of Jared Taylor seriously examining reasons to believe that little children aren't as smart as adults.

>>139095045
it needs a parallel commenting and rating function (its own database, not posting on YouTube)

BEWARE: ALL PRIVACY THREADS ON /pol/ ARE SHILLED BY DISCORD FAGS.
>BEWARE: ALL PRIVACY THREADS ON /pol/ ARE SHILLED BY DISCORD FAGS.
BEWARE: ALL PRIVACY THREADS ON /pol/ ARE SHILLED BY DISCORD FAGS.
>BEWARE: ALL PRIVACY THREADS ON /pol/ ARE SHILLED BY DISCORD FAGS.
BEWARE: ALL PRIVACY THREADS ON /pol/ ARE SHILLED BY DISCORD FAGS.
>BEWARE: ALL PRIVACY THREADS ON /pol/ ARE SHILLED BY DISCORD FAGS.
BEWARE: ALL PRIVACY THREADS ON /pol/ ARE SHILLED BY DISCORD FAGS.
>BEWARE: ALL PRIVACY THREADS ON /pol/ ARE SHILLED BY DISCORD FAGS.
BEWARE: ALL PRIVACY THREADS ON /pol/ ARE SHILLED BY DISCORD FAGS.
>BEWARE: ALL PRIVACY THREADS ON /pol/ ARE SHILLED BY DISCORD FAGS.

>>139095118
It's just...the implications.

Because of their monopoly on internet search, the amount of manipulation Google can engage in via restricting access to information it doesn't want you to see is basically unparalleled in history. There's no evidence they're, say, trying to take over the world or anything, but god damn they COULD do it if they were crafty with it, they have the technology to do it.

Hitler was correct
Filthy jews

>>139090265
Quick rundown?

>>139095118
>Why do you think Jew York Times and MSM sources always come up first for a search
Because they have more money to buy up advertising space and therefore the ability to push their content more than others.

Same goes for buying up user data from Facebook, Google, etc. to find ways on how to make more profit from users.

>>139089761
Won't this eventually lead to YouTube shrinking as more and more content creators jump ship to other video sharing sites?

File: 1390693853693.png (145KB, 567x701px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 567x701px

>>139095116

The guy is a shill and full of shit. Videos being demonetized usually isn't because of "advertisers not wanting their product associated with those views", it's just Jewtube being Jewtube and disincentivizing certain content.

They even demonetized over 600 WeAreChange vids even though they're pretty neutral.

They will demonetize anything that isn't leftist or pro-establishment at this point, even pro-gun videos.

>>139095116
And what's your plan to change that?

>>139095059
No, I'm the only one who understands what is actually happening. You wont beat the Left by playing at their games, because they're not responsive to those attacks. The idea of "making people live up to their own promises" only works if people care about their own honour, which has been established to not be the case with these people.

What drives these people mad is having things thrown in their faces. It's why they're going mad at statues and get triggered by memes.

So we should take a leaf from Generation Identity's book, and start on these high-visibility campaigns, and mass triggering. So why not make a transcript of that Jared Taylor video, and give printed copies to college students?

We need to go into overdrive reporting videos that hate on hetero whitey. Or even anything that has vague dislike or criticism of anything. You see what they are doing ultimately is making it illegal to have critical thought.

>>139090034
I think last year pewdiepie mentioned how the only youtubers to make the "best of youtube" where kid friendly stuff with a literal 100% like ratio, which he said was impossible, they've been setting this up for awhile.

>>139095359
Then why trust search engines at all? We used to live without them and post links ourselves, and respond to people asking for links, or end up in places by following hyperlinks.

You need to stop thinking within their boundaries.

>>139091626
Idiot, demonetization is just a small part of it. Non-leftist content will be in quarantine and the only traffic it'll get will be the external links you send to it. It'll be the same as uploading your video to a filesharing host. Most of the battle of ideas now happen on these monopolies and one side is effectively mass banning the other.

File: M00nMan.jpg (10KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x168px

Long live Moonman!!

>>139095473
NY times doesnt even have money, they have been operating at a loss on some mexican niggers dime for a while. Their whole scheme is actually losing them all money but they have the money to lose.

>>139095494
I am not so sure about shrinking, but rather losing content about certain topics in favour of (((entertainment))) which can sell more products via advertising.

Honestly, those who would jump ship would be quickly replaced by people how have no problems with creating censorded content for the sake of extra cash.

Good.

>>139095740
And of course useless republishits (including Trump) won't do anything about it because they already have all the money and free speech they could ever want. They need to be regulated like utilities.

>>139095494
Yeah, for sure. Imagine being an artist and being told you're not allowed to say or do certain things. No matter what your political beliefs are, you should be against this completely.

>>139092219
>Bing is a porn search engine and duck duck go is another botnet we need an open source search engine
Pajeet knows things. True things.

>>139095792
http://www.nasdaq.com/article/ny-times-nyt-q2-earnings-beat-digital-subscribers-rise-cm822639

>>139095740
Well of course they are. What did you think would happen if you relied on the charity of an enemy for your success?

>>139092299
>>139093856
>Was unable to use hook on Firefox or Chrome
What do you mean?

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=6SJNVb0GnPI&bpctr=1503690225
works fine on firefox.

>>139089761
when the internet started, any talks of censorship immediately was met with extreme disapproval and comparisons to communist china. now it's sad, this stuff gets swept under the rug. inch by inch we are becoming censored. where is the backlash? you protest against everything but what matters

It is shit like this that pushed me away from libertarianism.

>>139092044
dropbox.com/s/dslz02sem3jkazy/IQr.MP4?dl=0`


if anyone wants the video for themselves

>>139095293
No one would use it, trust me. One of my sites get like 5k uniques a day and only maybe 6-7 comments a month.

>>139096024
They also used to talk about Tibet and Palestine but now it is all just killing white males.

>>139093692
>They took most modifiers away and will actively ignore certain ones because the algorithm thinks it knows better than you.
>That makes it insanely hard to search for obscure subjects and makes mainstream shit bubble to the top.
if I had a nickel for every fucking time the damn results say, "Did you mean [something I was not looking for]?" I would have a lot of nickels. At least ten bucks worth or so.

Really wish Jewgle never bought YT, they used to be so based.

>>139094201
>>139094950

They're still private companies. Nobody forces you to use them, and if they want to ban you for silence you for being an autistic shitposting cunt, then they can. That's freedom.

Why do you retards keep expecting your enemies to play fair?

What kind of world do you think you're living in?

Seriously, answer my question. What do you think this is all about?

File: 1367356670344.jpg (8KB, 180x280px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 180x280px

>>139089761

>>139096040
It's almost like we need an ideology that defends the individual from all types of collective power.

I feel like we've invented that already....starts with an L or something....

Recently, one of American Renaissance's Youtube videos titled "Race Differences in Intelligence" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SJNVb0GnPI), a fully cited video indulging in standard data accepted in academia, has been a victim of Google's sudden spearhead against what its employees deem to be "hateful" and "dangerous". In reality, it is an attempt concocted by "leftist" radicals—Communists/Muslim/Israeli sympathizers—working at Google, for the government, and for Hollywood, to memory hole material they do not like while simultaneously advancing their own propagandist agenda.

The internal memo leaked in the past month by a (now ex-) employee of Google shows the absolute state of the company and others like it in Silicon Valley; companies that now dominate the mainstream of information and news, influencing the minds of millions of people with an agitprop echo chamber both online and in real life. As with the example provided above, facts are deemed hateful by partisan overseers of knowledge and therefore are permissible to be hidden by them in an objectionable form of justification.

The question regarding "hate speech" in the U.S., and whether or not the constitution permits it, was recently answered in Matal v. Tam. The ruling was of course simple: in the United States of America, speech that is hateful is free speech.

>"Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.”"

This quote is indeed helpful as it clearly defines what is to be "hate speech."

1/2

>>139096298
Silicon Valley companies such as Google, media outlets such as CNN, and mainstream popcorn production farms such as Hollywood create the means of which people consume information in different ways. So, what happens when these information cartels are given the freedom to candidly choose what information people can and can not have access to? If you are observant enough, you could see that "hate speech", as defined by this industry trifecta clique, is regularly conflated with the emotional responses that scientific evidence may evoke in people who are easily offended or, more sinisterly, wish to use as an excuse to further their agenda.

Nice loophole. The government can't do this but private companies sure can. I don't doubt there's absolutely rife domestic and foreign government intervention in this obviously broken system of information distribution. It doesn't surprise me that the DNC has spies like Imran Awan on their payroll.

Gamergate is a fantastic 1:1 microcosm of what is currently happening, this is why it's so often attacked as being nothing or something vain.

2/2

>>139089882
>YouTube also declared that if “enough users flag a video as ‘hate speech’ or ‘violent extremism,’ YouTube may impose restrictions on the content even if it breaks none of the platform’s rules,” according to a report.

Sounds like a plan.

File: 1491297910330.gif (489KB, 497x373px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 497x373px

Now imagine what will happen when Google buys out Cloudflare and can shut down sites at will.

File: serveimage?url=https:%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FRddAJiGxTPQFa%2Fgiphy-facebook_s.jpg&sp=34a2098e570cc72c01098568a3833395.jpg (49KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 480x270px

>>139089761
How about creating a YouTube clone like HookTube that simply embeds the videos but with the removed features? Not missing out on features and additionally wasting Google's resources.

Another alternative is creating a new video platform that focuses on free speech as the new Twitter alternative. Hoping that many make the switch from YouTube by monetarizing the creators. That's a big project, though.

>>139096093
yeah I know.

Although you know, there's always LiveLeak.

>>139096294
Libertarians are such autists. Good lord, you'll still be waving that Gasden flag in a fucking gulag, won't you?

>>139096024
The cause lies in a change of culture. People used to have a lot more of an attitude (probably because the 90's 'tude was still going strong) when it came to those in control of the web. Now it's reached the point where people who just want to tune in and veg out are a majority (they're in this thread as well), so such traits have fallen out of favour.

Why don't you guys just create your own platform for sharing content and stop using YT?

Don't like how they manage their site? You're free to build your own. This is how capitalism works.

Whaaa... YT is censoring us. Tell them to puss off and build your own. But just like the left you whine and cry like a little bitch.

File: 1475715697762.jpg (83KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 850x400px

>>139096174

No, that's the illusion of freedom.

Do you really think giant multinational corporations like Facebook, Google, PayPal, Disney, Apple that have more power than some individual states should censor anything and do whatever they want without backlash?

Would you say the same thing if they banned any liberal on Twitter who uses the word "racism", "diversity", "LGBT" or "tolerance"?

Anyone can see the double standards where they try to control the flow of information to billions of people and you expect no one to call them out or doing anything about it. Monopolies need to be kept in check.

The same 6 multinational corporations own 90%+ of the media in the US and they destroy and buy out any potential competition and use whatever sabotage they can to prevent anyone else from risng up. "Free market" is a myth.

When you add it up to the controlled media only allowing a few perspectives and tries to silence anyone they don't like through character assassination, college campuses and universities regularly fire professors who hold politically incorrect viewpoints or disinvite them and prevents them from speaking, there's barely any freedom left anymore for things that everyone use for their daily lives.

You're autistic yourself if you don't understand the concept of "free speech" beyond the First Amendment and you think megacorps should do whatever they want and suppress information without backlash. PayPal is already starting to do the same too, soon banks might follow.

>>139089882
>YouTube also declared that if “enough users flag a video as ‘hate speech’ or ‘violent extremism,’ YouTube may impose restrictions on the content even if it breaks none of the platform’s rules,” according to a report.
you know what to do

>>139090337
holy shit I remember the time when I was this naive like 20 years ago. Not trying to insult you bro just commenting on how even "based" kiks these days are clueless about what is going on in the world

>>139090337
holy shit I remember the time when I was this naive like 20 years ago. Not trying to insult you bro just commenting on how even "based" kids these days are clueless about what is going on in the world

>>139089882
Lol Prager. They have good economic vids, but they shill Israel wayyy too much.

>>139096386
It's almost like the guys in the days of BBSs warned us all along about letting the corporate-controlled web be the arbiter of information exchange was a bad idea.

>>139095542
>They will demonetize anything that isn't leftist or pro-establishment
>that isn't pro-establishment
what

>>139096386
In all seriousness, what do we do after this?

Reminds me of when the Catholic Church tried to control the printing press. Dissidents persevered, but it took hundreds of years for them to eventually have a reformation.

>>139096534
This would be easy as pie to do if people weren't addicted to just tuning into a video stream and watching it with their mouths hanging open and drool in their lap. Video is fucking expensive to host and serve, and even Google can't afford YouTube.

>>139089761
Do you hear that? Can you feel it?
That is the sound and the motion of more and more people being pushed to the right. God I love it. Don't quit lefties, you've done more for conservatives than anyone else in history.

That power corrupts absolutely meme must be true.

Say goodbye to leafy, pewdiepie, keemstar and anyone else who isn't part of the tumblr left.

>>139096425
>Another alternative is creating a new video platform that focuses on free speech as the new Twitter alternative. Hoping that many make the switch from YouTube by monetarizing the creators. That's a big project, though.
Many of those in the works and getting some traction. Personally I'm hoping Andrew Torba grows some balls and upfronts big dollarinos for the media capabilities gab.ai needs to have to really take off. Who said you need one twitter and one youtube.

don't even know any of you give a fuck about any of this anyway when there is less than a month before SHTF anyway
https://youtu.be/gfRxWwaOO1s

>>139096148
Eh, I'm okay with those, often they help with typos.
The real bother are the ones that silently change your results. Those are intrusive as shit and you mostly don't even notice it.

>>139089761
It's simple. Collaborate and pull together then make an alternative platform to YouTube that has more freedom of content.
I'm not saying make another cookie cutter alt-right website just another that's very YouTube like only minus the totalitarian rules.

But ofc nobody's gonna do anything but bitch so why even bother posting this thread?

File: 1473156462236.jpg (217KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 750x500px

>>139089761
THE ANSWER TO 1984

File: 1485373378767.jpg (58KB, 614x433px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 614x433px

IS 1776

>>139096723
They all are going to bend over for the sake of income.
Maybe some will screech a bit to appease their audience, but sooner or later they all will bow down.

>>139096846
That's a big gun

>>139095740
sorry about your illiteracy.
Try reading the second line of my post

>>139096499
I meant "Liberal".

Libertarians seem perfectly fine with corporate assrape of the public, given all the Koch money they guzzle.

>>139089761
cant wait to hear e-celebs whine about this one constantly

>>139096833
We have vid.me
We just gotta make it popular.

ROUND UP THE CYBER KIKES

KILL THEM ONE BY ONE

>>139096685
Become more independent. Stop relying on these companies in order to exchange, serve, and host information.

>>139096833
Lots of things are in the works and growing, You're just the basic bitch who has no idea what's going on and think it's up to one person to change the world starting from scratch at the exact moment you hit post. In every discussion like this there's a couple people like you.

File: 1493849755249.jpg (770KB, 1262x2094px) Image search: [Google]

770KB, 1262x2094px

>>139096654

Basically anything that doesn't follow the mainstream media narrative and poses a threat to globalists.

>>139096876
For you

>>139096833
We need to move away from platforms entirely. The web is not a broadcast medium. It is not radio, and it is not television.

>>139089761
How long until my 11 year old account gets banned from some offensive comment I made years ago?

>>139096425
>>139096728
I just noticed the flagged video in question does not work on HookTube.
Did Google restrict the embedding of such flagged videos?

File: Leogold.jpg (187KB, 459x795px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 459x795px

>>139096838
"The more of us you kill, the more that secessionism will live on in the hearts of the people."

>>139096957
vid.me is more cucked than jewtube. They can't wait to ban all "controversial" videos as soon as their userbase is large enough. vid.me will betray us if we go there.

>>139097138
kek

>>139090337
>>139090456
>>139090549
>>139095118
>>139096554
>>139096570
Use Qwant as a search engine and Brave as a browser. Bam, effectively reducing your digital footprint to 0.

>>139090337
Next up is to begin re-writing history using powerful AI crawlers which can subtly re-edit the records of the past. WE WUZ stuff for instance.

>>139097120
Which one? I hooktubed the Race Differences video and it worked. Firefox/Windows 10 LTSB.

Why the fuck doesnt notch launch a video streaming site?

>>139097043
Stop with the screen-grabs at insane line lengths. Either make the lines shorter (like articles do) or save it as a text file and post it on pastebin.

>>139097228
He's a billionaire

>>139096957
>>139097151
>vid.me is more cucked than jewtube
This. It's not only in their TOS, you can just straight up email them to remove any video and they'll do it. If vid-me becomes a monopoly like youtube it'll be far worse than youtube.

>>139097228
Because even with his billions he'd burn through it in a few months.

>>139096685
Innovate past the printing press. All technologies will eventually die to newer technologies.

>>139097223
Never mind. The problem seems to be on my side.

>>139089882
>>139089761
and they said the SJWs would be inoffensive

>>139097025
>You're just the basic bitch who has no idea what's going on
Well how can I know which sites are ment to replace YouTube if they're not even popular/successful?
>and think it's up to one person to change the world starting from scratch at the exact moment you hit post
Not really. That's why I said collaborate.
>>139097094
Why? It's what sells and it's popular. If you exclude that then you might as well don't even try to compete.
It's like saying "why do we need cars when we've got horses?"

>>139096174
>>139089920
these tools became public utilies and therefore can not be subject to the emotional whims of ideological people

File: a lot of corpses and explosives in a corner at UNATCO.jpg (151KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1920x1080px

>>139089882
>Earlier this month, YouTube also declared that if “enough users flag a video as ‘hate speech’ or ‘violent extremism,’ YouTube may impose restrictions on the content even if it breaks none of the platform’s rules,” according to a report.
This gon b gud

>>139097316
why not just make a p2p video streaming site?

File: 1503129108022.gif (1MB, 407x161px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 407x161px

>>139097521
Share the load

Hate speech is too vague and the internet too vast. Flag everything as hate speech and they don't know any better. Make everyone from upstart to fame abandon Youtube. Alternatives will come out of need and Youtube has to adapt to survive.

File: 1484174530375.gif (19KB, 200x214px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 200x214px

>>139094426
>So saying that toddlers are on average less intelligent than grown-ups is hate speech.
Pedo normalization soon thanks to our moral arbiters, Google!

>>139094192
Except there is always a loophole in Youtube's shitty algorithms. It takes literally nothing to scream DMCA at them to have a video taken down. Literally everything is hunted down for copyright and, given how crazy these fucks are, anything that offends them will be removed and with a legion of SJWs to help them, it will simply be removed without review and you know this.

Fight fire with fire. You don't have to go after big channels, focus on smaller ones and attack the normies. Get them to realize and recognize that a private entity is willing to dictate what they say and upload because they are bigots that hate freedom. Send this commie shitfest into the toilet and wake up more normies. People are waking up to CNN and lefties have a lovely tendency to go full-tilt anytime something causes them harm. Use it against them and piss of the people they make money off of.

File: whygodwhy.png (74KB, 412x351px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 412x351px

>>139097491
>tfw you will never be badass enough to single-handedly defeat the globalist takeover and would just end up a homeless bum like most people in that game

Reality is depressing.

>>139097442
>Why?
Because it allows for a single point of attack.

>It's what sells and it's popular.
It also requires the charity of large corporations who are not on your side for existence.

> If you exclude that then you might as well don't even try to compete.
You have to compete on your own terms. Large centralised platforms are the domain of governments and large corporations, not underground movements against the establishment.

Why does not using video, but using far more portable text, frighten you so much?

So can't we completely fuck this internet deathstar from the inside out by mass reporting everything and clogging their thought censors? What's to stop us from doing that?

>>139097521
LBRY

I haven't looked deeply into it yet but it claims to do that.

The problem is you need to install software to make it work. Without some kind of incentive that's not going to happen outside of a certain population of idealists.

>>139097521
Because people want to upload too many videos to keep enough people seeding them all. These YouTubers have hundreds of videos, are you going to see them all?

The ultimate end goal of all of this isn't to stop hate speech. It's to control the public narrative. They literally want to suppress anything that goes against the personal political beliefs of those running the company. This act is so corrupt it should be considered illegal.

They're going to push anything that isn't ultra liberal down to the bottom of their search results. They're going to suppress pro conservative videos and search results. And half of the country is going to praise them for it because google is supporting their side.

>>139097746
idk man im spitballing ideas.

how about setting up a campaign to flood youtube with the most offensive type of videos there are out there at a specific given time?

File: 1502705308235.gif (4KB, 452x523px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 452x523px

>>139096174
>Small businesses are forced to build third bathrooms to accommodate trannies; doesn't matter if it's private.
>Google can do whatever it wants and doesn't need to accommodate anyone, regardless of how big and ubiquitous it is.
You leftist pigs change your position when it supports your sick, twisted ideology.

File: 2017.jpg (67KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1024x768px

>>139097789
Say hello to your new world government.

>>139097675
>It also requires the charity of large corporations who are not on your side for existence
Then ask some for investment/support. The problem is that even if it works there's nothing guaranteeing success or it devolving into a echochamber worser than YouTube.
>Large centralised platforms are the domain of governments and large corporations, not underground movements against the establishment.
well duh. So?
Even 4chan is part of such a government domain albeit not very open about it. I don't see a problem there.

Another angle to this that we don't ever touch is accelerationism. Instead of thinking up ideas to make it better, think up ways to make it worse. Unbearable. Then millions of minds will do your work for you.

>>139091740
Pretty damn sure this is happening.
A few weeks ago, my recommendeds would be an equal mix of politics and vidya.
After google made their announcements, the relateds mysteriously became all vidya.
And not just "it went from 10 pol 10 vidya to 8 pol 12 vidya" I mean literaly 20 vidya 0 pol.

>>139096174
>Nobody forces you to use them

Actually social pressure forces you to use them. Do you know how fucking weird you look to people when you don't have a facebook account?

>>139098033
If you want to be really scared, try google searching anything negative to do with google itself. The results will be....less than conclusive.

>>139097789
It's almost like they're the establishment, and control all the infrastructure.

>>139097803
I've already told everyone what we should do, but no one wants to hear it because reading is hard.

>>139098033
I've noticed this as well.

The corporations are going to win, aren't they?

>Earlier this month, YouTube also declared that if “enough users flag a video as ‘hate speech’ or ‘violent extremism,’ YouTube may impose restrictions on the content even if it breaks none of the platform’s rules,” according to a report.


:D

>>139098207
I don't think so, it's just a matter of people creating a viable alternative.

>>139098007
Accelerationism is pointless if we don't have a system in place to pick up the pieces.

>>139097964
How much do you think large-scale video hosting costs?

Google is getting spooky now

fucking hell, here we come technocracy

>>139098310
A few billion maybe more.

heres an idea

search of a name of a person critical of communism or the left and see what type of video pops up first

see if its entertainment flood or actual related videos

>>139090145
wew

>>139097521
It's possible if you use something that avoids the seeder problem. Something like Tor where you are a forced host.

File: 1478187528877.jpg (465KB, 1049x590px) Image search: [Google]

465KB, 1049x590px

>>139098328
Pic related

>>139098207
They will if /pol/ keeps going on about making their own corporation to host a large platform, which requires many other large corporations (Routing, DNS, Hosts, Domain Registrars, Data Centres, etc.) to succeed.

>>139089761
And yet i can still find latest episodes of the daily shoah on youtube mirror accounts

>>139089761
This is your fault everyone. We never should have allowed these tech companies to get this big and centralized.

Remember when people used RSS readers and could subscribe to whatever people you wanted to? There's no reason Google should be controlling the majority of the internet's video content.

File: 1475883368087.jpg (13KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 225x225px

>>139098405

>>139096174
Thats a cute excuse until our government becomes a private entity that can do the exact same thing. Will the excuse be valid then?

This is a slippery slope where corporations have far more power than any government and are now subjecting people to tyrannies that tyrants of the past could only dream of. Having control of what people say, think, or talk about in an attempt to control narrative so that it can steer discourse to what they believe is right. So if they believe every 3rd child should be sacrificed to Moloch, Communism will set people free, and anything going against their narrative is hate speech, they can steer people in that direction and have congress pass laws to force people to believe that way.

The private company meme is a shit meme that does not afford them the right to trample on the very freedoms and principles that America and, arguably any civilized western nation, is founded upon. They are not above scrutiny and, in all honesty, the fact that they base their operations in the US and still wish to stifle the founding principles that gave them their money and corporations should be fought against and destroyed at every turn. We fought against this voer 2 centuries ago in order to free ourselves from such evils. As far as I am concerned, it may be time to do that again.

>>139098472
What is this meant to prove? What's your point?

>>139098431
I keep saying we should stop relying on large centralised services and no one is listening. They're addicted to free resources and easy entertainment.

>>139098310
There are... Hundreds of video sites. Google will be myspaced instead of becoming the NWO if we think up clever ways to make it even shittier.

Have to leave. Thanks a lot, OP, for keeping degoogling alive and please repost when the thread dies?

>>139098381
whos that in the middle

>>139098481
>Having control of what people say, think, or talk about

Time you leave your house and start interacting with actual people.

>>139098627
>Hundreds of video sites
And how many are philosophically the same as YouTube?

>>139089761
so more demonitizations for anybody with a slightly right-wing position, but all of the creepy pedo-bait shit will be untouched, right?

>>139097789
>I'm not getting the major news and happenings from /pol/

>>139091831
Use Bing, use DuckDuckGoy, use startpage, use searx.me, use Yahoo search, fucking use ANYTHING but Joogle.

File: 1503468939305.gif (987KB, 500x300px) Image search: [Google]

987KB, 500x300px

>>139098481
>when you realize Teddy K was right and we all cucked ourselves with technology

>>139098481
Unless Google will send someone into your house at night and drag you off to prison for having an unlicensed newspaper like the Chronicle of Current Events then, no, they're not as bad as past tyrannies.

>>139098692
Erich Schmidt Czar of Google.

>>139090549
>New World Order
>New

>>139094460
Holy shit, it's actually happening.

>>139098769
>demonitizations
>removed content
>censored content
>etc

We really need a alternate platform from youtube, not like it's been good for years away.

>>139089761
Good, I hope they shut down those gross pedophiles videos.

>>139093589
They already do this with Windows Phone for example. No Google apps for Windows phone. But Microsoft is obliged by law to offer Google Chrome as an alternative browser.

>>139098874
PLATFORMS ARE WHAT GOT US INTO THIS MESS TO BEGIN WITH

CENTRALISATION OF ANY KIND ONLY BENEFITS THOSE AT THE CENTRE

AND IF ALL ROADS LEAD THERE THEN YOU ALLOW FOR HIGHWAYMEN

THE WEB IS NOT A BROADCAST MEDIUM

KEEP SAYING THAT OVER AND OVER UNTIL YOU GET IT

"THE WEB IS NOT A BROADCAST MEDIUM"

>>139096685
Use different alternatives to these website. Begin learning about your enemy and start building services that rival them, even if you have to go full on house of cards on them to do so.

But, let it be known, should worse come to worse and they start trying to take our freedoms away from us by forcibly using their (((private entity))) status to shut it down, its time to start hunting them down. We fought against this tyranny once and the price of freedom is eternal vigilance. If we must pay in blood once more to liberate ourselves from this obvious enemy whose entire goal is far more devious than most tyrannical governments, then we need to put the tyrants back in their place: 6 feet under or in a ditch.

File: DALhhQsUIAAORrJ.jpg (104KB, 934x506px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 934x506px

>>139098694

Are you somehow saying Youtube, Facebook, Google, Twitter, Reddit, Hollywood and the mainstream media don't control the way the billions of people who use them think?

Think about that for a second and leave your cave.

File: 1486862618955.jpg (360KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 1920x1080px

>>139089761

Videos that talk about the hoaxed nature of the news and politics have been hammered. Also some of the ones exposing the huge amount of trannies in politics, television, and sport. Our reality is full of fiction. Who knows where it ends?

>>139097789
It's a devilish ploy, though it essentially boils down to the old "create the problem then sell the solution" tactic. First you demonize the actual authority figure in the country as evil (the Trump Administration, this has already largely been achieved) then paint yourself as a benevolent authority figure standing up to the supposed evil. The masses who have been indoctrinated to despise the government naturally turn to the only alternative figure of authority, Big Business, and scream "please save us from our evil government. fight them for us!" and of course, Business responds "gladly".

>>139098983
WHAT OTHER OPTIONS IS THEIR .

>>139098983
>implying 4chan isn't a platform

Alright so what's the plan?

Don't use computers, print media, televised media, and any avenue of information?

>>139097521
It's possible if it's something like a blockchain and seeders (miners) get rewarded for hosting.

That would mean professional corporations would form just to be a part of the blockchain. But how do we finance it?

>>139098254
I wonder what would happen if the videos on the White House's official channel were massed flagged?

>>139098931
lol, this is only for dissenting views. ISIS videos, pedophilia videos, they'll stay up just fine.

>>139099157
At some point everyone needs to name the jew and debt reset the world.

>>139099043
I actually agree with you that all these corps control what we think.
That's why I said its about time you (and all of us really) went out and started talking with each other face to face.

>>139098748
The ones that dont allow commenting, rating and reporting are relatively safe.
I mean they still need to be approved by admins, but the chances of blocking are slimmer, the less people involved in making the decision(complaining).

>>139098694
Cute, but it does nothing to prove me wrong.

>>139098833
Oh? So doxxing people, getting them fired for wrong think, lobbying for laws and legislation that gives them more encroaching powers over people and what the say, think, view, and learn isn't in the same vein? We aren't far off from that reality where they can literally drag you out into the street and murder you with the government's blessing on the basis of having the wrong opinion simply because they'll become too powerful to stop or legislate. They already have laws in place where they can sue countries/sovereign nations for issues that cost them money, they can get legislators to introduce rider bills into new laws and amendments that can literally give them complete immunity and allow them to hire para-military to protect themselves and their interests simply by buying them out. Check out some legislation from a few years ago that gave Monsanto power to not be sued for GMOs and allowed them the ability to purchase PMCs like BlackWater/Academi. Can you honestly say that we aren't heading in that direction? Can you honestly say that tyrants wouldn't have loved this idea and used it to its fullest extent?

>>139090337
There are other search engines, duckduckgo, bing, etc.
As google restrict its utility others will rise.

>>139099108
I've told you all. Text. The written word. This is something we can actually manage to host and serve, and this is something that can be easily spread around, and this is something that can be printed out and spread in the form of pamphlets. There are also countless rock-solid utilities that allow for the spread of text.

This is something we can work with, this is something that doesn't require large corporations to host and serve, it can be copied, pasted, re-hosted, mirrored, printed, typed and re-uploaded.

It's something everyone can take part in spreading, (not broadcasting, SPREADING) because everyone has the capabilities to play their part.

Video, by nature of the size of the file, requires untold infrastructure to serve and host, and re-uploading is outside the realm of possibility for most people.

File: quote-zuck-yeah-so-if-you-ever-need-info-about-anyone-at-harvard-zuck-just-ask-zuck-i-have-over-mark-zuckerberg-280610.jpg (88KB, 850x518px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 850x518px

>>139099335

Even if we personally do that, it won't stop the enemy from using social media to effectively control public opinion all over the world on a wider scale than anyone could do by talking face to face. The internet has been a godsend for theanti-establishment and people on the right to get their views out there since it was a lot harder before with cable news and newspapers. Now they see their entire narrative collapsing, that's why they're censoring more and more.

This isn't about /pol/acks who are already distrustful of the mainstream narrative, it's about your average Joe who uses Google for online searches, Youtube and Netflix to watch what's recommended, and Facebook to talk with friends and keep up with news. You could never get the kind of info you get online, especially as quickly and conveniently, by talking face and face.

>>139099826
so ur saying 4chan basicaly

File: snek friend watches art.png (377KB, 626x885px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 626x885px

>>139097164
Already on the Brave wagon but is Qwant better than duckduckgo? I'll certainly change the search engine if so.

>>139099978
No. No! What was the website for the Anarchist's Cookbook? There wasn't one, it was spread and copied and ended up all over the world. Dissident printing behind the Iron Curtain ended up in the Middle East within DAYS of someone clacking away at the typewriter.

I'm arguing for a change in culture, where people are encouraged to download things and put things up constantly, multiply everything. But you can't stop thinking about things in terms of centralised sites and pages and hosts, and you're getting your shit pushed in because it makes you vulnerable and weak, and easy to take down by those that want you gone, because they'll all conspire together to do it.

Fuck you guys. You're all idiots. You deserve to fail.

>>139100149
i doubt it's better. go to /g/ for that
DDG has been comprimised for months though...

>>139100307
kys

>>139089761
kek

Its not entirely Google's fault, they've been pressured into doing this. For awhile now tons of big companies have been pulling their ads off youtube because of "extremist content" and Google are scrambling to stop them from leaving and make the ones that have left come back ("Until Google can ensure this won’t happen again, we are removing our ads from Google’s non-search platforms") Maybe its futile for them to try and please their advertisers like this, but maybe you don't understand what its like to be a huge corporation that needs to make money and keep the stakeholders happy. You can blame the entire business community for this, not just Google

>>139100307
>Fuck you guys. You're all idiots. You deserve to fail.
speak for yourself.

>>139098931
How do you know that they exist?

>>139100430
I'm not the one saying "the answer to large centralised hosting is more large centralised hosting."

File: Beautiful Cinnamon Roll Too good For This World Marina.jpg (1MB, 1100x1500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1100x1500px

>>139100334
>DDG has been comprimised for months though...
Thanks for the info anon, I assumed that so I'll be changing since now it's literally in the settings. I'm sure I can trust the /g/ays to know what they're talking about.

>>139096386
>Four Chins literally becomes only accessible through the dark web after it's labelled a terrorist organization by the ADL, MSNBC, and the Anita Sarkeesian/UN.
Wew I can't wait for my shitposting to be considered as dangerous as Hezbollah militants.

>>139099763
I switched to duckduckgo a while ago. The results are not as good for certain topics, but at least they are probably not compiling a list of my complete search history.

File: 1394861605277.jpg (78KB, 1024x994px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1024x994px

>>139095960
>What do you mean?
>https://hooktube.com/watch?v=6SJNVb0GnPI&bpctr=1503690225
>works fine on firefox.

Would not work for me for several minutes. After I used Brave, then made >>139093856 post, it worked on Firefox.

>>139096076
Thanks, brazilanon!

>>139096174
Nope. They have to bake the fucking cake now.

>>139096582
they literally are jeish