Should we buy google

>>139027097
How much is that in NEET bux?

>>139027097
Since when is Google for sale? If this were possible, wouldn't it already have been done?

Awesome idea. Alphabet has a market capitalization (total value) of >$600 billion. If we get everyone in America to contribute $1000 to the effort then we'll almost do it.

>>139027312
publicly traded company. just buy enough stocks to get on the board.

we are going to need 52.351.669.447,5 usd to get 51% if we combine our efforts and manipulate some dumb idealists into donation too that is entirely posible.

two seperate campaigns using both the alt left and the hardcore right against each other to cause complete chaos in both camps

Slightly more realistic is to buy Twitter, where 51% only costs ~$6 billion.

>>139027420
Okay, but how much would that cost exactly?

Also, anyone who doesn't like Antifa, sign this new petition to get rid of Antifa (not the one to label them terrorists):
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/enforce-article-50-us-code-842-0

And if you haven't signed it yet, here's the one to label them terrorists:
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/formally-recognize-antifa-terrorist-organization-0

>>139027097
microsoft owns the share of google that matters

>"i'm an ideas guy"

>>139027097
>crowdfund 300 billion dollars
is 4chan slow for anyone else btw

>>139028914

I agree with this. Google is too high market cap. Lets do this as a trial run. Im in for 1k

>>139030174

Twitter has like 150mm daily active users. If 5% of those people kicked in $1000 we can get there. We can reorganize it into a B corp so the board can consider other goals besides shareholder profit.

Twitter and google have to kick off nazis because advertisers hate nazis, regardless of the free speech principles, and the management of those companies legally have to focus only on commercial goals.

>>139029954
yes pics been loading slow as hell lately

>>139031447
I usually go to /wsg/ to listen to music and all the webms are stuttering. Fucking Hironip.

>>139027097
It's would be much more cost effective to launch your own platform

I'd never do it because I don't trust any of you to actually go through with it and buy the stocks.

>>139031086
What about mass shilling (without getting paid) for https://gab.ai/ or https://www.minds.com/, which could seriously compete with Twitter? That sounds more realistic to me than getting 5% of Twitter to donate $1000, at least in my opinion.

>>139033928
Exactly, I'd never donate to an anonymous person.

>>139027097
>crowdfund 2 buy stocks.
OP, go and slam your head into brick walls until you're unconscious.