It has begun. I didn't expect them to go after the presidents this soon, though.
>>138954518
They can do what they want and blame who they want, blacks will always be losers at life
>>138954518
This concerns me, and should concern others significantly more. The idea of removing history because we don't like what it represented is something straight out of a book, either 1984 or Brave New World. Either way, it doesn't really matter.
I hope to God people will come to their senses and move on from this awful trend. We are quite literally destroying history. Idc if it's just statues, next thing you know they go for plaques and ask for building names to be changed, then it could lead to the books they don't like being removed form circulation, then ignorance in general.
>>138954983
Believe it or not, one of the things you predicted is already happening
>>138955178
Fucking hell.
Why is this happening. What has history done to deserve this?
>>138954983
This
Also they're too stupid to understand the meaning of CONTEXT
Slavery, "racism", etc was normal and pretty widespread back then
Of course a few presidents were slaveholders. It was inevitable given the era
>>138955388
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KiNWJ8FiYg
"People" like this
>>138954983
This is the Liberal fallacy. There is literally no level of accomplishment for any of their positions. It is the embodiment of "slippery slope."
Let's say they get their way with the statues, then the plaques, then the books... well the internet still exists so censor that. And then censor language even further. And then, and then, and then.
>>138955840
>>138955510
>>138955459
Well anons, I might write a paper and submit it to my college and hopefully see it published. I'll get some help from some English professors to articulate the language better, because at this point this issue needs to be discussed in places where it might not even matter.
We'll see what happens.
The way I see it, you shouldn't judge historical figures by modern standards. In some of these cases, these people lived at least 200 years ago and what is deemed horrible now could have been socially acceptable back then. Going by the logic leftists are using to try and justify this, we might as well erase all history before 1965.
>>138956489
>erase all history before 1965
can you imagine living in a world like that? anything pure and good would be gone forever.
>>138956904
Liberals can find a way to justify anything. They want to remove Grant's Tomb in NYC because he was "anti Semitic" because of some rule he tried to pass in 1862 expelling Jews from some southern states to stop a smuggling business. The thing that isn't mentioned, though, is that he tried his best to make it up to Jews. He knew he screwed up. He appointed more Jews to public office than all of his predecessors combined and even had a Jew as his pallbearer when he died. Yet leftists still say he's an "anti Semite"
>>138954983
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Olds
FUCKING 4CHAN PIECE OF SHIT SYSTEM THINKS IM SPAMMIG SO I CANT POST
>can't do a damn thing
Fuck 4chan
Oh yeah.
>flips off religious fags
>>138957157
It's never enough for the kikes.
>>138958169
Quite literally what is unfolding right before our very eyes. And it doesn't even need an official proclamation by our government, because the people are already doing it.
>Fucking idiots.
>>138954518
> ass of Kim Kardashian
can fap
> Jefferson
....
the choice is obvious
From the snek point of view one should replace all monuments with some distributor of incentives.
Or with factories. Or shops.