Thoughts?
>>138915820
Why should I trust the same people who thought Hillary was going to win last year?
>>138916071
Do you mean the polls?
>>138915820
"TRUMP ISN'T POPULAR ENOUGH TO WIN THE ELECTION" -US media, election day.
>>138916279
fake quote, now
>>138915820
keep going, baby
>>138915820
These polls are weighted. What do you think their formula for that is?
>>138915820
You rode the short bus to school, didn't you?
>>138915820
Thought 1: He desperately sucks and has no business being the President.
Thought 2: We are damned fools for electing him.
Thought 3: "IT" is never fucking happening. Trump has no trump card to play. Expect 4 years of disappointment unless they actually impeach him or he finds a shred of honor in his orange vessel and falls on his own sword.
To everyone who points to the polls in the last election for some vindication, Hillary's approval rating on election day was near-as-makes-no-difference to Trumps. They were both equally unpopular. The story of 2016 isn't of Trump winning, but of Hillary losing. She is now carved on the Mount Losemore of America politics. It's like Bill Burr asked on Conan, "How the hell do you lose to that?" Trump's approval on election day was horrid and it's mostly stayed that way by historical standards.
>>138919968
Fuck off Tokyo rose
Nate Silver and the rest destroyed the credibility of polls. Not once has a polling place asked me anything or anyone I know.
>>138915820
My thoughts....
Popularity only matters on the internet. He could have an approval rating of 0%, but he would still be President.
WTF I LOVE POLLS NOW
>>138915820
>polls
Only thought needed
The same polls that said Donald trump would never win in a million years
>>138915820
>>138915820
kill yourself shill rat
gallup said his approval rating was 30 for the election that he won. 4 points higher wow