/script>
Google image search for
American white inventors
white women with children
European history people
happy American couple
white marriage
white wedding
criminal children <---- this one is the best
>>138883949
>Triggered.
Huh... soft cultural replacement? Maybe. Maybe..
All human beings have equal value.
>>138883949
google: oven definition
>>138884249
kek
>>138883949
>criminal children
YEah. Google is not on your side, Burger. Or mine.
>>138884249
nigger what
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxIin_c_hYI
Do not give in to the end western civilization. For us to fight in this world. That is the only way. Rage my soldiers, scream my soldiers.
bump because this made me feel sick
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm makes u think
We will overcome and be victorious.
Back to >>>/b/, kiddo. At this point, you're either freshly born, willfully ignoring explanations of how the search algorithms produce these results, or you understand full well what you're doing to get these results and just shitposting.
>>138886546
No look up other similar searches there are few white men.
>>138883949
>>138884249
>>138884762
honestly thought was a joke
then googled
>should've know better tbqh
>>138886546
>willfully ignoring explanations of how the search algorithms produce these results
do go ahead and explain fuckface
those searches work as expected if you put in "black" or "african" where appropriate
>>138886937
How many times in your life in normal speech have you said "European history people"? Once you start including wordings or extra terms outside of normal speech, the algorithm will find uses that do. So you get "black people European history" or "American non-white inventors" or "black and white marriage" -- search terms in which these words will actually widely be used.
>>138887192
stfu faggot I am a computer scientist and you are an idiot
>>138887192
I knew you were just going to play dumb and ignore me.
>white inventors
>white women with children
>white marriage
these are normal fucking searches and they all come up with blacks and interracial shit. however if you just substitute "white" with "black" you get expected results. these kinds of searches have been known for a while now.
>>138887192
he's right you know. But you'll rather be scared than informed.
>>138889790
>search these without "white"
>get mostly white people (strange how the kikes at google aren't suppressing these searches...)
>add racial terms in the mix
>get results from nigger sites discussing these things in terms of race because if you just look at history from a non-racialized lens niggers get BTFO
Bonus fun: Try searching shit like "white marriage" in duckduckgo, bing, and yahoo. Are they all in on it? Congrats, you are the one millionth person to discover that search algorithms are still often pretty shitty.
Whats good for images so I can set up searx.