Are rural environments superior to urban ones?

>>138867749
Care to elaborate?

>>138868008
No

Perhaps

>>138868008
In every way but economical.

>>138868008
Better mental health
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es403688w

>>138867749
>>138868039
Maybe...I dont know...Can you repeat the question?

>>138867713
They are about equal if the doctor give you something for your urban

>>138867713
For developing people they are. City people are of such limited capacity. 90% of them couldn't lift a fucking rock.

>>138869141
I'm not at mood to read a study. Is there less stress in rural or what?

>>138867713
BLOOD AND SOIL

>>138867713
Yes
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264649939_Nazi_Technical_Thought_Revisited
In fact, Gottfried Feder, the godfather of national socialism, believed it was extremely important to absolutely abolish the urbanite, break cities down into garden city communes, and radically revolutionize civil engineering for this purpose - so that nationalistic tendencies could naturally form across the nation, and abolish urban degeneracy. The old guard of the nazi party leadership and the war effort combined however, led them down another path.

>>138867713
If you're a national socialist and you don't worship the work of Gottfried Feder and make it your mission to understand everything he's done, you're doing nazi wrong.

>>138867713
I live in Birmingham UK..

>answer to your question...
ABSO-FECKIN-LUTELY!

I guess this thread is finished.

File: 1502459500156.jpg (38KB, 480x520px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 480x520px

>[Dawn of time] - ~2007
City
>~2007 - now
Village

>>138869807
Urbanites are degenerates. The human being can only maintain familiarity with a few hundred people, and so high trust communities form better in low population areas. This makes people naturally form a loyalty to community first, then region, then nation. In urban areas, population is too dense, trust is low, people do not cooperate, and loyalty to community is less common, breaking down loyalty to region and nation. The people have less sense of duty in urban areas, and are naturally more materialistic.

>>138867713
No. Rural areas are nothing but poor, inbred shitholes

File: IMG_0896.jpg (83KB, 1024x430px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 1024x430px

>>138871348
Shut up you stupid faggot

>>138867713
No and yes.

Less job opportunities, but it is more peaceful. Cleaner air, but poorer.

>>138871501
Link?

>>138871206
source?

>>138867713
Infinitely superior.

>>138871348
>Be in Vancouver.
>Pay over 1000$ at bare minimum for a tiny apartment with no laundry or extras
>Climb ranks in company over 4 years and still take home about 2500$ a month and barely getting by
>Be in Northern rural area
>Pay $750 for a two bedroom townhouse with built in laundry
>Entry level work taking home 3000$-4000$ a month
really makes me think

>>138871599
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2655144/Massachusetts-smartest-state-Mississippi-lowest-IQ-Maps-reveal-intelligence-levels-US-based-tweets.html

Just look it up yourself sometime, retard. Maybe if you shouldn't make shit up and pull it out of your ass 24/7.
>Lowest IQ California
>most urbanized state in country is California
>Highest IQ Vermont
>most rural state in the country is Vermont
really makes me think

>>138871599
you'll also notice the highest IQ areas also have the lowest amount of blacks and other third worlders.

>>138871599
https://brandongaille.com/list-average-iq-by-country-and-american-states/
>Vermont = #4
>California = #48
But but but but muh inbred rural hicks....

>>138867713
Rural environments produce people with better character, which, when combined with good education, produces higher quality human capital. Urban environments make better use of that human capital than rural environments, though.

>>138871599
>>138872840
>>138873200
>States by white population % 2013
http://www.indexmundi.com/facts/united-states/quick-facts/all-states/white-population-percentage#map
>states by rural v urbanized population ratio
https://priceonomics.com/the-most-urbanized-states-in-america/

>1. Massachusetts: 104.3 == 83.2% white == 86% Urban, rank 4th urban
>2. New Hampshire: 104.2 == 94.2% white == 60% urban, rank 41st urban
>3. North Dakota: 103.8 == 89.6% white == 59% urban, 42nd urban
>4. Vermont: 103.8 == 95.2% white == 39% urban, 50th urban
>5. Minnesota: 103.7 == 86.2% white == 74% urban, rank 27th

> 48. California: 95.5 == 73.5% white == 93% urban, rank #1 most urban state

Hmm.