They STILL wont outlaw these chemicals even though it's widely accepted in the scientific community that these chemicals negatively affect the health of living organisms, not even after the WHO published several publications on the health effects of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs). See: http://www.who.int/ceh/risks/cehemerging2/en/
>but the dosage of these chemicals humans are exposed to probably isn't high enough to negatively affect our health, right?
Wrong. There is now substantial evidence that low doses of EDCs have adverse effects on human health.
See: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3365860/
EDCs are in almost ALL modern products, you cannot avoid them even if you know about the effects they have on your health and actively tried to avoid them.
> See: pic related (the peer-reviewed study it's from): http://www.feingold.org/Research/PDFstudies/Dodson2012.pdf)
This is the ultimate redpill. Watch the first season of Utopia (the british series) if you haven't seen it.
>>138838379
>shop at trader joe's or whole foods
problemo solved, you filthy roo-monkey
>>138838493
Read this study: http://www.feingold.org/Research/PDFstudies/Dodson2012.pdf
You'll still find EDCs in most of the "alternative" products as well.
>>138838493
Why did you even post this? Is it meant to be a joke?
>grow your own food.
>>138838379
There is no over population problem.
You're an idiot blue piller.
Over population is propaganda straight from the illuminati/NWO.
>>138838658
EDCs are not just in your food, they're on your floorboards, in your furniture, on your shower curtains, and most likely in the dust inside your house.
>>138838758
Why do you think population growth has been declining since the introduction of these chemicals, dumb fuck?
>>138838758
It's widely known that EDCs have adverse affects on ability to reproduce.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3365860/
ctrl+f: "female reproduction" read the paragraph of the 2nd result
>>138838906
Why are only certain groups affected by a declining population even within the same country?
Nothing to do with the societal changes?
>>138839164
post proof