Why is /pol/ so baffling to normies?

They deliberately obscure us in an attempt to disempower us. It doesn't matter. You can silence /pol/ but you can't silence the people that constitute /pol/; this is a website, but we are the people.

they want to know their enemy

>>138820545
Dude, everything is baffling to normies

Because /pol/ is the barbarian at the gates who slaughters your diplomats because they don't understand your conventions. /pol/ disregards so much of what they regard as sacred and obvious that they can wrote pseudo-anthropological thinkpieces as much as they want but they still don't get it.

>>138820959
Obviously. My question is despite all (((their))) resources dedicated in that effort why do the continue to barely scrape the surface

>>138820545
/our/ arguments are asymmetrical.

>>138821460
How do you mean?

>>138821218
yeah when no one has to give a fuck about offending Jews and having their careers ruined, they can call out kikery

>>138820545
Australians...normies can't fathom the bantz.

>>138821832
tit for tat means staying in their paradigm.

File: Look over yonder.jpg (5KB, 199x199px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 199x199px

>>138820545
All is satire but taken literally. Hakuhō Shō FTW.

>>138820545
Because if you actually understand this place you will become redpilled, and if you are redpilled you're not going to waste your time writing that tripe for (((them)))

this is actually a positive thing.
>investigative reporter for cnn comes to /pol/
>cant take the hate
>swollows partial seed of red pill
>leaves.

>>138820545
>academic studies, journalistic "exposès", alphabet agency research and NGO assessments
Yeah but has anyone competent ever tried it? :)

>browser /pol/
>attempts to dissect it
>gets a mouth full of red pill
>cognitive dissonance kicks in
>suppresses everything