What's flyover America's excuse?
Not sucking kike dick
>>138758324
now post a middle class households per capita map
>>138758324
Less people = less millionaires
>>138758324
Red states are worthless.
>>138758406
>>138758457
guys come on, the map IS per capita. You aren't helping yourselves.
here are the numbers.
>>138758373
Gee Texas sure is a backwards hick state you guys.
The bigger they come the harder they fall.
>>138758324
The fact that they don't have access to the ocean when the world economy is becoming even more reliant on trade than it was before, among other things.
>>138758457
>per capita
>>138758639
why are you quoting me?
I said now post a middle class per capita map
It will show you that cities simply have a tiny ultra rich ruling class and a ton of poor people, that has never been conducive to an innovative and successful society/nation
>>138758811
my b, that's my american "educayshun" kicking in.
If you're gonna be rich as fuck, why live in the middle of nowhere? Live in the city, and pay to build big fucking walls around your house/neighborhood to keep the minorities at bay.
>>138758811
and this was all I could find, not that reassuring.
Get it together flyover country.
>>138758324
Who gives a fuck? Enjoy your 1 gorillian jew-bucks. I'll keep my tight-knit communities and low crime rate.
Keep building mansions next to ghettos, and keep inciting the niggers to riot. Good plan, Jude.
>>138758899
well personally I'd rather live in the middle of nowhere because cities are boring and have nothing to do, as well as all the other shitty things about them like crowding, noise, bad smells, lack of scenery
>>138758324
rural inbred pickup driving white trash tends not to have money. It's about that simple.
>>138759139
Midwest is balling in the middle class, baka if they can do it, so can montana.
>>138759139
That map isn't per capita and isn't useful for this conversation
Also to look at this objectively we'd need to account for cost of living, and overall quality of life
Just because cities have retarded inflated costs doesn't mean the people there are more productive
>>138759139
>>138758811
oh here's an even clearer map
>>138759292
east montana is honorary midwest in my book.
>>138759434
That doesn't work either, of course the place with more ultra rich will have a high median income
That dataset doesn't account for the ultra rich/poor division
>>138759574
Yes it does.
Median income is not average income.
His data is correct, inland states are poorer than those with access to the ocean, but that's a natural thing that exists almost everywhere (see mainland China vs port cities for a recent example).