Be honest /pol/, what is considered pedophilia and is it wrong

If she get her period then it's good to go

>>138746939
>4
>2
>3
>5
>1
prove me wrong

>>138746939
Don't see it like that
the idea that a person should only have sex once mentally developed in order to avoid being 'used' or getting into difficult situation seems very important to me....
even minors can abuse other minors.

I think there should be an age limit even if it is a arbitrary constraint

>>138747100
FPBP

It's biology, deal with it you hyper-cucks

>>138747623
So a retard or a drunk person cant have sex because they may be used?

>>138747100
This, it's nature's way of saying okay.

>>138746939
I'm against paedophilia,but hebephilia is awwright.

>>138746939
The definition of pedo is 12 and under. I blame America for distorting that concept.
Also i'd fug all those girls in OPs pic prob.

>>138746939

Kill
Fuck
Kill
Fuck
Kill

>>138747791
Well;
For drunks it would depend on how drunk: If the person is literally hanging on to the earth just to not fall up, then he's in no position to give consent, if a sober person takes advantage of it then it's obviously abuse.

For mentally retarded it's a bit more difficult, the accepted method is that their care takers are in charge of their relationships as they are considered unable to form safe ones themselves.

>>138746939
>>138747100
>>138747812
>those flags
Everything checks out.

>>138747812
And prior to the 1900s, it would probably be legal (so long as you married them).

>>138746939
Just kill yourself.

>>138748345
>he
lol what?

>>138746939
>Flag

Pottery


Machmud pls. We all know your tastes already

Well saged and reported

>>138748832
I tried to write it in gender-less terms,
I assumed gender-less means you just refer to the person as a 'he' by default.

>>138746939
3,2,4,1,5

>>138746939
Typical subhuman pedo. You should be gassed.

>>138746939
pedophilia = sexual interest in childen

definiton of "child" differs a lot from country to country, in my country a child is anyone below the age of 14 and i think that is a good definition

File: pukirev_ner_brak.jpg (367KB, 1300x1631px) Image search: [Google]

367KB, 1300x1631px

>>138746939

The average age of marriage in England from the age of Elizabeth to the Victorian era was about twenty-five for both sexes.

http://www.history.com/news/history-lists/5-things-victorian-women-didnt-do-much

Tacitus says the same thing of the ancient Germans in his "Germania."

If a woman had sexual relations of any kind outside of marriage in before times, she was shunned by society, as, for example, you may see by reading the book Pride and Prejudice, where, after the character Lydia runs away with a soldier, she is considered as good as ruined unless she marries him.

The conclusion therefore is that paedophilia, or even ephebophilia, has never been normal in Western civilization. In the comparatively fewer cases where a man (say) in his twenties did have relations with (say) a fifteen-year-old, it was only legitimately done in a marriage contracted with the consent of the parents; whereas the people who incessantly make threads of this kind are advocating that older men should be able freely to seduce and use young girls with impunity. It is simple paedophile and ephebophile propaganda, and antithetical to everything decent and good.

>>138746939
Stop trying to make pol look like sickos, you leftie fucks are seriously fucked in the head kys

>>138746939
>those "young" girls
>pedophilia

They probably have more sexual experience at their age than most on 4chan.

>>138749573
Why would a leftist post this with a muslim flag
Retard

>>138747100

This

Based roach.

>>138748982
Oh, my bad. I agree btw.

>>138749573
kys roastie

>>138750092
>Oh, my bad
NO APOLOGY GIVE SUBMARINE!

>>138746939
Theese look all healthy and good to go. Heres my 100 dinars...

>>138746939
Pre-puberty sex is wrong. It is not natural.

Post-puberty sex is ok. To be sure puberty is pretty much over and, let's say the 14th birthday is the cut off.

This is what it is here and I think it is a good compromise. 13 is really too young.

>>138746939
How old are these girls?

I would guess
>25
>20-22
>20
>25

File: pepe_gib.png (53KB, 755x512px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 755x512px

>>138746939
gib polak gf

File: 1503285898716.png (805KB, 1273x1031px) Image search: [Google]

805KB, 1273x1031px

Guess who ran London's infamous child brothels?

Go on /pol/? You'll never, ever guess. Uh uh. The same people who spread the rumour that a gentleman could cure his dose of the clap by paying to have sex with a child prostitue virgin, no less.

Take a wild Jack The Ripper style stab in the dark, at the ones who won't be blamed for nothing.

Guess which lobby group opposed the installation of a Legal Age of Consent as a direct result of this inhumanity? I wonder if you'll even know who they are, or have ever even heard of them before.

>>138750649
No idea i just got a random pic cause I need one

>>138746939
I googled this the other day. A pedophile is someone who is specifically attracted to prepubescent children in a sexual way. Laws of consent, and ages of consent, vary from state to state in the US. So, what does that mean? Well, I dunno, but there's certainly this grey area between fully-out-of-puberty and 18 that we all feel makes us a pedophile for enjoying, but really is not wrong or illegal at all. It's even quite natural, if looked at from a biological view point, to enjoy the sexual beauty of a member of our species who is sexually mature.

Does that mean I want to fuck 16 year olds? Well, yes and no, but regardless, my principles allow me to take a step back and say "no, they need to fuck each other. I am not the same as them any more. It would not be fair or right", or something like that, but the gist is that I think it's an inherently damaging relationship, for someone over the age of 19 to be with someone under the age of 17, so I wouldn't "indulge", even if I were tempted.

Pedophilia is a mental illness involving sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Attraction to a fourteen year old with boobs and nice ass isn't pedophilia, in the mental health sense.

But, and this is a big 'but,' it is also important to understand that in the twenty first century it is rarely in a 14 year old girl's best interest to have a romantic or sexual relationship with an older man, and of course there is the legal factor. But denying one's attraction to sexually mature girls and bottling it up leads to unnecessary guilt and development of more serious problems down the road.

>>138746939
>Future Coalburners of America.
They all have the look.

File: 1503281330692.jpg (66KB, 546x618px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 546x618px

HEY /POL/ guess who ran Berlin's infamous child brothels inbetween the wars? Chased out of Blighty they relocated to Germany and plied their trade openly and shamelessly, with little kids hooking outside of every major hotel?

You'll never, ever guess, silly /pol/. When have you ever been right about something consistently?

>>138746939
>it's ok to take sexual advantage of children because childhood ended sooner thousands of years ago.

In most places around the world it's not the 7th century still, ahmed. I'm sorry your culture is stuck in the dark ages. Well, no, I'm not. I'm just sorry we haven't obliterated your culture yet. Pray to your child-raping prophet we never decide to end you because our apathy is all that stands between islam and the dust bin of history.

File: 1502890817339.png (586KB, 644x459px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 644x459px

>>138746939
Only a fucking muslim could seriously ask that question!

>>138746939
Woman are pretty dumb and irrational at the best of times. Young girls are that taken to an insane extreme, it's best to protect that innocence where possible as any man (nevermind young boys) can take advantage so easily.

You probably only want the age reduced so you can take advantage of some girl as you can't get with 18 year olds. A whole other aspect is the physical difference, a young girl is completely defenceless against a man but that's probably lesser to the mental aspect.

Tl;dr Muslims are pathetic fags and the white degenerates who agree are worse.

>>138751353
How exactly is consensual sex taking advantage
Are you an illiterate retard?
Plus several other moral values are taken from thousand of years ago
Lets end marriages cause it's not the 7th century
Kys

File: 1502922124834.jpg (67KB, 750x714px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 750x714px

>>138746939

Attraction to anyone who doesn't have big tits/ass or a big cock

>>138746939
Masallah, Muhammad had the first night with Aisha after their marriage, when she was 9 years old. No problem man.
You are either larping or proud of your pedophile prophet.

>>138747367
>>4
>>2
>>3
>>5
>>1
Not an argument, I came here to say this

>>138752330
Muhammad (PBUH) is a great example to be followed
But my argument lies beyond just following the righteous prophet

>>138751945
children cant consent now fuck off to /b/ and jerk off to lolitrash

File: 1503316917854.png (1MB, 1050x903px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1050x903px

You might not believe this /pol/ but there was child prostitution in New York during World War Two. Strangely, the operation that once plagued London and Berlin magically relocated across the Atlantic, somehow. Same MO as Berlin, with wretched little working class white kids hooking outside of big hotels. It wasn't very successful (which says something nice about the Americans at the time) but most bizarrely when the owners of the three brothels were arrested, all charges were dropped and they simply vanished following depositions by a certain powerful lobby group.

I bet you can't guess which one? Hmmmm?

>>138747812
this 2bh

>>138751400
>Carolann Gallow
There is always a fucking white degenerate involved in this nonsense lol
>checking of jewish too

>>138746939
Flag checks out.

>>138749492
When you are so ashamed of your pedo ancestors that you are willing to spread propaganda and conspiracies to prove they were not. Lmao

>>138746939
A girl is property of her father, no one can tell him when he's allowed to start doing her or when he's allowed to have her married.

>>138750775
Well if I'll never guess then tell me, who?

>>138750649
They're about 16 yo.

>>138750748
*rooskie

>>138752542
>my argument
appears to be "I want to fuck a kid, therefore it's morally right"? There doesn't seem to be much more to it than that, or were you saving the thesis for a later post?

If you live in some thrid world shithole where life is so cheap you can't tell that fucking a kid up is so high on the "it's wrong" scale there might not be too much higher, then sure, what difference does it make to a life in Hell anyway? But we know you don't mean that, 'cos for whatever reasons the paedophile collective of the planet all want to fuck white kids from Western nations. It's almost like some sort of pathetic attempt at payback for being the best at everything, and a little snivelling kid is as heavy as you can manage?