Why is Tucker Carlson on TV? He's is a terrible debater.

I think he was pretty fair to be honest.

>>138535883
What was there even to debate. The not agreed with waters calling Carson a white supremacists is and the nig implied he was basically a diversity hire at his because of the word urban. These leftist nig are triggered so easily.

>>138537177
What the fuck am I reading

File: pepe autism.png (308KB, 492x419px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 492x419px

>>138537177

>>138535883
Yeah he was straight up terrible, I only tuned in tonite at the end so I wouldn't miss the Trump speech, Fox has basically become garbage drivel. Want real news? Go to Breitbart or frankly, look what's being diascussed on pol.

>>138535883
Like I care about "conservatives."

I don't care if he invites losers on to make them look like idiots. TV isn't anything more than casual entertainment anyway.

File: starofdavid.jpg (74KB, 301x346px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 301x346px

>>138535883
you seem like you have no argument and therefore an "terrible debater"

>>138537438
learn to read maybe

>>138537817

It's pretty bad when the "closest thing to pol on video-based news" is Tucker Carlson.

No wonder the masses are retards.

>>138539491

Tucker doesn't do anything controversial, he just sticks to the most basic logical argument.