obviously not asking neocons
>>138394167
We did a good job electing someone that wasn't a neocon, but the flaw in our plan was that someone was stupid to have a consistent set of policies. Now Bannon/Paul 2020
>>138394167
/ptg/ will, without question.
>>138394167
no. i hope his staff reads this.
Joke's on you, I am a neocon.
>>138394167
I will be upset with any neocon faggotry he commits. That being said we're not going into Afghanistan with ground troops
>>138394494
I know that from the fact you can't read
>>138394998
I don't have time to read, I'm busy doing what's right.
>>138394167
>If Trump Goes Full Neocon, Will You Compromise Your values To Still Support Him?
no
>>138394167
Depends on what it is, but in general...
Nopety nope
>>138394167
>Full Neocon
no, but doesn't seem to be much chance of that happening.