How do you make a poor country rich, /pol/?
>>138385149
1) switch from fiat to hard currency.
2) local manufacturing base
3) INCLUDING LOCALLY SOURCED WORKERS
there done all fixed easy peasy.
>>138385149
wait... you just want it rich "on paper"??
Immigrants, lots of them.
>>138385149
Your chart is all wrong, since GDP measurement is for lowest IQ retards. Here's how you can measure it.
>>138386613
could you elaborate? cause your chart seems to suggest household debt is what makes a country rich.
>>138386613
>Posts an even more retarded measurement.
>>138385149
shhhhhhhh, don't tell!!
>>138387487
Unfortunately on a fiat based currency it means exactly that. It allows for unwarranted borrowing at the cost of destroying the value of a currency. Which in turn is offset on actual economic growth (real wealth).
>>138385149
Economic nationalism.
>>138385149
Some simply have too many geographic hurdles to overcome to ever become "first world" in a reasonable time frame
>>138389150
Technology makes that irrelevant; this isn't the bronze age.
Tax haven
>>138385149
How the hell Singapore is so rich?
Do these ugly people shits gold or what?
>>138385149
>>138389507
Export and re-export hub and they're a tax haven that offers sweeheart deals to corporations for jobs.
>>138388081
3 amigos?
>>138389425
Some things can't be sufficiently corrected with current technology (lack of access to the oceans, non-temperate climate, poor soil, few sources of water etc.)
>>138389507
>really makes you think
>>138389883
Nonsense, trains and planes make location irrelevant, soil can be reset, water can be transported thousands of miles with canals, and we can even convert ocean water to clean; drinkable water.
>>138390207
all of which cost money and resources. if poor countries had money and resources, they wouldnt be poor
>>138389507
economic liberty with little state intervention. they modelled themselves after hong kong back than when it was good.
>>138389708
>3 amigos?
Yes. Problem?
>>138385149
make everyone else poorer
>>138390207
>trains and planes make location irrelevant
Not at all, naval transport always has been and still is the cheapest mass transport option. A lack of access to the ocean (or in Russia's case access to an all year warm water port) is crippling to an economy. Have you ever heard of a wealthy land-locked power?
>soil can be reset
Some can, but it's too expensive for wide scale use in the countries that really need it
>water can be transported thousands of miles with canals
Very costly, desert nations that institute such things are oil wealthy
>and we can even convert ocean water to clean; drinkable water.
Still incredibly expensive and inefficient as of now
>>138390811
>Have you ever heard of a wealthy land-locked power
these faggots >>138390649
>>138391053
naval transportation includes rivers.
>>138391308
well if you include rivers, no nation is at all "landlocked" considering you'll have to get water to drink from somewhere
>>138385149
What did Botswana do? Thats an impressive jump
>>138391653
well, ships need to be able to actually move (and oh body, ships on the Rhein are huge), but other than that. yes. Direct access to the ocean isn't that important afterall.
>>138385439
because the future is in manufacture
>>138391814
Literally stopped being niggers and started to be productive and reasonable (except AIDS I supposed).
Countries are poor because of the low-IQ people living there.
>>138385149
kill all the niggers
>>138391814
one of the freest economies in africa, government didn't fall for the extreme corruption meme, also has a shitload of diamonds
>>138391930
Yes it is