/pol/ BTFO

The author's perspective is clearly declared within the first sentence.

File: 1496291002943.png (299KB, 1002x930px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 1002x930px

And by the same maxim the anti white

File: 1482456604515.jpg (1MB, 2525x2314px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2525x2314px

>>138370423

File: 1496919545439.jpg (289KB, 1361x2048px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1361x2048px

>>138370423
This pic describes /pol/tard shitposting down to the decimals

Why are Jews so good at deconstructing retard nazi scrubs? Is it their upbringing?

File: 22without-jews-there-would-never-have-been-bolshevism.jpg (745KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

745KB, 1280x720px

>>138370423
Anti Semitism?

File: 1447889500625.jpg (112KB, 431x696px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 431x696px

>>138370423

>>138370423
Pretty spot on

File: 1499303093561.png (600KB, 650x994px) Image search: [Google]

600KB, 650x994px

>>138371277
Hate for Nazism is identical to hate for Judaism

File: 1416054921475.jpg (46KB, 400x266px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 400x266px

Why won't jews acknowledge their crimes?

File: 1482542480799.png (130KB, 612x792px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 612x792px

>>138370423
Hitler said it first and best

>>138371277
Sartre wasn't Jewish.

Am reading the work right now:
>http://abahlali.org/files/Jean-Paul_Sartre_Anti-Semite_and_Jew_An_Exploration_of_the_Etiology_of_Hate__1995.pdf
Good read so far... Sartre absolutely correctly, in my opinion, points out the doublethink that Jew-haters are prone to.

>A classmate of mine at the lycée told me that Jews "annoy" him because of the thousands of injustices that "Jew‐ ridden" social organizations commit in their favour. "A Jew passed his agrégation the year I was failed, and you can't make me believe that that fellow, whose father came from Cracow or Lemberg, understood a poem by Ronsard or an eclogue by Virgil better than I." But he admitted that he disdained the agrégation as a mere academic exercise, and that he didn't study for it. Thus, to explain his failure, he made use of two systems of interpretation, like those madmen who, when they are far gone in their madness, pretend to be the King of Hungary but, if questioned sharply, admit to being shoemakers. His thoughts moved on two planes without his being in the least embarrassed by it. As a matter of fact, he will in time manage to justify his past laziness on the grounds that it really would be too stupid to prepare for an examination in which Jews are passed in preference to good Frenchmen. Actually he ranked twenty‐seventh on the official list. There were twenty‐six ahead of him, twelve who passed and fourteen who failed. Suppose Jews had been excluded from the competition; would that have done him any good? And even if he had been at the top of the list of unsuccessful candidates, even if by eliminating one of the successful candidates he would have had a chance to pass, why should the Jew Weil have been eliminated rather than the Norman Mathieu or the Breton Arzell?

>>138372572
Sartre never got anything correct because he worked from a wholly false premise.

>>138373883
And what premise would that be?