why is diversity a bad thing?

There is always inherent distrust between the races, subconscious or otherwise. And some cultures just aren't compatible with one another.

>>138354638

Because diversity activists see diversity as a goal unto itself, rather than something that should just be a natural consequence of letting in foreigners with in-demand job skills. My parents are Lebanese immigrants who were practically invited to work in Silicon Valley back when they were desperate for engineers in the 80's. That's how (minimal) diversity should come about, not by allowing illiterate third worlders to flood into your country.

Diversity + Proximity = Conflict

You can't fight nature. Groups naturally stick together, and those different groups will end up fighting. Integrating different groups into a multi-ethnic society has never worked on a large scale. Babylon, Rome, Hellenic Empire, USSR, British Empire, etc, etc. Every multi-cultural society that has ever existed falls apart eventually, except for small states like Switzerland.

>>138355168
But even in Switzerland, the residents of the various cantons share a lot in common, as far as common ethnic cultural heritage is concerned. Another successful small multi-ethnic state is Singapore. Singapore however is not a democracy, and the President has said it cannot be a democracy, as all the ethnic groups would only vote in their interest and end up being out voted by the Chinese majority anyway.

>>138354638
When you find insects in your home do you squash them or give them land plots?

>>138355450
>self interest is ethnically-defined

interesting concept

>>138354638
The world is already diverse, what they are trying to do now is only to make the Western World a big brown mess

>>138355587
If people do not have self interest, who will have equal interest for them?

>>138355450
Also the cantons in Switzerland have a huge degree of autonomy.

>>138354638
Because it always leads to conflict.

Forget about Muslims and Europe, look at Northern Ireland, Iraq, Sudan, South Africa, anywhere which ethnic or religious diversity exists in a major way ends up as a conflict zone.

The end goal of diversity is no diversity

File: familiarity breeds contempt.png (468KB, 1293x912px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1293x912px

>>138354638
>why is diversity a bad thing?

Try living in a majority black city for a few weeks and you'll figure it out really fast if you survive.

It's code for Africanization.

>>138354638
Why is it good?

File: right_rainbow.jpg (24KB, 669x250px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 669x250px

>>138354638
it's a good thing

>>138354638
>why is diversity a bad thing?
It's not inherently bad.
But if you love heavy metal, and you're force to listen to one song of every other musical genre for every one metal song you listen too, well, you're doing it wrong.

>>138355888
Nobody looks out for anybody, and if they do they're nepotists anyway.

What non-white country is having diversity pushed by it's political class?

>>138354638
>diversity

"diversity" = anti-white
"diversity" = no freedom of ides

thats the reality of today

lefies are the new fascists

File: 1483177524652.jpg (109KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 500x500px

>>138354638
how can there be diversity if you mix everything together to become one and the same?

Without acknowledging and protecting different cultures and keeping them seperated as their own thing there would nothing diverse be left.

>>138354638

Diversity is a straw man created by the elite.

Diversity and homogeneity are not good or bad per se. The real issue is labor relations with the owners of the means of production.

The elite always want more cheap labor. They can do this by importing masses of foreigners. This is why we have Africans in the US.

What happens is we have more and more people competing for the same job and the winner in the one that accepts the lowest salary. This continues until we are all literally slaves.

>>138354638
"Diversity" combined with their "blame whitey" philosophy has no other end result besides the complete subjugation and death of people of European decent

File: -Sage-.jpg (5KB, 180x169px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 180x169px

>>138354638
>1 post by this ID
>well /pol/ emoji
We're done here boys

>>138354638
there was no identity politics before when only white men could vote

>>138354638
Look at the thought diversity between the right and left and the strife it has caused.

>>138354638
It's not inherently bad, at least not in every case. African shitholes would benefit from diversity, meaning more whites and East Asians.

White countries do not benefit from being filled with brown third-world slime, though.

"Diversity" doesn't mean "different races."

It means "Less white people." They want whites gone.

>>138354638
It causes infighting and distrust within communities.

File: 726646_900.jpg (152KB, 568x900px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 568x900px

>>138354638
because it will be the end of white people

>>138354638
Diversity isn't a bad thing by default. But diversity can include bad things or become a bad thing in itself.

For a lot of progressives diversity is a goal onto itself, whatever follows is none of their concern. Diversity for the sake of diversity. Diverse often just means non-western and usually travels in one direction. For an example: they'll never advocate for more europeans in Africa or Asia. They rarely talk about a need of more christians in the middle-east or even buddhists in Africa.

The recent push of diversity has proven to be disastrous in the westerns world. It promotes self-segregation and thus destroys social cohesion. Also, just take a look outside the western world: name me one country with a lot of large ethnic groups where "diversity" works. It never working historically when peoples are forced to live among each other.

>>138354638
Its not necessarily, but it tends towards conflict and division, and if you have a subgroup which reaches a meaningful size (say 15/20%), it usually turns into us vs them.

After WWI, the post mortem was that "national self determination" would prevent another war, so they broke up the continental european empires, and gave all the balkan states states. This broke down when they started getting hoovered up again.

To be clear, it appears that limited diversity based on work, or diversity leading to full assimilation (which is very very rare, by full assimilation i mean literally being bred in until you cant be distinguished, which essentially never happens), can work, but usually only if the two groups being merged are very similar. In this way the saxon tribes and the celtic tribes integrated (along with some other germanics and scandies) and became anglos. But the idea that a random selection of people from different continents will ever form a cohesive tribe is a fantasy. Theres been a 10-12% black minority in the US for hundreds of years, its still sharply distinguished and politics is rewritten along racial lines.

The minute you get seperate politics for seperate races, diversity is over, at least in a democracy. Unless democracy ends - that's the likely outcome in the US. An autocrat can maintain the balance of power between groups, but a democracy will always always always be us vs them.

In terms of in the workspace, there was an article in the Harvard Business Review, apparently diversity has no impact on performance. Doesn't make it better or worse. Interestingly, diversity of viewpoint was slightly correlated with imrpoved output

>>138354638
They bring their backwards beliefs and traditions wherever they march into, yet queens and kings step aside like they're George Thorogood.

>>138354638
ONE POST BY THIS ID

>>138354638
Why is is a good thing?

>>138354638
The right by (my) definition seeks government intervention for genetic and cultural majorities (or the largest minorities) and against smaller minorities. The left seeks government intervention for the smallest genetic and cultural minorities, and against such more dominant groups.

Because the left must embrace genetic and cultural diversity to build a coalition against the right, it must unite its people ideologically and cannot afford ideological diversity. Because the right does not embrace genetic or cultural diversity, its ability to reject ideologies is a function of how much of their majority they can afford to lose, rendering them incapable of rejecting ideological diversity once their majority instead becomes a dominant minority.

So both sides have their own diversity. Although I'm a classical liberal, I tend to value ideological diversity more than genetic diversity, so I identify as center-right.

>>138354638
Certainly the humans are destined to be mixed. At least "white" people. That was what happened in Latin America a long years ago when Spanish conquerors arrived here. They mixing with native and USA is happen over the same thing. Perhaps the Asian people will be the race more purely ahead the next years

File: file.png (16KB, 410x81px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 410x81px

>>138358685

File: 1489858427472.png (1MB, 1600x1242px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x1242px

because they waste resources teaching nonobjective bullshit like liberal arts. If they disbanded it all and made only shit that matters post-secondary education (stem) there would be nothing wrong with it.

>>138359154
>>138354638
oh shit I thought op said university. Like you even need an answer as to why diversity is bad and can't just see it.