>Trump will be the cause of World Wa-

>>138343950
>implying that WW3 won't be caused by multiple conflicts which will be combined into a single, huge war because of international alliances

Also, I hope India conquers China.

Are they Indians throwing poop?

India and China will nuke it out. For good reason, everyone else will stay out of the war.

EU is importing as many refugees as possible and will institute a draft. They need refugees because they are hardened and expendable. Their army will be to defend Europe from 500 million Indian refugees.

South East Asia will get cucked by refugees from China.

>>138343950
>Videos emerged
>No video
Dailystormers pls go the fuck away from us

It isn't abnormal for 3rd world countries to have to have small border skirmishes

>>138344831
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/video-shows-india-china-clash-pangong-lake-ladakh/1/1029687.html

Yeah? Then maybe you should go ask dr. Jill Stien on how to make your bliss bubble nuke proof.

>>138344218
>This
I hope the world nukes that Asian cesspool back to the dark ages and I don't mean India either. Fucking chinks are worse than a Fucking plague.

hindus will never beat a billion raving commies even with nukes

>>138344615

China believes they can win a nuclear war with India and are building bases in the South China Sea to deter US/Japan from getting involved.

This has been a long con by the PROC. They will take all of India and Russia will be their tribute. When you have 3 billion populace, a 60 million man army will easily take Eruope.

Communist have been raising their power level this past century in a hyperbolic time chamber and soon they will be ready to go Super Communist on the world.

>>138345682
>>138345698
Alright, what if India forms an alliance against China with other east asian countries that dislike them, such as Cambodia, Vietnam, South Korea, Japan, etc?

>>138344831
Get fucking destroyed you idiot shill

>>138345698
Someone has earned their 50 cents today. Now you're chinky broke ass can afford to buy some noodle cups...be sure to boil the water first or you'll get a tumor.

>>138346066
It will only make chink dick harder for raping them all together. Dragon is rising and you better lube up.

File: 1502197387540.jpg (3MB, 2621x2000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2621x2000px

>China and Indian blow each other into nuclear dust.
>Japan makes another season of Spice + Wolf due to the radioactive fallout.
Absolutely perfect.

>literally playing king of the hill on a pile of dirt

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0e92bFVXmQY

With commentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuqdPgNX0sk

Link? I'd like to hear the differences in autistic screeches across both languages.

>>138343950
hindus dindu

>That flying kick at :53 secs in

>>138343950
>Border clash between nuclear powers
>literally just a big fistfight
what the fuck

>>138343950
Both India taking over China and China taking over India would be huge catastrophes.

>>138344218
In what world does china lose that.

File: 1494076781802.png (857KB, 1254x655px) Image search: [Google]

857KB, 1254x655px

Daily reminder that these dashed lines are all Indian claimed lands, which actually belongs to China in the East and Pakistan and China in the Western part.

Daily reminder that India is the land grabbing jews of South Asia.

>>138347911
who does tibet belong to?

>>138347769
never played CnC? two gooks are worth one of anything else and they only really shine when shitposting in large numbers.

>>138346879
Japan would be gone dude. Whatever remains of the U.S would be probably be fighting amongst themselves. Shit would literally be civilization ending.

>>138347982
People's republic of China. They were first occupied by them and now it is a part of it.

File: 1371506540239.png (17KB, 232x212px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 232x212px

>>138347982

REKT

>>138345698
Dude, china would get destroyed. They have the largest army but the smallest pee pee's. Fucking chink.

>>138344831
GTFO Jew

>>138346764
Dream on you Fucking retard.

>>138348019
No, we wont. China doesnt have enough nukes to BTFO India AND the US AND Japan and so on.

We, on the other hand, have enough to take on China and Russia.

It wont be civilization ending for us. It WOULD be civ-ending for them if we dog-piled them in the nuke party. The cost would be high, but recoverable.

>>138347983
first off they are chinks not gooks. the gooks are waiting to get vaporized. are two chinks really worth one poointheloo.
and
>India is re-organising its mechanised forces to achieve strategic mobility and high-volume firepower for rapid thrusts into enemy territory. At present, the Indian army has severe deficiencies in its artillery (particularly self-propelled guns) and ammunition stocks, not to mention the inability of some of its modern tanks to operate in the heat and dust of the desert regions around the international border

>>138348321
India is done m8! DONE!

>>138344218
So literally just like the last two? You would think that by now we would realize that mutual defense pacts might not be such a good thing.

>>138349589
Might be on to something

>>138343950
looks like I'm going to be rooting on the poos

>>138348550
no, it would be civilization ending. Holy fuck your burgerland education shows

>>138347616
nobody wants to escalate the situation by using weapons

>>138344615
Military illiterate confirmed.

>>138344218
if it comes to a ground war, china is going to wreck ass, in regards to troops. As far as tanks, India has got it. If they use chemical weapons, china will overwhelmingly have an advantage. But it all comes down to nukes, and india could obliterate chinas populated areas 10 times over.

>>138343950
They better go to war, both chinks and Indians are subhuman and both countries are overpopulated, plz nuke each other

File: snoze.jpg (84KB, 960x675px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 960x675px

>>138343950
Nope the answer will be Israel will be the cause of the next big war to get shekels

>>138344615
>take in a hundred thousand refugees fleeing from their war torn countries
>draft them to fight in a war

lolol yeah i dont think so my friend.

>>138350217
Atmospheric testing proves limited nuclear wars are quite practical which is why the Soviets and NATO trained for a tac nuke battlefield.

Your lack of military education is showing.

Overlay all atmospheric test shots on a map of the Poo and Chink border. If they went off at once, millions would die but everyone does sooner or later.

Even the region wouldn't be bothered much. Poos can drink from the Ganges with no ill effects and the dog boilers are equally robust.

>>138344218
F P B P
People say American Civil War 2 or WW3; why not both?

>>138350217
Atmospheric testing proved otherwise for a limited nuclear war. Your military ignorance is showing. Soviet and NATO troops prepared to fight on the nuclear battlefield and it wasn't for show. NBC suits and systems and APCs are examples.

The Chinks have twice the warheads of pooland so poo shills BTFO. The dog boilers can take the hit and win, but India should make a peace offering to nuke Pakibanistan in return for Chinese staying out of it. The Pakiban menace affects both so they should band together to exterminate Muslims.

>>138345698
>When you have 3 billion populace, a 60 million man army will easily take Eruope.

Go look up the average loss of life in pretty much every engagement China's gone through. Their numbers mean nothing, nor do they have the Russian winter to back them up in a domestic war.

>>138344218
China would rip India to pieces. Bear in mind that there is an extremely large Indian Communist Party that would immediately become 5th columnists in any conflict.

File: 1497023432068.jpg (29KB, 312x340px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 312x340px

>>138350777
no one notices the triple sevens of truth?

>>138345698
>When you have 3 billion populace, a 60 million man army will easily take Eruope.
lol, they wouldn't be able to supply 1/10 of the number and they would all starve to death on their way through Russia.

Their numbers are a liability.

>>138348550
You understand that a nuclear war with even the exchange of 200 warheads would lead to a catastrophic collapse of the entire global environment?

>>138351622
200 paki warheads =/= 200 US warheads

>>138350800
>Mutually Assured Destruction
you big dum dum

>>138350217
The DoD and soviet defense ministries both had post-nuke plans.

Our own research indicated we could survive. It would be brutal, but we could. Neither side viewed nuclear war as ideal, but both sides had every intention of continuing on, mushroom clouds or no. Or do you seriously think military and government contingency planners look at a nuclear war and go "gg m8, lets call it a day"? It's literally their job to say "our oil reserves got btfo and California just got struck by 30 warheads, time for Plan ____".

Sober, scientifically minded people with access to much more data and resources than most people on the subject believed that society would exist after the bomb and that there would still be governments with various degrees of efficacy and control, I have no reason to doubt them over paranoid Fallout 4 larping.

File: terrible.png (495KB, 800x602px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 800x602px

>>138347911

fighting over some desolate mountains

>>138351622
no, it wouldn't at all

a bigger concern would be both the united states and russia losing 90% of their oil refining capacity, which would reduce the oil output of the top 10 oil refining countries to 67%

oh, and let's not forget russia and the united states not really existing anymore

>>138351622
Considering that we have tested plenty of nukes of varying sizes at land, sea, and air I would argue that that's a load of crap.

>>138343950
>>138345067
>indiatoday
>border clashes
>video of usual Poo in the Loo "im not really attacking you! just walking into your way! dont shoot me like last time we laughed about your million warnings and utterly destroyed us" chestbumping on the border with Chinese troops
>its literally nothing

>>138348646
>its that superpoower by 2030 loo that seriously thinks poo in the loo "plans" to achieveanything are worth their shit
>India is re-organising
You poos tried to modernize you forces since almost 50 years and the gap between China has grown just farther than it was the last time you got defeated in a war by them.

You have been building on your AC made of foreign parts and with help of Russian engineers for almost 10 years and its still years away from finished and it will still have A FUCKING RAMP.

ww3 has been goining on for 15 years now

>>138352925
200 nukes isnt enough to kill America. We anticipated over 2000 soviet nukes, and STILL expected to survive. Even better if it targets mostly cities, because that spares more farmland, which reduces the food strain.

People assume 200 nukes = 200 cities. That isnt the case. Generally, you need 2-3 nukes for sufficient erradication, even more for extremely hardened targets. That many targets getting hit several times over drastically reduces the scale of the damage, even if it makes localized damage absolute.

>>138347616
They didnt want to kick off WWIII.

>>138353405
>200 nukes isnt enough to kill America.
say that after washington dc is a crater, you can't make any more oil, and most of your important military bases have beenflattened

>We anticipated over 2000 soviet nukes, and STILL expected to survive.
as an idea, yes. as a country, no. the united states government will still exist, but it will be much closer to the united nations in function than the present united states government. the real power will be in the individual states.

>That many targets getting hit several times over drastically reduces the scale of the damage, even if it makes localized damage absolute.
"drastic reduction" is a scientific term here, not a practical one. the united states will still be brought back 150 years.

>>138353405
t. Dr Strangelove

File: 9c12bf0ff98d54d7e42840b21e9920a9.jpg (40KB, 499x604px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 499x604px

>>138350777
>1383
>>138350777
>>138350777
>>138350777


YES triple 7 win the lottery. Jews all along

>>138351622
>You understand that a nuclear war with even the exchange of 200 warheads would lead to a catastrophic collapse of the entire global environment?
Not really, but ut would completely fuck up the infrastructure and cause widespread chaos and famine.

So its not the 200 nukes that would damage the earth, its the 5+ billion people that chimp out that would.

>>138353687
No, it wont. The knowledge survives, and thus everything, in time, can be rebuilt. We rebuilt the South after the Civil War, Japan rebuilt after WW2, Russia has rebuilt it's western half on occassion, and Vietnam rebuilt after French, Japanese, and American wars.

DC is disposable, they knew its a target. Do you seriously believe that they would put all their eggs in DC? Why do you think installations like Site B Mount Weathers complex, Raven Rock, and the STRATCOM bunkers exist? DC is a principal target. This is known well in advance, and planned for, for the same reason the USSR had backup plans.

As i said, the price would be high. The standard of living would change for the worse, quickly and drastically. But power and wealth is relative, and if China hurls 200 nukes at us and we chuck 1000+ at them, we'd still be better off, and thus we "win" the war in the long term, since we'd be in the better post-war condition. After the war comes recovery, but the most important resources -knowledge and training- wouldnt magically vanish.

>>138352244
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_response

>>138354528
>DC is disposable, they knew its a target. Do you seriously believe that they would put all their eggs in DC? Why do you think installations like Site B Mount Weathers complex, Raven Rock, and the STRATCOM bunkers exist?
"yeah DC is gone, the president is dead, the vice president is dead, so the speaker of the house is now the president of the united states, stand by for an immediate press conference about how everything is under control coming from some smelly bunker in a mountain somewhere"
you are not going to have a solid federal government presence after an exchange, period. you will have military chain of command, but that will be it. the states will be doing the majority of the clean up work, and the federal government will act as a mediator and a face to the outside world.

>>138354528
>After the war comes recovery
There is no guarantee that there will be any kind of government structure left to facilitate a nationwide or even state wide rebuilding. Civilisation didn't really bounce back after the Bronze age collapse or when Rome collapse.

And what's worse is that back then people actually knew how to grow their own food. People today are extremely specialized and therefore they would be basically useless if SHTF.

But humans will obviously survive.

>>138347911
Blink twice if chinese soldier is standing behind you and you need help.

>>138355104
>the president is dead

Unlikely, if only because he has a bunker

>VP is dead
in a time of war that is likely to go nuclear, it is highly unlikely the VP and the President would be anywhere near each other. Even during 9/11, the President, VP and designated cabinet survivor were kept far, far, far apart. VP went to Raven Rock, Bush went to STRATCOM, iirc all the Air Force One planes were wheels up until given the all clear.

>senate and house
during 9/11 they were all quickly moved to Mount Weathers. They are also the most disposable due to their number and lack of authority in emergency action. They used to have a bunker at the Executive hotel in DC, if they have another it's not publically disclosed.

>we'd have a military chain of command
Good, that's all we need in the aftermath for nuked areas, resource allocation and management will be paramount.

>states will do cleanup
Yes, thats exactly what the National Guard is for, but the US fed still has important resources (Corps of Engineers, manpower, ability to distribute critical resources, FEMA).

>federal govt will be the face
True, and in all likelihood, if even half the submarine fleet is intact we'd still have a powerful second strike capability if hostilities havent ceased by then. That strike ability is critical, since you

A- dont want to blow your entire load, on the off chance another party wants to dogpile you (ie., you retain a nuclear deterrent)

B- if hostilities continue, you can strike the other side AGAIN, throwing rebuilding efforts into chaos.

People much smarter than the average bear have exhausted this topic and concluded that there is no guarantee that ww3 would end, and that it wouldnt be an extinction event, albeit a transformative one on the scale the western world has never seen since the Black Plague.

>>138343950
>faggot doesnt link, completely destroying purpose of post
>faggot
>kys

File: Indian-office-workers.jpg (78KB, 640x402px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 640x402px

>>138343950
UNLEASH THE ARMY OF SOFTWARE TESTERS

>>138350638
>As far as tanks, India has got it.
You should have watched the last tank biathlon where India managed to shredder all its tanks and got disqualified

India cant produce, nor really even repair or build the spareparts of their main tank force of outdated T-90s and their home produced "tank" has already proven to be worthless overweight huge metal coffin just begging to be droned and only Indians seriously believe to be even on par in a real battle with their T-90s.

Indias tank forces may work against countries like Butan, Bangladesh or Srilanka that cant produce their own shit and are small enough even India can outlast them. But not against one of equal or greater size that can field equivalent and superior tanks in equal numbers and reproduce them faster than India can afford to import spares and has more than enough other means to blow up Indias tanks than their own tanks.

>But it all comes down to nukes, and india could obliterate chinas populated areas 10 times over.
By Indian standards half of their fired nukes wouldnt even make in past the Himalaya, half of the remaining not even get trough China and half of the remaining would not even explode. Thats assuming none get shot down and they manage to fire everything they have.

We are talking about Indians who just very recently created their first attempt to copy the Russian rocket engines they have been using for decades that hasnt ended already with a disaster.

It would be a onesided disaster for India just like their last war with China. Thats why poos constantly push this "India-Russia alliance" angle when neither China nor Russia are even close to being hostile and have resolved all their border conflicts long ago. Russia would at best just milk India while writing letters of DEEP CONCERNS, again just like their last war with China, when India begged both sides of the cold war for aid and to bomb China for them only to get snubbed by both. They have no hope.

>>138355477
Rome didnt bounce back because they were effectively occupied and constantly raided, and had a leadership structure that wasnt exactly built to withstand decapitation.

A more apt comparison is post-Vietnam War Vietnam, where it rebuilt the damage we did. After effects are present, obviously, but they did.

All of this also overlooks any aid the US may recieve for reconstruction, whether its from the UN, our allies in ROK and Japan, India, Canada/Mexico, the EU, or some collective that wishes to see the return of the US economy to fill the vacuum.

File: thinking.jpg (23KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 600x600px

>>138343950
I unironically think India would win a conventional war against China. For one thing, China hasn't fought a convention war since the late 1970s against Vietnam. In that case, it was mostly a stalemate.

India on the other hand has had on again off again skirmishes with Pakistan into the 1990s. Also, its mountainous terrain, which India has plenty of experience operating in, especially in Kashmir.

>>138356459
>Blink twice if chinese soldier is standing behind you and you need help.

Daily reminder no one wants to be "helped" by Poos

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/15/world/asia/squeezed-by-an-india-china-standoff-bhutan-holds-its-breath.html

>India says it is acting on Bhutan’s behalf in the standoff. But its intervention has not resulted in much gratitude here. On the contrary, many in Bhutan feel that India’s protective embrace has become suffocating.
>the latest standoff has inflamed festering resentments over India’s influence in the country. In particular, many suspect that India has sought to block Bhutan’s efforts to establish diplomatic relations and expand trade with Beijing
>“Bhutan has every right to its sovereignty; that’s the crux of the thing,” said Wangcha Sangey, a former publisher and head of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry
>“We have the right to live the way we want to live and to have the foreign relations we want to have.”
>when India ordered its troops [...], it seemed to do so without a request from Bhutan
>the authorities have since closed the foot trails to the disputed area. That has shut down an informal shuttle trade with Tibetan towns on the Chinese side of the border. [...] trade has become a livelihood along the border.
>Many interviewed in Bhutan expressed more concern about India’s actions than China’s. Some note that one effect of India’s move [...] has been to undermine border negotiations with China that could have cleared the way for closer economic ties.
>In 1998, China proposed ceding the northern areas to Bhutan in exchange for the western ones
>last year, the two sides seemed to be nearing a consensus
>In 2012, the prime minister at the time met with his Chinese counterpart at a Group of 20 summit meeting [...]. Not long afterward, India cut subsidies to Bhutan for cooking oil and kerosene. The move was widely seen as retaliation,

Never trust a Poo

>>138347911

Bahadur randi im coming to kathmandu

>>138358783
Please archive https://archive.is/G9Zge

>>138352244
China and India have too large populations and too small nuclear arsenals to annihilate each other, so MAD doesn't apply

File: 1478096783604.jpg (44KB, 480x402px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 480x402px

>>138359285
LOL learn to use loo before you come
>>138356459
topkek
pic not related

>>138358783
>sneaky poo in loo's