So Powerful!

>>138276821
so its the same shit for fat woman as always capitalizing on libshit delusions?

Wouldn't hesitate.

>>138276821
The amount of circlejerking that women need to get through life without killing themselves is astounding. It's a wonder how humanity ever made it beyond the first instances of language.

holy shit her teef

File: 1502678273030.gif (240KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 320x320px

>>138276953
>stunningly obese
women entertain feel-good delusions, what else is new

>>138276821

Oh great, now we're making fatties feel normal?

ITS HARD ENOUGH GETTING LAID AS IT IS! JESUS FUCK!!!

>>138276821
>Only goes up to US 20.
Hambeasts will just complain even more because their sizes aren't included despite the marketing.
They won't be happy until human sizes are referred to with pejoratives and ambulocetus sizes are all random platitudes.
Anorexic (0-2) > Bony (4-6) > Childish (8-10)
Delightful (12-14) > Effervescent (16-18) >Fabulous (20-22) >>> Zaftig (50-52)

>>138276821
>Fabulous
>Land Whale

as if people aren't going to catch

Sheena where's fabulous
;^)

They are treating fat women like children and it's working. I'll bet this brand actually succeeds because a bunch of insecure land whales don't want to look at numbers representing their size.

>>138276821
I would the one on the far right. Imagine how soft and wet her pussy feels.

File: 20170819_214800.jpg (15KB, 172x158px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 172x158px

How did this woman ever become an underwear model? She's hideous even by fat nigger standards.

File: derkaposter.png (601KB, 3600x5400px) Image search: [Google]

601KB, 3600x5400px

>>138279541
dat's rayraycis, anon. for shame

>>138276821
If they wanted to empower women thay should be making Ironman suits for them. Not "body positive" bullshit

File: 1471537011508.gif (729KB, 716x620px) Image search: [Google]

729KB, 716x620px

>>138279257
>bottom right
Kek

>>138276821
They do this shit to make more money. I remember in the 90s all the models on tv were either rail thin black woman or rail thin white woman no asian or latinos. Now they realize if they pander to every race and size they will make more money. Because it makes "beauty" more accessible.

>>138279541
I was thinking the same thing. Those giant gums and micro-teeth wtf

>>138276821
In my experience women don't need "empowering".

File: huperfnippon.jpg (203KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 900x900px

>>138276821
That was the fattest asian they could find

>>138277330
> stunning and brave

>>138279541
Talent agent is white, cant tell them apart. Meets the quota so who gives a fuck.

File: 1503048833200.jpg (76KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1200x630px

>>138276821
What the fuck is going on.

File: 5921ebd03e.jpg (56KB, 720x405px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 720x405px

>>138276821
>>138276821
>#TheNewSkinny
https://youtu.be/H-9UpGFVMsk

File: f6BMo-1458674641-271-lists-header.jpg (409KB, 625x625px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 625x625px

>>138280496
Just figured out these people's "art"
The art of staying alive where in any other era they would have been beaten to death

>>138276821
Why would anyone want to empower unhealty lifestyles?

>>138276821
When you want to be fabulous but you are only lovely.

>>138280161
tons of fat hmong chicks in america, could've just used one of them

File: 1499230920842.jpg (203KB, 1221x1213px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1221x1213px

>>138280782
When I see girls this fat,
I don't think about how they look,
I think about how they must smell.

The third body type is not ugly. Would smash that thicc booty.

>>138277473
Nah.
Women aren't going to buy lingerie imagining they'll look like THAT. This is just free PR for the company.

File: MissHelsinose.jpg (135KB, 1024x624px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1024x624px

>>138280324

File: never happy.jpg (379KB, 1105x3050px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1105x3050px

>>138281148

>>138280910
Because animals want to fuck fat people with fat asses.

>>138276953
I fucking knew it, I came here to say stunning must be for the really fat bitches.

>>138277330
Was thinking more along the lines it's stunning we found enough fabric to create just underwear for you.

File: Aku, no!.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x270px

>>138276821
Obligatory.

>>138276821
kek changing the title of something does not change the reality of something.

>>138280324
Sounds like systems of oppression to me.

>>138276821
Women aren't going to buy this. You gonna replace fucking shoe numbers too?

>>138276953
Fucking cows.
Gf is size 0, she's petite so is very cool.

>>138276953
oh I am lovely

>>138276821
>"lovely"
>"gorgeous"
>"beautiful"
>"fabulous"
>"stunning"
>uses the ugliest sheboon in history as a model
Are they trying to stir the pot of memes to help spread their message?

>>138282040
Leftists have been doing this for over a century and it only results in the ruining of words.

>>138281471
Lol.

Also the one on the left look pissed. Also lol.

>>138276953
>lovely to look at
>gorgeously thick
>Beautiful to ignore
>Fabulously fat
>STUNNING you're still breathing with her on top

>>138276953

So... anyone a 2 or 0 is out of luck? Assuming they vanity size as well. Looks like girlfriend will have to stick with Victoria's Secret and Agent Provocateur

>>138279541
Yeah. There's some cute (by nigress standards) doughy black women.

Why'd you have to gotl out of your way to pick the worst one you could find? With worst shade of nigger skin to boot?

>>138276821
Except women's clothing have been enlarging their numbers for years. Mostly so that women feel good about fitting in a "lower number" then what they normally wear. As to entice them into believing that the piece either is a better fit or more flattering making them more likely to buy the piece. There is a reason why size zero actually exists. However those women want to reject all measurements because objectivity means they have to face reality. Secondly, how the fuck is anyone supposed to know if the correct size they want is gorgeous or fabulous without a chart? At least with numbers there was some logic to the sizing.

>>138276953
>Fabulous
>Stunning

You got to be kidding me.

Numbers are sexist!

>>138285119
Pretty much this. Bra sizing is already kind of a mess to those unfamiliar with how it works (that's without going into other nation's bra size standards) and this is probably the big reason why so many us wear ill-fitting bras which contributes to shit support and potential back issue exacerbation. This is only going to confuse people more, and that's not a good thing considering the importance of good support.

Body 'positivity' is really just 'lowering the bar to our level', this is stupid as fuck.