Explain yourself

>>138179867
When a white punches a muslim, it's a terrorist attack.
When a muslim stabs and kill a white to steal his wallet, it's just standard criminality.
That's how you get such stupid results.

>>138179867
nice source here.
lets just claim stuff, no further proof needed.

>>138180014
http://www.theinvestigativefund.org/investigations/politicsandgovernment/2346/home_is_where_the_hate_is

>>138179867
No shit, conservatives have a history of intolerance and violence.

>>138180007
Have any evidence to verify that claim?

>>138179867
let's stretch that statistic back to 2001 and see how it looks after that.

Fake news, they didn't even count the Orlando shooting.

Now adjust for population.

File: 1484614831757.jpg (32KB, 547x328px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 547x328px

>>138179867
Right-wing extremism isn't a problem, its a solution

>>138180868
Let's stretch it back to the 19th of April then.

Either way, crazed wingnuts with easy access to weaponry will always be the majority of terrorists. Just like in the middle east.

>>138179867
The US has very few muslims, doesn't it?
Wouldn't it make more sense to gauge the ratio of Islamic violence vs population, as well as the body count? You'd get an entirely different graph if you did.

One Islamic attack killing 20+ vs Eric Matthew Frein killing one and wounding another are counted as the same "incident", despite all of us knowing that these incidents are not equal simply due to raw body count.

Also, counting libertarian terror attacks as well as neocon terror attacks under "right wing" is just silly. One doesn't want the tyranny of the state while the other wants the state to control even more, making them diametric opposites. Same is true for mashing liberal left with the commies.

Maybe a graph indicating the different incidents per ideology would shed some light on the matter, but then you'd just have to replace the "Left-wing" bar with "Communism/Marxism" and nothing would change, would it?

>>138179867
this graph is misleading. right wing includes black nationalists, anti government people, etc. check your source dude

>>138182878
also "right wing" is a very broad term. its not fair to say the US has a problem with right wing extremism when multiple very different groups fall under the term "right wing". but you obviously dont care; you just want to anger your opposition

>not including abortion
>Left wing terror attack against unborn

I know for a fact minor incidents like graffiti counts as terrorist attacks in these bogus statistic.